Learned tolerance to ethanol in a spinal reflex separated from supraspinal control

Involvement of peripheral TRPV1 in TMJ hyperalgesia induced by ethanol withdrawal

Ethanol withdrawal increases nociception after the injection of formalin into the rat's temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Little is known about the neurological basis for hyperalgesia induced by ethanol withdrawal, but it has been reported that ethanol can potentiate the response of transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor-1 (TRPV1) in superficial tissues. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that peripheral TRPV1 could be involved on nociceptive behavioral responses induced by the injection of formalin into the TMJ region of rats exposed to chronic ethanol administration and ethanol withdrawal. Behavioral hyperalgesia was verified 12 h after ethanol withdrawal in rats that drank an ethanol solution (6.5%) for 10 days. In another group submitted to the same ethanol regimen, the selective vanilloid receptor antagonist capsazepine (300, 600 or 1200 microg/25 microl) or an equal volume of vehicle were injected into the TMJ regions 30 min before the TMJ formalin test. The local injections of capsazepine reduced the increased nociceptive responses induced by ethanol withdrawal. The effect of capsazepine on rats that did not drink ethanol was not significant. These results indicate that the peripheral TRPV1 can contribute to the hyperalgesia induced by ethanol withdrawal on deep pain conditions.

Effects of ethanol on deep pain evoked by formalin injected in TMJ of rat

It has been reported that ethanol can alter nociceptive sensitivity from superficial tissues, such as skin and subcutaneous region. However, the influence of ethanol on deep pain conditions is not understood. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the acute, chronic and ethanol withdrawal effects on nociceptive behavioral responses induced by the injection of formalin into the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) region of rats. In experiment 1, rats were injected with ethanol (2,5 g/Kg, i.p.) or an equal volume of saline 15 min before the administration of formalin (1.5%) into the TMJ. Rats pretreated with ethanol showed a decrease in nociceptive behavioral responses. In experiment 2, rats were given an ethanol solution (6.5%) or tap water to drink for 4 and 10 days. On day 4, the animals (ethanol group) showed amounts of analgesia when submitted to the TMJ formalin test. Tolerance to the antinociceptive effects was observed on day 10. Behavioral hyperalgesia was verified 12 hr after withdrawal in another group that drank ethanol for 10 days. These results show that ethanol can affect the nociceptive responses related to deep pain evoked by the TMJ formalin test.

Dissipation of contingent tolerance to the anticonvulsant effect of diazepam: effect of the criterion response

The effect of convulsive stimulations on the dissipation of tolerance to the anticonvulsant effect of diazepam was investigated using the kindled-convulsion model. Amygdala-kindled rats were rendered tolerant to diazepam's anticonvulsant effect by 25 "bidaily" (one/48 h) diazepam injections (2.5 mg/kg), each followed 1 h later by a convulsive stimulation. They were then divided into nine groups for the tolerance-dissipation phase of the experiment. Of the nine groups, three received bidaily control handling for one trial, three trials, or seven trials; three received bidaily saline injections, each 1 h before a convulsive stimulation, for one, three, or seven trials; and three received bidaily diazepam injections, each 1 h after a convulsive stimulation, for one, three, or seven trials. Finally, each rat received a tolerance-retention test (i.e., a diazepam injection followed 1 h later by a convulsive stimulation) 48 h after its last tolerance-dissipation trial. The tolerance dissipated gradually but completely over the 4-, 8-, and 16-day test intervals in the rats that received a convulsive stimulation before each injection during the tolerance-dissipation phase, whether they were injected with saline or diazepam; in contrast, tolerance did not dissipate in the rats that received saline injections but no stimulations. Remarkably, the discontinuance of the bidaily diazepam injections, even for 16 days, was not sufficient to dissipate the tolerance that had developed to diazepam's anticonvulsant effect; nor was the continuation of the bidaily diazepam injections sufficient to keep tolerance from dissipating.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Contingent tolerance to the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine, diazepam, and sodium valproate in kindled rats

The effect of convulsive stimulation during periods of drug exposure on the development of tolerance to the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), diazepam (DZP), or sodium valproate (VPA) was studied in three similar experiments. In each experiment, amygdala-kindled rats were assigned to one of three groups: one group received a drug injection (CBZ, 70 mg/kg, IP; DZP, 2 mg/kg, IP; VPA, 250 mg/kg, gavage) 1 h before each of a series of 10 bidaily (one every 48 h) convulsive stimulations, a second group received the same dose of the drug 1 h after each of the 10 stimulations, and a third group served as a vehicle control. The drug tolerance test occurred in each experiment 48 h after the 10th tolerance-development trial; every rat received the appropriate dose of CBZ, DZP, or VPA 1 h before being stimulated. In each experiment, only the rats from the drug-before-stimulation group displayed a significant amount of tolerance to the drug's anticonvulsant effect. Thus the development of tolerance to the anticonvulsant effects of CBZ, DZP, and VPA was not an inevitable consequence of drug exposure; the development of tolerance was contingent upon the occurrence of convulsive stimulation during the periods of drug exposure. These results support the idea that functional drug tolerance is an adaptation to a drug's effects on ongoing patterns of neural activity, rather than to drug exposure per se.

Roles of intoxicated practice in the development of ethanol tolerance

The development of tolerance to the motor impairment effect of ethanol was examined in separate groups of rats receiving and not receiving intoxicated practice. Tolerance to the motor impairment effect of ethanol developed whether or not rats received intoxicated practice during chronic ethanol treatment. Depending on the treatment dosage and test dose, intoxicated practice might enhance the level of tolerance attained. Tolerance to other effects of ethanol (hypothermia and narcosis) developed as a function of the treatment dosage. Intoxicated practice on the moving belt did not modify the development of tolerance to these effects of ethanol. Tolerance to the motor impairment effect of ethanol, however, was retained much longer in the intoxicated practice group following the termination of ethanol treatment.

Analysis of the role of behavioural factors in the development of tolerance to the benzodiazepine midazolam

Two experiments were conducted on the acute and chronic effects of the short-acting benzodiazepine midazolam on fixed ratio schedule-maintained operant responding in rats. Acute administration of midazolam produced suppression of responding in large doses but elevation of responding in small doses. Following intermittent (every third day) chronic treatment tolerance developed rapidly to the rate-suppressant effects of large doses of midazolam but did not develop to the rate-elevating effects of small doses, even after chronic treatment with large doses of the drug. Thus, when tolerance was measured in terms of shifts in dose-effect curves, it was manifested as a non-parallel shift in the curve after chronic treatment. Since tolerance developed to the effects of large but not small doses, the observed tolerance could not be attributed to changes in disposition of the drug. The development of tolerance did not depend on whether the drug was given before or after behavioural testing. These findings contrast with data reported in behavioural studies with other sedative-hypnotics (ethanol, barbiturates). Animals tolerant to midazolam showed no cross-tolerance to ethanol, a drug for which there is reliable evidence indicating that behavioural factors play a role in acquisition of tolerance. Tolerance to midazolam cannot therefore be explained in terms of learned strategies acquired as a result of drug-induced loss of rewarding stimuli. This conclusion contrasts with recent suggestions (File, 1985; File and Pellow, 1985) that tolerance to benzodiazepines may be mediated by instrumental conditioning processes.

The contribution of classical conditioning to tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of ethanol

In rats, ethanol increases the latency of the tail-flick reflex to radiant heat. Three experiments examined the contribution of classical conditioning to the acquisition of tolerance to this antinociception. Experiment 1 showed that the antinociception produced by ethanol was dose dependent. The results of Experiment 2 demonstrated that rats exposed to a series of ethanol injections paired with a distinctive environment developed tolerance to this antinociception. In Experiment 3, tolerance was more pronounced in animals that had been exposed to ethanol and tested in the distinctive environment than in animals that had received ethanol in a nondistinctive environment. In contrast to previous reports in the literature, these results show that animals need not practice the tail-flick reflex while intoxicated in order to develop tolerance. Additionally, the data suggest that classical conditioning may contribute to tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of ethanol.

Learned and pharmacologically-induced tolerance to ethanol and cross-tolerance to morphine and clonidine

The development of tolerance to the inhibitory effect of ethanol on the tail-flick reflex was studied in the spinal rat. This preparation was used in order to avoid uncontrolled learning effects. Tolerance due to intoxicated practice (learned tolerance) and tolerance due to mere ethanol exposure (pharmacologically-induced tolerance) were studied in separate experiments. It was found that that learned tolerance to ethanol also caused tolerance to morphine and clonidine, whereas pharmacologically-induced tolerance did not have the same effect. The results challenge the concept of "behaviorally augmented tolerance" and suggest that learned and pharmacologically-induced tolerance involve different basal mechanisms in the CNS.