Flurothyl seizure thresholds in mice treated neonatally with a single injection of monosodium glutamate (MSG): evaluation of experimental parameters in flurothyl seizure testing

Chemical models of epilepsy with some reference to their applicability in the development of anticonvulsants

This paper reviews chemical models of epilepsy and their relevance in the identification and characterization of anticonvulsants. For each convulsant we discuss possible modes of administration, clinical type(s) of seizures induced, proposed mechanism(s) of epileptogenesis and, where available, responsiveness of the induced seizures to anticonvulsants. The following compounds are reviewed: pentylenetetrazol, bicuculline, penicillin, picrotoxin, beta-carbolines, 3-mercaptopropionic acid, hydrazides, allylglycine; the glycine antagonist strychnine; gamma-hydroxybutyrate; excitatory amino acids (glutamate, aspartate, N-methyl-D-aspartate, quisqualate, kainate, quinolinic acid); monosubstituted guanidino compounds, metals (alumina, cobalt, zinc, iron); neuropeptides (opioid peptides, corticotropin releasing factor, somatostatin, vasopressin); cholinergic agents (acetylcholine, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, pilocarpine); tetanus toxin; flurothyl; folates; homocysteine and colchicine. Although there are a multitude of chemical models of epilepsy, only a limited number are applied in the routine screening of potential anticonvulsants. Some chemical models have a predictive value with regard to the clinical profile of efficacy of the tested anticonvulsants. Some chemical models may contribute to a better understanding of possible mechanisms of epileptogenesis.

Animal models of the epilepsies

The study of mechanisms of the epilepsies requires employment of animal models. Choice of a model system depends upon several factors, including the question to be studied, the type of epilepsy to be modelled, familiarity and convenience. Over 50 models are reviewed. Major categories of models are those for simple partial seizures: topical convulsants, acute electrical stimulation, cortically implanted metals, cryogenic injury; for complex partial seizures: kainic acid, tetanus toxin, injections into area tempesta, kindling, rodent hippocampal slice, isolated cell preparations, human neurosurgical tissue; for generalized tonic-clonic seizures: genetically seizure-prone strains of mouse, rat, gerbil, fruitfly and baboon, maximal electroshock seizures, systemic chemical convulsants, metabolic derangements; and for generalized absence seizures: thalamic stimulation, bilateral cortical foci, systemic penicillin, gamma-hydroxy-butyrate, intraventricular opiates, genetic rat models. The lithium-pilocarpine, homocysteine and rapid repetitive stimulation models are most useful in studies of status epilepticus. Key findings learned from each of the models, the model's strengths and weaknesses are detailed. Interpretation of findings from each of these models can be difficult. Do results pertain to the epilepsies or to the particular model under study? How important are species differences? Which clinical seizure type is really being modelled? In a model are behavior or EEG findings only similar superficially to epilepsy, or are the mechanisms comparable? The wealth of preparations available to model the epilepsies underscores the need for unifying themes, and for better understanding of basic mechanisms of the epilepsies.