Discriminative stimulus properties of CGS 9896: interactions within the GABA/benzodiazepine receptor complex

Inverse agonist properties of the FG 7142 discriminative stimulus

A two-lever, food-motivated discrimination was established between the benzodiazepine receptor partial inverse agonist FG 7142 (5.0 mg/kg) and its vehicle. The FG 7142 discriminative stimulus was pharmacologically characterized by testing trained rats with a variety of benzodiazepine receptor ligands. Administration of the inverse agonist DMCM (0.15-0.30 mg/kg) dose-dependently mimicked the FG 7142 stimulus. In contrast, the benzodiazepine receptor agonist chlordiazepoxide, partial agonist ZK 91 296, mixed agonist/antagonist CGS 9896 and antagonist RO 15-1788 blocked the FG 7142 cue. These results indicate that the FG 7142 discriminative stimulus is based on its inverse agonist activity. The generalization of FG 7142 to the anxiogenic/convulsant compound pentylenetetrazole (PTZ), but not to the anorectic agent norfenfluramine, indicates that the anxiogenic properties of FG 7142, rather than its anorectic actions, may underlie the FG 7142 discriminative stimulus.

Drug discrimination models in anxiety and depression

Drug discrimination is a technique for investigating the stimulus properties of centrally active drugs. Although many studies have employed animals to investigate the stimulus properties of substances used clinically for the treatment of anxiety and depression, it would be a mistake to consider the internal discriminative stimuli as being related specifically to the anxiolytic or antidepressant properties of these drugs. Rather drug cues are better considered as relating to the pharmacological action of classes of compounds. Thus, benzodiazepine cues generalize to other compounds acting at benzodiazepine receptors, but not to substances (anxiolytic or otherwise) acting at 5-HT1A receptors. Similarly, antidepressants with different pharmacological properties, for example the tricyclic imipramine, or the phenylaminoketone buproprion produce distinct, unrelated discriminative stimuli. For this reason, the limits of drug discrimination techniques for investigating novel anxiolytic or antidepressant drugs should be clearly recognized. Attempts to identify an anxiogenic discriminative stimulus using pentylenetetrazole have also been misguided. In this technique it has proven difficult to separate unequivocally the pharmacological proconvulsant effects of the drug from the psychological construct anxiety. Nevertheless, drug discrimination remains a valuable technique for investigating pharmacological interactions in animals and man.