Effects of antimuscarinic antiparkinsonian drugs on brightness discrimination performance in rats

Performance of conventional pigs and Göttingen miniature pigs in a spatial holeboard task: effects of the putative muscarinic cognition impairer Biperiden

Background

The pig is emerging as a model species that bridges the gap between rodents and humans in research. In particular, the miniature pig (referred to hereafter as the minipig) is increasingly being used as non-rodent species in pharmacological and toxicological studies. However, there is as yet a lack of validated behavioral tests for pigs, although there is evidence that the spatial holeboard task can be used to assess the working and reference memory of pigs. In the present study, we compared the learning performance of commercial pigs and Göttingen minipigs in a holeboard task.

Methods

Biperiden, a muscarinic M1 receptor blocker, is used to induce impairments in cognitive function in animal research. The two groups of pigs were treated orally with increasing doses of biperiden (0.05 – 20 mg.kg^-1) after they had reached asymptotic performance in the holeboard task.

Results

Both the conventional pigs and the Göttingen minipigs learned the holeboard task, reaching nearly errorless asymptotic working and reference memory performance within approximately 100 acquisition trials. Biperiden treatment affected reference, but not working, memory, increasing trial duration and the latency to first hole visit at doses ≥ 5 mg.kg^-1.

Conclusion

Both pig breeds learned the holeboard task and had a comparable performance. Biperiden had only a minor effect on holeboard performance overall, and mainly on reference memory performance. The effectiveness needs to be evaluated further before definitive conclusions can be drawn about the ability of this potential cognition impairer in pigs.

A comparison of scopolamine and biperiden as a rodent model for cholinergic cognitive impairment

RATIONALE

The nonselective muscarinic antagonist scopolamine hydrobromide (SCOP) is employed as the gold standard for inducing memory impairments in healthy humans and animals. However, its use remains controversial due to the wide spectrum of behavioral effects of this drug.

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated whether biperiden (BIP), a muscarinic m1 receptor antagonist, is to be preferred over SCOP as a pharmacological model for cholinergic memory deficits in rats. This was done by comparing the effects of SCOP and BIP using a battery of operant tasks: fixed ratio (FR5) and progressive ratio (PR10) schedules of reinforcement, an attention paradigm and delayed nonmatching to position task.

RESULTS

SCOP induced diffuse behavioral disruption, which included sensorimotor responding (FR5, 0.3 and 1 mg/kg), food motivation (PR10, 1 mg/kg), attention (0.3 mg/kg, independent of stimulus duration), and short-term memory (delayed nonmatching to position (DNMTP), 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg, delay-dependent but also impairment at the zero second delay). BIP induced relatively more selective deficits, as it slowed sensorimotor responding (FR5, 10 mg/kg) and disrupted short-term memory (DNMTP, 3 mg/kg, delay-dependent but no impairment at the zero second delay). BIP had no effect on food motivation (PR10) or attention.

CONCLUSION

Muscarinic m1 antagonists should be considered an interesting alternative for SCOP as a pharmacological model for cholinergic mnemonic deficits in animals.

Effects of cholinesterase inhibitors on a two-component chained schedule performance in rats

The acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors physostigmine (PHY), tacrine (THA), and heptylphysostigmine (HEP) have been evaluated as potential therapeutics for treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and as prophylactics against organophosphate (OP) poisoning. The above medical applications are based upon the neurochemical principles of elevation of transient levels of acetylcholine (ACh) in brain and reversible inhibition of AChE in blood and brain, respectively. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of these drugs on performance of a two-component chained schedule of differential-reinforcement-of-high-rate (DRH) reward/differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) nonreward contingencies, for water reinforcement in 2-h experimental sessions in rats. Both PHY (0.031-0.25 mg/kg, SC) and HEP (0.625-10.0 mg/kg, SC) decreased overall reinforcement rate and nonreinforced response in a dose-related and parallel manner, whereas THA (0.625-5.0 mg/kg) decreased the overall reinforcement rate in a dose-related manner, but did not significantly affect nonreinforced response. The least significant doses of PHY (0.625 mg/kg), THA (1.25 mg/kg), and HEP (1. 25 mg/kg) on the behavioral performance were associated with oral movements and/or muscle fasciculation. Moderate to high doses of these drugs (i.e., PHY >/= 0.624, THA >/= 1.25, and HEP >/= 1.25 mg/kg) produced behavioral suppression, which resulted mostly from the cessation of responding in the presence of cholinergic adverse events. The ED(50) values of the behavioral disruption (as documented by overall reinforcer loss) for PHY, THA, and HEP were 0. 081, 3.87, and 2.89 mg/kg, respectively, and the behavioral-deficit-free (BDF) doses were 0.031, 0.625, and 0.625 mg/kg, respectively. Preclinical data revealed that the BDF doses of both PHY and HEP have moderate inhibition of AChE, which leads to an efficacious elevation of ACh level in the brain, whereas the BDF dose of THA shows no significant AChE inhibition or elevation of brain ACh level; however, they all have cognition enhancing effects at their respective safety doses. The above data suggest that the BDF doses of PHY and HEP may have prophylactic efficacy against OP poisoning, whereas THA may not. The BDF doses of these three drugs are comparable to the maximum tolerated doses in clinical practice, suggesting that the present rat model may have potential value in predicting the clinical safety of AChE inhibitors developed for therapy of AD and prophylaxis against OP poisoning as well.