Guide to physical urticarias

Cold Urticaria Syndromes: Diagnosis and Management

Cold urticaria is a chronic condition causing episodic symptoms of cold-induced wheals or angioedema in response to direct or indirect exposure to cold temperatures. Whereas symptoms of cold urticaria are typically benign and self-limiting, severe systemic anaphylactic reactions are possible. Acquired, atypical, and hereditary forms have been described, each with variable triggers, symptoms, and responses to therapy. Clinical testing, including response to cold stimulation, helps define disease subtypes. More recently, monogenic disorders characterized by atypical forms of cold urticaria have been described. Here, we review the different forms of cold-induced urticaria and related syndromes and propose a diagnostic algorithm to aid clinicians in making a timely diagnosis for the appropriate management of these patients.

Successful treatment of delayed pressure urticaria with 300 mg of omalizumab every 14 days

Delayed pressure urticaria is a rare form of chronic inducible urticaria characterized by erythematous-painful plaques that develop in areas of the skin exposed to prolonged pressure. Its treatment is very difficult, and its response to antihistamines is variable. Cases of delayed pressure urticaria, which have been completely controlled with the use of omalizumab in recent years, have been reported.

Rational ideation and empiric validation of an innovative digital dermographic tester

BACKGROUND

Dermographism is a condition characterized by a weal response to a combination of pressure and traction on skin surface, and its diagnosis is based on medical history, clinical criteria and provocation test. The Dermographic Tester^® , a pen-sized tool containing a spring-loaded blunt tip, is the most widely used instrument for the provocation test, and it exerts increasing pressures on the skin surface according to an arbitrary units (AU) scale. Analysing the mechanism of function and trying to convert the AUs to SI units (g/mm² ), we found that this instrument had some defects and limits that would compromise a true and repeatable quantification of the weal response threshold. Consequently, we decided to develop a new instrument, the Digital Dermographic Tester (DDT), which is engineered with an inside force sensor to implement features lacking in the current tools, in the hope of enhancing the precision of the provocation test.

AIM

To validate the effectiveness and accuracy of the DDT.

METHODS

We tested the DDT on 213 participants purposely sampled to obtain three groups, each with a different pattern of reaction to mechanical stimuli. Based on anamnestic, diagnostic and symptomatic criteria, patients were divided into dermographic urticaria (DU), spontaneous urticaria (SU) and healthy control (HC) groups. The DDT was used to apply 12 levels of pressure to the skin surface, and a frequency distribution of positive reactions was displayed for each group.

RESULTS

A force of 36-40 g/mm² appropriately differentiated physiological from pathological conditions with high sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The DDT was found to be capable of differentiating patients with DU patients from those with SU and from HCs, and was able to precisely identify the weal elicitation threshold.

Angioedema--assessment and treatment

BACKGROUND

Angioedema has numerous hereditary, acquired and iatrogenic causes. A number of studies show that angioedema is inadequately assessed and treated during its acute phase as well as in the follow-up period. We present an algorithm for the assessment and treatment of patients with angioedema. KNOWLEDGE BASE: The article is based on a literature search in PubMed, a review of bibliographies and the authors' clinical experience and research.

RESULTS

The majority of angioedema patients have accompanying urticaria. Pathophysiologically, angioedemas are divided into histaminergic and non-histaminergic forms. In a large group of patients no positive trigger is identified. On assessment in hospital the most frequently identified cause is drug intake, normally angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and NSAIDs , while allergic/pseudoallergic and idiopathic reactions are more commonly seen in general practice. There are a number of rare causes of angioedema, all of which are important to keep in mind. The acute and prophylactic treatment will depend on the subtype of angioedema and is best provided through cross-disciplinary collaboration.

INTERPRETATION

Angioedema is a potentially life-threatening condition and should be assessed and treated systematically. It is important to remember that angioedema is either histaminergic or non-histaminergic, as the treatment of the two types is different.

Other Allergic Skin Disorders

In this chapter we discuss allergic skin disorders other than atopic dermatitis (AD): the urticaria-angioedema syndrome, allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), protein contact dermatitis (PCD), phytodermatitis, allergic photodermatitis and allergic vasculitis.

Chronic urticaria--which clinical parameters are pathogenetically relevant? A retrospective investigation of 339 patients

BACKGROUND

Urticaria is a clinical reaction pattern triggered by many factors causing liberation of vasoactive substances such as histamine, prostaglandins and kinins. It presents as transient itching wheals which are either limited to the local stimulus area or more widespread. Urticaria is classified according to its duration into acute (duration > or = 6 weeks) and chronic (duration 6 weeks) forms. Various clinical investigations may be initiated to diagnose the cause. This study critically evaluates the relevance of frequently performed laboratory investigations and searches for infectious foci, as well as the results of physical provocation testing and oral provocation with food additives.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The laboratory and clinical data of 339 patients who had been treated for urticaria at the Christian-Albrechts-University in Kiel over a period of four years were collected in a data entry form and statistically evaluated. Nominal values were analyzed by their relative and absolute quantities, quantitative parameters with the help of statistical data such as minimum, maximum, median and 25th and 75th percentiles.

RESULTS

Chronic recurrent urticaria was most common, accounting for 52% of cases. Women were affected 1.8 times more often than men. One-third of the patients also had angioedema. The medians of all laboratory parameters evaluated were within normal values. Only rarely were elevated antinuclear antibody titers, abnormal thyroid function tests or active infections such as hepatitis B or borreliosis detected. The search for infectious foci identified tonsillitis or sinusitis in almost 50% of analyzed patients. Positive reactions to physical testing occurred in 30% of patients and in 11% to oral provocation with various food additives.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of a large patient group stresses the relevance of individually-tailored evaluations in patients affected with urticaria rather than an expensive initial broad diagnostic testing. More specific searches should be based on individual clues.

Idiopathic Recurrent Angioedema

The treatment of idiopathic, chronic, recurrent angioedema with or without urticaria is difficult, both for patients and their physicians, because treatment often is only partially effective and is labor-intensive, expensive, and lengthy. New medications for urticaria and angioedema that currently are being tested clinically may prove effective.

Cold Urticaria: An Underrecognized Cause of Postsurgical Periorbital Swelling

PURPOSE

To report cold urticaria as an under-recognized cause of potential periorbital and facial edema after elective oculofacial plastic surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of three patients with primary acquired cold urticaria with review of the clinical aspects of each of the cases.

RESULTS

Two of the patients had significant postoperative swelling attributed to primary acquired cold urticaria after the routine use of cool compresses to their surgical sites. The third patient had known primary acquired cold urticaria and required special perioperative management. All three patients ultimately had a good surgical outcome with no long-term sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

Although primary acquired cold urticaria is generally not a serious condition, it can be easily overlooked and misdiagnosed as a localized adverse reaction to injected anesthetic, topical antibiotic ointments, or early preseptal cellulitis after eyelid or facial surgery. Rarely, this condition can be fatal and should be recognized by the surgeon to ensure both optimal surgical results and general medical management. Three simple screening questions should identify most patients with this disorder.

The spectrum of acquired and familial cold-induced urticaria/urticaria-like syndromes

Acquired cold urticaria syndromes represent one of the more common forms of physical urticaria. The syndromes are heterogenous, and a diagnostic classification is presented to facilitate collation for future studies. Acquired cold urticaria represents an excellent reproducible in vivo model to investigate the mechanisms of urticaria. The discussion includes clinical manifestations, laboratory features, pathogenesis, and management of these disorders. A description of familial types, particularly familial cold auto-inflammatory syndrome (FCAS) that is manifested by cold-evoked signs and symptoms of chronic inflammation, is included. FCAS historically has been included with acquired cold urticaria, even though the exanthem of FCAS is maculopapular caused by leukocytic infiltration. FCAS has become an important investigative syndrome, as it represents a reproducible in vivo model of chronic inflammation.

Urticaria and angioedema: an overview

Persistent or frequent episodes of urticaria are difficult to evaluate and treat. The best test to identify most patients with a specific underlying cause (eg, physical trigger, allergen, systemic disease) likely is the taking of a careful and detailed history and performance of a physical examination by a specialist who is knowledgeable in urticarial disease. Further study of the pathogenesis and treatment of urticaria is crucial. Given the limited efficacy of presently approved antihistamine treatments and the significant side effects of steroids and cyclosporine, there is a pressing need to evaluate other anecdotally supported urticaria treatments in randomized, controlled trials.

Physical urticaria

Physical urticarias are a unique subgroup of chronic urticaria in which patients develop urticaria secondary to environmental stimuli. Common triggers include exercise, temperature changes, cold, heat, pressure, sunlight, vibration, and water. Systemic symptoms have occurred during severe episodes. Physical urticarias are responsible for approximately 20% to 30% of all cases of chronic urticaria. A basic knowledge of these unusual disorders is important for all healthcare providers. This article covers the following types of physical urticarias: dermatographism, cholinergic urticaria, local heat urticaria, exercise-induced anaphylaxis, vibratory angioedema, solar urticaria, and aquagenic urticaria.

A comprehensive review of physical urticaria

Physical urticarias are an intriguing subgroup of urticarial disorders with unique circumstances and trigger stimuli precipitating symptom development. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiology will assist in the management process by facilitating prompt recognition and more accurate diagnoses.

Occupational skin diseases

Primary care physicians will likely see a wide variety of occupational skin diseases in their practices, including allergic contact dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis, contact urticaria, a variety of infectious diseases, and skin cancers. The ideal role of a medical practitioner involved in occupational dermatology is not only to diagnose and treat patients, but also to determine the cause of the occupational skin disease and to make recommendations for its prevention. Making the diagnosis and offering treatment, determining the cause, and recommending measures can be difficult undertakings.

Urticaria. The diagnostic challenge of hives

Hives pose a diagnostic challenge to physicians. With an acute episode, a careful look for possible triggers and relief of symptoms with H1 antihistamines are usually sufficient. For both urticaria and angioedema, the most helpful diagnostic tool may be a carefully taken medical history, including a family history. When a patient's urticaria lasts for more than 6 weeks, further physical and laboratory evaluation is warranted. Treatment of chronic urticaria generally involves the use of antihistamines first. Corticosteroids are to be avoided, if possible.

Urticaria and angioedema: a clinical spectrum

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to give the reader a global insight into the spectrum of urticaria, focusing on differential diagnosis and pathogenic mechanisms. This review will define the role of the mast cell, explore a possible autoimmune basis for urticaria, and examine the purported role of food allergy in chronic urticaria. Last, the work-up and treatment of urticaria will be discussed in the context of the histologic diagnosis.

STUDY SELECTION

The relevant past medical literature will be reviewed in the context of new and novel research into the mechanisms of chronic urticaria.

RESULTS

Urticaria can be classified histopathologically into the following three categories: (1) neutrophilic vasculitis, (2) polymorphous perivascular infiltrate, and (3) sparse perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate. Each of the above histologic patterns correlates with a distinct clinical entity and the work-up and treatment of urticaria will be related to each of the above histologic types.

CONCLUSIONS

Urticaria and angioedema are frustrating problems for both physicians and their patients; however, the problem can best be approached by considering urticaria as a symptom that may be part of a larger clinical spectrum. The physical examination and medical history remain the two most important pieces of information. The allergist frequently overlooks the value of a skin biopsy as an aid in sorting out the pathophysiology of urticaria and the biopsy results may help to classify urticaria into subgroups which respond differently to treatment.

Urticaria, angioedema, and rheumatologic disease

Urticaria and angioedema are common processes that are experienced by 15% to 25% of the population at least once during a lifetime. This article presents an overview of urticaria and angioedema with emphasis on these processes as they relate to rheumatic disease. Discussion includes classification of urticaria and angioedema and recommended evaluation and treatment of patients presenting with such problems.

Urticaria and angioedema

Urticaria and angioedema are usually the clinical consequence of vasoactive mediators derived from mast cells in the skin or mucosal tissues. Efforts to classify mast cell-mediated causes of urticaria and angioedema have generally been frustrated by their diverse pathogenesis and clinical course. The term acute is typically used to describe fleeting lesions whose recurrence does not extend beyond 6 weeks. Chronic is the term used to describe lesions that persist for more than a few hours but usually less than a day, and recurrences extend for more than 6 weeks. These definitions do not take histology into account. Skin biopsies of fleeting lesions demonstrate a paucity of inflammatory cells, whereas more persistent lesions display a spectrum of perivascular cuffing by predominantly T cells and monocytes. The presence of leukocytoclastic vasculitis in persistent lesions indicates an underlying immune complex disease. Many of the physical urticarias have fleeting lesions that can be induced with the appropriate stimulus for years. This review article has emphasized the clinical course and histology of urticaria and angioedema lesions in an effort to provide a more complete understanding of the pathogenesis and appropriate treatment. Clearly, avoidance of an identifiable inciting stimulus is optimum management, although most patients have no etiology defined or the cause is not realistically avoidable. At present, treatment options for these patients rely on antihistamines to control the immediate consequence of mast cell degranulation. Corticosteroids are reserved for the treatment of patients whose urticaria or angioedema lesions persist, reflecting the increasing involvement of mononuclear cells in the disease process. For leukocytoclastic vasculitis, corticosteroids are indicated, and cytotoxic drugs may be required for adequate treatment. Future treatments of urticaria and angioedema will evolve based on elucidation of the relevant cells and soluble mediators and will include counterregulatory or antagonistic peptides and drugs. C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency is a relatively uncommon cause of angioedema but is important to understand because of its ability to clinically mimic mast cell-mediated angioedemas and its unique pathogenesis and treatment. HAE can be divided into two serologic subtypes that simply reflect the location of the defect in one of the codominantly expressed C1-INH genes on chromosome 11. AAE can be divided into two serologic subtypes. AAE type I is due to massive consumption of C1-INH, presumably by tumor-related immune complexes. AAE type II is due to an anti-C1-INH autoantibody.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acute and chronic urticaria and angioedema

Urticaria and angioedema are clinical manifestations of various immunologic and inflammatory mechanisms, or they may be idiopathic. The respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts as well as the cardiovascular system may be involved in any combination. Patients with urticaria and/or angioedema can be classified based on pathophysiologic mechanisms into those with IgE-dependent or complement-mediated immunologic disorders, those with nonimmunologic disorders in which there is a direct effect on the mast cell or on arachidonic acid metabolism, and those whose condition is idiopathic. Evaluation of patients should focus on a thorough history. Laboratory tests provide minimal additional information. About one half of patients with urticaria alone and 25% with urticaria and angioedema or angioedema alone are free of lesions within 1 year. With urticaria, angioedema, or both, 20% of patients experience episodes for more than 20 years.

Sports-Aggravated Allergies

In brief Many people suffer from asthma MH and other allergic conditions. Participating in sports exposes these people both to specific allergens and to nonspecific factors that will influence the presentation of their allergic symptoms. Allergy patients experience both beneficial and deleterious effects of sports participation. For the patient whose symptoms are triggered or aggravated by sports activity, treatment should focus on avoiding or modifying the triggering factors either through physical means or through the use of pharmacologic agents.