Lac repressor is a transient gene-activating protein

Characterization of Gene Repression by Designed Transcription Activator-like Effector Dimer Proteins

Gene regulation by control of transcription initiation is a fundamental property of living cells. Much of our understanding of gene repression originated from studies of the Escherichia coli lac operon switch, in which DNA looping plays an essential role. To validate and generalize principles from lac for practical applications, we previously described artificial DNA looping driven by designed transcription activator-like effector dimer (TALED) proteins. Because TALE monomers bind the idealized symmetrical lac operator sequence in two orientations, our prior studies detected repression due to multiple DNA loops. We now quantitatively characterize gene repression in living E. coli by a collection of individual TALED loops with systematic loop length variation. Fitting of a thermodynamic model allows unequivocal demonstration of looping and comparison of the engineered TALED repression system with the natural lac repressor system.

Long Time-Scale Atomistic Simulations of the Structure and Dynamics of Transcription Factor-DNA Recognition

Recent years have witnessed an explosion of interest in computational studies of DNA binding proteins, including both coarse-grained and atomistic simulations of transcription factor-DNA recognition, to understand how these transcription factors recognize their binding sites on the DNA with such exquisite specificity. The present study performs microsecond time scale all-atom simulations of the dimeric form of the lactose repressor (LacI), both in the absence of any DNA and in the presence of both specific and nonspecific complexes, considering three different DNA sequences. We examine, specifically, the conformational differences between specific and nonspecific protein-DNA interactions, as well as the behavior of the helix-turn-helix motif of LacI when interacting with the DNA. Our simulations suggest that stable LacI binding occurs primarily to bent A-form DNA, with a loss of LacI conformational entropy and optimization of correlated conformational equilibria across the protein. In addition, binding to the specific operator sequence involves a slightly larger number of stabilizing DNA-protein hydrogen bonds (in comparison to nonspecific complexes), which may account for the experimentally observed specificity for this operator. In doing so, our simulations provide a detailed atomistic description of potential structural drivers for LacI selectivity.

Biomolecular Assemblies: Moving from Observation to Predictive Design

Biomolecular assembly is a key driving force in nearly all life processes, providing structure, information storage, and communication within cells and at the whole organism level. These assembly processes rely on precise interactions between functional groups on nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates, and small molecules, and can be fine-tuned to span a range of time, length, and complexity scales. Recognizing the power of these motifs, researchers have sought to emulate and engineer biomolecular assemblies in the laboratory, with goals ranging from modulating cellular function to the creation of new polymeric materials. In most cases, engineering efforts are inspired or informed by understanding the structure and properties of naturally occurring assemblies, which has in turn fueled the development of predictive models that enable computational design of novel assemblies. This Review will focus on selected examples of protein assemblies, highlighting the story arc from initial discovery of an assembly, through initial engineering attempts, toward the ultimate goal of predictive design. The aim of this Review is to highlight areas where significant progress has been made, as well as to outline remaining challenges, as solving these challenges will be the key that unlocks the full power of biomolecules for advances in technology and medicine.

Phenotypic Nonspecificity as the Result of Limited Specificity of Transcription Factor Function

Drosophila transcription factor (TF) function is phenotypically nonspecific. Phenotypic nonspecificity is defined as one phenotype being induced or rescued by multiple TFs. To explain this unexpected result, a hypothetical world of limited specificity is explored where all TFs have unique random distributions along the genome due to low information content of DNA sequence recognition and somewhat promiscuous cooperative interactions with other TFs. Transcription is an emergent property of these two conditions. From this model, explicit predictions are made. First, many more cases of TF nonspecificity are expected when examined. Second, the genetic analysis of regulatory sequences should uncover cis-element bypass and, third, genetic analysis of TF function should generally uncover differential pleiotropy. In addition, limited specificity provides evolutionary opportunity and explains the inefficiency of expression analysis in identifying genes required for biological processes.

Mfd Protein and Transcription-Repair Coupling in Escherichia coli

In 1989, transcription-repair coupling (TRC) was first described in Escherichia coli, as the transcription-dependent, preferential nucleotide excision repair (NER) of UV photoproducts located in the template DNA strand. This finding led to pioneering biochemical studies of TRC in the laboratory of Professor Aziz Sancar, where, at the time, major contributions were being made toward understanding the roles of the UvrA, UvrB and UvrC proteins in NER. When the repair studies were extended to TRC, template but not coding strand lesions were found to block RNA polymerase (RNAP) in vitro, and unexpectedly, the blocked RNAP inhibited NER. A transcription-repair coupling factor, also called Mfd protein, was found to remove the blocked RNAP, deliver the repair enzyme to the lesion and thereby mediate more rapid repair of the transcription-blocking lesion compared with lesions elsewhere. Structural and functional analyses of Mfd protein revealed helicase motifs responsible for ATP hydrolysis and DNA binding, and regions that interact with RNAP and UvrA. These and additional studies provided a basis upon which other investigators, in following decades, have characterized fascinating and unexpected structural and mechanistic features of Mfd, revealed the possible existence of additional pathways of TRC and discovered additional roles of Mfd in the cell.

Bacterial promoter repression by DNA looping without protein-protein binding competition

The Escherichia coli lactose operon provides a paradigm for understanding gene control by DNA looping where the lac repressor (LacI) protein competes with RNA polymerase for DNA binding. Not all promoter loops involve direct competition between repressor and RNA polymerase. This raises the possibility that positioning a promoter within a tightly constrained DNA loop is repressive per se, an idea that has previously only been considered in vitro. Here, we engineer living E. coli bacteria to measure repression due to promoter positioning within such a tightly constrained DNA loop in the absence of protein–protein binding competition. We show that promoters held within such DNA loops are repressed ∼100-fold, with up to an additional ∼10-fold repression (∼1000-fold total) dependent on topological positioning of the promoter on the inner or outer face of the DNA loop. Chromatin immunoprecipitation data suggest that repression involves inhibition of both RNA polymerase initiation and elongation. These in vivo results show that gene repression can result from tightly looping promoter DNA even in the absence of direct competition between repressor and RNA polymerase binding.

Mechanism of promoter repression by Lac repressor-DNA loops

The Escherichia coli lactose (lac) operon encodes the first genetic switch to be discovered, and lac remains a paradigm for studying negative and positive control of gene expression. Negative control is believed to involve competition of RNA polymerase and Lac repressor for overlapping binding sites. Contributions to the local Lac repressor concentration come from free repressor and repressor delivered to the operator from remote auxiliary operators by DNA looping. Long-standing questions persist concerning the actual role of DNA looping in the mechanism of promoter repression. Here, we use experiments in living bacteria to resolve four of these questions. We show that the distance dependence of repression enhancement is comparable for upstream and downstream auxiliary operators, confirming the hypothesis that repressor concentration increase is the principal mechanism of repression loops. We find that as few as four turns of DNA can be constrained in a stable loop by Lac repressor. We show that RNA polymerase is not trapped at repressed promoters. Finally, we show that constraining a promoter in a tight DNA loop is sufficient for repression even when promoter and operator do not overlap.

Operator sequence alters gene expression independently of transcription factor occupancy in bacteria

A canonical quantitative view of transcriptional regulation holds that the only role of operator sequence is to set the probability of transcription factor binding, with operator occupancy determining the level of gene expression. In this work, we test this idea by characterizing repression in vivo and the binding of RNA polymerase in vitro in experiments where operators of various sequences were placed either upstream or downstream from the promoter in Escherichia coli. Surprisingly, we find that operators with a weaker binding affinity can yield higher repression levels than stronger operators. Repressor bound to upstream operators modulates promoter escape, and the magnitude of this modulation is not correlated with the repressor-operator binding affinity. This suggests that operator sequences may modulate transcription by altering the nature of the interaction of the bound transcription factor with the transcriptional machinery, implying a new layer of sequence dependence that must be confronted in the quantitative understanding of gene expression.

Mechanism of transcriptional repression at a bacterial promoter by analysis of single molecules

The molecular basis for regulation of lactose metabolism in Escherichia coli is well studied. Nonetheless, the physical mechanism by which the Lac repressor protein prevents transcription of the lactose promoter remains unresolved. Using multi-wavelength single-molecule fluorescence microscopy, we visualized individual complexes of fluorescently tagged RNA polymerase holoenzyme bound to promoter DNA. Quantitative analysis of the single-molecule observations, including use of a novel statistical partitioning approach, reveals highly kinetically stable binding of polymerase to two different sites on the DNA, only one of which leads to transcription. Addition of Lac repressor directly demonstrates that bound repressor prevents the formation of transcriptionally productive open promoter complexes; discrepancies in earlier studies may be attributable to transcriptionally inactive polymerase binding. The single-molecule statistical partitioning approach is broadly applicable to elucidating mechanisms of regulatory systems including those that are kinetically rather than thermodynamically controlled.

Effect of promoter architecture on the cell-to-cell variability in gene expression

According to recent experimental evidence, promoter architecture, defined by the number, strength and regulatory role of the operators that control transcription, plays a major role in determining the level of cell-to-cell variability in gene expression. These quantitative experiments call for a corresponding modeling effort that addresses the question of how changes in promoter architecture affect variability in gene expression in a systematic rather than case-by-case fashion. In this article we make such a systematic investigation, based on a microscopic model of gene regulation that incorporates stochastic effects. In particular, we show how operator strength and operator multiplicity affect this variability. We examine different modes of transcription factor binding to complex promoters (cooperative, independent, simultaneous) and how each of these affects the level of variability in transcriptional output from cell-to-cell. We propose that direct comparison between in vivo single-cell experiments and theoretical predictions for the moments of the probability distribution of mRNA number per cell can be used to test kinetic models of gene regulation. The emphasis of the discussion is on prokaryotic gene regulation, but our analysis can be extended to eukaryotic cells as well.

Bending the rules of transcriptional repression: tightly looped DNA directly represses T7 RNA polymerase

From supercoiled DNA to the tight loops of DNA formed by some gene repressors, DNA in cells is often highly bent. Despite evidence that transcription by RNA polymerase (RNAP) is affected in systems where DNA is deformed significantly, the mechanistic details underlying the relationship between polymerase function and mechanically stressed DNA remain unclear. Seeking to gain additional insight into the regulatory consequences of highly bent DNA, we hypothesize that tightly looping DNA is alone sufficient to repress transcription. To test this hypothesis, we have developed an assay to quantify transcription elongation by bacteriophage T7 RNAP on small, circular DNA templates approximately 100 bp in size. From these highly bent transcription templates, we observe that the elongation velocity and processivity can be repressed by at least two orders of magnitude. Further, we show that minicircle templates sustaining variable levels of twist yield only moderate differences in repression efficiency. We therefore conclude that the bending mechanics within the minicircle templates dominate the observed repression. Our results support a model in which RNAP function is highly dependent on the bending mechanics of DNA and are suggestive of a direct, regulatory role played by the template itself in regulatory systems where DNA is known to be highly bent.

Gene repression by minimal lac loops in vivo

The inflexibility of double-stranded DNA with respect to bending and twisting is well established in vitro. Understanding apparent DNA physical properties in vivo is a greater challenge. Here, we exploit repression looping with components of the Escherichia coli lac operon to monitor DNA flexibility in living cells. We create a minimal system for testing the shortest possible DNA repression loops that contain an E. coli promoter, and compare the results to prior experiments. Our data reveal that loop-independent repression occurs for certain tight operator/promoter spacings. When only loop-dependent repression is considered, fits to a thermodynamic model show that DNA twisting limits looping in vivo, although the apparent DNA twist flexibility is 2- to 4-fold higher than in vitro. In contrast, length-dependent resistance to DNA bending is not observed in these experiments, even for the shortest loops constraining <0.4 persistence lengths of DNA. As observed previously for other looping configurations, loss of the nucleoid protein heat unstable (HU) markedly disables DNA looping in vivo. Length-independent DNA bending energy may reflect the activities of architectural proteins and the structure of the DNA topological domain. We suggest that the shortest loops are formed in apical loops rather than along the DNA plectonemic superhelix.

Environmental regulation operating at the promoter clearance step of bacterial transcription

In vivo transcription of the Escherichia coli argO gene, which encodes an arginine (Arg) exporter, requires the LysR-family regulator protein ArgP (previously called IciA) and is induced in the presence of Arg or its naturally occurring antimetabolite analog canavanine. Lysine (Lys) addition, on the other hand, phenocopies an argP mutation to result in the shutoff of argO expression. We now report that the ArgP dimer by itself is able to bind the argO promoter-operator region to form a binary complex, but that the formation of a ternary complex with RNA polymerase is greatly stimulated only in presence of a coeffector. Both Arg and Lys were proficient as coeffectors for ArgP-mediated recruitment of RNA polymerase to, and open complex formation at, the argO promoter, although only Arg (but not Lys) was competent to activate transcription. The two coeffectors competed for binding to ArgP, and the ternary complex that had been assembled on the argO template in the presence of Lys could be chased into a transcriptionally active state upon Arg addition. Our results support a novel mechanism of argO regulation in which Lys-bound ArgP reversibly restrains RNA polymerase at the promoter, at a step (following open complex formation) that precedes, and is common to, both abortive and productive transcription. This represents, therefore, the first example of an environmental signal regulating the final step of promoter clearance by RNA polymerase in bacterial transcription. We propose that, in E. coli cells, the ternary complex remains assembled and poised at the argO promoter at all times to respond, positively or negatively, to instantaneous changes in the ratio of intracellular Arg to Lys concentrations.

Affinity purification of plasmid DNA directly from crude bacterial cell lysates

We have shown previously that a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein based on the Lac repressor protein can isolate pre-purified DNA efficiently from simple buffer solution but our attempts to purify plasmids directly from crude starting materials were disappointing with impractically low DNA yields. We have optimized the procedure and present a simple affinity methodology whereby plasmid DNA is purified directly by mixing two crude cell lysates, one cell lysate containing the plasmid and the other the protein affinity ligand, without the need for treatment by RNaseA. After IMAC chromatography, high purity supercoiled DNA is recovered in good yields of 100-150 microg plasmid per 200 mL shake flask culture. Moreover, the resulting DNA is free from linear or open-circular plasmid DNA, genomic DNA, RNA, and protein, to the limits of our detection. Furthermore, we show that lyophilized affinity ligand can be stored at room temperature and re-hydrated for use when required.

LacO-LacI interaction in affinity adsorption of plasmid DNA

Current approaches for purifying plasmids from bacterial production systems exploit the physiochemical properties of nucleic acids in non-specific capture systems. In this study, an affinity system for plasmid DNA (pDNA) purification has been developed utilizing the interaction between the lac operon (lacO) sequence contained in the pDNA and a 64mer synthetic peptide representing the DNA-binding domain of the lac repressor protein, LacI. Two plasmids were evaluated, the native pUC19 and pUC19 with dual lacO3/lacOs operators (pUC19(lacO3/lacOs)), where the lacOs operator is perfectly symmetrical. The DNA-protein affinity interaction was evaluated by surface plasmon resonance using a Biacore system. The affinity capture of DNA in a chromatography system was evaluated using LacI peptide that had been immobilized to Streamline adsorbent. The KD-values for double stranded DNA (dsDNA) fragments containing lacO1 and lacO3 and lacOS and lacO3 were 5.7 +/- 0.3 x 10(-11) M and 4.1 +/- 0.2 x 10(-11) M respectively, which compare favorably with literature reports of 5 x 10(-10)-1 x 10(-9) M for native lacO1 and 1-1.2 x 10(-10) M for lacO1 in a saline buffer. Densitometric analysis of the gel bands from the affinity chromatography run clearly showed a significant preference for capture of the supercoiled fraction from the feed pDNA sample. The results indicate the feasibility of the affinity approach for pDNA capture and purification using native protein-DNA interaction.

Allosteric transition pathways in the lactose repressor protein core domains: asymmetric motions in a homodimer

The crystal structures of lactose repressor protein (LacI) provide static endpoint views of the allosteric transition between DNA- and IPTG-bound states. To obtain an atom-by-atom description of the pathway between these two conformations, motions were simulated with targeted molecular dynamics (TMD). Strikingly, this homodimer exhibited asymmetric dynamics. All asymmetries observed in this simulation are reproducible and can begin on either of the two monomers. Asymmetry in the simulation originates around D149 and was traced back to the pre-TMD equilibrations of both conformations. In particular, hydrogen bonds between D149 and S193 adopt a variety of configurations during repetitions of this process. Changes in this region propagate through the structure via noncovalent interactions of three interconnected pathways. The changes of pathway 1 occur first on one monomer. Alterations move from the inducer-binding pocket, through the N-subdomain beta-sheet, to a hydrophobic cluster at the top of this region and then to the same cluster on the second monomer. These motions result in changes at (1) side chains that form an interface with the DNA-binding domains and (2) K84 and K84', which participate in the monomer-monomer interface. Pathway 2 reflects consequent reorganization across this subunit interface, most notably formation of a H74-H74rsquo; pi-stacking intermediate. Pathway 3 extends from the rear of the inducer-binding pocket, across a hydrogen-bond network at the bottom of the pocket, and transverses the monomer-monomer interface via changes in H74 and H74rsquo;. In general, intermediates detected in this study are not apparent in the crystal structures. Observations from the simulations are in good agreement with biochemical data and provide a spatial and sequential framework for interpreting existing genetic data.

Rationally designed insulator-like elements can block enhancer action in vitro

Insulators are DNA sequences that are likely to be involved in formation of chromatin domains, functional units of gene expression in eukaryotes. Insulators can form domain boundaries and block inappropriate action of regulatory elements (such as transcriptional enhancers) in eukaryotic nuclei. Using an in vitro system supporting enhancer action over a large distance, the enhancer-blocking insulator activity has been recapitulated in a highly purified system. The insulator-like element was constructed using a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein making stable DNA loops (lac repressor). The insulation was entirely dependent on formation of a DNA loop that topologically isolates the enhancer from the promoter. This rationally designed, inducible insulator-like element recapitulates many key properties of eukaryotic insulators observed in vivo. The data suggest novel mechanisms of enhancer and insulator action.

Role of hydration in the binding of lac repressor to DNA

The osmotic stress technique was used to measure changes in macromolecular hydration that accompany binding of wild-type Escherichia coli lactose (lac) repressor to its regulatory site (operator O1) in the lac promoter and its transfer from site O1 to nonspecific DNA. Binding at O1 is accompanied by the net release of 260 +/- 32 water molecules. If all are released from macromolecular surfaces, this result is consistent with a net reduction of solvent-accessible surface area of 2370 +/- 550 A. This area is only slightly smaller than the macromolecular interface calculated for a crystalline repressor dimer-O1 complex but is significantly smaller than that for the corresponding complex with the symmetrical optimized O(sym) operator. The transfer of repressor from site O1 to nonspecific DNA is accompanied by the net uptake of 93 +/- 10 water molecules. Together these results imply that formation of a nonspecific complex is accompanied by the net release of 165 +/- 43 water molecules. The enhanced stabilities of repressor-DNA complexes with increasing osmolality may contribute to the ability of Escherichia coli cells to tolerate dehydration and/or high external salt concentrations.

Promoter clearance and escape in prokaryotes

Promoter escape is the last stage of transcription initiation when RNA polymerase, having initiated de novo phosphodiester bond synthesis, must begin to relinquish its hold on promoter DNA and advance to downstream regions (DSRs) of the template. In vitro, this process is marked by the release of high levels of abortive transcripts at most promoters, reflecting the high instability of initial transcribing complexes (ITCs) and indicative of the existence of barriers to the escape process. The high abortive initiation level is the result of the existence of unproductive ITCs that carry out repeated initiation and abortive release without escaping the promoter. The formation of unproductive ITCs is a widespread phenomenon, but it occurs to different extent on different promoters. Quantitative analysis of promoter mutations suggests that the extent and pattern of abortive initiation and promoter escape is determined by the sequence of promoter elements, both in the promoter recognition region (PRR) and the initial transcribed sequence (ITS). A general correlation has been found that the stronger the promoter DNA-polymerase interaction, the poorer the ability of RNA polymerase to escape the promoter. In gene regulation, promoter escape can be the rate-limiting step for transcription initiation. An increasing number of regulatory proteins are known to exert their control at this step. Examples are discussed with an emphasis on the diverse mechanisms involved. At the molecular level, the X-ray crystal structures of RNA polymerase and its various transcription complexes provide the framework for understanding the functional data on abortive initiation and promoter escape. Based on structural and biochemical evidence, a mechanism for abortive initiation and promoter escape is described.

The anti-initial transcribed sequence, a portable sequence that impedes promoter escape, requires sigma70 for function

The anti-sequence, a portable element extending from +1 to +15 of the transcript, is sufficient to prevent promoter escape from a variety of strong final sigma70 promoters. We show here that this sequence does not function with even the strongest final sigma32 promoter. Moreover, a particular class of substitutions in final sigma70 that disrupt interaction between Region 2.2 of final sigma70 and a coiled-coiled motif in the beta'-subunit of RNA polymerase antagonizes the function of the anti-element. This same group of mutants prevents lambdaQ-mediated anti-termination at the lambdaP(R') promoter. At this promoter, interaction of final sigma70 with the non-template strand of the initial transcribed sequence (ITS) is required to promote the pause prerequisite for anti-termination. These mutants prevent pausing because they are defective in this recognition event. By analogy, we suggest that interaction of final sigma70 with the non-template strand of the anti-ITS is required for function of this portable element, thus explaining why neither final sigma32 nor the Region 2.2 final sigma70 mutants mediate anti-function. Support for the analogy with the lambdaP(R') promoter comes from preliminary experiments suggesting that the anti-ITS, like the lambdaP(R') ITS, is bipartite.

In vitro interaction of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein with the lactose repressor

Sedimentation equilibrium studies show that the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CAP) and lactose repressor associate to form a 2:1 complex in vitro. This is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of a direct interaction of these proteins in the absence of DNA. No 1:1 complex was detected over a wide range of CAP concentrations, suggesting that binding is highly cooperative. Complex formation is stimulated by cAMP, with a net uptake of 1 equivalent of cAMP per molecule of CAP bound. Substitution of the dimeric lacI-18 mutant repressor for tetrameric wild-type repressor completely eliminates detectable binding. We therefore propose that CAP binds the cleft between dimeric units in the repressor tetramer. CAP-lac repressor interactions may play important roles in regulatory events that take place at overlapping CAP and repressor binding sites in the lactose promoter.

Modulation of transcription reveals a new mechanism of triplet repeat instability in Escherichia coli

Many human hereditary disease genes are associated with the expansion of triplet repeat sequences. In Escherichia coli (CTG/CAG) triplet repeat sequences are unstable and we have developed a plasmid-based assay enabling us to observe and quantify both expansions and deletions. In this work, we have investigated the role of transcription on the instability of a (CTG/CAG) insert containing 64 repeats. Using this assay, we show that induction of transcription results in a significant increase in the frequency of long deletions and a reduction in the frequency of long expansions. On the other hand, overproduction of transcription repressor molecules leads to an increase in both expansions and deletions. In this latter case, we propose that the increased instability is due to the arrest of replication progression by the interaction of the repressor molecule with its cognate operator and subsequent generations of DNA strand breaks.

The malonate decarboxylase operon of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus KCCM 40902 is regulated by malonate and the transcriptional repressor MdcY

A regulatory gene-like open reading frame oriented oppositely to mdcL, coined mdcY, was found upstream from the structural genes of the mdcLMACDEGBH operon in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus KCCM 40902. To elucidate the function of this gene, mdcY was expressed in Escherichia coli, and the MdcY protein was purified to homogeneity. Its DNA binding activity and binding site were examined by gel retardation and footprinting assays in vitro and by site-directed mutagenesis of the binding sites in vivo. The regulator bound target DNA regardless of the presence of malonate, and the binding site was found centered at -65 relative to the mdcL transcriptional start site and contains a 12-bp palindromic structure (5'-ATTGTA/TACAAT-3'). Using a promoter fusion to the reporter gene luc, we found that the promoter P(mdcY) is negatively regulated by MdcY independent of malonate. However, the promoter P(mdcL) recovered its activity in the presence of malonate. When mdcY was introduced into A. calcoaceticus KCCM 40902 in which the gene is inactivated by an IS3 family element, malonate decarboxylase was significantly repressed in cultures growing in acetate, succinate, or Luria-Bertani medium. However, in cells growing in malonate, malonate decarboxylase was induced, indicating that MdcY is a transcriptional repressor and that malonate or a product resulting from malonate metabolism should be the intracellular inducer of the mdc operon.

Transcriptional regulation of an archaeal operon in vivo and in vitro

The basal transcription apparatus of Archaea corresponds to the core machinery of the eucaryal RNA polymerase II system. However, it is not yet known how regulation of archaeal transcription is achieved. Examination of complete archaeal genome sequences reveals homologs of bacterial transcriptional regulators. We have studied one such molecule, MDR1, an A. fulgidus homolog of the bacterial metal-dependent transcriptional repressor, DtxR. We find that in vivo expression of the MDR1-containing operon is regulated by metal ion availability. In vitro analyses show that MDR1 recognizes three operator elements in its own promoter in a metal-dependent manner. MDR1 negatively regulates transcription of its own gene in a reconstituted in vitro system, not by abrogating the binding of TBP or TFB to the promoter but by preventing RNA polymerase recruitment.

Glycine insertion in the hinge region of lactose repressor protein alters DNA binding

Amino acid alterations were designed at the C terminus of the hinge segment (amino acids approximately 51-59) that links two functional domains within lactose repressor protein (LacI). Gly was introduced between Gly(58) and Lys(59) to generate Gly(58+1); Gln(60) was changed to Gly or Pro, and up to three additional glycines were inserted following Gln(60) --> Gly. All mutant proteins exhibited purification behavior, CD spectra, assembly state, and inducer binding properties similar to wild-type LacI and only small differences in trypsin proteolysis patterns. In contrast, significant differences were observed in DNA binding properties. Gly(58+1) exhibited a decrease of approximately 100-fold in affinity for O(1) operator, and sequential Gly insertion C-terminal to Gln(60) --> Gly resulted in progressively decreased affinity for O(1) operator, approaching nonspecific levels for insertion of >/=2 glycines. Where sufficient affinity for O(1) operator existed, decreased binding to O(1) in the presence of inducer indicated no disruption in the allosteric response for these proteins. Collectively, these results indicate that flexibility and/or spacing between the core and N-terminal domains did not significantly affect folding or assembly, but these alterations in the hinge domain profoundly altered affinity of the lactose repressor protein for its wild-type target sequence.

Efficient control of raf gene expression by CAP and two Raf repressors that bend DNA in opposite directions

The plasmid-borne raf operon of Escherichia coli encodes proteins involved in the uptake and utilisation of the trisaccharide raffinose. The operon is subject to dual regulation; to negative control by the binding of RafR repressor to twin operators, O1 and O2, and to positive control by the cAMP-binding protein, CAP. We have identified the CAP binding site (CBS) as a 22 bp palindromic sequence with incomplete dyad symmetry by deletion analysis, DNasel footprinting and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) of CAP-DNA complexes. The CBS is centred 60.5 bp upstream of the transcription start point and partially overlaps O1. In vivo, CAP increases rafA (alpha-galactosidase) gene expression up to 50-fold. The 28 bp spacing between the centres of CBS and the - 35 box is essential, since insertions of 4, 8, 12 or 16 bp completely eliminated rafA gene expression. In vitro binding studies revealed that the CBS, O1 and O2 sites, can be simultaneously occupied by their cognate proteins. However, no cooperativity between binding of CAP and RafR was detected. EMSA with circularly permuted DNA fragments demonstrated that CAP and RafR proteins bend raf promoter (rafP) DNA by 75 degrees +/- 5 degrees and 95 degrees +/- 5 degrees, respectively, in opposite directions. Among sugar catabolic operons, the compact arrangement of three protein-binding sites, a CBS and two operators bounding the - 35 promoter box, is unique and provides a sensitive and highly efficient device for transcriptional control.

A vector for systematic gene inactivation in Bacillus subtilis

To study the functions of the uncharacterized open reading frames identified in the Bacillus subtilis genome, several vectors were constructed to perform insertional mutagenesis in the chromosome. All the pMUTIN plasmids carry a lacZ reporter gene and an inducible Pspac promoter, which is tightly regulated and can be induced about 1000-fold. The integration of a pMUTIN vector into the target gene has three consequences: (1) the target gene is inactivated; (2) lacZ becomes transcriptionally fused to the gene, allowing its expression pattern to be monitored; (3) the Pspac promoter controls the transcription of downstream genes in an IPTG-dependent fashion. This last feature is important because B. subtilis genes are often organized in operons. The potential polar effects generated by the integration of the vectors can be alleviated by addition of IPTG. Also, conditional mutants of essential genes can be obtained by integrating pMUTIN vectors upstream of the target gene. The vectors are currently being used for systematic inactivation of genes without known function within the B. subtilis European consortium. pMUTIN characteristics and the inactivation of eight genes in the resA-serA region of the chromosome are presented.

Dissecting the molecular details of prokaryotic transcriptional control by surface plasmon resonance: the methionine and arginine repressor proteins

The commercial surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensors, BIACORE, have been used to investigate the molecular details of macromolecular interactions at prokaryotic promoter-operators. For the Escherichia coli methionine repressor, MetJ, we have quantitated the interaction of the protein with synthetic and natural operator sites and shown that the SPR response is directly related to the stoichiometry of the complexes being formed. The utility of a continuous flow system has also been exploited to investigate transcription from an immobilised promoter-operator fragment; with transcripts collected and subsequently characterised by RT-PCR. This technique has enabled us to investigate how repressor binding affects (i) the interaction of the RNA polymerase (RNAP) with the promoter and (ii) the ability of RNAP to initiate transcription. Remarkably, the repression complex appears to stabilise binding of RNAP, whilst having the expected effects on the levels of transcripts produced. This may well be a general mechanism allowing rapid transcription initiation to occur as soon as the repression complex dissociates. These techniques have also been used to examine protein-DNA interactions in the E. coli and Bacillus subtilis arginine repressor systems. The repressors are the products of the argR and ahrC genes, respectively. Both proteins form hexamers in rapid equilibrium with smaller subunits believed to be trimers. There are three types of operator in these systems, autoregulatory, biosynthetic and catabolic (B. subtilis only). Sensorgrams show that each protein recognises the three types of immobilised operator differently and that binding is stimulated over 100-fold by the presence of L-arginine.

QacR is a repressor protein that regulates expression of the Staphylococcus aureus multidrug efflux pump QacA

The Staphylococcus aureus QacA protein is a multidrug transporter that confers resistance to a broad range of antimicrobial agents via proton motive force-dependent efflux of the compounds. Primer extension analysis was performed to map the transcription start points of the qacA and divergently transcribed qacR mRNAs. Each gene utilized a single promoter element, the locations of which were confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis. Fusions of the qacA and qacR promoters to a chloramphenicol acetyl transferase reporter gene were used to demonstrate that QacR is a trans-acting repressor of qacA transcription that does not autoregulate its own expression. An inverted repeat overlapping the qacA transcription start site was shown to be the operator sequence for control of qacA gene expression. Removal of one half of the operator prevented QacR-mediated repression of the qacA promoter. Purified QacR protein bound specifically to this operator sequence in DNase I-footprinting experiments. Importantly, addition of diverse QacA substrates was shown to induce qacA expression in vivo, as well as inhibit binding of QacR to operator DNA in vitro, by using gel-mobility shift assays. QacR therefore appears to interact directly with structurally dissimilar inducing compounds that are substrates of the QacA multidrug efflux pump.

Transcription activation and repression by interaction of a regulator with the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase: the model of phage phi 29 protein p4

Regulatory protein p4, encoded by Bacillus subtilis phage phi 29, has proved to be a very useful model to analyze the molecular mechanisms of transcription regulation. Protein p4 modulates the transcription of phage phi 29 genome by activating the late A3 promoter (PA3) and simultaneously repressing the two main early promoters, A2b and A2c (or PA2b and PA2c). This review describes in detail the regulatory mechanism leading to activation or repression, and discusses them in the context of the recent findings on the role of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit in transcription regulation. Activation of PA3 implies the p4-mediated stabilization of RNA polymerase at the promoter as a closed complex. Repression of the early A2b promoter occurs by binding of protein p4 to a site that partially overlaps the -35 consensus region of the promoter, therefore preventing the binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter. Repression of the A2c promoter, located 96 bp downstream from PA2b, occurs by a different mechanism that implies the simultaneous binding of protein p4 and RNA polymerase to the promoter in such a way that promoter clearance is inhibited. Interestingly, activation of PA3 and repression of PA2c require an interaction between protein p4 and RNA polymerase, and in both cases this interaction occurs between the same surface of protein p4 and the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase, which provides new insights into how a protein can activate or repress transcription by subtle variations in the protein-DNA complexes formed at promoters.

Inducible gene expression from African swine fever virus recombinants: analysis of the major capsid protein p72

A method to study the function of individual African swine fever virus (ASFV) gene products utilizing the Escherichia coli lac repressor-operator system has been developed. Recombinant viruses containing both the lacI gene encoding the lac repressor and a strong virus late promoter modified by the insertion of one or two copies of the lac operator sequence at various positions were constructed. The ability of each modified promoter to regulate expression of the firefly luciferase gene was assayed in the presence and in the absence of the inducer isopropyl beta-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG). Induction and repression of gene activity were dependent on the position(s) of the operator(s) with respect to the promoter and on the number of operators inserted. The ability of this system to regulate the expression of ASFV genes was analyzed by constructing a recombinant virus inducibly expressing the major capsid protein p72. Electron microscopy analysis revealed that under nonpermissive conditions, electron-dense membrane-like structures accumulated in the viral factories and capsid formation was inhibited. Induction of p72 expression allowed the progressive building of the capsid on these structures, leading to assembly of ASFV particles. The results of this report demonstrate that the transferred inducible expression system is a powerful tool for analyzing the function of ASFV genes.

On the mechanism of inhibition of phage T7 RNA polymerase by lac repressor

We study here the effect on phage T7 RNA polymerase activity of lac repressor bound downstream of the T7 promoter. When repressor binds in vitro at an operator centered at +13 or +15 with respect to transcription start, it does not prevent initiation, though the transcript yield is reduced. However, the processivity of the polymerase is depressed and transcript extension is blocked at positions +4 and +6, respectively. These results indicate that repressor and polymerase do not simply exclude each other from the promoter. Rather, they would come into steric conflict and compete for establishment or retention of interactions with the same segment of DNA, without this leading to the immediate displacement of either polymerase or repressor. The resulting destabilization of the transcription complex would depress both initiation rate and enzyme processivity. In contrast to the above results, little reduction in runoff transcription is observed when operator is centered at +47. The decreased sensitivity of polymerase to repressor bound at +47 versus +13 or +15 is likely to be due to the higher stability of the elongation complex during the transcription of downstream regions in comparison with the first transcribed nucleotides. We also show that under conditions of leaky repression and with operator centered at +13, a mutant T7 RNA polymerase showing normal promoter affinity but a slower elongation rate is more sensitive to repression than the wild-type enzyme, both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, this higher sensitivity is largely due to a reduced ability of the mutant to overcome the elongation block at position +4. The parallel between the in vitro and in vivo data suggests that in vivo the repressor also does not prevent polymerase from binding to promoter, but interferes with subsequent steps in initiation and transcript extension, in this case presumably largely extension beyond +4.

Lactose repressor protein: functional properties and structure

The lactose repressor protein (LacI), the prototype for genetic regulatory proteins, controls expression of lactose metabolic genes by binding to its cognate operator sequences in E. coli DNA. Inducer binding elicits a conformational change that diminishes affinity for operator sequences with no effect on nonspecific binding. The release of operator is followed by synthesis of mRNA encoding the enzymes for lactose utilization. Genetic, chemical and physical studies provided detailed insight into the function of this protein prior to the recent completion of X-ray crystallographic structures. The structural information can now be correlated with the phenotypic data for numerous mutants. These structures also provide the opportunity for physical and chemical studies on mutants designed to examine various aspects of lac repressor structure and function. In addition to providing insight into protein structure-function correlations, LacI has been utilized in a wide variety of applications both in prokaryotic gene expression and in eukaryotic gene regulation and studies of mutagenesis.

Repression and activation of promoter-bound RNA polymerase activity by Gal repressor

By binding to the DNA site OE at position -60.5 in the gal operon, the GalR protein activates transcription from the P2 promoter located on the opposite face of DNA (position -5) and represses transcription from the P1 promoter located on the same face (position +1). GalR increases RNA polymerase binding at P2 and inhibits isomerization at P1 by forming a GalR-DNA-RNA polymerase ternary complex in each case. The specific effect of GalR at one promoter is independent of the presence of the other promoter. The enhancement or repression is also not the intrinsic property of a promoter; the regulation can be reversed by switching the angular orientation of the promoters relative to OE. Both enhancement and repression appear to require the same interaction between RNA polymerase alpha-subunit and GalR and/or the same interaction between RNA polymerase alpha-subunit and DNA in the ternary complexes. We have discussed how GalR might exert opposite effects in the steps involved in the formation of the open complex from free RNA polymerase and DNA.

FNR-dependent repression of ndh gene expression requires two upstream FNR-binding sites

The ndh gene of Escherichia coli encodes a non-proton-translocating NADH dehydrogenase (NdhII) that is anaerobically repressed by the global transcription regulator, FNR. FNR binds at two sites (centred at -50.5 and -94.5) in the ndh promoter but the mechanism of FNR-mediated repression appears not to be due to promoter occlusion. This mechanism has been investigated using an aerobically active derivative of FNR, FNR* (FNR-D154A), with ndh promoters containing altered FNR-binding sites. FNR* repressed ndh gene expression both aerobically and anaerobically in vivo. Gel retardation analysis and DNase I footprinting with purified FNR* protein confirmed that FNR interacts at two sites in the ndh promoter, and that FNR and RNA polymerase (RNAP) can bind simultaneously. Studies with three altered ndh promoters, each containing an impaired or improved FNR-site, indicated that both FNR-sites are needed for efficient repression in vivo. The alpha-subunit of RNAP interacted with two regions (centred at -105 and -46), each overlapping one of the FNR-sites in the ndh promoter. Footprints of the FNR*-RNAP-ndh ternary complex indicated that FNR*-binding at -50.5 prevents the alpha-subunit of RNAP from docking with the DNA just upstream of the -35 element. Binding of a second FNR* molecule at the -105 site likewise prevents binding of the alpha-subunit at its alternative site, thus providing a plausible mechanism for FNR-mediated repression based on displacement of the alpha-subunit of RNAP.

Interaction of Gal repressor with inducer and operator: induction of gal transcription from repressor-bound DNA

Gal repressor inhibits transcription from the gal promoter (P1) when it binds to the cognate operator (O(E)). The repression is relieved by the presence of the inducer D-galactose. Compared with its interaction with free repressor, D-galactose binds to the repressor-operator complex with 10-fold reduced affinity as determined by fluorescence enhancement measurements. Thermodynamic analysis and fluorescence anisotropy showed that the stability of the repressor-operator complex is reduced by only 7-fold by the presence of the inducer in the complex. The formation of the inducer-repressor-operator ternary complex has been confirmed by CD spectral analysis. Fluorescence spectroscopy and energy transfer experiments suggest that individual allosteric effects of the two ligands, inducer and operator, on Gal repressor are responsible for the slightly weakened stability of the ternary complex compared with the stability of the inducer-repressor and repressor-operator complexes. In vitro transcription results demonstrated full derepression of transcription of the P1 promoter under conditions in which the concentrations of the inducer-repressor binary complex are severalfold higher than the dissociation constant of the inducer-repressor-operator ternary complex into inducer-repressor and free DNA. These results strongly suggest that the inducer binding to the repressor-operator complex does not lead to dissociation of the repressor from the operator during transcription induction. Because Gal repressor inhibits transcription by modulating the alpha subunit of the P1-bound RNA polymerase, we conclude that the inducer binding to the operator-bound repressor only allosterically relieves the inhibitory effect of repressor on RNA polymerase without dissociating the repressor from DNA.

The Spo0A protein of Bacillus subtilis inhibits transcription of the abrB gene without preventing binding of the polymerase to the promoter

Repression of transcription of the abrB gene is essential to expression of many of the postexponential genes in Bacillus. The repression is due to the activity of the response regulator protein Spo0A. We have used in vitro transcription and DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting to explore the mechanism of transcription inhibition. Spo0A binds to specific DNA sequences (0A boxes), and two such boxes are found downstream of the tandem promoters for the abrB gene. The data indicate that both RNA polymerase and Spo0A bind simultaneously to a DNA fragment containing the promoters and the 0A boxes. The Spo0A prevents the polymerase from inducing DNA strand denaturation at the promoter for the abrB gene.

Crystal structure of the lactose operon repressor and its complexes with DNA and inducer

The lac operon of Escherichia coli is the paradigm for gene regulation. Its key component is the lac repressor, a product of the lacI gene. The three-dimensional structures of the intact lac repressor, the lac repressor bound to the gratuitous inducer isopropyl-beta-D-1-thiogalactoside (IPTG) and the lac repressor complexed with a 21-base pair symmetric operator DNA have been determined. These three structures show the conformation of the molecule in both the induced and repressed states and provide a framework for understanding a wealth of biochemical and genetic information. The DNA sequence of the lac operon has three lac repressor recognition sites in a stretch of 500 base pairs. The crystallographic structure of the complex with DNA suggests that the tetrameric repressor functions synergistically with catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) and participates in the quaternary formation of repression loops in which one tetrameric repressor interacts simultaneously with two sites on the genomic DNA.

Crystal structure of lac repressor core tetramer and its implications for DNA looping

The crystal structure of the tryptic core fragment of the lac repressor of Escherichia coli (LacR) complexed with the inducer isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactoside was determined at 2.6 A resolution. The quaternary structure consists of two dyad-symmetric dimers that are nearly parallel to each other. This structure places all four DNA binding domains of intact LacR on the same side of the tetramer, and results in a deep, V-shaped cleft between the two dimers. Each monomer contributes a carboxyl-terminal helix to an antiparallel four-helix bundle that functions as a tetramerization domain. Some of the side chains whose mutation reduce DNA binding form clusters on a surface near the amino terminus. Placing the structure of the DNA binding domain complexed with operator previously determined by nuclear magnetic resonance onto this surface results in two operators being adjacent and nearly parallel to each other. Structural considerations suggest that the two dimers of LacR may flexibly alter their relative orientation in order to bind to the known varied spacings between two operators.

Purification, characterization and mode of action of PdhR, the transcriptional repressor of the pdhR-aceEF-lpd operon of Escherichia coli

The repressor of the pdhR-aceEF-lpd operon of Escherichia coli, PdhR, was amplified to 23% of total cell protein and purified to homogeneity by heparin-agarose and cation-exchange chromatography. The purified protein is a monomer (M(r) 29,300) which binds specifically to DNA fragments containing the pdh promoter (Ppdh) in the absence of pyruvate. The pdh operator was identified by DNase I footprinting as a region of hyphenated dyad symmetry, +11AATTGGTaagACCAATT+27, situated just downstream of the transcript start site. In vitro transcription from Ppdh was repressed > 1000-fold by PdhR and this repression was antagonized in a concentration-dependent manner by its co-effector, pyruvate. Studies on RNA polymerase binding at Ppdh showed that RNA polymerase protects the -44 to +21 region in the absence of PdhR, but no RNA polymerase binding or protection upstream of +9 could be detected in the presence of PdhR. It is concluded that PdhR represses transcription by binding to an operator site centred at +19 such that effective binding of RNA polymerase is prevented.

Regulation of xylose utilization in Bacillus licheniformis: Xyl repressor-xyl-operator interaction studied by DNA modification protection and interference

Xylose utilization in Bacillus licheniformis is inducible by xylose. We establish here that the Xyl repressor recognizes and binds an xyl operator sequence located 12 nucleotides downstream from the transcription start site of the xyl operon. DNA-retardation experiments employing xyl regulatory DNA and soluble protein extracts indicate complex formation in the presence of Xyl repressor. Two repressor-operator complexes are distinguished by different gel mobilities. They yield the same in situ copper-phenanthroline footprint. This result suggests that a single xyl operator may be bound by different oligomers of Xyl repressor. Methylation and hydroxyl radical cleavage protection of the xyl operator by Xyl repressor binding and ethylation interference of Xyl repressor binding to the xyl operator reveals symmetrical interaction of the repressor with two half sites of the operator, which show palindromic symmetry and are located on the same side of the B-form DNA structure.

Promoters responsive to DNA bending: a common theme in prokaryotic gene expression

The early notion of DNA as a passive target for regulatory proteins has given way to the realization that higher-order DNA structures and DNA-protein complexes are at the basis of many molecular processes, including control of promoter activity. Protein binding may direct the bending of an otherwise linear DNA, exacerbate the angle of an intrinsic bend, or assist the directional flexibility of certain sequences within prokaryotic promoters. The important, sometimes essential role of intrinsic or protein-induced DNA bending in transcriptional regulation has become evident in virtually every system examined. As discussed throughout this article, not every function of DNA bends is understood, but their presence has been detected in a wide variety of bacterial promoters subjected to positive or negative control. Nonlinear DNA structures facilitate and even determine proximal and distal DNA-protein and protein-protein contacts involved in the various steps leading to transcription initiation.

The beta recombinase from the Streptococcal plasmid pSM 19035 represses its own transcription by holding the RNA polymerase at the promoter region

The beta protein encoded by the Streptococcus pyogenes plasmid pSM19035 is a site-specific recombinase involved in both resolution of plasmid multimers into monomers and DNA inversion. It has been proposed that the DNA region to which the beta recombinase binds to mediate recombination includes a promoter from which orf alpha and the beta gene are transcribed. We have determined the sites at which transcription of the orf alpha and the beta gene initiates in vitro and we have demonstrated that highly purified beta recombinase acts as a repressor of its own synthesis. The promoters are located within the beta recombinase binding site, which we have defined previously. The binding of the beta recombinase to its target site does not seem to exclude RNA polymerase from the promoter, despite the overlapping of their binding sites. Therefore, it is likely that the beta recombinase does not repress transcription by a mere steric hindrance on RNA polymerase binding.

Mutations that affect regulation of the korB gene of Streptomyces lividans plasmid plJ101 alter plasmid transmission

Using the catechol dehydrogenase gene as a reporter, we isolated random mutations in the plJ101 korB gene operator/promoter (OP) region that affect korB expression and regulation. We mapped these mutations to inverted repeat sequences within the promoter and studied their effects on binding of the KorB repressor protein to the OP, on expression of the korB gene, and on plasmid transmission during mating. Additionally, we investigated the biological effects of KorB binding to a locus (sti, for strong incompatibility) adjacent to the korB OP and implicated in plJ101 replication. Our results identify sites that influence the synthesis and autoregulation of KorB; they also show that interaction of KorB with sti affects repression of korB and transmission of plasmids to spores of recipients.