Transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure

Investigation of alcoholic liver disease

In heavy drinkers with clinical evidence of liver disease, routine investigations should exclude the possibility of other chronic liver diseases of non-alcoholic aetiology requiring specific therapy--these include chronic viral hepatitis, autoimmune diseases of the liver, Wilson's disease and genetic haemochromatosis. If abnormalities in liver biochemistry persist despite abstinence, or if the diagnosis of alcoholic liver disease is in doubt, a liver biopsy should be carried out. Studies evaluating the role of liver biopsy in alcoholic liver disease suggest that without histological confirmation the diagnosis will be inaccurate in 10-20% of patients. Serum biochemistry and the currently available imaging modalities have severe limitations in determining the relative contributions of fatty liver, alcoholic hepatitis and cirrhosis to the overall picture in alcoholic liver disease. Histological examination is therefore of additional value in determining the prognosis, which is worst in patients with a combination of alcoholic hepatitis and cirrhosis. There are a number of indices available, based on clinical and laboratory information, for evaluating the short-term prognosis, but these can only be used with accuracy if the histological pattern of damage has initially been evaluated.

Coagulation factor V and VIII/V ratio as predictors of outcome in paracetamol induced fulminant hepatic failure: relation to other prognostic indicators

The value of coagulation factor V and VIII/V levels as prognostic indicators was assessed in 27 patients with fulminant hepatic failure and compared with other predictive indices. Admission factor V levels were significantly reduced in 22 patients with paracetamol induced hepatic failure compared with a healthy control group (median 9.5% v 103%, respectively; p less than 0.001) and with lower values in non-A non-B hepatitis (median 2.7%). Values in the seven patients who died after paracetamol overdose, considered together with the four who underwent liver transplantation (group median 5.1%), were significantly lower than in the 11 who survived (median 11.8%; p less than 0.01). Median admission factor VIII was higher in those who died or received a transplant than in those who survived (298% v 162%; p less than 0.05), with both results higher than in healthy volunteers (median 104%; p less than 0.01) but lower than in non-A non-B hepatitis (median 340%). The ratio of factor VIII/V on admission was less than 30 in all patients who survived paracetamol overdose (median 17) with corresponding values greater than 30 in 10 of 11 of those who died (median 39). A factor V result less than or equal to 10% on admission predicted an adverse outcome in 10 of 11 fatal cases, a 91% sensitivity which was greater than for the previously defined indicator of an arterial blood pH less than 7.30 on admission (sensitivity 82%). Prothrombin time at admission or on day 4 did not usefully predict outcome in our series. Predictive accuracy was 73% and 82% for factor V and admission acidosis respectively and 95% for factor V in conjunction with admission coma grade III or IV and factor VIII (ratio > 30). These criteria may be useful in selecting patients with paracetamol induced fulminant hepatic failure for transplantation.