High-dose meropenem in meningitis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Treatment ofPseudomonas aeruginosainfection in critically ill patients

Critically ill patients are on the increase in the present clinical setting. Aging of our population and increasingly aggressive medical and therapeutic interventions, including implanted foreign bodies, organ transplantation and advances in the chemotherapy of malignant diseases, have created a cohort of particularly vulnerable patients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the leading gram-negative organisms associated with nosocomial infections. This organism is frequently feared because it causes severe hospital-acquired infections, especially in immunocompromised hosts, and is often antibiotic resistant, complicating the choice of therapy. The epidemiology, microbiology, mechanisms of resistance and currently available and future treatment options for the most relevant infections caused by P. aeruginosa are reviewed.

Intra-abdominal infections: considerations for the use of the carbapenems

Intra-abdominal infection remains a common and frequently severe medical condition, carrying with it significant morbidity and mortality. These infections are almost always polymicrobial in nature as they are caused by mixed aerobic/anaerobic intestinal flora. Despite substantial improvements in both the medical and surgical management of these infections over the last several decades, there remains an opportunity to further enhance the utilization of adjunctive antibiotic therapy. As a result of the epidemiology and the current resistance profile of the infecting pathogens, the carbapenems represent a class of antibiotics that are considered appropriate for the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. This review will discuss the classification and microbiology of these infections and emerging resistance in the pathogens of interest. The review also and focuses on the role of the carbapenems in the management of the constellation of diseases known as intra-abdominal infection.

Evaluation of antimicrobial regimens in a guinea-pig model of meningitis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

To compare the efficacy of meropenem, ceftazidime, tobramycin and ceftazidime+tobramycin in a guinea-pig model of P. aeruginosa meningitis. After anesthesia, the atlanto-occipital membrane was punctured with a butterfly needle and 100 microl of a solution containing 10(6)CFU/ml of P. aeruginosa were injected directly into the cisterna magna. Four h later, therapy was initiated with saline or antibiotics given im for 48 h in doses that obtained CSF levels as in human meningitis: ceftazidime 200 mg/kg/8h, meropenem 200 mg/kg/8h, tobramycin 30 mg/kg/24h. Tobramycin was also given intracisternally. Animals were sacrificed at different time points. CSF and blood samples were collected and a meningeal swab was performed. Four hours after inoculation, bacterial concentration in CSF was 4 to 5log10CFU and mean WBC was 16,000/-l. All control animals died in 24h with a 12% increase in cerebral edema. All blood-cultures were negative. Ceftazidime, ceftazidime+tobramycin and meropenem reduced the CSF bacterial concentration at 8h by 2.5log10. At 48 h all CSF cultures were sterile but meningeal swab cultures remained positive in 30%. Our results suggest that meropenem may be at least as effective as ceftazidime and that the addition of tobramycin to ceftazidime may improve its efficacy.

Antimicrobial agents in the treatment of bacterial meningitis

The use of antimicrobial agents in the treatment of acute bacterial meningitis has undergone significant changes in recent years. There is a wealth of in vitro and animal model data that support the use of the specific antimicrobial agents in the treatment of bacterial meningitis, although not all regimens have been evaluated in clinical trials. Recent investigations have focused on expanding the potential antimicrobial formulary to manage patients with bacterial meningitis effectively in this era of increasing antimicrobial resistance. Despite these advances, the morbidity and mortality of acute bacterial meningitis remain unacceptably high. The use of adjunctive dexamethasone has been shown to improve morbidity and mortality in patients with bacterial meningitis, although concerns have been raised that dexamethasone may reduce penetration of certain antimicrobial agents into cerebrospinal fluid.

Meropenem Administered as a Prolonged Infusion to Treat Serious Gram-Negative Central Nervous System Infections

The treatment of gram-negative infection of the central nervous system (CNS) presents a clinical challenge due to antibiotic resistance and difficulties with penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Two patients with gram-negative CNS infections were treated successfully with high-dose, prolonged infusions of meropenem. The CSF meropenem concentrations exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration of the pathogen for virtually the entire dosing interval in both cases. Our experience demonstrates that dosage modification to maximize pharmacodynamic targets and bactericidal activity may be practically applied to optimize antibiotic treatment for difficult-to-treat CNS infections.

Treatment of Bacterial Meningitis

The therapeutic approach to acute bacterial meningitis has changed in recent years as a result of changes in in vitro susceptibility of many meningeal pathogens to previously standard antimicrobial therapy. Given the emergence of strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae that are resistant to penicillin and the cephalosporins, the combination of vancomycin plus a third-generation cephalosporin is recommended as empiric therapy for suspected or proven pneumococcal meningitis, pending results of in vitro susceptibility testing. Strains of Neisseria meningitidis with reduced susceptibility to penicillin have also been described, although most patients with these resistant strains have recovered with standard penicillin therapy. Although the third-generation cephalosporins have greatly improved outcome in patients with meningitis caused by aerobic gram-negative bacilli, many organisms in this group are now resistant to these drugs; the carbapenems and fluoroquinolones may be effective alternative agents and have been successfully used in small case series. Further surveillance of the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of meningeal pathogens is critical for future recommendations in the treatment of bacterial meningitis.

Antibacterial agents in infections of the central nervous system

Experimental animal models have provided information applicable to antimicrobial therapy of infections of the central nervous system. The efficacy of an antimicrobial agent in the therapy of bacterial meningitis depends on its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, its activity in purulent cerebrospinal fluid, and a demonstration of rapid bactericidal activity against the offending pathogen. The recent emergence of resistant pathogens is challenging the therapy for bacterial meningitis. Various strategies for treating resistant pathogens have been evaluated in experimental animal models. Encouraging results have led to clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of newer agents, alone or in combination with standard regimens.

Carbapenems and monobactams: imipenem, meropenem, and aztreonam

Imipenem and meropenem, members of the carbapenem class of beta-lactam antibiotics, are among the most broadly active antibiotics available for systemic use in humans. They are active against streptococci, methicillin-sensitive staphylococci, Neisseria, Haemophilus, anaerobes, and the common aerobic gram-negative nosocomial pathogens including Pseudomonas. Resistance to imipenem and meropenem may emerge during treatment of P. aeruginosa infections, as has occurred with other beta-lactam agents; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is typically resistant to both imipenem and meropenem. Like the penicillins, the carbapenems have inhibitory activity against enterococci. In general, the in vitro activity of imipenem against aerobic gram-positive cocci is somewhat greater than that of meropenem, whereas the in vitro activity of meropenem against aerobic gram-negative bacilli is somewhat greater than that of imipenem. Daily dosages may range from 0.5 to 1 g every 6 to 8 hours in patients with normal renal function; the daily dose of meropenem, however, can be safely increased to 6 g. Infusion-related nausea and vomiting, as well as seizures, which have been the main toxic effects of imipenem, occur no more frequently during treatment with meropenem than during treatment with other beta-lactam antibiotics. The carbapenems should be considered for treatment of mixed bacterial infections and aerobic gram-negative bacteria that are not susceptible to other beta-lactam agents. Indiscriminate use of these drugs will promote resistance to them. Aztreonam, the first marketed monobactam, has activity against most aerobic gram-negative bacilli including P. aeruginosa. The drug is not nephrotoxic, is weakly immunogenic, and has not been associated with disorders of coagulation. Aztreonam may be administered intramuscularly or intravenously; the primary route of elimination is urinary excretion. In patients with normal renal function, the recommended dosing interval is every 8 hours. Patients with renal impairment require dosage adjustment. Aztreonam is used primarily as an alternative to aminoglycosides and for the treatment of aerobic gram-negative infections. It is often used in combination therapy for mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. Approved indications for its use include infections of the urinary tract or lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal and gynecologic infections, septicemia, and cutaneous infections caused by susceptible organisms. Concurrent initial therapy with other antimicrobial agents is recommended before the causative organism has been determined in patients who are seriously ill or at risk for gram-positive or anaerobic infection.

Disposition and elimination of meropenem in cerebrospinal fluid of hydrocephalic patients with external ventriculostomy

The broad antibacterial spectrum and the low incidence of seizures in meropenem-treated patients qualifies meropenem for therapy of bacterial meningitis. The present study evaluates concentrations in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the absence of pronounced meningeal inflammation. Patients with occlusive hydrocephalus caused by cerebrovascular diseases, who had undergone external ventriculostomy (n = 10, age range 48 to 75 years), received 2 g of meropenem intravenously over 30 min. Serum and CSF were drawn repeatedly and analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy. Pharmacokinetics were determined by noncompartmental analysis. Maximum concentrations in serum were 84.7 +/- 23.7 microg/ml. A CSF maximum (CmaxCSF) of 0.63 +/- 0.50 microg/ml (mean +/- standard deviation) was observed 4.1 +/- 2.6 h after the end of the infusion. CmaxCSF and the area under the curve for CSF (AUCCSF) depended on the AUC for serum (AUCS), the CSF-to-serum albumin ratio, and the CSF leukocyte count. Elimination from CSF was considerably slower than from serum (half-life at beta phase [t1/2beta] of 7.36 +/- 2.89 h in CSF versus t1/2beta of 1.69 +/- 0.60 h in serum). The AUCCSF/AUCS ratio for meropenem, as a measure of overall CSF penetration, was 0.047 +/- 0.022. The AUCCSF/AUCS ratio for meropenem was similar to that for other beta-lactam antibiotics with a low binding to serum proteins. The concentration maxima of meropenem in ventricular CSF observed in this study are high enough to kill fully susceptible pathogens. They may not be sufficient to kill bacteria with a reduced sensitivity to carbapenems, although clinical success has been reported for patients with meningitis caused by penicillin-resistant pneumococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Empiric treatment of hospital-acquired lower respiratory tract infections with meropenem or ceftazidime with tobramycin: a randomized study. Meropenem Lower Respiratory Infection Group

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous empiric treatment with meropenem compared with ceftazidime-tobramycin in patients with hospital-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonblind, randomized trial.

SETTING

Multicenter trial conducted at 22 centers.

PATIENTS

Two hundred eleven patients were enrolled and 121 were evaluable for the analysis of both clinical and bacteriologic efficacy.

INTERVENTIONS

One hundred four patients were randomized to receive intravenous meropenem (1000 mg) every 8 hrs and 107 patients were randomized to receive intravenous ceftazidime (2000 mg) plus tobramycin (1 mg/kg) every 8 hrs. Sixty-three meropenem-treated patients and 58 ceftazidime-tobramycin-treated patients were eligible for the analysis of clinical and bacteriologic efficacy. In the ceftazidime-tobramycin group, 32 (55%) evaluable patients received more than six doses of tobramycin, 24 (41%) received six doses or fewer, and two (3%) did not receive any tobramycin.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The analysis of efficacy was based on the clinical and bacteriologic responses at the end of treatment. Satisfactory clinical responses occurred in 56 (89%) of 63 of the meropenem-treated patients and in 42 (72%) of 58 of the ceftazidime-tobramycin-treated patients (p = .04). Corresponding bacteriologic response rates were 89% and 67%, respectively (p = .006). The frequency and profile of drug-related adverse events was similar across treatment groups. Seizures were reported in three meropenem-treated patients, but these seizures were considered by the investigator to be unrelated to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Meropenem is well tolerated and more efficacious than the combination of ceftazidime and tobramycin for the initial empiric treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

Randomized comparison of meropenem with cefotaxime for treatment of bacterial meningitis. Meropenem Meningitis Study Group

Broad-spectrum cephalosporins are drugs of choice for the treatment of meningitis in communities which can afford them. The emergence of cephalosporin-resistant pneumococci demands the clinical trial of alternate agents. Carbapenems are active against the bacteria causing meningitis, but the use of imipenem-cilastatin was frustrated by drug-associated seizures. The safety and efficacy of meropenem, a new carbapenem, were compared to those of cefotaxime in a prospective randomized trial of 190 children with bacterial meningitis. Seizures occurred within 24 h before antibiotic therapy in 16 of 98 patients (16%) randomized to receive meropenem and in 6 of 92 patients (7%) randomized to receive cefotaxime. In patients without seizures before therapy, seizures occurred during therapy in 5 of 82 patients (6%) receiving meropenem and in 1 of 86 patients (1%) receiving cefotaxime (95% confidence interval: -0.7%, 10.6%). None were thought to be drug related. Twenty-four meropenem-treated patients (24%) and 11 cefotaxime-treated patients (12%) had neurological abnormalities before therapy. In patients without pretherapy neurological abnormalities, these abnormalities were present after treatment in 4 of 74 meropenem-treated patients (5%) and in 2 of 81 cefotaxime-treated patients (2%) (95% confidence interval: -3.2%, 9.1%). Of 75 meropenem-treated and 64 cefotaxime-treated patients with pretherapy positive cerebrospinal-fluid cultures, 68 and 59, respectively, had repeat lumbar punctures. Bacterial eradication was found to be 100% in both groups. Our data suggest that meropenem may be a carbapenem agent that is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of bacterial meningitis.