The effects of protection by D-Pen2-D-Pen5-enkephalin or D-Ala2-NMePhe4-Gly-ol-enkephalin against beta-chlornaltrexamine in the spinal cord on the antinociception induced by beta-endorphin administered intracerebroventricularly in the mouse

Effects of intrathecal injection of nimodipine, omega-conotoxin GVIA, calmidazolium, and KN-62 on the antinociception induced by cold water swimming stress in the mouse

The present study was designed to determine if spinal calcium channels, calmodulin, and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II were involved in the production of antinociception induced by cold water swimming stress (CWSS). The effects of intrathecal (i.t.) injection of nimodipine, omega-conotoxin GVIA, calmidazolium, or (S)-5-isoquinolinesulfonic acid, 4-[2-[(5-isoquinolinyl-sulfonyl)methylamino]-3-oxo-3-(4-phenyl-1-piperaz inyl)-propyl]phenyl ester (KN-62) on CWSS-induced antinociception were studied in ICR mice. The antinociception was assessed by the tail-flick test. CWSS produced inhibition of the tail-flick response. Various doses of nimodipine (10-40 ng), omega-conotoxin GVIA (5-40 ng), calmidazolium (10-40 ng), or KN-62 (5-40 ng) injected i.t. alone did not show any antinociceptive effect in the tail-flick test. I.t. pretreatment with omega-conotoxin GVIA, calmidazolium, or KN-62 dose dependently attenuated the CWSS-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response. However, i.t. pretreatment with nimodipine did not affect the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by CWSS. Our results suggest that spinal N-type calcium channel, calmodulin and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II may be involved in the production of antinociception induced by CWSS. On the other hand, CWSS-induced antinociception appears not to be mediated via the spinal L-type calcium channel.

Effects of spinally and supraspinally injected 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, cholera toxin, and pertussis toxin on cold water swimming stress-induced antinociception in the mouse

1. The cold (4 degrees C) water swimming stress (CWSS) for 3 min significantly increased the inhibition of the tail-flick response in ICR mice. 2. Pertussis toxin (PTX, 0.05-0.5 microgram) in mice pretreated intrathecally (IT) for 6 days attenuated the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by CWSS. However, intracerebroventricular (ICV) pretreatment with PTX at the same doses did not affect CWSS-induced inhibition of the tail-flick inhibition. 3. 3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX, 0.01-1 ng) in mice pretreated IT for 10 min dose-dependently attenuated the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by CWSS. However, IBMX in mice ICV pretreated ICV at the same doses was not effective in attenuating the CWSS-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response. 4. Neither IT nor ICV pretreatment with cholera toxin (CTX, 0.05-0.5 microgram) for 24 hr affected the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by CWSS. 5. The ICV or IT injection of PTX, CTX, or IBMX did not affect the basal tail-flick response latency. 6. It is concluded that spinal, but not supraspinal, PTX-sensitive G-proteins and cAMP phosphodiesterase may be involved in the antinociception produced by CWSS. However, neither spinal nor supraspinal CTX-sensitive G-proteins appear to be involved in mediating the antinociception induced by CWSS.

Nicotine enhances morphine- and beta-endorphin-induced antinociception at the supraspinal level in the mouse

The effect of nicotine administered supraspinally on antinociception induced by supraspinally administered opioids was examined in ICR mice. The intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of nicotine alone at doses from 1 to 12 micrograms produced only a minimal inhibition of the tail-flick response. Morphine (0.2 micrograms), beta-endorphin (0.1 microgram), D-Pen2.5-enkephalin (DPDPE; 0.5 microgram), trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl) cyclohexyl] benzeocetamide (U50, 488H; 6 micrograms) caused only slight inhibition of the tail-flick response. Nicotine dose dependently enhanced inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.c.v. administered morphine (0.2 microgram) or beta-endorphin (0.1 microgram). The degree of enhancing effect of nicotine toward beta-endorphin-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response was greater than toward morphine-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response. However, i.c.v. administered nicotine at the same doses was not effective in enhancing the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by DPDPE (0.5 microgram) or U50, 488H (6 micrograms) administered i.c.v. Our results suggest that stimulation of supraspinal nicotinic receptors may enhance antinociception induced by morphine (a mu-opioid receptor agonist) and beta-endorphin (an epsilon-opioid receptor agonist) administered supraspinally. However, the activation of nicotinic receptors at supraspinal sites may not be involved in enhancing the antinociception induced by DPDPE (a delta-opioid receptor agonist) or U50, 488H (a kappa-opioid receptor agonist) administered supraspinally.

Involvement of supraspinal and spinal CCK receptors in the modulation of antinociception induced by cold water swimming stress in the mouse

We have previously reported that supraspinally and spinally located CCK receptors are involved in antagonizing supraspinally administered opioid-induced antinociception. Cold water swimming stress (CWSS) produces antinociception and opioid receptors are involved in CWSS-induced antinociception. The present study was designed to determine if supraspinal and spinal CCK receptors were involved in modulating the CWSS- induced antinociception. Antinociception was assessed by the tail-flick test. CWSS caused a profound inhibition of the tail-flick response. Various doses of CCK injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) or intrathecally (i.t.) alone did not show any antinociceptive effect. The i.c.v. or i.t. pretreatment with CCK (0.05-0.5 ng) dose dependently attenuated the CWSS- induced inhibition of the tail-flick response. In addition, i.c.v. pretreatment with lorglumide (0.1-10 pg) but not PD135,158 (1-100 pg) dose dependently reversed CCK's inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by CWSS. However, both lorglumide and PD135,158 injected i.t. reversed the antagonism of CCK against the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by CWSS in a dose-dependent manner. Our results suggest that, at the supraspinal level, CCK(A) but not CCK(B) receptors may be involved in antagonizing the CWSS-induced antinociception. In the spinal cord both CCK(A) and CCK(B) receptors appear to be involved in antagonizing the CWSS-induced antinociception.