Specific protection of different normal tissues

Metabolomics-based predictive biomarkers of radiation injury and countermeasure efficacy: current status and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

There is an urgent need for specific and sensitive bioassays to augment biodosimetric assessments of unwanted and excessive radiation exposures that originate from unexpected nuclear/radiological events, including nuclear accidents, acts of terrorism, or the use of a radiological dispersal device. If sufficiently intense, such ionizing radiation exposures are likely to impact normal metabolic processes within the cells and organs of the body, thus inducing multifaceted biological responses.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the application of metabolomics, an emerging and promising technology based on quantitative and qualitative determinations of small molecules in biological samples for the rapid assessment of an individual's exposure to ionizing radiation. Recent advancements in the analytics of high-resolution chromatography, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatics have led to untargeted (global) and targeted (quantitative phase) approaches to identify biomarkers of radiation injury and countermeasure efficacy. Biomarkers are deemed essential for both assessing the radiation exposure levels and for extrapolative processes involved in determining scaling factors of a given radiation countering medicinal between experimental animals and humans.

EXPERT OPINION

The discipline of metabolomics appears to be highly informative in assessing radiation exposure levels and for identifying biomarkers of radiation injury and countermeasure efficacy.

Repurposing Pharmaceuticals Previously Approved by Regulatory Agencies to Medically Counter Injuries Arising Either Early or Late Following Radiation Exposure

The increasing risks of radiological or nuclear attacks or associated accidents have served to renew interest in developing radiation medical countermeasures. The development of prospective countermeasures and the subsequent gain of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval are invariably time consuming and expensive processes, especially in terms of generating essential human data. Due to the limited resources for drug development and the need for expedited drug approval, drug developers have turned, in part, to the strategy of repurposing agents for which safety and clinical data are already available. Approval of drugs that are already in clinical use for one indication and are being repurposed for another indication is inherently faster and more cost effective than for new agents that lack regulatory approval of any sort. There are four known growth factors which have been repurposed in the recent past as radiomitigators following the FDA Animal Rule: Neupogen, Neulasta, Leukine, and Nplate. These four drugs were in clinic for several decades for other indications and were repurposed. A large number of additional agents approved by various regulatory authorities for given indications are currently under investigation for dual use for acute radiation syndrome or for delayed pathological effects of acute radiation exposure. The process of drug repurposing, however, is not without its own set of challenges and limitations.

Metabolomic studies in tissues of mice treated with amifostine and exposed to gamma-radiation

Although multiple radioprotectors are currently being investigated preclinically for efficacy and safety, few studies have investigated concomitant metabolic changes. This study examines the effects of amifostine on the metabolic profiles in tissues of mice exposed to cobalt-60 total-body gamma-radiation. Global metabolomic and lipidomic changes were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (QTOF-MS) in bone marrow, jejunum, and lung samples of amifostine-treated and saline-treated control mice. Results demonstrate that radiation exposure leads to tissue specific metabolic responses that were corrected in part by treatment with amifostine in a drug-dose dependent manner. Bone marrow exhibited robust responses to radiation and was also highly responsive to protective effects of amifostine, while jejunum and lung showed only modest changes. Treatment with amifostine at 200 mg/kg prior to irradiation seemed to impart maximum survival benefit, while the lower dose of 50 mg/kg offered only limited survival benefit. These findings show that the administration of amifostine causes metabolic shifts that would provide an overall benefit to radiation injury and underscore the utility of metabolomics and lipidomics to determine the underlying physiological mechanisms involved in the radioprotective efficacy of amifostine. This approach may be helpful in identifying biomarkers for radioprotective efficacy of amifostine and other countermeasures under development.

Amifostine inhibited the differentiation of RAW264.7 cells into osteoclasts by reducing the production of ROS under 2 Gy radiation

Patients with malignant tumors receive radiotherapy, and radiation could harm the skeletal system, leading to radiation-induced osteoporosis. A major cause of this phenomenon is the activation of osteoclasts by radiotherapy. In this study, we studied whether amifostine (AMI) could affect the differentiation of osteoclast precursor cells (RAW264.7 cells) into osteoclasts under 2 gray (Gy) radiation. Four groups were used in the experiment: (a) 0 Gy (no radiation); (b) 0 Gy + AMI; (c) 2 Gy radiation; and (d) 2 Gy radiation + AMI. After radiation, a proliferation assay, a reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay, a comet assay, Trap staining, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and an animal study to test the effect of AMI on osteoclast precursor cells under 2 Gy radiation were conducted. Cell proliferation was significantly inhibited by AMI (P < .05). In addition, 2 Gy radiation led to longer "comet tails", high level of ROS, and more Trap-positive cells in vivo and in vitro (P < .05). Radiation improved the expression of CSTK, NFAT, and Rankl/OPG gene (P < .05), as well as Trap-5b levels in the serum, and decreased bone mineral density. AMI inhibited the differentiation of RAW264.7 cells, shortened the tail moment length of comets, and decreased the level of ROS induced by radiation. The expression of NFAT, CTSK, and Rankl/OPG was decreased by AMI at the detection time point in radiation groups (P < .05). AMI inhibits the maturation and differentiation of osteoclasts under radiation conditions by reducing DNA damage and ROS induced by radiation, thereby reducing the adverse effects of radiation in the skeletal system, indicating that AMI might be used to treat osteoradionecrosis.

Amifostine Suppresses the Side Effects of Radiation on BMSCs by Promoting Cell Proliferation and Reducing ROS Production

This study is aimed at investigating the effect of amifostine (AMI) on rat bone marrow stromal stem cells (BMSCs) exposed to 2 Gy radiation. The BMSCs were divided into four groups, namely, group A that received 0 Gy radiation, group B that received 0 Gy radiation and AMI, group C that received 2 Gy radiation, and group D that received 2 Gy radiation and AMI. The proliferation, apoptosis, and distribution of BMSCs in the cell cycle, along with their osteogenesis ability, adipogenesis ability, and ROS production, were subsequently examined. The levels of ALP, PPARγ, P53, and TNFα were determined by Western blotting. The results demonstrated that the proliferation of BMSCs and the levels of ALP in group C were much lower than those in group A. The production of ROS and levels of PPARγ, P53, and TNFα in the group that received 2 Gy radiation were much higher than those in group A. Furthermore, the production of ROS and the levels of PPARγ, P53, and TNFα were much lower in group D than in group C. Additionally, the levels of ALP and extent of cell proliferation were much higher in group D than in group C. The results demonstrated the potential of AMI in reducing the side effects of radiation in BMSCs and in treatment of bone diseases caused by radiation.

THE POTENTIATION OF THE RADIOPROTECTIVE EFFICACY OF TWO MEDICAL COUNTERMEASURES, GAMMA-TOCOTRIENOL AND AMIFOSTINE, BY A COMBINATION PROPHYLACTIC MODALITY

This study was designed to evaluate the possible potentiation of survival protection afforded by relatively low-dose amifostine prophylaxis against total body irradiation in combination with a protective, less toxic agent, gamma-tocotrienol (GT3). Mice were administered amifostine and/or GT3, then exposed to 9.2 Gy ⁶⁰Co γ-irradiation and monitored for survival for 30 days. To investigate cytokine stimulation, mice were administered amifostine or GT3; serum samples were collected and analyzed for cytokines. Survival studies show single treatments of GT3 or amifostine significantly improved survival, compared to the vehicle, and combination treatments resulted in significantly higher survival compared to single treatments. In vivo studies with GT3 confirmed prior work indicating GT3 induces granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). This approach, the prophylactic combination of amifostine and GT3, which act through different mechanisms, shows promise and should be investigated further as a potential countermeasure for acute radiation syndrome.

γ-Tocotrienol as a Promising Countermeasure for Acute Radiation Syndrome: Current Status

The hazard of ionizing radiation exposure due to nuclear accidents or terrorist attacks is ever increasing. Despite decades of research, still, there is a shortage of non-toxic, safe and effective medical countermeasures for radiological and nuclear emergency. To date, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) has approved only two growth factors, Neupogen (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), filgrastim) and Neulasta (PEGylated G-CSF, pegfilgrastim) for the treatment of hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS) following the Animal Efficacy Rule. Promising radioprotective efficacy results of γ-tocotrienol (GT3; a member of the vitamin E family) in the mouse model encouraged its further evaluation in the nonhuman primate (NHP) model. These studies demonstrated that GT3 significantly aided the recovery of radiation-induced neutropenia and thrombocytopenia compared to the vehicle controls; these results particularly significant after exposure to 5.8 or 6.5 Gray (Gy) whole body γ-irradiation. The stimulatory effect of GT3 on neutrophils and thrombocytes (platelets) was directly and positively correlated with dose; a 75 mg/kg dose was more effective compared to 37.5 mg/kg. GT3 was also effective against 6.5 Gy whole body γ-irradiation for improving neutrophils and thrombocytes. Moreover, a single administration of GT3 without any supportive care was equivalent, in terms of improving hematopoietic recovery, to multiple doses of Neupogen and two doses of Neulasta with full supportive care (including blood products) in the NHP model. GT3 may serve as an ultimate radioprotector for use in humans, particularly for military personnel and first responders. In brief, GT3 is a promising radiation countermeasure that ought to be further developed for U.S. FDA approval for the ARS indication.

Medical Countermeasures for Radiation Exposure and Related Injuries: Characterization of Medicines, FDA-Approval Status and Inclusion into the Strategic National Stockpile

World events over the past decade have highlighted the threat of nuclear terrorism as well as an urgent need to develop radiation countermeasures for acute radiation exposures and subsequent bodily injuries. An increased probability of radiological or nuclear incidents due to detonation of nuclear weapons by terrorists, sabotage of nuclear facilities, dispersal and exposure to radioactive materials, and accidents provides the basis for such enhanced radiation exposure risks for civilian populations. Although the search for suitable radiation countermeasures for radiation-associated injuries was initiated more than half a century ago, no safe and effective radiation countermeasure for the most severe of these injuries, namely acute radiation syndrome (ARS), has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The dearth of FDA-approved radiation countermeasures has prompted intensified research for a new generation of radiation countermeasures. In this communication, the authors have listed and reviewed the status of radiation countermeasures that are currently available for use, or those that might be used for exceptional nuclear/radiological contingencies, plus a limited few medicines that show early promise but still remain experimental in nature and unauthorized for human use by the FDA.

Radiation countermeasure agents: an update (2011-2014)

INTRODUCTION

Despite significant scientific advances over the past 60 years towards the development of a safe, nontoxic and effective radiation countermeasure for the acute radiation syndrome (ARS), no drug has been approved by the US FDA. A radiation countermeasure to protect the population at large from the effects of lethal radiation exposure remains a significant unmet medical need of the US citizenry and, thus, has been recognized as a high priority area by the government.

AREA COVERED

This article reviews relevant publications and patents for recent developments and progress for potential ARS treatments in the area of radiation countermeasures. Emphasis is placed on the advanced development of existing agents since 2011 and new agents identified as radiation countermeasure for ARS during this period.

EXPERT OPINION

A number of promising radiation countermeasures are currently under development, seven of which have received US FDA investigational new drug status for clinical investigation. Four of these agents, CBLB502, Ex-RAD, HemaMax and OrbeShield, are progressing with large animal studies and clinical trials. G-CSF has high potential and well-documented therapeutic effects in countering myelosuppression and may receive full licensing approval by the US FDA in the future.

Amifostine for salivary glands in high-dose radioactive iodine treated differentiated thyroid cancer

BACKGROUND

Radioactive iodine treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer possibly results in xerostomia. Amifostine has been used to prevent the effects of irradiation to salivary glands. To date, the effects of amifostine on salivary glands in radioactive iodine treated differentiated thyroid cancer remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of amifostine on salivary glands in high-dose radioactive iodine treated differentiated thyroid cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were obtained from computerized searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and paper collections of conferences held in Chinese.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled clinical trials and quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials comparing the effects of amifostine on salivary glands after radioactive iodine treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer with placebo and a duration of follow up of at least three months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Two trials with 130 patients (67 and 63 patients randomised to intervention versus control) were included. Both studies had a low risk of bias. Amifostine versus placebo showed no statistically significant differences in the incidence of xerostomia (130 patients, two studies), the decrease of scintigraphically measured uptake of technetium-99m by salivary or submandibular glands at twelve months (80 patients, one study), and the reduction of blood pressure (130 patients, two studies). Two patients in one study collapsed after initiation of amifostine therapy and had to be treated by withdrawing the infusion and volume substitution. Both patients recovered without sequelae. Meta-analysis was not performed on the function of salivary glands measured by technetium-99m scintigraphy at three months after high dose radioactive iodine treatment due to the highly inconsistent findings across studies (I(2) statistic 99%). None of the included trials investigated death from any cause, morbidity, health-related quality of life or costs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Results from two randomised controlled clinical trials suggest that the amifostine has no significant radioprotective effects on salivary glands in high-dose radioactive iodine treated differentiated thyroid cancer patients. Moreover, no health-related quality of life and other patient-oriented outcomes were evaluated in the two included trials. Randomised controlled clinical trials with low risk of bias investigating patient-oriented outcomes are needed to guide treatment choice.

Amifostine in clinical oncology: current use and future applications

Amifostine (Ethyol), an inorganic thiophosphate, is a selective broad-spectrum cytoprotector of normal tissues that provides cytoprotection against ionizing radiation and chemotherapeutic agents, thus preserving the efficacy of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. This review summarizes the preclinical data and clinical experience with amifostine, and provides insight into future clinical directions. Amifostine, an inactive pro-drug, is transformed to an active thiol after dephosphorylation by alkaline phosphatase found in the normal endothelium. The absence of alkaline phosphatase in the tumoral endothelium and stromal components, and the hypovascularity and acidity of the tumor environment, may explain its cytoprotective selectivity. The cytoprotective mechanism of amifostine is complicated, involving free radical scavenging, DNA protection and repair acceleration, and induction of cellular hypoxia. Intravenous administration of amifostine 740-900 mg/m(2) before chemotherapy and 250-350 mg/m(2) before each radiotherapy fraction are widely used regimens. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of amifostine as a cytoprotector for cisplatin chemotherapy and for radiation-induced xerostomia. Ongoing trials are being conducted to determine the efficacy of amifostine in reducing radiation-induced mucositis and other toxicities. Novel schedules and routes of administration are under investigation, and may further simplify the use of amifostine and considerably broaden its applications.

Cytoprotection by WR-1065, the active form of amifostine, is independent of p53 status in human malignant glioma cell lines

PURPOSE

This study tests the hypothesis that p53 status, i.e. wild type versus mutant form, is a determinant in radiation protection of human glioma cells by WR-1065, the active thiol form of amifostine (WR-2721).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cytoprotective effectiveness of WR-1065 when present during irradiation was investigated using four well-characterized human glioma cell lines. The p53 positive lines were U87 and D54, and the mutant p53 lines were U251 (mutant at codon 273; CGT/CAT; Arg/His) and A172 (mutant at codon 242; TGC/TTC; Cys/Phe). Treatment conditions included exposure of cells to a range of doses (0-10Gy) alone or in combination with 4mM of WR-1065 added 30min prior to irradiation. Resultant survival curves were obtained using a clonogenic assay and protection factors, the ratio of terminal slopes +/- WR-1065, were determined for each glioma cell line.

RESULTS

The Do values of wild-type U87 and D54 were 1.62 and 1.89Gy while those of p53 mutants U251 and A172 were 1.64 and 1.68 Gy, respectively. Protection factors were determined to be 2.4 and 1.9 for U87 and D54, and 2.6 and 2.8 for U251 and A172, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The p53 status of the four human glioma cell lines tested was not a predictor for either their relative sensitivity to ionizing radiation or ability to be protected by WR-1065. It is concluded that cytoprotection exhibited by cells exposed to WR-1065 during irradiation is independent of their p53 status.

Salivary gland protection by S-2-(3-aminopropylamino)-ethylphosphorothioic acid (amifostine) in high-dose radioiodine treatment: results obtained in a rabbit animal model and in a double-blind multi-arm trial

Since differentiated thyroid cancer has an excellent prognosis, reduction of long-term side effects of high-dose radioiodine treatment (HD-RIT), i.e. salivary gland impairment is important. Thus, radioprotective effects of amifostine were studied. Salivary gland function was quantified by scintigraphy both in rabbits and patients. Fifteen rabbits were studied prior to and up to 6 months after HD-RIT applying 2 GBq 131I. Ten animals received 200 mg/kg amifostine prior to HD-RIT, and five served as controls. Animals were examined histopathologically. Fifty patients with differentiated thyroid cancer were evaluated prospectively prior to and 3 months after HD-RIT with either 3 or 6 GBq 131I in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Twenty-five patients were treated with 500 mg/m2 amifostine intravenously prior to HD-RIT, and 25 patients receiving physiological saline solution served as controls. Complete ablation of the thyroid was achieved in all rabbits four weeks after HD-RIT. In control rabbits 6 months after HD-RIT parenchymal function was reduced significantly (p < 0.0001) by 75.3 +/- 5.3% and 53.6 +/- 17.4% in parotid and submandibular glands, respectively. In contrast, in amifostine-treated rabbits parenchymal function was not significantly reduced. Histopathologically, marked lipomatosis was observed in control animals but was negligible in amifostine-treated animals. In control patients, salivary gland function was significantly (p < 0.001) reduced by 40.2 +/- 14.1% and 39.9 +/- 15.3% in parotid and submandibular glands, respectively, three months after HD-RIT, and 11 patients developed xerostomia. In 25 amifostine-treated patients, salivary gland function was not significantly reduced (p = 0.691), and xerostomia did not occur. Thus, parenchymal damage in salivary glands induced by high-dose radioiodine therapy can be reduced significantly by amifostine. This may improve quality of life of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Radioprotection of salivary glands by S-2-(3-aminopropylamino)-ethylphosphorothioic (amifostine) obtained in a rabbit animal model

BACKGROUND

Impairment of salivary gland function following high-dose radioiodine treatment (HDRIT) is a well-recognized side effect of the treatment. Because differentiated thyroid cancer has an excellent prognosis, reduction of long-term side-effects is mandatory. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the radioprotective effect of amifostine in a rabbit animal model.

METHODS

Salivary gland scintigraphy was performed in a total of 16 New Zealand White rabbits. Uptake of 99-Tc-pertechnetate was calculated in percentage of injected activity as a quantitative measure of both salivary gland and thyroid function. Reproducibility of salivary gland scintigraphy was evaluated in one rabbit without any intervention. Fifteen rabbits were studied prior to and up to 6 months after high-dose radioiodine treatment applying 2 GBq 131I. Ten animals received 200 mg/kg amifostine prior to high-dose radioiodine therapy, and 5 served as controls. Salivary glands were examined histopathologically.

RESULTS

Variation coefficient of parenchymal function was less than 3.8% in salivary glands. Prior to HDRIT, thyroid uptake was 0.417+/-0.373% and 0.421+/-0.241% in control and amifostine-treated rabbits, respectively. Four weeks after HDRIT, complete ablation of the thyroid was achieved in both groups. Prior to HDRIT, uptake of 99mTc-pertechnetate in salivary glands of five control rabbits was not significantly different from ten amifostine-treated rabbits. In control rabbits 6 months after HDRIT, parenchymal function was reduced significantly (p < 0.0001) by 75.3+/-5.3% and 53.6+/-17.4% in parotid and submandibular glands, respectively. In contrast, in amifostine-treated rabbits, parenchymal function was reduced by 10.6+/-3.4% and 6.5+/-4.3% (p > 0.05) in parotid and submandibular glands, respectively. Histopathologically, marked lipomatosis was observed in control animals but was negligible in amifostine-treated animals.

CONCLUSION

Parenchymal damage in salivary glands induced by high-dose radioiodine treatment can be significantly reduced by amifostine in this rabbit animal model. This corresponds to data obtained in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Salivary gland protection by amifostine in high-dose radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer

BACKGROUND

Salivary gland impairment following high-dose radioiodine treatment is a well-recognized side effect, in general caused by free radicals. Therefore, it seemed promising to evaluate the radioprotective effect of the radical scavenger amifostine in patients receiving high-dose radioiodine therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Quantitative salivary gland scintigraphy using 100 to 120 MBq Tc-99m-pertechnetate was performed in 17 patients with differentiated thyroid cancer prior to and 3 months after radioiodine treatment with 6 GBq I-131. Eight patients were treated with 500 mg/m2 amifostine prior to high-dose radioiodine treatment and compared retrospectively with 9 control patients. Xerostomia was graded according to WHO criteria.

RESULTS

In 9 control patients high-dose radioiodine treatment significantly (p < 0.01) reduced Tc-99m-pertechnetate uptake by 35.4 +/- 22.0% and 31.7 +/- 21.1% in parotid and submandibular glands, respectively. Of these 9 patients, 3 exhibited xerostomia Grade I (WHO). In contrast, in 8 amifostine-treated patients, there was no significant (p = 0.878) decrease in parenchymal function following high-dose radioiodine treatment, and xerostomia did not occur in any of them.

CONCLUSION

Parenchymal damage in salivary glands induced by high-dose radioiodine treatment can be reduced significantly by amifostine. This may help to increase patients' quality of life in differentiated thyroid cancer.

Toxicity, biodistribution and radioprotective capacity of L-homocysteine thiolactone in CNS tissues and tumors in rodents: comparison with prior results with phosphorothioates

L-Homocysteine thiolactone (L-HCTL) was evaluated for its potential as an intravenously-administered central nervous system (CNS) radioprotector in C3H mice and F344 rats. Toxicity assessments in the mouse yielded a LD50 of 297 mg/kg and in the rat 389 mg/kg. Biodistribution studies in tumor-bearing mice showed that brain specimens contained more label at 10 min than the tumors but less at 30 or 60 min. Brain uptake relative to the tumors, the brain/tumor ratio, ranged between 0.5 and 3.3. The cervical spinal cord of non-tumor-bearing rats was irradiated with 32 Gy 137Cs with or without prior treatment with L-HCTL following which the time to forelimb or hindlimb paralysis was measured to determine the relative protective factors (RPFs) for this radiation dose. For forelimb paralysis the RPF was 1.9 (+/- 1.0, SD) and for hindlimb it was 2.0 (+/- 1.1, SD). 36B-10 glioma cells irradiated in vitro with or without L-HCTL and assayed for colony forming capacity demonstrated a dose modifying factor (DMF) of only 1.15 (+/- 0.16, SE). Rats bearing intracerebral 36B-10 glioma received 137Cs irradiation with or without L-HCTL after which the tumors were similarly assayed in vitro. From this the glioma DMF was 1.2 (+/- 0.30, SE). Compared to prior results with phosphorothioates our data show that the toxicity of L-HCTL is roughly the same as WR2721, WR77913 and WR3689 and that it distributes at higher levels in the CNS after systemic administration. L-HCTL may well equal these phosphorothioates at protecting normal CNS tissue without requiring administration directly into the cerebrospinal fluid-containing spaces and it does not protect the 36B-10 glioma.

Radiation and chemotherapy sensitizers and protectors

Radiosensitizers and radioprotectors are part of the chemical modifier approach to cancer therapy whereby the state of the tumor cells and/or normal tissues are modified such that a therapeutic gain is achieved using conventional radiation or chemotherapy. Radiosensitization can be achieved by the use of oxygen-mimetic compounds, agents that alter DNA sensitivity to irradiation, maneuvers that alter DNA repair processes, and manipulation of tissue oxygenation. Standard chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin can be utilized in a manner that optimizes the radiosensitization properties. Protection and sensitization can occur by altering the thiol status of the cell. The chemical modifiers field is both developing novel approaches to cancer treatment and increasing the understanding of basic cancer biology.