Growth hormone response to clonidine in neuroleptic-free patients with multidagnostically defined schizophrenia

Competing definitions of schizophrenia: what can be learned from polydiagnostic studies?

The contemporary diagnoses of schizophrenia (sz)-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition(DSM-IV) and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision(ICD-10)-are widely considered as important scientific achievements. However, these algorithms were not a product of explicit conceptual analyses and empirical studies but defined through consensus with the purpose of improving reliability. The validity status of current definitions and of their predecessors remains unclear. The so-called "polydiagnostic approach" applies different definitions of a disorder to the same patient sample in order to compare these definitions on potential validity indicators. We reviewed 92 polydiagnostic sz studies published since the early 1970s. Different sz definitions show a considerable variation concerning frequency, concordance, reliability, outcome, and other validity measures. The DSM-IV and the ICD-10 show moderate reliability but both definitions appear weak in terms of concurrent validity, eg, with respect to an aggregation of a priori important features. The first-rank symptoms of Schneider are not associated with family history of sz or with prediction of poor outcome. The introduction of long duration criteria and exclusion of affective syndromes tend to restrict the diagnosis to chronic stable patients. Patients fulfilling the majority of definitions (core sz patients) do not seem to constitute a strongly valid subgroup but rather a severely ill subgroup. Paradoxically, it seems that a century after the introduction of the sz concept, research is still badly needed, concerning conceptual and construct validity of sz, its essential psychopathological features, and phenotypic boundaries.

Psychoneuroendocrinology of schizophrenia

The study of psychoneuroendocrinology of schizophrenia has yielded an extensive but inconclusive body of data. Investigations to date have been limited by several factors, including the confounding effects of neuroleptic drugs, methodological limitations, and lack of appreciation for the heterogeneity of the illness. Previously, the focus of research has been on the measurement of anterior pituitary hormones, guided by the assumptions that these hormones are regulated by the central nervous system (CNS) to a significant degree and that the unique anatomic relationship of the pituitary gland to the hypothalamus and the CNS is potentially relevant. Patients with schizophrenia do appear to have distinct endocrinologic profiles. However, although the hormonal differences between patients with schizophrenia and the general population appear to be subtle in magnitude. Nonetheless, investigation, and the exploration of the possible effect of gonadal and posterior pituitary hormones merits particular attention.