The immune response of a marine teleost, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, (winter flounder) to the protozoan parasite Glugea stephani

Immunity to gastrointestinal microparasites of fish

Fish intestinal parasites cause direct mortalities and also morbidity, poor growth, higher susceptibility to opportunistic pathogens and lower resistance to stress. This review is focused on microscopic parasites (Protozoa and Metazoa) that invade the gastrointestinal tract of fish. Intracellular parasites (mainly Microsporidia and Apicomplexa) evoke almost no host immune reaction while they are concealed in the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments, and can even use fish cells (macrophages) as Trojan horses to spread in the host. Inflammatory reaction only appears when the parasite bursts infected cells. Immunity against extracellular parasites is depicted for the myxozoans Ceratonova shasta and Enteromyxum spp. The cellular and humoral innate responses and the production of antibodies are crucial for resolving some of these myxozoonoses, but an excessive inflammatory reaction (concerted by cytokines) can become a fatal pathophysiological consequence. The local immune response plays a key role, with numerous genes more strongly regulated in the intestine than at lymphohaematopoietic organs.

Effect of Tetramicra brevifilum (Microspora) infection on respiratory-burst responses of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) phagocytes

In vitro assays were performed to investigate microsporidian-induced intracellular and extracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by peritoneal-exudate adherent (PEA) cells from turbot. ROS production was quantified using the fluorescent reagents OxyBURST Green H2HFF BSA (extracellular) and OxyBURST Green H2DCFDA succinimidyl ester (intracellular). Five days before assay, the cells had been elicited in vivo by intraperitoneal injection of sodium thioglycollate or spores of Tetramicra brevifilum. Elicitation with spores led to a marked increase in the proportion of neutrophils among PEA cells. PEA cells from normal turbot showed considerable extracellular and intracellular ROS production in response to microsporidian spores. By contrast, PEA cells from microsporidian-infected turbot showed considerably reduced extracellular and intracellular ROS production in response to microsporidian spores. Extracellular ROS production was affected by the addition of infected turbot serum to the assay medium, regardless of whether the PEA cells had been obtained from normal or infected fish. The presence of microsporidian-infected turbot serum significantly reduced intracellular ROS production by PEA cells elicited with microsporidian spores. These results suggest that (a) microsporidian spores partially suppress the repiratory-burst response of turbot phagocytes; and (b) infected turbot serum contains substances capable of modulating the respiratory-burst response of turbot phagocytes to microsporidian spores.

The humoral immune response of turbot, Scophthalmus maximus L., to spore-surface antigens of microsporidian parasites

Experiments based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) revealed considerable antigenic homology in turbot between two species of microsporidian, Tetramicra brevifilum (a parasite of the turbot, Scophthalmus maximus) and Glugea caulleryi (a parasite of the lesser sand-eel, Ammodytes tobianus). We next investigated whether G. caulleryi is able to suppress the turbot immune response. Intraperitoneal inoculation of turbot with G. caulleryi spores (whether heat-killed or viable) did not suppress the humoral immune response to injection of G. caulleryi spores plus adjuvant 15 days later; in fact, specific serum antibody levels (as revealed by ELISA) reached maximum levels by about Day 30 post re-exposure. Similar results were obtained with cellular enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: 15 days after injection with G. caulleryi spores plus adjuvant, specific antibody secretion rate was higher in turbot which had been pre-exposed to G. caulleryi spores than in turbot which had not been pre-exposed.

Immune response of fish to parasitic protozoa

Epizootic outbreaks of fish diseases are increasingly common as a result of intensive aquaculture, fish farming and sea ranching. Very few drugs are available for treatment or prophylaxis against fish diseases, and development of such compounds is inhibited by different national regulations governing the use of chemicals in fish for human or animal consumption. Alternative approaches are urgently needed. But although the taxonomy and biology of fish parasites have been extensively studied, relatively little is known about protective immunity in fish and the effects of parasites on the piscine immune system. In this article, Patrick Woo discusses the immune responses of fish to parasitic protozoa, showing that vaccination is a viable control strategy, and stressing the need for a coordinated global research programme on fish diseases.