Reduced CD21 (CR2) and CD54 (ICAM-1) expression in MT2 cells with HIV-1 or HIV-2 strains

Impact of TNFalpha, LTalpha, Fc gammaRII and complement receptor on HIV-1 trapping in lymphoid tissue from HIV-infected patients

OBJECTIVES

To investigate HIV trapping mechanisms in patients with acute infection and in asymptomatic individuals prior to and during antiretroviral therapy. To determine the role of complement receptor (CR), Fc gamma receptor II (Fc gammaRII), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), and lymphotoxin alpha (LTalpha) expression in HIV trapping efficiency.

METHODS

Lymphoid tissues from three acutely HIV-infected patients and six asymptomatic, chronically HIV-infected patients collected prior to and during antiretroviral therapy were compared with lymphoid tissues from six HIV-seronegative subjects. HIV, TNFalpha and LTalpha RNA expression was detected and quantified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. CR, Fc gammaRII and HIV p24 antigen were detected and quantified by fluorescence immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The amount of trapped HIV did not differ significantly between patients with acute HIV infection and asymptomatic individuals, and was independent of the presence of CR or Fc gammaRII expression. However, in patients with acute infection, the amount of trapped virus was correlated inversely with the number of HIV-infected cells (P = 0.0092) and with the size of the light zone (P = 0.037). In these patients, the number of TNFalpha-expressing cells was correlated inversely with the amount of trapped virus (P = 0.014) and positively correlated with the size of the light zone in germinal centers (P = 0.041). No correlations were observed between TNFalpha or LTalpha expression and Fc gammaRII or CR expression.

CONCLUSION

This report provides the first evidence that in humans TNFalpha is involved in the development of lymphoid follicles, HIV trapping, and, consequently, in early host immune responses. A model is proposed for early events in patients during acute HIV infection.

Neutralization of HIV type 1 by alloimmune sera derived from polytransfused patients

Antibodies (Abs) against HLA and other cell surface molecules, which HIV-1 acquires during the budding process at the host cell surface, neutralize HIV-1 in vitro. Macaques were protected against infection by SIV grown in human cells after xenoimmunization with human MHC molecules. Besides the immune responses arising against xenogeneic antigens, the highly polymorphic character of the HLA antigens enables the induction of alloresponses after exposure to allogeneic HLA molecules. Since polytransfused (PT) patients develop alloresponses, including humoral anti-HLA responses, we assumed that sera derived from PT patients may neutralize HIV-1. In a model system two PT sera out of a panel of 12 PT and 6 normal control sera neutralized HIV IIIB in vitro. Neutralizing activity of the PT sera was comparable to the efficacy of anti-HIV sera. The neutralizing capacity coincided with strong IgG reactivity against (HIV-infected) cell lines, which were used for virus production, and recognition of cell-free viral particles. Active human complement enhanced HIV neutralization mediated by the sera. Our results suggest an IgG-mediated neutralization based on recognition of allogeneic HLA molecules expressed on the viral surface. A vaccination strategy based on alloimmunization appears conceivable and requires further investigation.

Altered expression of CD4, CD54, CD62L, and CCR5 in primary lymphocytes productively infected with the human immunodeficiency virus

Infection of T cells with HIV-1 induces loss of CD4 and HLA class I from the cell surface. In the present article we have investigated whether changes in expression of other cell surface molecules could be related to HIV infection. To detect HIV-infected cells at the single-cell level, peripheral blood lymphocytes were infected in vitro with HIV-HSA, a reporter virus encoding the murine heat-stable antigen. Expression of HSA on activated primary lymphocytes was an efficient indicator of productive infection. Expression of the majority of the cell surface proteins studied was unaffected by HIV infection (HLA class I, II, CD11a, CD18, CD25, CD27, CD28, CD29, CD30, CD31, CD38, CD44, CD45R0, CD49d, CD57, CD94, CD95, and CXCR4). However, phenotypic changes specific to the productively infected cells were detected. Expression of the CD4 molecule was progressively lost and this was closely associated with loss of CD62L expression, a molecule involved in T cell homing into the lymph nodes. By contrast, T cells productively infected with this T-tropic reporter virus were enriched for CD54, and for CCR5, the main coreceptor for M-tropic viruses. Given the roles of CD62L, CD54, and CCR5 in lymphocyte trafficking, these results suggest that cells productively infected with HIV might have altered homing patterns in vivo.

Complement receptors in HIV infection

The complement system plays an important role in the antimicrobial defense of the organism. Its components recognize a large variety of pathogens and target them for destruction, either directly by formation of a membrane attack complex or indirectly by recruiting phagocytic cells. In addition, it has several functions in cell activation, clearance of immune complexes, control of inflammatory reactions, chemotaxis and autoimmunity. For mediation of all these tasks of the complement system, complement receptor molecules on the cell surface play a key role. Current knowledge on structure, function, signal transduction and associated molecules is briefly summarized here. The role of complement receptors for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated pathogenesis is ambiguous and varies depending on cell type. On the one hand, complement receptors support the infected host to manage HIV infection and to defend itself, at least partially, against viral spreading throughout the organism. Such complement receptor-mediated supporting mechanisms are activation of immune cells and lysis of viral particles and infected host cells. On the other hand, HIV employs complement receptors to intrude more easily into various cell types, to become localized into lymph follicles and to activate viral replication in latently infected cells. This review summarizes the complex interaction of virus and complement receptors in HIV infection for different cell types.

Role of complement in HIV infection

In human plasma, HIV activates the complement system, even in the absence of specific antibodies. Complement activation would, however, be harmful to the virus if the reactions were allowed to go to completion, since their final outcome would be virolysis. This is avoided by complement regulatory molecules, which either are included in the virus membrane upon budding from the infected cells (e.g. DAF/CD55) or are secondarily attached to HIV envelope glycoproteins as in the case of factor H. By using this strategy of interaction with complement components, HIV takes advantage of human complement activation for enhancement of infectivity, for follicular localization, and for broadening its target cell range at the same time that it displays an intrinsic resistance against the lytic action of human complement. This intrinsic resistance to complement-mediated virolysis can be overcome by monoclonal antibodies inhibiting recruitment of human factor H to the virus surface, suggesting a new therapeutic principle.