Mutagenic effects of DNA-containing oncogenic viruses and malignant transformation of mammalian cells

Unboxing the molecular modalities of mutagens in cancer

The etiology of the majority of human cancers is associated with a myriad of environmental causes, including physical, chemical, and biological factors. DNA damage induced by such mutagens is the initial step in the process of carcinogenesis resulting in the accumulation of mutations. Mutational events are considered the major triggers for introducing genetic and epigenetic insults such as DNA crosslinks, single- and double-strand DNA breaks, formation of DNA adducts, mismatched bases, modification in histones, DNA methylation, and microRNA alterations. However, DNA repair mechanisms are devoted to protect the DNA to ensure genetic stability, any aberrations in these calibrated mechanisms provoke cancer occurrence. Comprehensive knowledge of the type of mutagens and carcinogens and the influence of these agents in DNA damage and cancer induction is crucial to develop rational anticancer strategies. This review delineated the molecular mechanism of DNA damage and the repair pathways to provide a deep understanding of the molecular basis of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. A relationship between DNA adduct formation and cancer incidence has also been summarized. The mechanistic basis of inflammatory response and oxidative damage triggered by mutagens in tumorigenesis has also been highlighted. We elucidated the interesting interplay between DNA damage response and immune system mechanisms. We addressed the current understanding of DNA repair targeted therapies and DNA damaging chemotherapeutic agents for cancer treatment and discussed how antiviral agents, anti-inflammatory drugs, and immunotherapeutic agents combined with traditional approaches lay the foundations for future cancer therapies.

The activated human c-Ha-ras-1 oncogene as a mutagen

The induction of gene mutations and chromosome aberrations by plasmid pEJ6.6 carrying the activated c-Ha-ras-1 oncogene from human bladder carcinoma was studied in cultured Chinese hamster cells. Both an increase in the frequency of hypoxanthine-phosphoribosyltransferase-deficient (HPRT-) mutants and chromosome aberrations was observed after pEJ6.6 transfection as compared to control series (pBR322). In order to define whether it is the oncogene which is responsible for the mutagenic effect of pEJ6.6, a derivative of c-Ha-ras-1 carrying a deletion in its coding region was constructed. As shown in all experiments, the frequency of HPRT- mutants after treatment with pEJ6.6 plasmid exceeded that in control dishes treated by pEJ6.6 plasmid with an inactivated oncogene. The effect was rather weak but statistically significant. Thus, the results of experiments carried out show that the mutagenic activity of pEJ6.6 plasmid is chiefly determined by its oncogene. The role of the mutagenic effects of activated oncogenes in malignant transformation is discussed.

Reversion to normal phenotype induced by SV40 in a spontaneously transformed malignant Chinese hamster cell line

By using a selection procedure that excluded the transforming effect of SV40, reversions to several properties of normal phenotype were for the first time obtained in a transformed Chinese hamster cell line after SV40 infection. The value of induction to recovery of contact inhibition was typical for SV40-induced reverse gene mutations. Thirteen of 15 isolated revertant clones were T-antigen positive, thus synthesizing the product of viral oncogene. Therefore, in the majority of clones reversion occurred in spite of the presence of viral transforming protein. Dot hybridization revealed the presence of SV40 DNA in all revertants including those expressing no T antigen. The virus rescued from one T-antigen positive and two negative clones proved to be infectious. Reversion to contact inhibition was followed by reversion as regards serum requirements and growth in soft agar. However, in all cases reversion was partial. Karyologic analysis of revertant clones showed that six clones maintained the hypodiploid karyotype of the parental clone, six revertants were near-tetraploid, and one was near triploid. The possible events underlying the SV40-induced reversions to normal phenotype and the role of virus-induced mutations in viral carcinogenesis are discussed.