Genetic damage in Salmonella typhimurium by near-ultraviolet radiation. Lack of repair by plasmid pKM101

Genotoxicity of singlet oxygen

Singlet oxygen, 1O2 (1 delta g), fulfills essential prerequisites for a genotoxic substance, like hydroxyl radicals and other oxygen radicals: it can react efficiently with DNA and it can be generated inside cells, e.g. by photosensitization and enzymatic oxidation. As might be anticipated from the non-radical character of singlet oxygen, the pattern of DNA modifications it produces is very different from that caused by hydroxyl radicals. While hydroxyl radicals produce DNA strand breaks and sites of base loss (AP sites) in high yield and react with all four bases of DNA, singlet oxygen generates predominantly modified guanine residues and few strand breaks and AP sites. There is now convincing evidence that a major product of base modification caused by singlet oxygen is 8-hydroxyguanine (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine). Indeed, the recently reported miscoding properties of 8-hydroxyguanine can explain the predominant type of mutations observed when DNA modified by singlet oxygen is replicated in cells. There are also strong indications that singlet oxygen generated by photosensitization can act as an ultimate DNA modifying species inside cells. However, indirect genotoxic mechanisms involving other reactive oxygen species produced from singlet oxygen are also possible and appear to predominate in some cases. The cellular defense system against oxidants consists of effective singlet oxygen scavengers such as carotenoids. The observation that carotenoids can inhibit neoplastic cell transformation when administered not only together with but also after the application of chemical or physical carcinogens might indicate a role of singlet oxygen in tumor promotion that could be independent of the direct or indirect DNA damaging properties.

Bacterial genes involved in response to near-ultraviolet radiation

A model of the possible pathways of activities following NUV treatment was presented in Section I and in Fig. 1. Some of the components are firmly established, some are speculative, and many are difficult to evaluate because of insufficient experimental information. Perhaps the most relevant experiments, especially concerning ozone depletion, would be to determine the mutational specificity of NUV. By selecting lacI mutants after exposing cells to NUV, and sequencing the bases of this gene, this is now feasible. There are some problems, however. The mutation frequency is normally so low that it might be difficult to distinguish NUV mutants from spontaneous mutants. However, by irradiating cells having a uvrA or uvrB mutation, the frequency of mutation above background can be increased considerably. There remains the problem as to what fraction of the observed mutations results from oxidative damage. Some of this could be clarified by comparing mutation spectra of cells treated with NUV and cells subjected to excess oxidative damage and determining what fraction results from other avenues of lesion formation in DNA. Different species of reactive oxygen could cause different kinds of DNA lesions, and, fortunately, use of appropriate mutants should allow us to sort out any differences in specificity of lesions. Also, by appropriate manipulation of quantities of endogenous photosensitizers, it might be possible to sort out the specific mutations that are caused by photodynamic action. Another avenue of research is to explore the pathways by which NUV lesions are repaired, and whether such repair is error prone or error free. Again, the use of mutants such as xthA, uvr, and polA should assist in our understanding of the specificity of the mutational events. There are now a number of examples of global control mechanisms whereby cells abruptly shift their protein synthesis pattern under environmental stress. It is important to understand whether NUV stress results in induction of one or more of the known regulatory genes, or whether another regulon might be involved. One particular aspect of regulation that remains unsolved is the role of the katF gene, which is known to regulate the xthA and katE, but it may also regulate other genes as well. A number of striking physiological events occur even at very low fluences of NUV irradiation of cells. In part, this may be related to regulon induction. However, some of these events are in need of special exploration, such as changes at the membrane level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mutagenic and lethal effects of near-ultraviolet radiation (290-400 nm) on bacteria and phage

Despite decades of study of the effect of near-ultraviolet radiation (NUV) on bacterial cells, insights into mechanisms of deleterious alterations and subsequent recovery are just now emerging. These insights are based on observations that 1) damage by NUV may be caused by a reactive oxygen molecule, since H2O2 may be a photoproduct of NUV; 2) some, but not all, of the effects of NUV and H2O2 are interchangeable; 3) there is an inducible regulon (oxyR) that responds to oxidative stress and is involved in protection against NUV; 4) a number of NUV-sensitive mutants are defective either in the capacity to detoxify reactive oxygen molecules or to repair DNA damage caused by NUV; and 5) recovery from NUV damage may not directly involve induction of the SOS response. Since several distinctly different photoreceptors and targets are involved, it is unknown whether NUV lethality and mutagenesis result from an accumulation of damages or whether there is a particularly critical photoeffect. To fully understand the mechanisms involved, it is important to identify the chromophore(s) of NUV, the mechanism of toxic oxygen species generation, the role of the oxidative defense regulon (oxyR), the specific lesions in the DNA, and the enzymatic events of subsequent repair.