A chromosome study of 6-thioguanine-resistant mutants in T lymphocytes of Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors

Molecular Analysis of Mutations in the Human HPRT Gene

The HPRT assay uses incorporation of toxic nucleotide analogues to select for cells lacking the purine scavenger enzyme hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase. A major advantage of this assay is the ability to isolate mutant cells and determine the molecular basis for their functional deficiency. Many types of analyses have been performed at this locus: the current protocol involves generation of a cDNA and multiplex PCR of each exon, including the intron/exon junctions, followed by direct sequencing of the products. This analysis detects point mutations, small deletions and insertions within the gene, mutations affecting RNA splicing, and the products of illegitimate V(D)J recombination within the gene. Establishment of and comparisons with mutational spectra hold the promise of identifying exposures to mutation-inducing genotoxicants from their distinctive pattern of gene-specific DNA damage at this easily analyzed reporter gene.

In vitro studies of the genotoxicity of ionizing radiation in human G(0) T lymphocytes

In an effort to mimic human in vivo exposures to ionizing irradiation, G(0) phase T lymphocytes from human peripheral blood samples were utilized for in vitro studies of the genotoxic effects of (137)Cs low-LET irradiation and (222)Rn high-LET irradiation. Both types of radiation induced mutations in the HPRT gene in a dose-dependent manner, with a mutant frequency (MF) = 4.28 + 1.34x + 7.51x(2) for (137)Cs (R(2) = 0.95) and MF = 4.81 + 0.67x for (222)Rn (R(2) = 0.51). Post (137)Cs irradiation incubation in the presence of cytosine arabinoside, a reversible inhibitor of DNA repair, caused an increase in the MF over irradiation alone, consistent with a misrepair mechanism being involved in the mutagenicity of low-LET irradiation. The spectrum of (137)Cs irradiation-induced mutation displayed an increase in macro-deletions (in particular total gene deletions) and rearrangement events, some of which were further defined by either chromosome painting or direct DNA sequencing. The spectrum of (222)Rn irradiation-induced mutation was characterized by an increase in small alterations, especially multiple single base deletions/substitutions and micro-deletions. These studies define the specific response of human peripheral blood T cells to ionizing irradiation in vitro and form a basis for evaluating the genotoxic effects of human in vivo exposure.

Comparison of common gene mutation tests in mammalian cells in culture: a position paper of the GUM Commission for the Development of Guidelines for Genotoxicity Testing

In gene mutation tests a decision concerning mutations is made on the basis of hereditary functional changes. In terms of the large amount of data available, the most suitable tests for routine testing in mammalian cells in culture are the tests for acquisition of 6-thioguanine resistance in Chinese hamster cells (V79 and CHO) and for acquisition of alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluorothymidine resistance in the mouse lymphoma line L5178Y TK+/- 3.7.2C. The molecular bases, peculiarities, advantages and disadvantages of these systems will be presented. Which system is to be preferred in any particular case depends among other things on the purpose of the study and the extent to which a technically competent performance of these comparatively exacting tests can be guaranteed.

Biological and biophysical techniques to assess radiation exposure: a perspective

Biological dosimeters measure biologically relevant effects of radiation exposure that are in some sense an estimate of effective dose, whereas biophysical indicators serve as surrogates of absorbed dose in a manner analogous to conventional thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The biological and biophysical dosimeters have the potential to play an important role in assessing unanticipated or occupational radiation exposures. For example, where the exposure is large and uncertain (i.e. radiation accidents), accurate dose information can help in deciding the most appropriate therapy and medical treatment. Another useful area is that of lifetime accumulated dose determination, and the ability to distinguish between and integrate the exposures from natural and anthropogenic (medical X-rays, indoor radon, natural background radiation, occupational and non-occupational exposures). Also, the possibility to monitor individual response and differences in inherent or induced radiation sensitivity may have important implications for radiation protection. More commonly, this type of dosimetry could be used for routine monitoring to detect and quantify unsuspected exposure, for regulatory purposes or for epidemiological studies of the long-term effects of radiation exposure (e.g. in Japanese A-bomb survivors or in the population surrounding Chernobyl). This review is a comparative study of the existing techniques and their future prospects. It summarizes the sensitivity, reproducibility, limiting dose, dose-rate, energy, LET response, sources of variability and uncertainty, and other practical aspects of each bio-indicator. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach are evaluated on the basis of common criteria for particular applications, and are summarized for each assay both in the text and in tabular form, for convenience. It is clear that no single indicator qualifies to reliably measure occupational exposures at the current levels of sensitivity conventional dosimetry services provide. Most of the bio-techniques are applicable to the detection of relatively high radiation exposures at relatively short times after exposure. Some of the bio-indicators have been identified that are, or offer future prospects for becoming, appropriate bio-indicators for dosimetry needs. However, all methods are subject to biological and other variables that are presently uncontrolled, and represent a major source of uncertainty. These include variations in background signals not directly associated with radiation exposure, inter- and intra-individual variability of radiation response, and genetic and environmental effects. Although these factors contribute to the lack of confidence in biological dosimetry, promising bio-indicators may be applied to large populations to establish the inherent variability and confounding factors that limit quantitative data collection and analysis, and reduce reliability and reproducibility.