Nucleic acid sandwich hybridization in detection of HPV 16 DNA: technique and its clinical application

Specificity of molecular hybridization techniques for the detection of bluetongue virus serotypes in Culicoides variipennis

Direct blot hybridization (DBH) and sandwich hybridization (SH) were evaluated for their ability to detect bluetongue virus (BTV) RNA in the biting midge Culicoides variipennis (Coquillett). Probes were derived from the L3 RNA segment of BTV, serotype 17. RNA of the five BTV serotypes occurring in the USA (BTV-2, BTV-10, BTV-11, BTV-13, and BTV-17) was extracted from pools of varying numbers of infected and uninfected biting midges and assayed by direct blot and sandwich hybridization tests. Direct blot hybridization using an RNA transcript probe or cDNA probe was a fast, efficient and sensitive technique, detecting as few as one midge infected with any BTV serotype in a pool of 50 or 100. Sandwich hybridization was able to detect the homologous serotype, BTV-17, in pools containing a single infected midge in a total of 50 or 100. However, detection of the heterologous serotypes, BTV-10, BTV-11, and BTV-13, was limited to pools containing 5 or more infected midges in a total of 50, and BTV-2 was undetectable by SH. Hybridization techniques provide an alternative to the conventional detection methods of inoculation of cell culture or embryonated chicken eggs for detection of BTV.

A rapid solution hybridization method for detection of human papillomaviruses

Nucleic acid hybridization methods in routine diagnosis of micro-organisms have been limited by the tedious assay procedures. We have previously described the sandwich hybridization method which allows convenient testing of biological specimens. In this paper we describe the adaptation of the solution hydridization method into the microtitre plate format using 35S-isotope as label. Using 3-hour hybridization followed by 2-hour collection of the hybrids a sensitivity of 5 x 10(5) target DNA molecules was achieved. The method was applied for identification of human papillomaviruses in crude gynaecological specimens. A simple 1-day assay protocol was achieved with high HPV type specificity. The specificity was confirmed by testing a variety of unrelated micro-organisms, none of which gave a positive signal in the test. Results, obtained as numerical values, were easy to interpret; positive and negative samples gave clearly distinguishable signals.

Basic concepts and practical applications of recombinant DNA techniques in detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Review article

Recent studies on the role of infectious agents in the pathogenesis of malignancy have demonstrated a strong association between HPV and several human benign and malignant epithelial neoplasms. There are 60 distinct types of HPV, of which HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35 and 39 have been associated with squamous cell neoplasia of the genital tract. Rapid progress in the field of recombinant DNA technology with the availability of specific probes has enabled the detection of HPV genomic sequences in characteristic HPV lesions. In addition, HPV sequences have been found in malignant squamous cell lesions, and even in normal tissues lacking the morphologic signs of HPV infection. Currently, hybridization analysis of the nucleic acid is the most reliable method for diagnosis of HPV infections, also permitting the genotyping of these viruses. A variety of hybridization procedures have been developed with different sensitivities and specificities. Despite the divergent technical modifications, however, all hybridization tests working according to the same basic principles. The double helix of DNA composed of two complementary polynucleotide chains can be opened by heating or by increasing pH. Cooling of the two strands allows reassociation. Labeled HPV DNA or RNA probe hybridizes with the complementary sequences allowing the detection of HPV sequences in the samples. Hybridization assays can be conducted under conditions in which virtually all HPVs will be detected, but not specifically typed (low stringency) or under conditions in which the type can be identified (high stringency). Widely divergent results have been reported both in prevalence of HPV infection and distribution of different HPV types in the genital tract. These discordant results have been explained on the basis of sampling effects, differences in histopathological diagnosis, geographical variations in HPV types and interlaboratory variation in HPV detection and typing techniques. In this review the various procedures for detecting HPV sequences by hybridization and related techniques are shortly described.

Human papillomaviruses: are we ready to type?

The issue of determining which human papillomavirus (HPV) is present in a clinical specimen (typing specimens for HPVs) is receiving attention because HPVs cause condyloma acuminata and are associated with the continuum of disease which ranges from dysplasia to invasive genital cancer. Morphological inspection of precancerous lesions is not sufficient to determine which lesions will progress and which will not. A number of research tools based primarily on deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization have been developed. These permit identification and typing of HPV in genital tract scrapings or biopsies. Some HPV types (e.g., HPV-16 and HPV-18) have been identified in high-grade dysplasias and carcinomas more commonly than other types (e.g., HPV-6) and have been designated "high risk" types for cervical cancer. Thus, the question arises whether HPV typing would improve patient management by providing increased sensitivity for detection of patients at risk or by providing a prognostic indicator. In this review, the available typing methods are reviewed from the standpoint of their sensitivity, specificity, and ease of application to large-scale screening programs. Data implicating HPVs in the genesis of genital tract cancers are reviewed, as is the association of specific HPV types with specific outcomes. We conclude that there is currently no simple, inexpensive assay for HPV types, although such assays may be developed in the future. Analysis of the typing data indicates that, while HPV types can be designated high risk and low risk, these designations are not absolute and thus the low-risk group should not be ignored. In addition, interpretation of the data is complicated by finding high-risk types in individuals with no indication of disease. Insufficient data exist to indicate whether knowledge of the presence of a given HPV type is a better prognostic indicator than cytological or histological results. Thus, more research is needed before it can be determined whether typing information will augment the method currently in use for deciding treatment regimen and whether it warrants widespread use.

Sandwich hybridization in solution: a rapid method to screen HPV 16 DNA in cervical scrapes

A solution hybridization method is introduced as a rapid diagnostic method for demonstration of papillomavirus DNA in cervical scrapes. 32P-Labelled detector probe and the biotinylated capture probes were hybridized with DNA of the specimen after pretreatment by boiling in alkaline SDS. After 4 h of hybridization the hybrids were collected onto avidin coated beads and measured. The sensitivity of the method was 1-5 x 10(5) HPV 16 DNA molecules. Cervical carcinoma cell lines CaSki and SiHa were informative as to the sensitivity of the solution hybridization and the in situ hybridization methods. CaSki cells containing about 700 HPV 16 DNA copies per cell were positive by both methods. SiHa cells with one HPV 16 DNA copy per cell were positive by the sandwich assay but remained negative in the in situ test. A series of 126 cervical scrapes collected from consecutive patients participating in a follow-up study for cervical HPV infection were tested for HPV 16 DNA by both methods. The detection rate of the sandwich test was 19/126 (15%) and that of the in situ method 21/126 (17%) yielding 26 diagnoses altogether. Twelve of these were obtained by one method only. The results obtained by studying the cervical cell lines and repeated specimens taken from constantly HPV 16 positive patients suggested that the two methods can measure different types of infections and thus complement each other in the diagnosis of cervical HPV infections.

Screening of premalignant cervical lesions for HPV 16 DNA by sandwich and in situ hybridization techniques

A series of 97 cervical smears and 69 directed punch biopsies derived from 84 consecutive women prospectively followed-up for cervical HPV (human papillomavirus) infections were studied using the sandwich hybridization and in situ hybridization techniques with HPV 16 DNA probes. The aim was to test the sensitivity and applicability of these two techniques in routine diagnosis of cervical HPV infections from smears. As a measure of specimen adequacy, the number of cells recovered in the cervical scrape was determined along with HPV 16 DNA in the sandwich hybridization test using human pro-alpha 2(I)-collagen gene probe. CIN (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) was suggested in 56% of the patients by the Pap smear, and disclosed in 65% of the biopsies. HPV 16 DNA was present in 57% of cervical scrapes consistent with CIN, i.e., were of Pap smear classes III or IV. Forty percent of the scrapes not suggestive of CIN, i.e., Pap smear classes I or II, also contained HPV 16 DNA. The detection rate for HPV 16 DNA of the sandwich hybridization method was 89% of that of the in situ method in adequate scrapes, but only 43% in cell-poor specimens. The number of HPV 16 DNA-positive scrapes as compared with the total number of diagnoses obtained by studying also the biopsies was 31/36 (69 patients). The results indicate that the cervical scrape as a noninvasive specimen is applicable for screening of cervical HPV infections, and it can be studied with acceptable sensitivity by the rapid sandwich hybridization technique. However, if a punch biopsy is indicated it should be studied using the in situ hybridization technique that allows more sensitive detection of HPV DNA than any other hybridization method and enables the analysis of several HPV types in the same sample instead of only one HPV type in the scrapes.