Increased firing of neurons in the posterior hypothalamus which precede classically conditioned pupillary dilations

Background luminance effects on pupil size associated with emotion and saccade preparation

Pupil dilation is consistently evoked by affective and cognitive processing, and this dilation can result from sympathetic activation or parasympathetic inhibition. The relative contributions of the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems on the pupillary response induced by emotion and cognition may be different. Sympathetic and parasympathetic activity is regulated by global luminance level. Higher luminance levels lead to greater activation of the parasympathetic system while lower luminance levels lead to greater activation of the sympathetic system. To understand the contributions of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems to pupillary responses associated with emotion and saccade preparation, emotional auditory stimuli were presented following the fixation cue whose color indicated instruction to perform a pro- or anti-saccade while varying the background luminance level. Pupil dilation was evoked by emotional auditory stimuli and modulated by arousal level. More importantly, greater pupil dilation was observed with a dark background, compared to a bright background. In contrast, pupil dilation responses associated with saccade preparation were larger with the bright background than the dark background. Together, these results suggest that arousal-induced pupil dilation was mainly mediated by sympathetic activation, but pupil dilation related to saccade preparation was primarily mediated by parasympathetic inhibition.

Differential conditioning of anticipatory pupillary dilation responses in humans

The purpose of the present experiments was to demonstrate conditioning of anticipatory pupillary dilation responses in humans as previous efforts to condition pupillary dilation had yielded inconsistent results. In those studies, using an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) had yielded more promising results than using non-aversive USs. In three experiments we utilized a reaction time task as a non-aversive US and observed reliable differential conditioning of anticipatory pupillary dilation. Differential responding was evident within very few trials and was largest late in the anticipatory interval. Experiment 4 replicated these findings using an aversive US (electric shock). In measuring anticipatory responses in a differential conditioning preparation all four experiments provided clear evidence for Pavlovian conditioning of pupillary dilation in humans.