The lasting ribosome alteration produced by virginiamycin M disappears upon removal of certain ribosomal proteins

Crystal structure of the synergistic antibiotic pair, lankamycin and lankacidin, in complex with the large ribosomal subunit

The structures of the large ribosomal subunit of Deinococcus radiodurans (D50S) in complex with the antibiotic lankamycin (3.2 Å) and a double antibiotic complex of lankamycin and lankacidin C (3.45 Å) have been determined, in continuation of previous crystallographic studies on lankacidin-D50S complex. These two drugs have been previously reported to inhibit ribosomal function with mild synergistic effect. Lankamycin, a member of the macrolide family, binds in a similar manner to erythromycin. However, when in complex with lankacidin, lankamycin is located so that it can form interactions with lankacidin in the adjacent ribosomal binding site. When compared to the well-documented synergistic antibiotics, Streptogramins A and B, the pair of lankacidin and lankamycin bind in similar sites, the peptidyl transferase center and nascent peptide exit tunnel, respectively. Herein, we discuss the structural basis for antibiotic synergism and highlight the key factors involved in ribosomal inhibition.

Novel streptogramin antibiotics

Streptogramins represent a unique class of antibiotics remarkable for their antibacterial activity and their unique mechanism of action. These antibiotics are produced naturally as secondary metabolites by a number of Streptomyces species and have been classified into two main groups. They consist of at least two structurally unrelated compounds, group A or M (macrolactones) and group B or S (cyclic hexadepsipeptides). Both groups bind bacterial ribosomes and inhibit protein synthesis at the elongation step and they act synergistically in vitro against many microorganisms. Streptogramins A and B act synergistically in vivo; the mixture of the two compounds is more powerful than the individual components and their combined action is irreversible. The pharmacokinetic parameters of group A and B streptogramins in blood are similar. The major gap, limiting the therapeutic use of the natural compounds, was represented by the lack dissolution in water. The synthesis of water-soluble derivatives of pristinamycin I(A) and II(B) has allowed the development of injectable, first represented by quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid) and oral formulations, represented by RPR-106972, streptogramins with fixed compositions. Streptogramins have demonstrated activity against Gram-positive microorganisms in vitro and in vivo, including those with multi-drug resistance. Moreover, the absence of cross-resistance to macrolides in many of these microorganisms and the rarity of cross-resistance between the two groups of antibiotics associated with the rapid bacterial killing are the principal features of the streptogramins, offering the possibility for treating the rising number of infections that are caused by multi-resistant Gram-positive bacteria.

Mutations in ribosomal protein L16 conferring reduced susceptibility to evernimicin (SCH27899): implications for mechanism of action

A clinical isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP#5) that showed decreased susceptibility to evernimicin (MIC, 1.5 microgram/ml) was investigated. A 4,255-bp EcoRI fragment cloned from SP#5 was identified by its ability to transform evernimicin-susceptible S. pneumoniae R6 (MIC, 0.03 microgram/ml) such that the evernimicin MIC was 1.5 microgram/ml. Nucleotide sequence analysis of this fragment revealed that it contained portions of the S10-spc ribosomal protein operons. The nucleotide sequences of resistant and susceptible isolates were compared, and a point mutation (thymine to guanine) that causes an Ile52-Ser substitution in ribosomal protein L16 was identified. The role of this mutation in decreasing susceptibility to evernimicin was confirmed by direct transformation of the altered L16 gene. The presence of the L16 mutation in the resistant strain suggests that evernimicin is an inhibitor of protein synthesis. This was confirmed by inhibition studies using radiolabeled substrates, which showed that the addition of evernimicin at sub-MIC levels resulted in a rapid decrease in the incorporation of radiolabeled isoleucine in a susceptible isolate (SP#3) but was much less effective against SP#5. The incorporation of isoleucine showed a linear response to the dose level of evernimicin. The incorporation of other classes of labeled substrates was unaffected or much delayed, indicating that these were secondary effects.

Analysis of the reversible binding of virginiamycin M to ribosome and particle functions after removal of the antibiotic

Type A synergimycins (VM) were shown to act catalytically and to induce two ribosomal alterations: (a) inability to promote polypeptide synthesis; (b) high-affinity binding of type B synergimycins (VS). A claim for irreversible binding of type A synergimycins to ribosomes has promoted the present reinvestigation. Submission of ribosomes from VM-treated bacteria to a purification procedure (supposed to remove the drug, according to a low association constant previously reported) yielded particles still holding residual VM. The formation of VM.ribosome complexes, more stable than previously inferred but without covalent linkage, was deduced from the extractability of complexed VM by organic solvents. Moreover, incubation of these complexes with increasing amounts of anti-VM immunoglobulins progressively restored ribosome activity in protein synthesis. Binding of VS to ribosomes, by fluorimetric titrations in the presence of substoichiometric concentrations of VM, was incompatible with catalytic action of type A synergimycins. Ribosomes from VM-treated bacteria displayed also a higher affinity for VS than did control ribosomes. This property did not disappear when ribosome.VM complexes were incubated with anti-VM IgG, nor when VM-IgG complexes were withdrawn from the reaction mixture by protein A-agarose binding. We can conclude that VM binding produces: (1) an inhibition of ribosome-promoted peptide bond formation, which occurs only in the presence of the drug; and (2) an increase of ribosome affinity for VS, which lasts after VM removal. The linkage of this drug with ribosomes is tight but reversible and its action is stoichiometric.

Inhibition of polypeptide synthesis in cell-free systems by virginiamycin S and erythromycin. Evidence for a common mode of action of type B synergimycins and 14-membered macrolides

Macrolides, lincosamides and type B synergimycins are powerful inhibitors of protein synthesis in vivo, but many of them were found to be inactive in vitro. In the present work, we confirm that virginiamycin S (a type B synergimycin) and erythromycin (a 14-membered macrolide) have no effect on poly(U)-directed poly(Phe) synthesis. However, the amino-acid polymerization reactions directed by poly(U,G), poly(U,C), poly(A,G) and poly(A,C) were increasingly inhibited (20-50%) by both antibiotics. The action of these inhibitors proved to be template-dependent and favored by the incorporation of proline and of basic amino acids into peptides. Under these conditions, virginiamycin S and erythromycin markedly stimulated a release of peptidyl-tRNA from the ribosomes. In the poly(A,C) model system, these antibiotics produced a 50% inhibition of amino-acid incorporation into total peptides, a 70% release of ribosome-bound peptidyl-tRNA, and a 95% repression of the synthesis of long peptide chains. The production of equivalent effects at saturating concentrations of these antibiotics in the four model systems examined is suggestive of a similarity in their mode of action. Our results indicate that 14-membered macrolides and type B synergimycins can act on ribosomes during the whole elongation process. The functional block produced by both antibiotics is usually reversible, but may result in a premature release of peptidyl-tRNA when the stability of ribosomal complexes is lowered by the incorporation of basic amino acids.

Ribosome protection by tRNA derivatives against inactivation by virginiamycin M: evidence for two types of interaction of tRNA with the donor site of peptidyl transferase

Virginiamycin M (VM) was previously shown to interfere with the function of both the A and P sites of ribosomes and to inactivate tRNA-free ribosomes but not particles bearing peptidyl-tRNA. To explain these findings, the shielding ability afforded by tRNA derivatives positioned at the A and P sites against VM-produced inactivation was explored. Unacylated tRNA(Phe) was ineffective, irrespective of its position on the ribosome. Phe-tRNA and Ac-Phe-tRNA provided little protection when bound directly to the P site but were active when present at the A site. Protection by these tRNA derivatives was markedly enhanced by the formation of the first peptide bond and increased further upon elongation of peptide chains. Most of the shielding ability of Ac-Phe-tRNA and Phe-tRNA positioned at the A site was conserved when these tRNAs were translocated to the P site by the action of elongation factor G and GTP. Thus, a 5-10-fold difference in the protection afforded by these tRNAs was observed, depending on their mode of entry to the P site. This indicates the occurrence of two types of interaction of tRNA derivatives with the donor site of peptidyl transferase: one shared by acylated tRNAs directly bound to the ribosomal P site (no protection against VM) and the other characteristic of aminoacyl- or peptidyl-tRNA translocated from the A site (protection of peptidyl transferase against VM). To explain these data and previous observations with other protein synthesis inhibitors, a new model of peptidyl transferase is proposed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The in vitro and in vivo inactivation of ribosomes by virginiamycin M does not entail an alteration of 5, 16 and 23 S ribosomal RNA

The M component of virginiamycin blocks protein synthesis by inactivating catalytically the 50 S ribosomal subunits: the in vitro interaction of 50 S with virginiamycin M, followed by removal of the antibiotic, results in a lasting damage of the particle. This enzyme-like inactivation of 50 S subunits resembles that of 30 S subunits by colicin E3, which entails the cleavage of 16 S rRNA. To explore this possibility, rRNA obtained from particles incubated in vivo and in vitro with virginiamycin M were analyzed. Electrophoretic analysis of 5, 16 and 23 S rRNA did not reveal major changes, nor did it show the appearance of additional fragments. To exclude the possibility of terminal alterations, the 5'- and 3'-extremities of these RNA were also sequenced and found unchanged. Conclusions drawn in the present work parallel those of an accompanying paper (Moureau, P., Di Giambattista, M. and Cocito, C. (1983) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 739, 164-172) describing the dissociation and reassociation of ribosomes incubated with virginiamycin M: the lasting ribosome damage by this antibiotic appears to be due to a conformational rather than to a structural alteration.