Purification and cellular localization of wild type and mutated dihydrolipoyltransacetylases from Azotobacter vinelandii and Escherichia coli expressed in E. coli

Global analysis of genomic texts: the distribution of AGCT tetranucleotides in the Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis genomes predicts translational frameshifting and ribosomal hopping in several genes

Present availability of the genomic text of bacteria allows assignment of biological known functions to many genes (typically, half of the genome's gene content). It is now time to try and predict new unexpected functions, using inductive procedures that allow correlating the content of the genomic text to possible biological functions. We show here that analysis of the genomes of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis for the distribution of AGCT motifs predicts that genes exist for which the mRNA molecule can be translated as several different proteins synthesized after ribosomal frameshifting or hopping. Among these genes we found that several coded for the same function in E. coli and B. subtilis. We analyzed in depth the situation of the infB gene (experimentally known to specify synthesis of several proteins differing in their translation starts), the aceF/pdhC gene, the eno gene, and the rplI gene. In addition, genes specific to E. coli were also studied: ompA, ompFand tolA (predicting epigenetic variation that could help escape infection by phages or colicins).

Enzymological and physiological consequences of restructuring the lipoyl domain content of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex of Escherichia coli

The core-forming lipoate acetyltransferase (E2p) subunits of the pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) complex of Escherichia coli contain three tandemly repeated lipoyl domains although one lipoyl domain is apparently sufficient for full catalytic activity in vitro. Plasmids containing IPTG-inducible aceEF-IpdA operons which express multilip-PDH complexes bearing one N-terminal lipoyl domain and up to seven unlipoylated (mutant) domains per E2p chain, were constructed. Each plasmid restored the nutritional lesion of a strain lacking the PDH complex and expressed a sedimentable PDH complex, although the catalytic activities declined significantly as the number of unlipoylated domains increased above four per E2p chain. It was concluded that the extra domains protrude from the 24-meric E2p core without affecting assembly of the E1p and E3 subunits, and that the lipoyl cofactor bound to the outermost domain can participate successfully at each of the three types of active site in the assembled complex. Physiological studies with two series of isogenic strains expressing multilip-PDH complexes from modified chromosomal pdh operons (pdhR-aceEF-IpdA) showed that three lipoyl domains per E2p chain is optimal and that only the outermost domain need be lipoylated for optimal activity. It is concluded that the reason for retaining three lipoyl domains is to extend the reach of the outermost lipoyl cofactor rather than to provide extra cofactors for catalysis.

Structure/function relationships in the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex from Azotobacter vinelandii. Role of the linker region between the binding and catalytic domain of the dihydrolipoyl transacetylase component

The role of the hinge region between the binding domain and the catalytic domain in dihydrolipoyl transacetylase (E2p) from Azotobacter vinelandii was addressed by deletion mutagenesis. Mutated dihydrolipoyl transacetylase proteins were constructed with a deletion of 11 amino acids in the hinge region between the binding domain and the N-terminal part of the catalytic domain of E2p [E2p(pAPE1)] and with a further deletion of 9 amino acids into the N-terminal sequence protruding from the globular structure of the catalytic domain [E2p(pAPE2)] and found to take part in the intratrimer interaction. Both proteins behaved as wild-type E2p with respect to catalytic activity and quaternary structure. The interaction of the peripheral components pyruvate dehydrogenase (E1p) and lipoamide dehydrogenase (E3) with the mutated E2p proteins was studied. E2p(pAPE1) assembles to a trimeric pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) with 15% decreased complex activity. No difference in affinity towards the peripheral components was detected. Upon binding of E3, E2p(pAPE2) dissociates into trimers and monomers. At saturation, two dimers of E3 were bound/E2p monomer instead of one dimer/E2p chain in trimeric wild-type E2p or E2p (pAPE1). The monomeric E2p species was catalytically inactive. Upon binding of excess E1p, some monomer formation of the E2p mutant took place. E1p however can prevent monomerization by E3. It is concluded that E1p is bound between two different E2p chains in the trimer. The substrates CoA and acetyl-CoA also prevent monomerization because they are bound by amino acid residues of two different E2p chains. In the presence of CoA no difference in affinity with respect to E1p and E3 binding was observed. CoA (and acetylCoA) also prevent dissociation of the 24-subunit core structure of wild-type E2p when added before addition of E1p or E3. Therefore, it seems likely that in vivo A. vinelandii PDC is based on a 24-subunit E2p core, like Escherichia coli PDC. A functional difference between complexes based on a trimer or a 24-subunit core has not been observed. A role of the hinge region as a spacer to allow binding of E1p or E3 seems unlikely. The results are discussed on the basis of the three-dimensional structure of the catalytic domain.

Reconstitution of pyruvate dehydrogenase multienzyme complexes based on chimeric core structures from Azotobacter vinelandii and Escherichia coli

Two unique restriction sites were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis at identical positions in the DNA encoding the dihydrolipoyltransacetylase (E2p) components of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex from Azotobacter vinelandii and from Escherichia coli. In this manner each DNA chain could be cut into three parts, coding for the lipoyl domain, which consists of three lipoyl subdomains, the binding domain and the core-forming catalytic domain, respectively. Chimeric E2p components were constructed by exchanging the three domains between E2p from A. vinelandii and E. coli on gene level. The six chimeric E2p proteins were expressed and purified from E. coli TG2. All chimeras were catalytically active, 24-subunit E2p proteins. Interactions of the peripheral components E1p and E3 with the wild-type enzymes from A. vinelandii and E. coli and with the chimeric proteins were studied by gel-filtration experiments, analytical ultracentrifugation and reconstitution of the overall activity of the complex. A. vinelandii E3 interacts only with those chimeras that contain the A. vinelandii binding domain, whereas E. coli E3 interacts with all chimeras. Exchange of the lipoyl or catalytic domain did not influence the binding properties of E3. Recognition of E1p depends on the origin of both the binding domain and the catalytic domain. E. coli E1p interacts strongly with those chimeras in which both the binding domain and the catalytic domain were derived from E. coli E2p and weakly with chimeras that contained either the binding domain or the catalytic domain from E. coli E2p. No binding of E. coli E1p was observed when both domains were of A. vinelandii origin. A. vinelandii E1p recognizes E2p from A. vinelandii and E. coli, but strong interaction required that the binding and catalytic domain were of the same origin. Exchange of lipoyl domains had no effect on the binding properties of the E1p component. These observations confirm previous conclusions, based on site-directed mutagenesis of A. vinelandii E2p [Schulze, E., Westphal, A. H., Boumans, H., and de Kok, A. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 202, 841-848], that the binding site for E1p consists of amino acid residues derived from both the binding and the catalytic domain and extend these conclusions to E. coli E2p. Dissociation of the 24 subunit E2p core was only detected when the chimeric E2p proteins contained the catalytic domain from A. vinelandii E2p. Dissociation depends on the binding of peripheral components to the E1p-binding sites, pointing to differences in the inter-trimer contacts between the E2p proteins from both species.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)