Systemic treatment of cancer in the elderly

Rising to the medication's requirements: The experience of elderly cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy in the elective oncogeriatrics field

A new subfield of oncology has emerged in the last twenty years to raise awareness and address the specific needs of elderly cancer patients, a population that was long neglected in oncology. We sought to understand the individual experiences, as well as moral and social implications of considering elderly cancer patients as "treatable". Following an anthropological critical interpretative approach focusing on practical and symbolic effects of chemotherapy in a rapidly evolving medical field, we conducted 20 semi-structured interviews and observations of medicine storage places at home among elderly cancer patients aged 70 and over in a clearly incurable situation receiving palliative chemotherapy. We used photographs representing paths as triggers in interviews, and compared the patients' views with those of 12 health professionals in oncology during a brief open-ended interview. Elderly cancer patients consider themselves to be survivors and fighters. Their long trajectory is a result of their successful struggle and tolerance of the treatments allowing them to carry on. They continually observe their physical ability and test their resistance, they resist complaining and are grateful to have cancer at a late stage of life. By highlighting their active life rather than the treatment inconveniences, they show they are "young elderly" persons, capable of keeping active physically. They are treated precisely because they demonstrated that they had the physical and moral capacity to take the hit of the chemotherapy to their bodies and had the will to fight. The development of oncogeriatrics has enabled the treatment of the fittest cancer patients over 70, but the ethical debate to treat some elderly patients and not others, and decisions of therapeutic abstention facing frail elderly cancer patients remains an issue rarely discussed. This aspect should not be eluded by the important progress achieved in medicine facing cancer.

Recombinant Hemopoietic Growth Factors: Comparative Hemopoietic Response in Younger and Older Subjects

OBJECTIVE

To study the effectiveness of hemopoietic growth factors in older patients.

DESIGN

Literature review. All articles published in English language between 1987 and 1990 were reviewed. Those reporting studies without age limits as entry criteria and describing the effects of growth factors in individual patients were suitable for analysis. Bone marrow transplantation related articles were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The meanfold increase of granulocytes for Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor, Granulocyte Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor, and Interleukin 3 and of hemoglobin for erythropoietin were compared in subjects younger and older than 65, by Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Of 68 studies, 23 were suitable for analysis. These included patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, aplastic anemia, chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression, chronic granulocytopenia, anemia, and myelosuppression of malignancies and of chronic disease. Of 204 patients, 67 were 65 years of age or older and 42 were over 70. No difference was seen in meanfold increase of granulocyte and hemoglobin in time of response to growth factors or in response in presence of an absolute neutrophil count lower than 1000/microliters between younger and older patients.

CONCLUSION

Early response to hemopoietic growth factors appears well maintained with advanced age. Prospective studies of the prolonged effects of these factors in older and younger patients are needed.

Topotecan Dosing Guidelines in Ovarian Cancer: Reduction and Management of Hematologic Toxicity

Topotecan dosing considerations and alternative dosing schedules to reduce and manage myelosuppression during the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer were reviewed. The myelosuppression patterns from phase I, II, and III clinical trials were analyzed to evaluate the degree of hematologic toxicity and to determine risk factors predictive of myelosuppression. Additionally, recent publications of alternative topotecan doses and schedules were examined. Extent of prior therapy, prior platinum therapy (particularly carboplatin), advanced age, impaired renal function, and prior radiation therapy were identified as potential risk factors for greater hematologic toxicity after topotecan therapy. Reducing the starting topotecan dose to 1.0 or 1.25 mg/m2/day is recommended to reduce the incidence of severe myelosuppression in high-risk individuals receiving topotecan for 5 consecutive days. Hematopoietic growth factors, transfusion therapy, and schedule adjustments may also help manage myelosuppression. Alternative schedules of 3-day or weekly dosing appear to have less myelotoxicity and are currently under evaluation. The clinical aspects of topotecan-related myelosuppression and results from clinical trials indicate that the dose, and possibly the dosing schedule, of topotecan can be modified to reduce hematologic toxicity and improve tolerance without compromising efficacy. Prospective individualization of topotecan dosing may prevent or minimize dose-limiting myelosuppression and allow patients to achieve the maximum topotecan benefit by improving their ability to complete therapy with fewer treatment delays. Ongoing clinical trials evaluating alternative dosing schedules with superior hematologic tolerability may facilitate the inclusion of topotecan in combination regimens for patients with ovarian cancer. Proposed topotecan dosing guidelines to reduce and manage myelosuppression are outlined.

Prognostic factors in Hodgkin's lymphoma

Risk-adapted treatment strategies have constituted a major issue since the beginning of clinical research into Hodgkin's disease (HD). Various prognostic factors have been identified and several of those considered for staging procedures, resulting in strictly stage-dependent treatment recommendations for patients suffering from HD. These factors may be subdivided in host-related (e.g. age, sex) and tumour-related (e.g. number of tumour cells, growth characteristics, spread of tumour cells, resistance to apoptosis) factors. Owing to the striking improvement of the overall prognosis in HD patients it may be difficult to identify novel prognostic factors analysing the minority of patients with a fatal outcome. However, especially in advanced-stage disease, improved treatment results were achieved by the introduction of more aggressive treatment regimens, resulting in an increased toxicity rate. Thus, partially in contrast to earlier work in this field, future prognostic factors are needed for identification of those patients that have a good prognosis and might be susceptible to overtreatment. During the Fifth International Symposium on Hodgkin's Lymphoma, promising results on several new prognostic markers were presented. Furthermore, a joint effort to design new studies on large, well characterised patient groups has been initiated.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly multiple myeloma patients over the age of 70 years

The feasibility and efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) in patients aged > or = 70 years was analysed. Newly diagnosed (n = 34) and refractory multiple myeloma (n = 36) patients were studied. The median age was 72 years (range: 70-82.6). CD34+ cells were mobilized with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (n = 35) or G-CSF alone (n = 35), yielding medians of 11.8 x 10(6) versus 8 x 10(6) cells/kg respectively (P = 0.007). Because of excessive mortality (16%) in the first 25 patients who received melphalan 200 mg/m2 (MEL-200), the dose was subsequently decreased to 140 mg/m2 (MEL-140). Median times to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 0.5 x 10(9)/l and to platelets > 20 x 10(9)/l were 11 and 13 d respectively. Thirty-one patients (44%) received tandem auto-SCT. Complete remission (CR) was 20% after the first SCT and 27% after tandem SCT. Median CR duration was 1.5 years and was significantly longer for patients with < or = 12 months of prior chemotherapy (2.6 versus 1.0 years, P = 0.0008). The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) (+ standard error, SE) were projected at 20% + 9% and 31% + 10% respectively. Tandem SCTs positively affected EFS (4.0 versus 0.7 years; P = 0.003) and OS (4.0 versus 1.4 years; P = 0.02) compared with single auto-SCT. In conclusion, MEL-140 is less toxic and appears equally as efficacious as MEL-200 in elderly patients. The benefits of tandem SCT in this patient population need further evaluation in a randomized trial.

Drug therapy for gynaecological cancer in older women

A substantial proportion of all women dying from gynaecological malignancies are aged >75 years. Many reports have indicated that the survival of these patients is decreased compared with younger patients. Differences in biological behaviour, stage of the disease at presentation, and reluctance to undergo aggressive treatment with its associated morbidity are among the factors thought to be responsible for this difference in outcomes. However, investigations also indicate that elderly patients may receive less surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment without obvious clinical rationale. This overview is aimed at providing a guideline of chemotherapy appropriate for patients with epithelial ovarian, uterine (corpus and cervix), and vulvar cancer, aged 70 to 75 years and over. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of drug treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Patients aged between 70 and 75 years with a good performance status can be treated with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Carboplatin, either in combination or as a single-agent, may offer advantages in patients aged >75 years and in those with a poor performance status. For patients with early recurrence there is no standard treatment, but several cytostatic and hormonal agents can be used with palliative intent. Patients with a late recurrence are probably best retreated with a platinum-based regimen. In metastatic endometrial cancer, hormonal therapy is the first choice in tumours expressing a progesterone receptor. Poorly differentiated tumours infrequently respond to endocrine therapy. In this situation, and for patients with tumours that have become resistant to hormonal manipulation, platinum-based chemotherapy may be used. The use of carboplatin-based regimens seems preferable in elderly patients, particularly in those with a decreased performance status. The usefulness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with cervical cancer is limited. In case of recurrent or metastatic disease, the use of single agent (low-dose) cisplatin should be balanced against best supportive care. Although overall chemoradiation seems superior than radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, the feasibility of this approach in elderly patients needs further investigation. Chemoradiation might also be considered in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer. However, treatment-related morbidity can be considerable and randomised studies are lacking to prove a survival benefit. Our understanding of the tolerance and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients is still incomplete due to a paucity of trials that specifically focus on this subset of patients. However, there appears no argument to withhold chemotherapy based purely on age.

Ex vivo assessment of drug response by differential staining cytotoxicity (DiSC) assay suggests a biological basis for equality of chemotherapy irrespective of age for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

With a mean age at diagnosis for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) of 65 years, development of optimal therapeutic regimens has been hampered by the advanced age of patients. In general, because of comorbidity older patients are not treated with the intent of achieving a complete response and so do not attain the quality of response of younger patients and do not survive as long. We have investigated whether or not ex vivo cellular sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs could be an underlying biological basis for this age differential in response and survival by comparing ex vivo drug response with age in untreated CLL patients. Cells from 365 untreated CLL patients aged 31.1-87.1 years (average 65.3 years) were tested for drug response by differential staining cytotoxicity (DiSC) assay with a panel of 10 drugs. An average of 280 results (range 196-361) obtained for each drug was compared with patient age. For chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide, prednisolone, vincristine, doxorubicin, epirubicin, fludarabine, cladribine and methylprednisolone, no relationship was found between ex vivo drug response and age (r<0.12). For pentostatin, a possible but very weak relationship (r = 0.18; n = 210; P = 0.06) was found. We conclude that cellular sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs does not support the differential treatment of older and younger CLL patients.

Antineoplastic chemotherapy of the older cancer patient

Cancer chemotherapy may be effective and safe in older patients if some proper provisions are made. Doses of chemotherapy should be adjusted to the patient's glomerular filtration rate, and his or her hemoglobin should be maintained for the duration of the therapy. For patients who are 70 years of age or older and who are receiving moderately toxic chemotherapy, growth factors should be used. The risk of mucositis increases with the age of the patient, so it is important to treat it aggressively at the first signs of the complication.

The clinical impact of teniposide in the treatment of elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer

Teniposide (VM26) has been claimed to be active with a moderate toxicity in elderly patients affected by small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Twenty-two patients with SCLC older than 65 years received VM26 as first-line chemotherapy at a dose of 60 mg/m2 on 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Age distribution ranged from 67 to 80 years (median 72 years). Fourteen patients were men and eight were women. Twelve patients had limited disease (LD) and ten extensive disease (ED). One patient (LD) had a complete response, and four (3 LD, 1 ED) achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 22.7% (95% CI 6-40%). The most frequent toxicity was myelosuppression: 20 and 15% of patients had grade 3 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Our results seem to suggest that VM26 by this schedule is moderately effective in elderly patients with SCLC, and it cannot be recommended as a routine treatment.

Cancer in the elderly

This article reviews geriatric oncology and assesses options for treatment and care of the elderly patient with cancer. The size of the population over 65 years old is defined, with particular reference to the continuing growth of this subsection of the community. The high incidence of many cancers and their associated mortality rates in the elderly are identified and the epidemiology of such diseases in the geriatric population is addressed. Given the discrepancies in incidence and survival rates between patients younger and older than 65 years, the association between tumorigenesis and the aging process is explored. Specific aspects of tumor growth in the elderly are considered. General considerations of therapy for elderly patients with cancer are discussed, including the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chemotherapy in those over 65 years old, surgical options, the use of radiotherapy, and overall patient assessment. Next, treatment options for individual cancer states are reviewed, with particular emphasis on newer treatment options designed specifically for the elderly. Sections on cancer screening and supportive care are also included, the latter dealing with aspects of symptom control, quality of life assessment, and the physical and psychologic rehabilitation of the elderly patient with cancer who is undergoing treatment. Conclusions are then drawn as to the extent of the oncological process in those over 65 years old, with particular emphasis on the underdiagnosis and undertreatment of many malignancies in the past. The challenge created by the growing elderly population is underscored and necessary plans of action for oncologists in the future are defined. Such proposals are necessary if inroads are to be made into the unacceptable morbidity and mortality rates borne by our elderly patients with cancer.

Prognostic evaluation in geriatric oncology: problems and perspectives

The optimal management of older patients with malignant diseases may be prevented by two antithetic conditions: inadequate treatment and excessive treatment. A likely root of this problem appears to be paucity of prognostic information, which may hamper management-related decisions in the older person with cancer. The prognostic value of performance status and nutritional status may fade with aging, while the influence of mental, emotional and socioeconomic status on the outcome of neoplastic diseases may become more prominent. The Comprehensive Geriatric Evaluation (CGE), which encompasses emotional mental and social domains in addition to physical health and function, may prove a valuable clue for the selection of those older patients who are suitable candidates for antineoplastic treatment.

Systemic management of prostate cancer

The objective of this review is to explore different therapeutic options for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Orchiectomy, estrogen therapy, synthetic LHRH analogs and possibly antiandrogens are equally effective frontline treatment modalities. Ketoconazole is indicated in emergency situations, but chronic use is prevented by serious idiosyncratic toxicity and by long term complications. Combined androgen blockade (CAB), with leuprolide (or tryptorelin) and flutamide is more effective than single modality treatment in patients capable of strict treatment compliance. Estramustine phosphate may be as effective as CAB and may be the frontline treatment of choice in sexually active patients. Institution of single modality treatment may be delayed until cancer becomes symptomatic. Controversy lingers over whether the institution of CAB at an earlier time may improve progression free survival (PFS) and survival. Research projects of immediate clinical relevance include: comparison of CAB and estramustine; determination of the optimal time for CAB; study of other forms of CAB; and phase II trials of new cytotoxic agents.

Geriatric oncology: perspectives from decision analysis. A review

The management of advanced cancer in the older person is variable. In some patients with common malignancies chemotherapy may palliate symptoms and prolong survival, while in other patients chemotherapy is a cause of overwhelming toxicity and supportive care is the preferred form of treatment. We explored the principles of individualized management for the older person with cancer and we used decision analysis as a guide. From a decisional standpoint, geriatric malignancies may be subdivided into two categories: diseases whose management is not affected by age and diseases whose management may be age-conditioned. In the latter group one can distinguish three clinical situations: diseases with short survival when untreated, which are responsive only to highly toxic chemotherapy; diseases with short survival when untreated, which may be responsive to low-toxicity chemotherapy; and diseases with prolonged survival when untreated, whose clinical course may be affected by chemotherapy. From the analysis of these clinical situations, a critical paucity of information has emerged in five areas: prognostic evaluation of the older patients, interaction of comorbid conditions and cancer chemotherapy, availability of low-toxicity alternative treatment regimens, life expectancy and estimate of outcome utilities. Further research in these areas, according to the lines we propose, may fill critical gaps of knowledge and allow optimal management of geriatric cancer.

Prostate cancer: a model of cancer in the elderly

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men over 70. Chronic course of the disease and multiple therapeutic options allow a customized management of the patient's individual problems. Prognostic factors are stage, size of primary tumors, serum acid phosphatase levels, number of metastases, ureteral obstruction and patient's age. In localized disease, surgery and radiation therapy are equally effective for patients with a life expectancy less than or equal to 10 years. Surgery may be superior to radiation if longer survival is expected. In locally advanced disease radiation therapy is preferred to surgery, due to a lower rate of complications. Management of metastatic disease requires offsetting androgen effects by castration or by antiandrogens. Orchiectomy, the safest way to produce castration, is unacceptable to 50% of patients. LHRH analogs are safer than estrogens, but more expensive; the risk of tumor flare up controindicates these compounds in life-threatening situations. The use of ketoconazole is limited by long-term toxicity, but may be life-saving in life-threatening situations, due to a rapid onset of action. Antiandrogens are as effective as castration, but are not commercially available in the USA. Alternative treatments include Estracyt, intermittent estrogentherapy, progesterone derivative and aminogluthetimide. Radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy to the prostate cause erectile impotence with persistence of orgasmic sensations. These patients are ideal candidates for erection-restoring interventions, such as intrapenile injections or penile implants.