Effect of low oral doses of disopyramide and amiodarone on ventricular and atrial arrhythmias of chagasic patients with advanced myocardial damage

Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification and Prevention in Chagas Disease: A Non-systematic Review of the Literature

Chagas disease is an important public health problem in Latin America. However, migration and globalisation have resulted in the increased presence of Chagas disease worldwide. Sudden cardiac death is the leading cause of death in people with Chagas disease, most often due to ventricular fibrillation. Although more common in patients with documented ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death can also be the first manifestation of Chagas disease in patients with no previous symptoms or known heart failure. Major predictors of sudden cardiac death include cardiac arrest, sustained and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, left ventricular dysfunction, syncope and bradycardia. The authors review the predictors and risk stratification score developed by Rassi et al. for death in Chagas heart disease. They also discuss the evidence for anti-arrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, ICDs and pacemakers for the prevention of sudden cardiac death in these patients. Given the widespread global burden, understanding the risk stratification and prevention of sudden cardiac death in Chagas disease is of timely concern.

Amiodarone for arrhythmia in patients with Chagas disease: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Background

Chagas disease is a neglected chronic condition caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, with high prevalence and burden in Latin America. Ventricular arrhythmias are common in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy, and amiodarone has been widely used for this purpose. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of amiodarone in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy.

Methodology

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS up to January 2018. Data from randomized and observational studies evaluating amiodarone use in Chagas cardiomyopathy were included. Two reviewers selected the studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Overall quality of evidence was accessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Principal findings

We included 9 studies (3 before-after studies, 5 case series and 1 randomized controlled trial). Two studies with a total of 38 patients had the full dataset, allowing individual patient data (IPD) analysis. In 24-hour Holter, amiodarone reduced the number of ventricular tachycardia episodes in 99.9% (95%CI 99.8%-100%), ventricular premature beats in 93.1% (95%CI 82%-97.4%) and the incidence of ventricular couplets in 79% (RR 0.21, 95%CI 0.11–0.39). Studies not included in the IPD analysis showed a reduction of ventricular premature beats (5 studies), ventricular tachycardia (6 studies) and ventricular couplets (1 study). We pooled the incidence of adverse side effects with random effects meta-analysis; amiodarone was associated with corneal microdeposits (61.1%, 95%CI 19.0–91.3, 5 studies), gastrointestinal events (16.1%, 95%CI 6.61–34.2, 3 studies), sinus bradycardia (12.7%, 95%CI 3.71–35.5, 6 studies), dermatological events (10.6%, 95%CI 4.77–21.9, 3 studies) and drug discontinuation (7.68%, 95%CI 4.17–13.7, 5 studies). Quality of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.

Conclusions

Amiodarone is effective in reducing ventricular arrhythmias, but there is no evidence for hard endpoints (sudden death, hospitalization). Although our findings support the use of amiodarone, it is important to balance the potential benefits and harms at the individual level for decision-making.

Chagas disease is a chronic neglected tropical disease, with high prevalence and burden in Latin America. About 30% of chronically infected patients develop Chagas cardiomyopathy. Ventricular arrhythmias are common in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy and treatment approaches include medications, resynchronization therapy, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Studies published from 1980 to 1990 have evaluated the effect of amiodarone. According to our systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis, amiodarone reduced ventricular tachycardia, ventricular premature beats and incidence of ventricular couplets. Although the strong evidence of clinical benefit with arrhythmia reduction, this information should be interpreted with caution, since arrhythmia is a surrogate outcome and since its clinical impact on death and hospitalization reduction over time is not clear. Little information was identified related to hard endpoints. Regarding side effects, our systematic review observed that amiodarone was associated with corneal microdeposits, gastrointestinal events, sinus bradycardia, dermatological events, pneumonitis, hypothyroidism and drug discontinuation. The currently available evidence shows that amiodarone seems to be an effective antiarrhythmic drug for patients with Chagas disease, especially in settings where an implantable cardioverter defibrillator is not available or affordable, but that a balance between potential benefits and harms at the individual level is needed.

Adverse effects of low dose amiodarone: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the odds of experiencing adverse effects with low dose amiodarone therapy compared with placebo.

BACKGROUND

An estimate of the likelihood of experiencing amiodarone-related adverse effects with exposure to low daily doses of the drug is lacking in the published reports, and little information is available on adverse effect event rates in control groups not receiving the drug.

METHODS

Data from four published trials involving 1,465 patients were included in a meta-analysis design. The criteria for inclusion were 1) double-blind, placebo-controlled design; 2) absence of a crossover design between patient groups; 3) mean follow-up of at least 12 months; 4) maintenance amiodarone dose < or = 400 mg/day; and 5) presence of an explicit description of adverse effects. Data were pooled after testing for homogeneity of treatment effects across trials, and summary odds ratios were calculated by the Peto-modified Mantel-Haenszel method for each adverse effect.

RESULTS

The mean amiodarone dose per day ranged from 152 to 330 mg; 738 patients were randomized to receive amiodarone and 727 placebo. Exposure to amiodarone in this dose range, for a minimal duration of 12 months, resulted in odds similar to those of placebo for hepatic and gastrointestinal adverse effects, but in significantly higher odds than those of placebo (p < 0.05) for experiencing thyroid (odds ratio [OR] 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 8.7), neurologic (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.7), skin (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.2), ocular (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 9.6) and bradycardic (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.3) adverse effects. A trend toward increased odds of pulmonary toxicity was noted (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 5.3), but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). The unadjusted total incidence of drug discontinuation was 22.9% in the amiodarone group and 15.4% in the placebo group. The odds of discontinuing the drug in the amiodarone group was approximately 1.5 times that of the placebo group (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.9) (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, there is a higher likelihood of experiencing several amiodarone-related adverse effects with exposure to low daily doses of the drug. Thus, although low dose amiodarone may be well tolerated, it is not free of adverse effects.

Medical treatment of cardiac arrhythmias in Chagas' heart disease

There are no controlled clinical trials evaluating drug therapy in patients with ventricular arrhythmias and chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy. Empirical treatment with disopyramide (400-1, 1,000mg/d), phenytoin (4-6mg/d), mexiletine 600-1,200mg/d), propafenone (900mg/d), amiodarone (loading: 1,000mg/d, 10-14 days; maintenance 200-600mg/d), and sotalol (320mg/d) had efficacy and tolerance ranging from 18% to 90% with heterogeneous criteria for efficacy definition. Further studies with homogenous criteria are required to determine which is most appropriate drug therapy for patients with chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy and ventricular arrhythmias.

Effects of phenytoin on the ventricular tachyarrhythmias of chronic Chagas' disease

The effects of phenytoin on the ventricular tachyarrhythmias of 11 patients with chronic chagasic myocarditis were investigated, and correlated with the serum phenytoin levels. Physical examination, laboratory tests and 24- to 48-h ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings were performed before, during (7-14 days) and after treatment with phenytoin (4-6 mg/kg/day, orally, in three divided doses). Significant (greater than 90%) reduction of couplets, bigeminy and runs of ventricular tachycardia were observed in 50-67% of the patients, whereas the frequency of isolated premature ventricular contractions was significantly (greater than 70%) reduced in only 2 patients (18%). Proarrhythmic activity was not observed and adverse side effects were of mild intensity and usually transient, except in one patient, who developed pruritus and skin rash in the presence of toxic phenytoin serum levels (27 micrograms/ml). It is suggested that phenytoin may be useful for the control of repetitive forms of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in selected patients with chronic chagasic myocarditis.

Ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular myocardial function in chronic chagasic patients

To study the relationship of complex ventricular arrhythmias to the presence and extent of myocardial damage, 556 chronic chagasic patients were submitted to an extensive protocol, including left ventricular cineangiography and Holter monitoring, and properly classified according to clinical, electrocardiographic and hemodynamic findings. Stages of the clinical-hemodynamic classification corresponded to increasing degrees of myocardial damage, age, prevalence and complexity of ventricular arrhythmias. Myocardial damage (particularly left ventricular dilatation) was the most important clinical factor linked to the presence of complex ventricular arrhythmias. A clear difference in terms of ventricular function was found only when arrhythmias were grouped into simple (Lown grades I and II) and complex (grades III and IV) forms. It is recommended that any classification for chagasic patients must be based on signs of myocardial involvement, instead of clinical or electrocardiographic findings alone. Evaluation should include accurate determination of left ventricular myocardial function, along with the search for the presence of complex ventricular arrhythmias and abnormalities of conduction.

Amiodarone in the management of cardiac arrhythmias: current concepts

This article reviews current information on the clinical pharmacology, therapeutic utility, and adverse reactions of amiodarone, with emphasis on guidelines for its rational use.