Placebo-controlled trial of oral enoximone in end-stage congestive heart failure refractory to optimal treatment

Oral Enoximone as an Alternative to Protracted Intravenous Medication in Severe Pediatric Myocardial Failure

Phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitors have been used successfully in pediatric patients with acute or chronic myocardial dysfunction over the last two decades. Their protracted continuous intravenous administration is associated with risk of infectious and thromboembolic complications. Weaning intravenous medication and starting oral angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and/or beta-blockers can be challenging. We reviewed retrospectively hospital records of 48 patients receiving oral enoximone treatment in a single tertiary pediatric cardiac center between November 2005 and April 2014. Failure to wean from intravenous milrinone infusion and/or intolerance of ACE inhibitors and/or beta-blockers was indications for oral enoximone treatment. Age of the patients ranged between 0.5 and 191 months (median 7.5 months) at the time of starting enoximone treatment. There were 14 patients (29 %) with left ventricular dysfunction due to myocarditis or dilated cardiomyopathy and 34 patients (71 %) with myocardial dysfunction complicating congenital heart disease. Fifteen (44 %) of these 34 patients had left ventricular dysfunction, 13 (38 %) right ventricular dysfunction, and in 6 (18 %) both ventricles were failing. Duration of oral enoximone treatment was between 3 days and 34 months (median of 2.3 months). Myocardial functional recovery allowed for weaning of enoximone treatment in 15 patients (31 %) after 6 days-15 months (median 5 months). No adverse hemodynamic effects were noted. Blood stained gastric aspirates encountered in two patients resolved with concomitant milk administration. Based on our limited experience, oral enoximone is a well-tolerated and promising alternative to intravenous medication and/or other commonly used oral medications in selected pediatric patients with chronic heart failure.

Quality of life and long-term mortality in patients with advanced chronic heart failure treated with intermittent low-dose intravenous inotropes in an outpatient setting

AIMS

There are limited data on the effect of low-dose, intermittent inotropic therapy in an outpatient setting on the quality of life (QOL) in patients with advanced refractory heart failure (HF) symptoms. We aimed to analyse the effect of this treatment modality on QOL and subsequent survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population comprised 287 consecutive patients with advanced refractory HF symptoms who were treated with low-dose, intravenous intermittent inotropic therapy in the HF Day Care Service at Sheba Medical Centre between September 2000 and September 2012. All patients completed a baseline Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ), and 137 (48%) completed a 1 year follow-up questionnaire. MLWHFQ scores' means ranged from 0 (better QOL) to 5 (worse QOL). Mean age was 68 ± 12, 86% were men, 77% had ischaemic cardiomyopathy, and the mean left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was 26% ± 13. The mean baseline MLWHFQ score was 3.1 (±1), while the mean at 1 year of treatment was of 2.7 (±1.1), indicating an overall improvement in QOL associated with intermittent low-dose inotrope therapy (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that younger age, non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, and worse renal function were independently associated with improvement in QOL at 1 year. Improvement in QOL was not associated with a significant survival benefit during subsequent follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced refractory HF symptoms, treatment with low-dose, intermittent intravenous inotropes in an outpatient setting is associated with significant improvement in QOL. However, improvement in QOL in this population does not appear to affect subsequent long-term survival.

Inotropes do not increase mortality in advanced heart failure

Inotrope use is one of the most controversial topics in the management of heart failure. While the heart failure community utilizes them and recognizes the state of inotrope dependency, retrospective analyses and registry data have overwhelmingly suggested high mortality, which is logically to be expected given the advanced disease states of those requiring their use. Currently, there is a relative paucity of randomized control trials due to the ethical dilemma of creating control groups by withholding inotropes from patients who require them. Nonetheless, results of such trials have been mixed. Many were also performed with agents no longer in use, on patients without an indication for inotropes, or at a time before automatic cardio-defibrillators were recommended for primary prevention. Thus, their results may not be generalizable to current clinical practice. In this review, we discuss current indications for inotrope use, specifically dobutamine and milrinone, depicting their mechanisms of action, delineating their patterns of use in clinical practice, defining the state of inotrope dependency, and ultimately examining the literature to ascertain whether evidence is sufficient to support the current view that these agents increase mortality in patients with heart failure. Our conclusion is that the evidence is insufficient to link inotropes and increased mortality in low output heart failure.

Phosphodiesterase III inhibitors for heart failure

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of chronic heart failure, vasodilating agents, ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers have shown an increase of life expectancy. Another strategy is to increase the inotropic state of the myocardium : phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDIs) act by increasing intra-cellular cyclic AMP, thereby increasing the concentration of intracellular calcium, and lead to a positive inotropic effect.

OBJECTIVES

This overview on summarised data aims to review the data from all randomised controlled trials of PDIs III versus placebo in symptomatic patients with chronic heart failure. The primary endpoint is total mortality. Secondary endpoints are considered such as cause-specific mortality, worsening of heart failure (requiring intervention), myocardial infarction, arrhythmias and vertigos. We also examine whether the therapeutic effect is consistent in the subgroups based on the use of concomitant vasodilators, the severity of heart failure, and the type of PDI derivative and/or molecule. This overview updates our previous meta-analysis published in 1994.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised trials of PDIs versus placebo in heart failure were searched using MEDLINE (1966 to 2004 January), EMBASE (1980 to 2003 December), Cochrane CENTRAL trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004) and McMaster CVD trials registries, and through an exhaustive handsearching of international abstracting publications (abstracts published in the last 22 years in the "European Heart Journal", the "Journal of the American College of Cardiology" and "Circulation").

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials of PDIs versus placebo with a follow-up duration of more than three months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

21 trials (8408 patients) were eligible for inclusion in the review. 4 specific PDI derivatives and 8 molecules of PDIs have been considered.

MAIN RESULTS

As compared with placebo, treatment with PDIs was found to be associated with a significant 17% increased mortality rate (The relative risk was 1.17 (95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.30; p<0.001). In addition, PDIs significantly increase cardiac death, sudden death, arrhythmias and vertigos. Considering mortality from all causes, the deleterious effect of PDIs appears homogeneous whatever the concomitant use (or non-use) of vasodilating agents, the severity of heart failure, the derivative or the molecule of PDI used.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm that PDIs are responsible for an increase in mortality rate compared with placebo in patients suffering from chronic heart failure. Currently available results do not support the hypothesis that the increased mortality rate is due to additional vasodilator treatment. Consequently, the chronic use of PDIs should be avoided in heart failure patients.

Health-related quality of life measurement in heart failure: challenges for the new millennium

Health-related quality of life (HRQL), representing a patient-driven end point, has been increasingly emphasized in randomized clinical trials of new heart failure therapies. Measurement of HRQL depends on the use of validated instruments, with attention paid to the timing of administration and analysis of data in the context of conventional morbidity and mortality end points. In a review of HRQL measurement in heart failure drug trials published from 1966 to 1999, we found that important data, such as the number of participating subjects, are often lacking. HRQL is analyzed as a stand-alone end point without consideration of the underlying clinical trajectory of the disease. Improvements in trials methodology are warranted if quality-of-life data are to be meaningful in the determination of drug efficacy in heart failure.

Quality of life in cardiac patient research: a meta-analysis

This article reports a meta-analysis of 84 studies of quality of life (QOL) in cardiac patient populations published in the 5-year period 1987-1991. Selected methodologies and substantive characteristics of the studies are described. An overall effect size of .31 indicated a small but significant positive effect of pharmacologic, mechanical, surgical, nursing, or other treatment on QOL. No negative effect of treatment was found for any cardiovascular diagnostic category. Homogeneity analysis revealed eight potential moderators of the overall effect size: quality of study, gender of sample, time dimension, sampling method, intervention, marital status of subjects, quality-of-life dimension measured, and sample size.

Doppler-derived aortic maximal acceleration. A reliable index of left ventricular systolic function

We compared maximal acceleration of aortic blood flow (aortic Amax), calculated from maximal aortic velocity obtained with a conventional echo-Doppler machine with the invasive inotropic index left ventricular end-systolic pressure/left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESP/LVESV) ratio and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Continuous wave (CW) and pulsed wave (PW) Doppler aortic blood flows were recorded from the apical view in 16 patients (age, 62.3 +/- 6.4 years) within 24 h of left-sided catheterization. The theoretical exponential relationship between LVEF and LVESP/LVESV was confirmed in our study population (r = 0.92; p < 0.0001). The relationship between aortic Amax determined either by CW or PW and LVESP/LVESV was linear (r = 0.92 and 0.93, respectively, p < 0.001), whereas the relationship between aortic Amax and angiographic LVEF was exponential (PW: r = 84; CW: r = 0.85; both p < 0.001). We conclude that (1) aortic Amax, derived from maximal velocity obtained with a conventional machine, can be used as an index of left ventricular systolic function, and (2) PW as well as CW Doppler signals can be used for this calculation.

The role of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in heart failure

Myocardial contractility is dependent on available intracellular calcium and this can be enhanced by increasing intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate. One way of achieving this is by inhibiting the phosphodiesterase III enzyme. Over the last 15 years, a number of new drugs with this mechanism of action have been studied in man and have been found not only to have a positive inotropic action on the heart but also a vasodilating action on peripheral blood vessels. This combination of effects produces favourable haemodynamic improvement in patients with chronic heart failure. While some smaller studies showed that this did translate into an improvement in symptoms and functional capacity, a large well-designed and controlled clinical trial showed that survival was decreased when milrinone was used in target daily doses of 40 mg. For this reason, chronic long-term oral therapy with phosphodiesterase III inhibitors is not currently being actively pursued. They may still have a role as acute short-term therapy in severely ill patients who do not respond adequately to optimal standard drug therapy. Milrinone has been one of the most widely studied drugs in this regard. Even during short-term administration, its use should be closely monitored for any evidence of an increase in ventricular arrhythmias or decrease in ventricular function.