The role of captopril as single therapy in hypertension and angina pectoris

The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril rescues mice from endotoxin-induced lethal hepatitis

The renin–angiotensin system is classically regarded as a crucial regulator of circulatory homeostasis, but recent studies also revealed its pro-inflammatory roles. The beneficial effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) in severe inflammatory injury in the lung and heart have been previously reported, but its potential effects on lethal hepatitis were unknown. In this study, a mouse model with LPS/d-galactosamine (GalN)-induced fulminant hepatitis were used to test the protective potential of captopril, a representative ACEI. The results indicated that treatment with captopril significantly decreased the plasma level of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, alleviated the histopathological damage of the liver tissue and improve the survival rate of LPS/GalN-challenged mice. These effects were accompanied by reduced mRNA levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the liver, and decreased protein level of TNF-α and IL-6 in the plasma. In addition, the activation of caspases 3, 8 and 9, and the presence of TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells, were also suppressed by captopril treatment. The above evidence suggested that the renin–angiotensin system might be involved in the development of LPS/GalN-induced fulminant hepatitis and ACEI might have potential value in lethal hepatitis.

Anti-ischemic effects of angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibition in hypertension

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether augmentation of bradykinin (BK) bioavailability with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition is associated with reduced exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in hypertension.

BACKGROUND

Bradykinin responses are depressed in hypertension, and endothelial dysfunction contributes to myocardial ischemia by promoting abnormal coronary vasomotion during stress.

METHODS

Fourteen hypertensive (HT) and 17 normotensive (NT), mildly symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and ST-segment depression during exercise were studied before and after seven days of oral enalapril (EN), which was titrated from 2.5 to 20 mg daily. Patients underwent two treadmill exercise tests and determination of forearm vasodilator response to BK.

RESULTS

Despite receiving a lower dose of EN (7.8 vs. 14.8 mg, p < 0.001), NT patients had a significant reduction in blood pressure compared to HT patients. Compared to pre-EN, the ischemic threshold, defined as the rate-pressure product at the onset of 1-mm ST depression (p = 0.045), the duration of exercise to 1-mm ST depression (180 +/- 54 s, p = 0.007) and the maximum exercise duration (94 +/- 18 s, p < 0.001) were greater after EN in HT patients, but not in NT subjects (all p > or = 0.3). Patients with a greater drop in blood pressure experienced no improvement in exercise-induced ischemia. Forearm blood flow responses to BK were improved with EN in all patients to a similar extent. Moreover, no correlation was observed between the basal response to BK or the magnitude of its improvement with EN and with either the dose of EN or the improvement in exercise ischemic threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise-induced myocardial ischemia is ameliorated in HT patients with CAD by ACE inhibition.

ACE-inhibitors in coronary artery disease?

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors are established in the treatment of arterial hypertension and heart failure. In recent years ACE-inhibitors have also been used in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), since from experimental data an antiischemic action of these agents is suggested. Antiischemic effects of ACE-inhibitors may be exerted through a reduction of myocardial oxygen demand, by a reduction of angiotensin-mediated coronary vasoconstriction, by an interaction with bradykinin and the prostaglandin system, by a modulation of endothelial control of vascular tone, and by an interaction with the sympathetic nervous system. However, clinical findings on potential beneficial effects of ACE-inhibitors in patients with CAD are inconsistent and controversial. While in hypertensive patients with CAD ACE-inhibitors generally seem to attenuate myocardial ischemia at rest and during exercise, a significant fraction of about 30% of normotensive patients with CAD does not benefit or even deteriorates. Lowering of coronary perfusion pressure and alteration of transmural blood flow distribution may be responsible for this. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction (SOLVD) or congestive heart failure (CONSENSUS, SOLVD) ACE-inhibitors have been proven to prevent progressive deterioration in left ventricular function and to reduce mortality. In patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction (SAVE), long-term administration of captropril was associated with an improvement in survival and reduced morbidity and mortality due to major cardiovascular events. Therefore, from a prognostic viewpoint patients with CAD and left ventricular dysfunction or congestive heart failure should be treated with ACE-inhibitors, although the clinical use of ACE-inhibitors in patients with ongoing angina pectoris may be limited by an aggravation of angina, presumably due to critically lowering coronary perfusion pressure. Finally, ACE-inhibitors failed to prevent restenosis after successful PTCA. In conclusion, from a prognostic viewpoint patients with CAD and congestive heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction should be treated with ACE-inhibitors. In hypertensive patients ACE-inhibitors generally seem to attenuate myocardial ischemia. In normotensive patients with CAD and angina pectoris but without left ventricular dysfunction ACE-inhibitors cannot generally be recommended at present, unless the patients, which may have benefit from ACE-inhibitor treatment can be better defined.