Plastic material used to optimize radiotherapy of head and neck tumors and the mammary carcinoma

MRI-based Assessment of 3D Intrafractional Motion of Head and Neck Cancer for Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

To determine the 3-dimensional (3D) intrafractional motion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images from 56 patients with HNSCC in the treatment position were analyzed. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging consisted of 3D images acquired every 2.9 seconds for 4 minutes 50 seconds. Intrafractional tumor motion was studied in the 3 minutes 43 seconds of images obtained after initial contrast enhancement. To assess tumor motion, rigid registration (translations only) was performed using a region of interest (ROI) mask around the tumor. The results were compared with bulk body motion from registration to all voxels. Motion was split into systematic motion and random motion. Correlations between the tumor site and random motion were tested. The within-subject coefficient of variation was determined from 8 patients with repeated baseline measures. Random motion was also assessed at the end of the first week (38 patients) and second week (25 patients) of radiation therapy to investigate trends of motion.

RESULTS

Tumors showed irregular occasional rapid motion (eg, swallowing or coughing), periodic intermediate motion (respiration), and slower systematic drifts throughout treatment. For 95% of the patients, displacements due to systematic and random motion were <1.4 mm and <2.1 mm, respectively, 95% of the time. The motion without an ROI mask was significantly (P<.0001, Wilcoxon signed rank test) less than the motion with an ROI mask, indicating that tumors can move independently from the bony anatomy. Tumor motion was significantly (P=.005, Mann-Whitney U test) larger in the hypopharynx and larynx than in the oropharynx. The within-subject coefficient of variation for random motion was 0.33. The average random tumor motion did not increase notably during the first 2 weeks of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D intrafractional tumor motion of HNSCC is small, with systematic motion <1.4 mm and random motion <2.1 mm 95% of the time.

Assessment of a customised immobilisation system for head and neck IMRT using electronic portal imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate set-up reproducibility of a cabulite shell and determine CTV-PTV margins for head and neck intensity-modulated-radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients were entered into the study. A total of 354 anterior and lateral isocentric electronic portal images (EPIs) were compared to simulator reference images.

RESULTS

About 94% of all translational displacements were < or =3 mm, and 99% < or =5 mm. The overall systematic error was 0.9 mm (+/-1.0SD) in the Right-Left, 0.7 mm (+/-0.9SD) in the Superior-Inferior and -0.02 mm (+/-1.1SD) in the Anterior-Posterior directions. The corresponding SDs of the random errors were +/-0.4, +/-0.6 and +/-0.7 mm. The estimated margins required from CTV-PTV were calculated according to the Van Herk formula was 2.9, 2.6 and 3.3 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This head and neck immobilisation system is of sufficient accuracy for its use with IMRT treatments and a 3 mm CTV-PTV margin has been adopted.

Is one head and neck immobilization system as good as another? One center's experience

The William Buckland Radiotherapy Center has used 2 different immobilization systems for patients requiring radiotherapy to the head-and-neck region. A polycarbonate mask was manufactured for radical treatments and a thermoplastic mask for palliative treatments. This study evaluated field placement accuracy, staff opinion, and production costs of both systems. The manual matching program of Varian PortalVision Electronic Portal Imaging (EPI) System was used to assess field placement accuracy on a daily basis. Radiation therapists (RTs) were surveyed before and after the study to determine their opinions of each system. Production time and required materials were recorded to assess cost. Nineteen patients from each system had daily EPI results compiled with no statistically significant difference observed in field placement accuracy. The thermoplastic system was found to be more cost efficient due to a combination of the reduced production time and reuseability of the masks. User acceptability of the thermoplastic system has increased so that it is now the preferred system. In conclusion, the thermoplastic system is a viable alternative to the polycarbonate system in terms of treatment accuracy and cost. It is recommended that the thermoplastic system be used for all radical and palliative treatments. In addition, RTs prefer the thermoplastic system.

[Influence of thermoplastic masks on the absorbed skin dose for head and neck tumor radiotherapy]

The influence of thermoplastic masks used in clinical routine for patient immobilization in head and neck radiotherapy treatment on the absorbed skin dose has been investigated at Gustave-Roussy Institute. The measurements were performed in 60Co gamma-rays, 4 and 6MV X-rays and in 8 and 10MeV electron beams. Initially, the measurements were performed with thermoluminescent dosimeters (LiF) and a NACP chamber on a polystyrene phantom in order to study the influence of physical parameters (distance, field size, energy...) on first millimeters depth variation dose. The study was completed with in vivo measurements on 14 patients using various dosimeters (thermoluminescent detectors, diodes) in order to assess the increase of dose on first millimeters depth and to verify the delivered dose during treatment sessions (quality control). In treatment conditions, masks lead to an important increase of dose on the first millimeter in 60Co gamma-rays beams (dose value normalized to maximum of dose increase from 57.1% to 77.7% for 0.5 mm-water depth and from 78.5% to 88% for 1 mm-water depth); its contribution is less important in 4 and 6 MV X-rays beams (dose value normalized to maximum of dose increase from 49.5% to 63.2% for 0.5 mm-water depth and from 59% to 70.1% for 1 mm-water depth). Concerning 8 and 10 MeV electron beams, the normalized dose value increase respectively from 78.4% to 81.7% and from 82.2% to 86.1% for 0.5 mm-water depth. In vivo dosimetry enabled the quality control of delivered dose during treatment. Measured dose is in agreement within +/- 5% with the prescribed dose for 92.3% of cases. In routine, in vivo dosimetry allowed to quantify the increase of skin dose induced by thermoplastic masks for various energies of photon and electron beams as well as quality control.

Immobilization devices for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans show radiation dose distribution that is highly conformal to the target volume. The successful clinical implementation of these radiotherapy modalities requires precise positioning of the target to avoid a geographical miss. Effective reduction in target positional inaccuracies can be achieved with the proper use of immobilization devices. This paper reviews some of the immobilization devices that have been used and/or have the potential of being used for IMRT. The immobilization devices being reviewed include stereotactic frame, Talon system, thermoplastic molds, Alpha Cradles, and Vac-Lok system. The implementation of these devices at various anatomical sites is discussed.

Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors

PURPOSE

Setup accuracy is an important factor influencing the definition of the planning target volume (PTV). The purpose of this study was to compare the setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks used for immobilization of patients with brain or head and neck tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with brain or head and neck tumors were consecutively assigned to one of three different thermoplastic masks (Posifix): head mask with three fixation points (3 FP, ten patients), head and shoulder mask with four fixation points (4 FP, ten patients), head and shoulder mask with five fixation points (5 FP, four fixations plus an additional one on the top of head, ten patients). Once a week, during the session with a 6 MV linac (Elekta), orthogonal (antero-posterior and lateral) portal images were acquired for three fictitious isocenters placed during the simulation at the level of the head, the neck and the shoulders. Portal images and digitized simulator films were compared using the PIPS pro software, and displacements in antero-posterior (A-P), cranio-caudal (C-C) and medio-lateral (M-L) directions were calculated. From these displacements, 2D or 3D errors were also calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 915 portal images were obtained, of which 98% could be analyzed. For the whole population, total displacements reached a standard deviation (SD) of 2.2 mm at the level of the head and the neck. Systematic and random displacements were in the same order of magnitude and reached a SD of 1.8 mm. Patient setup was slightly worse at the shoulder level with a total displacement of 2.8 mm (1 SD) for both the C-C and the M-L directions. There again, the systematic and the random components were in the same order of magnitude below 2.4 mm (+/-SD). For isocenters in the head and in the neck, there was no substantial difference in the setup deviation between the three masks. The setup reproducibility was found to be significantly worse (P=0.01) at the level of the shoulders with the 3 FP mask. For the 2D random error, 1 SD of 2.3 mm was observed compared to 0.8 and 1.2 mm for the 4 and 5 FP masks, respectively. Lastly, 90% of the 3D total deviations were below 4.5 mm for the head and the neck. In the shoulder region, 90% of the 2D total deviations were below 5.5 mm.

CONCLUSION

Thermoplastic masks provide an accurate patient immobilization. At the shoulder level, setup variations are reduced when 4 or 5 FP masks are used. These data could be used for the assessment of margins for the PTV.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: rationale and methods

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a widely accepted technique for the treatment intracranial neoplasms. Combined with modern imaging modalities, SRS has established its efficacy in a variety of indications. From the outset, however, it was recognized that the delivery of a single large dose of radiation was essentially "bad biology made better by good physics." To achieve the accuracy required to compensate for this biological shortcoming, the application of SRS has required that a neurosurgical head frame of some sort be rigidly attached to the patients head. Historically, this prerequisite has, primarily for practical reasons, precluded the delivery of multiple fractions over multiple days. With recent improvements in immobilization and repeat fixation, the good biology of fractionated delivery has been realized. This technique, which has come to be known as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), has significantly expanded the efficacy of the technique through the use of accurate physical targeting coupled with the basic radiobiological principles gleaned from decades of clinical experience.

Comparison of two head and neck immobilization systems

PURPOSE

Accurate and reproducible patient positioning is fundamental to the success of fractionated radiotherapy. Concurrent with the introduction of three-dimensional treatment planning capabilities at our institution, a head and neck immobilization system consisting of a standard foam rubber head support and three casting strips was replaced by a customized mask-based device. This study was performed to analyze the impact of the customized immobilization system on the reproducibility of patient setup during irradiation of head and neck and brain tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients treated from 1989-1991 were immobilized with the strip system while those treated from 1991-1995 were immobilized with the mask. All treatment fields were simulated and were treated on a 4 MV (where the strip, but not the mask, system was fixed to the treatment couch) or > or = 6 MV (where both the strip and the mask systems were fixed to the couch) accelerator. Port films were taken on the initial treatment day, routinely during treatment, and following shifts (requested). The number, magnitude, and direction of any isocenter shifts were retrospectively reviewed. A two-tailed chi square test was used to compare the differences in requested shifts in the strip and mask groups.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 69 brain tumor (35 strip, 34 mask) and 71 head and neck (37 strip, 34 mask) patients. A total of 1575 port films representing 1070 isocenter placements were analyzed. No differences between the immobilization systems was seen on the 4-MV accelerator (where the mask system was not fixed to the couch). On the > or = 6-MV units, the frequency of shifts was 16.1% versus 6.2% (p = 0.002) with the strips and mask, respectively. Almost all of the benefit was seen in the routine films, where the corresponding rates were 13.2% and 4.1% (p = 0.007). For the mask system, the rate of requested shifts on routine films was 4.1% (8/197) for the > or = 6-MV units and 14.5% (24/166) for the 4-MV unit (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Using the frequency of physician-requested isocenter shifts as an indicator of the accuracy of patient repositioning, the newer mask system appears to be an improvement over the previously used strip system, provided that the immobilization device is secured to the treatment couch. Increased accuracy of daily setup provides an opportunity to improve the therapeutic ratio both by increased likelihood of tumor control and decreased risk of normal tissue complications.

Comparison of plastic and Orfit masks for patient head fixation during radiotherapy: precision and costs

PURPOSE

Two widely used immobilization systems for head fixation during radiotherapy treatment for ear-nose-throat (ENT) tumors are evaluated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Masks made of poly vinyl-chloride (plastic) are compared to thermoplastic masks (Orfit) with respect to the accuracy of the treatment setup and the costs. For both types of material, a cut-out (windows corresponding to treatment fields) and a full mask (not cut out) are considered. Forty-three patients treated for ENT tumors were randomized into four groups, to be fixed by one of the following modalities: cut-out plastic mask (12 patients), full plastic mask (11 patients), cut-out Orfit mask (10 patients), and full Orfit mask (10 patients).

RESULTS

Reproducibility of the treatment setup was assessed by calculating the deviations from the mean value for each individual patient and was demonstrated to be identical for all subgroups: no differences were demonstrated between the plastic (s = 2.1 mm) and the Orfit (s = 2.1 mm) group nor between the cut-out (s = 2.0 mm) and not cut-out (s = 2.1 mm) group. The transfer chain from similar to treatment unit was checked by comparing portal images to their respective simulation image, and no differences between the four subgroups (s = +/- 3.5 mm) could be detected. A methodology was described to compare the costs of both types of masks, and illustrated with the data for a department. It was found that Orfit masks are a cheaper alternative than plastic masks; they require much less investment expenses and the workload and material cost of the first mask for each patient is also lower. Cut-out masks are more expensive than full masks, because of the higher workload and the additional material required for second and third masks that are required in case of field modifications.

CONCLUSIONS

No substantial difference in patient setup accuracy between both types of masks was detected, and cutting out the masks had no impact on the fixing capabilities. A first Orfit mask will typically be a cheaper alternative than a plastic mask for most departments (lower fixed and variable costs). The higher material cost of the subsequent Orfit masks, compared to the plastic masks, offset the lower investment expenses.

Photogrammetric accuracy measurements of head holder systems used for fractionated radiotherapy

PURPOSE

We describe how stereo photogrammetry can be used to determine immobilization and repositioning accuracies of head holder systems used for fractionated radiotherapy of intracranial lesions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The apparatus consists of two video cameras controlled by a personal computer and a bite block based landmark system. Position and spatial orientation of the landmarks are monitored by the cameras and processed for the real-time calculation of a target point's actual position relative to its initializing position. The target's position is assumed to be invariant with respect to the landmark system. We performed two series of 30 correlated head motion measurements on two test persons. One of the series was done with a thermoplastic device, the other one with a cast device developed for stereotactic treatment at the German Cancer Research Center. Immobilization and repositioning accuracies were determined with respect to a target point situated near the base of the skull. The repositioning accuracies were described in terms of the distributions of the mean displacements of the single motion measurements.

RESULTS

Movements of the target in the order of 0.05 mm caused by breathing could be detected with a maximum resolution in time of 12 ms. The data derived from the investigation of the two test persons indicated similar immobilization accuracies for the two devices, but the repositioning errors were larger for the thermoplastic device than for the cast device. Apart from this, we found that for the thermoplastic mask the lateral repositioning error depended on the order in which the mask was closed.

CONCLUSION

The photogrammetric apparatus is a versatile tool for accuracy measurements of head holder devices used for fractionated radiotherapy.

Skin-sparing reduction effects of thermoplastics used for patient immobilization in head and neck radiotherapy

Skin-sparing benefits derived from the use of megavoltage photon beams can be strongly reduced when filters are inserted between the source and the patient. The use of plastic masks for immobilizing the patient is the most important cause of this reduction in head and neck treatments. The influence of thermoplastics, commercially available for patient immobilization systems (Orfit Raycast (Luxilon Ind. Co.), Posicast (Sinmed bv) and Optimold (WFR Aquaplast Corp.)), on the patient skin dose value has been investigated by using an NE2534 'Markus' chamber. Indicative measurements with moulded masks (carried out with 2-mm Orfit and 3.2-mm Optimold layers) show significant differences between masks moulded with the two thermoplastics.

Dosimetry and use of an immobilization system for head and neck radiotherapy treatments

The day-to-day reproducibility of planned radiotherapy treatment is an important precondition for achieving good clinical results and reducing toxic effects. This reproducibility is difficult to achieve in the irradiation of head and neck malignancies because of the mobility of this anatomical area. This paper presents a dosimetric study and analysis of the utility of a facial mask immobilization system prepared from an orthopedic glass-fiber bandage. The dosimetric study conducted on a lucite phantom shows that the interposition of one, two, or three layers of the bandage reduces the deep absorbed dose by about 1% at 0.5 cm2, while increasing the absorbed surface dose by 12% (for a field of 15 X 15 cm2 and one layer of bandage) to 46% (for a field of 5 X 5 cm and three layers of bandage). The dosimetric study conducted on a Rando Anderson manikin shows an average increase in the skin dose of about 8% and a maximum increase of about 20%. The good dosimetric results and the practicality of this system of immobilization have persuaded us to propose it as an alternative to the systems currently on the market, which, although rather more sophisticated, are also more expensive.

A head immobilization system for radiation simulation, CT, MRI, and PET imaging

An aquaplast mask/marker immobilization system for the routine radiation therapy treatment of head and neck disease is described. The system utilizes a commercially available thermoplastic mesh indexed and mounted to a rigid frame attached to the therapy couch. The apparatus is designed to permit CT, MRI, and PET diagnostic scans of the patient to be performed in the simulation and treatment position utilizing the same mask, thereby facilitating image correlation. Studies employing weekly simulation indicate that patient treatment position movement can be restricted to 3 mm over the course of treatment. This easily constructed system permits rapid mask formation to be performed on the treatment simulator, resulting in an immobilization device comparable to masks produced with vacuum-forming techniques. Details of construction, verification, and central axis CT, MRI, PET markers are offered.

Three-dimensional motion analysis of an improved head immobilization system for simulation, CT, MRI, and PET imaging

A mask/marker immobilization system for the routine radiation therapy treatment of head and neck disease is described, utilizing a commercially available thermoplastic mesh, indexed and mounted to a rigid frame attached to the therapy couch. Designed to permit CT, MRI, and PET diagnostic scans of the patient to be performed in the simulation and treatment position employing the same mask, the system has been tested in order to demonstrate the reproducibility of immobilization throughout a radical course of irradiation. Three-dimensional analysis of patient position over an 8-week course of daily radiation treatment has been performed for nine patients from digitization of anatomic points identified on orthogonal radiographs. Studies employing weekly simulation indicate that patient treatment position movement can be restricted to 2 mm over the course of treatment. This easily constructed system permits rapid mask formation to be performed on the treatment simulator, resulting in an immobilization device comparable to masks produced with vacuum-forming techniques. Details of motion analysis and central axis CT, MRI, and PET markers are offered.