The effect of radiotherapy on dysphagia and survival in patients with esophageal cancer

Endoscopic Palliative Therapies for Esophageal Cancer

Endoscopic palliation of dysphagia for patients with inoperable esophageal cancer is complex, highly dependent on local expertise, and best done in a multidisciplinary fashion. Systemic therapy is the standard of care because it has been shown to improve survival. Esophageal stenting has traditionally been the most used endoscopic modality. Some modalities such as laser and photodynamic therapy are rarely used. There has been an increasing amount of data on cryotherapy, especially for patients with mild-to-moderate dysphagia on systemic chemotherapy. This article will discuss the latest evidence guiding the palliation of esophageal cancer.

A Phase II Study of Biodegradable Stents Plus Palliative Radiotherapy in Oesophageal Cancer

AIMS

Self-expanding metal stents provide rapid improvement of dysphagia in oesophageal cancer but are associated with complications. The aim of the present study was to test the effectiveness of an alternative treatment of combining biodegradable stents with radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Simon two-stage single-arm prospective phase II trial design was used to determine the efficacy of biodegradable stents plus radiotherapy in patients with dysphagia caused by oesophagus cancer who were unsuitable for radical treatment. Fourteen patients were recruited and data from 12 were included in the final analyses.

RESULTS

Five of 12 patients met the primary end point: one stent-related patient death; four further interventions for dysphagia within 16 weeks of stenting (41.7%, 95% confidence interval 15.2-72.3%). The median time to a 10-point deterioration of quality of life was 2.7 weeks. Nine patients died within 52 weeks of registration. The median time to death from any cause was 15.0 weeks (95% confidence interval 9.6-not reached).

CONCLUSION

The high re-intervention observed, which met the pre-defined early stopping criteria, meant that the suggested alternative treatment was not sufficiently effective to be considered for a larger scale trial design. Further work is needed to define the place of biodegradable stents in the management of malignant oesophageal strictures.

Reassessment of the Role of Enteral Tube Feedings for Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Nutrition is important for patients with esophageal cancer because dysphagia can be exacerbated by chemoradiotherapy. Some centers suggest routine enteral tube placement (TF) to facilitate nutrition. This investigation was to evaluate the use of TF access for patients undergoing multi-modality therapy for esophageal carcinoma. This retrospective study analyzed 113 patients who underwent esophagectomy and 97 patients who underwent definition chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer between 2001 and 2013. Throughout this time period, a strategy for selective tube placement was used. Nutrition was assessed through absolute lymphocyte counts, protein, and albumin levels. A total of 28 (30%) patients during preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 31 (32%) of those undergoing definitive chemoradiation received TFs. There were 16 Dobhoff tubes, 28 gastrostomy tubes, and 15 jejunostomies. Tubes were maintained an average of 3.9 months with 20 (34%) of these patients reporting tube-related complications. At the time of surgery, there was no statistical difference in any of the nutritional assessments between those patients who received TF and those who did not. Both groups experienced similar total postoperative complication rates (64% vs 65%) and similar median length of hospital stay (12 to 13 days). Chemoradiotherapy resulted in decreased nutritional parameters; however, there was no difference in the degree of reduction between those who underwent TF and those who did not. The data show that routine placement of enteral access is not necessary for esophageal carcinoma. In fact, the risks of placing enteral access may outweigh the benefits. Administration of TF should be restricted to select patients during chemoradiotherapy or before esophagectomy.

Liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy for dysphagia palliation in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Dysphagia is a debilitating symptom in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer that contributes to poor quality of life and worsening nutritional status. The 2 most commonly used palliative modalities for dysphagia are radiation therapy and esophageal stent placement. However, radiation therapy is limited by adverse events (AEs) and total dose, and stent placement has a high rate of AEs, including reflux, migration, and chest pain. A relatively new modality of liquid nitrogen endoscopic spray cryotherapy has been described as salvage when other options have been exhausted and when patients are no longer receiving systemic therapy. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of cryotherapy as the primary modality for relieving dysphagia in inoperable esophageal cancer including patients receiving systemic cancer therapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, multicenter, consecutive case series of 49 inoperable esophageal cancer patients undergoing palliative endoscopic cryotherapy at 4 specialized cancer centers from May 2014 to May 2016. The primary outcomes were change in dysphagia scores between pre- and postcryotherapy and AEs. Dysphagia was measured using a 5-point Likert scale: 0, no dysphagia; 1, dysphagia to solids; 2, dysphagia to semisolids; 3, dysphagia to liquids; 4, dysphagia to saliva.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine men and 10 women with a mean age of 58 years underwent a total of 120 cryotherapy treatments. The mean dysphagia score improved significantly from 2.4 precryotherapy to 1.7 postcryotherapy (improvement of .7 points; P < .001). Minor AEs were seen in 6 of 120 (5.0%) cryotherapy treatments (1 intraprocedural and 5 postprocedural). In addition, 1 patient developed a severe intraprocedural AE of dilation-related perforation, whereas another patient developed a benign stricture requiring dilation.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary retrospective study suggests that liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy may be safe and effective for dysphagia palliation in inoperable esophageal cancer. Large prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and identify patient and procedure characteristics associated with the greatest benefit.

Fluoroscopic removal of retrievable self-expandable metal stents in patients with malignant oesophageal strictures: Experience with a non-endoscopic removal system

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate clinical outcomes of fluoroscopic removal of retrievable self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) for malignant oesophageal strictures, to compare clinical outcomes of three different removal techniques, and to identify predictive factors of successful removal by the standard technique (primary technical success).

METHODS

A total of 137 stents were removed from 128 patients with malignant oesophageal strictures. Primary overall technical success and removal-related complications were evaluated. Logistic regression models were constructed to identify predictive factors of primary technical success.

RESULTS

Primary technical success rate was 78.8 % (108/137). Complications occurred in six (4.4 %) cases. Stent location in the upper oesophagus (P=0.004), stricture length over 8 cm (P=0.030), and proximal granulation tissue (P<0.001) were negative predictive factors of primary technical success. If granulation tissue was present at the proximal end, eversion technique was more frequently required (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroscopic removal of retrievable SEMSs for malignant oesophageal strictures using three different removal techniques appeared to be safe and easy. The standard technique is safe and effective in the majority of patients. The presence of proximal granulation tissue, stent location in the upper oesophagus, and stricture length over 8 cm were negative predictive factors for primary technical success by standard extraction and may require a modified removal technique.

KEY POINTS

• Fluoroscopic retrievable SEMS removal is safe and effective. • Standard removal technique by traction is effective in the majority of patients. • Three negative predictive factors of primary technical success were identified. • Caution should be exercised during the removal in those situations. • Eversion technique is effective in cases of proximal granulation tissue.

Laser Therapy and Insertion of Wallstents for Palliative Treatment of Esophageal Carcinoma

A combination of endoscopic laser therapy (ELT) and insertion of Wallstents is a good alternative therapy for palliation of esophageal carcinoma and was performed in 12 patients. The method allows repeated laser therapy and, if necessary, supplementary insertion of stents to maintain the patients' ability to swallow during their remaining lifespan.

Recent Advances From Basic and Clinical Studies of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most aggressive squamous cell carcinomas and is highly prevalent in Asia. Alcohol and its metabolite, acetaldehyde, are considered definite carcinogens for the esophagus. Polymorphisms in the aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 gene, which encodes an enzyme that eliminates acetaldehyde, have been associated with esophageal carcinogenesis. Studies of the mutagenic and carcinogenic effects of acetaldehyde support this observation. Several recent large-scale comprehensive analyses of the genomic alterations in ESCC have shown a high frequency of mutations in genes such as TP53 and others that regulate the cell cycle or cell differentiation. Moreover, whole genome and whole exome sequencing studies have frequently detected somatic mutations, such as G:C→A:T transitions or G:C→C:G transversions, in ESCC tissues. Genomic instability, caused by abnormalities in the Fanconi anemia DNA repair pathway, is also considered a pathogenic mechanism of ESCC. Advances in diagnostic techniques such as magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging or positron emission tomography have increased the accuracy of diagnosis of ESCC. Updated guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network standardize the practice for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer. Patients with ESCC are treated endoscopically or with surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, based on tumor stage. Minimally invasive treatments help improve the quality of life of patients who undergo such treatments. We review recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of ESCC and advances gained from basic and clinical research.

Palliative radiotherapy in esophageal cancer

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy in palliation of dysphagia in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of esophagus and to see the quality of life (QoL) following radiotherapy. This was a prospective clinical study done between September 2006 and May 2008. All consecutive patients with SCC of the esophagus, who are not candidates for definitive treatment, were included in the study. Dysphagia and QoL were assessed using modified Takita's grading and modified questionnaire based on EORTC QLQ 30 respectively. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was delivered to all patients using linear accelerator 6 Mv photons. Patients who had good response with EBRT were further subjected to intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) at 700 cGy using Iridium-192. The cumulative dose each patient received was 65 Gy. Patients were followed up at 6 weeks from completion of treatment to look for any difference in dysphagia grade and QoL following therapy. Thirty-three patients were included in the study. The mean age among males and females was 60.9 and 49.8 years, respectively. Nineteen patients (57.6 %) received EBRT followed by ILBT; the remaining patients received only EBRT. Seven were lost during follow-up, and seven (21.2 %) died during the study period of 6 weeks. Nineteen (57.6 %) were followed up. On follow-up endoscopy, evidence of residual stricture was observed in 57.9 %, and growth in 36.8 %. Of the patients, 27.8 % had biopsy-confirmed residual disease. The median dysphagia score decreased from 4 to 3 after treatment (p = 0.002) in 17 (89.5 %) patients. The mean QoL score improved from 107.5 to 114.1 at 6-week follow-up. Following radiotherapy, 26.3 % had persistent chest pain, increased cough with expectoration in 15.8 %, and hyperpigmentation of skin in 10.5 %. Radiotherapy gives significant relief of dysphagia and improves QoL in 90 % of patients with SCC of esophagus. However, following radiotherapy, a number of patients will have persistent stricture, ulceration, and residual disease.

Different recurrence pattern after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to surgery alone in esophageal cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the rate and pattern of recurrences after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in esophageal cancer patients.

METHODS

We described survival and differences in recurrences from a single center between neoadjuvant CRT (carboplatin/paclitaxel and 41.4 Gy) and surgery alone for the period 2000-2011. To reduce bias, we performed a propensity score matched analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients were analyzed, 75 treated with neoadjuvant CRT and 129 with surgery alone. The pathologic response to neoadjuvant CRT was 69% with a complete response rate of 25%. After matching, baseline characteristics between the groups (both n = 75) were equally distributed. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival was 53 and 42% in the neoadjuvant CRT group compared with 24 and 18% in the surgery-alone group (P = 0.011). After 3 and 5 years' CRT, patients had an estimated locoregional recurrence-free survival of 83 and 73% compared with 52 and 49% in the surgery-alone group (P = 0.015). The distant recurrence-free survival was comparable in both groups. Locoregional recurrences were located less in the paraesophageal lymph nodes in the CRT group than in the surgery-alone group, 9 versus 21%, respectively (P = 0.041). With respect to differences in distant recurrences, we observed more skeletal recurrences in the surgery-alone group compared to CRT, 12 versus 1% (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The neoadjuvant CRT regimen we used offers a significant improvement in outcome, with a different recurrence pattern compared with surgery alone. This effect is probably due to both the pathologic complete response and eradication of micrometastases in CRT group.

Oesophageal cancer--an overview

Oesophageal carcinoma is one of the most virulent malignant diseases and a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Diagnosis and accuracy of pretreatment staging have substantially improved throughout the past three decades. Therapy is challenging and the optimal approach is still debated. Oesophagectomy is considered to be the procedure of choice in patients with operable oesophageal cancer. Endoscopic measures and limited surgical procedures provide an alternative in patients with early carcinomas confined to the oesophageal mucosa. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy are also frequently applied, either as definitive treatment or as neoadjuvant therapy within multimodal approaches. The question of whether multimodal treatment offers improved results has been the focus of many studies since the 1990s. Although results are discordant and even some meta-analyses remain inconclusive, it is now widely accepted that multimodal therapy leads to a modest survival benefit. The role of minimally invasive oesophagectomy is not yet defined. Endoscopic stent insertion, radiotherapy and other palliative measures provide relief of tumour-related symptoms in advanced, unresectable tumour stages.

Temporary stent placement with concurrent chemoradiation therapy in patients with unresectable oesophageal carcinoma: is there an optimal time for stent removal?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of the timing of stent removal on the outcome of temporary stent placement with concurrent chemoradiation therapy in patients with unresectable oesophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on 52 patients undergoing temporary stent placement. Stents were electively removed within 4 weeks in 15 patients (group A), 4-6 weeks in 17 patients (group B) and after 6 weeks in 20 patients (group C). Recurrent symptoms after stent removal, dysphagia score and overall survival periods were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

Stent placement and removal were technically successful in all patients. The dysphagia score was significantly improved in all groups (P < 0.001). In 19 patients (36 %), recurrent symptoms occurred 15-441 days after stent removal. In group A, recurrent obstruction was significantly higher than in groups B (P = 0.049) and C (P = 0.019). Incidence of oesophago-respiratory fistulas in group C was significantly higher than in group A (P = 0.027). There was no significant difference in survival periods.

CONCLUSION

The ideal time for stent removal likely falls between 4 and 6 weeks following the start of palliative CCRT allowing the temporary stents to relieve dysphagia effectively in patients with unresectable oesophageal carcinoma.

KEY POINTS

• Stents are usually required for unresectable oesophageal carcinoma • Optimal timing of stent removal is 4-6 weeks after starting palliative CCRT. • Early stent removal (<4 weeks) is associated with higher recurrence rates. • Delayed stent removal (>6 weeks) is associated with greater oesophago-respiratory fistula development.

Palliative therapy for patients with unresectable esophageal carcinoma

Most patients diagnosed with carcinoma of the esophagus do not undergo therapy with curative intent. The focus of treatment for these patients is to maximize their progression-free survival and palliate the most common sequelae of their disease: dysphagia, malnutrition, pain, and intraluminal tumor bleeding. This article discusses the available treatment options for palliation of patients with unresectable esophageal cancer.

Palliative radiotherapy for patients with tracheobronchial and esophageal compression due to intrathoracic malignant tumors

AIMS

To evaluate palliative outcomes of patients with extrinsic malignant tracheobronchial or esophageal stenosis treated with radiation. Mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy surrounding the tracheobronchi or esophagus may cause compression, presenting as dyspnea and dysphagia respectively. Treatment is important for symptom relief and maintaining patients' quality of life.

METHODS

Dyspnea and dysphagia were assessed using the Hugh-Jones score and a modified dysphagia scale, respectively. A total of 13 patients (median age, 60 years) with dyspnea received palliative radiotherapy. The primary organs were lung (n = 6), colorectum (n = 5), hypopharynx (n = 1) and uterine cervix (n = 1). Three patients received concurrent chemotherapy. The median time-adjusted biological effective dose (BED) was 33.0 Gy(10) . Ten patients (median age, 61) with dysphagia received palliative radiotherapy. The primary organs were lung (n = 7), esophagus (n = 2) and hypopharynx (n = 1). Three patients received concurrent chemotherapy. The median time-adjusted BED was 32.1 Gy(10) .

RESULTS

Palliation of dyspnea and dysphagia occurred in seven (54%) and five (50%) patients, respectively. Patients treated with doses over 35 Gy(10) had greater score improvements than those treated with less than 35 Gy(10) in both groups. Patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy had greater score improvements than those treated with radiotherapy alone. Dyspnea patients with pretreatment scores of 2 (n = 5) had greater score improvements than those with scores of 3 or more (n = 8).

CONCLUSION

External beam radiotherapy should be considered for patients with tracheobronchial or esophageal stenosis before their symptoms worsen. The prescription dose should be over 35 Gy(10) .

Airway complications after covered stent placement for malignant esophageal stricture: special reference to radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of airway complications and survival with special reference to radiation therapy in the care of patients undergoing covered stent placement for malignant esophageal strictures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 208 patients who underwent stent placement with or without palliative radiation therapy for inoperable esophageal cancer were included. The endpoints were frequency, type, and management of airway complications; association between occurrence of airway complications and radiation therapy history; and differences in stent-to-complication interval and survival period after esophageal stenting between patients who underwent radiation therapy before and those who underwent radiation therapy after stent placement.

RESULTS

Airway complications occurred in 23 patients (11.1%): 18 (78.3%) had esophagorespiratory fistula, three (13.0%) had airway narrowing, and two (8.7%) had both complications. The frequency of airway complications was significantly greater among patients who underwent RT than those who did not (p = 0.005) but was not significantly different between the radiation before stenting and radiation after stenting groups (p = 0.158). The median stent-to-complication interval and survival period after esophageal stenting were significantly shorter in the radiation before stenting group than in the radiation after stenting group (p = 0.002, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Esophagorespiratory fistula is much more common than airway narrowing as an airway complication. The rate of complications increases significantly in association with radiation therapy among patients with malignant esophageal stricture. Clinicians need to be aware of earlier airway complications and poorer prognosis among patients who undergo radiation therapy before placement of an esophageal stent than in patients who undergo radiation after stent placement.

Palliative interventions and prognosis in patients with advanced esophageal cancer

In a retrospective review, in order to describe the palliative care and prognosis of patients with advanced cancer of the esophagus, the clinical characteristics and the treatment modalities applied were explored in relation to survival and symptom relief for 261 patients treated without curative potential. The data were obtained from a study of all patients with cancer of the esophagus treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital in the 10-year period from 1990 to 1999. Medical data of the patients were reviewed and missing clinical information was retrieved from local hospitals and general practitioners. The patients were divided into three groups based upon the overall survival from start of treatment to death. Survival ≤3 months is in this paper, defined as 'short,' while survival > 6 months is defined as 'long.' Median survival for the total group of patients was 4 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival was 8%, 3%, and 1%, respectively. Patients with short survival (n= 107) had more advanced disease, lower performance status, and more dysphagia, weight loss, and pain and used more analgesics than patients with long survival (n= 91). Tumor characteristics such as localization, tumor length, and histology were not significantly associated with survival. This result was confirmed in a logistic regression analysis (with backward stepwise elimination) including sex, age, clinical stage, tumor length, tumor localization, histology, performance status, dysphagia, weight loss, and pain, where clinical stage, performance status, weight loss, and pain were included in the final model. A large variety of first-line palliative treatments were applied within the studied time period; external radiotherapy ± brachytherapy (n= 149), brachytherapy alone (n= 44), endoluminal stent (n= 28), laser evaporization (n= 8), chemotherapy (n= 5), and best supportive care only (n= 27). There were no clear differences in the effect on dysphagia between the modalities. Fourteen percent of the patients had treatment related complications. In conclusion, symptoms, performance status, and use of analgesics seemed to better prognosticate survival than tumor characteristics other than stage of disease. Our study reveals that knowledge about prognostic factors is crucial for the choice of palliative treatment. Even though all of the different treatment modalities seemed to provide relief of dysphagia, several other factors should be considered when deciding which treatment modality to offer. The time to onset of relief, duration of response, level of complications, and time spent in hospital should be a part of the decision-making process when selecting the appropriate treatment.

Stents for proximal esophageal cancer: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are an established palliative therapy for esophageal cancer. SEMS placement for cancers near the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is controversial because of a perceived increased risk of complications.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes after patients stented for proximal esophageal cancer (PC) and distal esophageal cancer (DC).

DESIGN

Matched case-control study from a prospective database.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center, Tenwek Hospital, Bomet, Kenya.

PATIENTS

All patients with PC located within 6 cm of the UES were matched with randomly selected controls with DC.

INTERVENTIONS

Outcomes of PC cases were compared with those of DC controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Dysphagia score, complications, median survival.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients with PC were identified and were randomly matched with DC controls. Ninety-three case-control pairs had adequate follow-up information available. Mean dysphagia scores (scale 0-4) improved from 3.4 and 3.3 before stenting for PC and DC, respectively, to 1.5 after stenting for both groups (P = .93). Early complications occurred in 6.5% of PC cases and 9.7% of DC controls (P = .44). Late complications occurred in 20.4% of PC cases and 15.1% of DC controls (P = .25). Median survival was 210 days for PC cases and 272 days for DC controls (P = .25). Outcomes were similar for the subgroup of PC cases whose cancer extended to within 2 cm of the UES.

LIMITATION

An important limitation is the absence of adequate follow-up data for 58 of the 151 case-control pairs.

CONCLUSIONS

SEMSs effectively palliate dysphagia in PC cases, whereas complication and survival rates are not statistically different from those of DC controls.

Esophageal cancer: current and emerging therapy modalities

During the last few years, there has been a gradual increase in treatment options for patients with esophageal malignancies. Several clinical studies have been performed, covering not only radiation and chemotherapy, but also the introduction of novel biological agents into the treatment arsenal. Patients with esophageal carcinoma are now offered second-line and sometimes even third-line treatments, and the number of research protocols is increasing. Despite the newly awakened interest in this malignancy, the overall 5-year survival rate has remained at approximately 10% since the 1980s. This review contains a compilation of available studies of esophageal malignancies and discusses current treatment options as well as newly developed therapies targeted at growth factor receptors.

A phase I/II study to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of accelerated fractionation radiotherapy for the palliation of dysphagia from carcinoma of the oesophagus

AIMS

We hypothesised that accelerated fractionated radiotherapy may provide a good palliative approach for dysphagia relief in patients with incurable oesophageal cancer, significantly reducing the overall duration of treatment, while providing symptom response with an acceptable toxicity profile. A phase I/II accelerated fractionation study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of this approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with incurable oesophageal cancer, symptomatic with dysphagia, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status<or=3, without fistula or oesophageal stent in situ, were eligible. Treatment consisted of 40 Gy in 20 fractions, twice a day (2 Gy per fraction, >or=6 h apart), 5 days a week, over 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the 39 evaluable patients, the dysphagia response rate was 69% (27/39) with a median response duration of 5.5 months. The median time to response was 4 weeks. Twenty-eight per cent (11/39) of patients had transient worsening in their dysphagia scores. Acute toxicity (weeks 1-8) occurred in 41% (16/39) of patients. An improvement in global quality of life by week 8 was seen in 42% of patients. There were no late neurological sequelae. The median overall survival was 8 (range 1.7-58+) months.

CONCLUSION

The ideal palliative regimen should be relatively short, with minimal toxicity, while offering a favourable response profile. Accelerated fractionation fulfils these criteria and is a suitable treatment alternative for the palliation of dysphagia, especially if the goal is to deliver a higher total biological dose within a shorter (2 week) period of time.

Palliative radiation therapy in oncology

Palliative radiation therapy is considered when the incurable cancer patient has symptoms specifically related to a malignancy that may be relieved by localized treatment of the primary tumor or metastatic lesions. Developing a treatment plan with radiation in the palliative setting may be more difficult than the curative setting, where there are clear guidelines for many situations. Radiation therapy has been used successfully in the management of a variety of pain syndromes. Radiation also has proven effective in the management of other tumor-related symptoms, including bleeding, neurologic compromise, dysphagia, and airway obstruction. Palliative radiation can be delivered using a variety of techniques: external beam radiation therapy, intraluminal brachytherapy (radioactive seed delivery), and systemic radionucleotides.

Stent placement or brachytherapy for palliation of dysphagia from esophageal cancer: a prognostic model to guide treatment selection

BACKGROUND

Brachytherapy was found to be preferable to metal stent placement for the palliation of dysphagia because of inoperable esophageal cancer in the randomized SIREC trial. The benefit of brachytherapy, however, only occurred after a relatively long survival. The objective is to develop a model that distinguishes patients with a poor prognosis from those with a relatively good prognosis.

METHODS

Survival was analyzed with Cox regression analysis. Dysphagia-adjusted survival (alive with no or mild dysphagia) was studied with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patient data is from the multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (SIREC, n = 209) and a consecutive series (n = 396). Patients received a stent or single-dose brachytherapy.

RESULTS

Significant prognostic factors for survival included tumor length, World Health Organization performance score, and the presence of metastases (multivariable p < 0.001). A simple score, which also included age and gender, could satisfactorily separate patients with a poor, intermediate, and relatively good prognosis within the SIREC trial. For the poor prognosis group, the difference in dysphagia-adjusted survival was 23 days in favor of stent placement compared with brachytherapy (77 vs. 54 days, p = 0.16). For the other prognostic groups, brachytherapy resulted in a better dysphagia-adjusted survival.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple prognostic score may help to identify patients with a poor prognosis in whom stent placement is at least equivalent to brachytherapy. If further validated, this score can provide an evidence-based tool for the selection of palliative treatment in esophageal cancer patients.

Multimodality treatment of esophageal cancer

Stage specific management of non-small cell lung cancer is widely accepted. The use of pretreatment disease stage to guide therapy for esophageal cancer is an intellectually appealing concept. To date, there isa relative lack of data upon which one may base stage specific treatment decisions for esophageal carcinoma. This is because thorough pretreatment TNM staging is not universally practiced. As a result, stage-specific treatment varies widely. Based upon the available data, surgery alone may be appropriate for resectable, node-negative disease. In the case of clearly un-resectable disease, definitive chemoradiation is indicated.The value of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment modalities in the case of clearly resectable node-negative disease (TlN0 or T2N0) is questionable;however, in the presence of lymph node involvement (N1), or in the case of a marginally resectable primary tumor (T3 or T4), neoadjuvant chemoradiation is probably indicated. Although the achievement ofa complete pathologic response following chemoradiation may obviate surgical resection, even microscopic residual cancer can result in local recurrence. To date, there is no reliable method of ascertaining a complete pathologic response before surgical resection. Therefore, when feasible, the addition of surgical resection following chemoradiation is warranted. Future treatment trials for esophageal cancer should include rigorous pretreatment staging protocols to elucidate stage-specific results of therapy.

Results of the Dutch National study of the palliative effect of irradiation using two different treatment schemes for non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

A national multicenter randomized study compared the efficacy of 2 x 8 Gy versus our standard 10 x 3 Gy in patients with inoperable stage IIIA/B (with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 3 to 4 and/or substantial weight loss) and stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1999 and June 2002, 297 patients were eligible and randomized to receive either 10 x 3 Gy or 2 x 8 Gy by external-beam irradiation. The primary end point was a patient-assessed score of treatment effect on seven thoracic symptoms using an adapted Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. Study sample size was determined based on an average total symptom score difference of more than one point over the initial 39 weeks post-treatment. The time course of symptom scores were also evaluated, and other secondary end points were toxicity and survival.

RESULTS

Both treatment arms were equally effective, as the average total symptom score over the initial 39 weeks did not differ. However, the pattern in time of these scores differed significantly (P < .001). Palliation in the 10 x 3-Gy arm was more prolonged (until week 22) with less worsening symptoms than in 2 x 8-Gy. Survival in the 10 x 3-Gy arm was significantly (P = .03) better than in the 2 x 8-Gy arm with 1-year survival of 19.6% (95%CI, 14.1% to 27.3%) v 10.9% (95%CI, 6.9% to 17.3%).

CONCLUSION

The 10 x 3-Gy radiotherapy schedule is preferred over the 2 x 8-Gy schedule for palliative treatment, as it improves survival and results in a longer duration of the palliative response.

Comparison of Temporary and Permanent Stent Placement with Concurrent Radiation Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical effectiveness of temporary metallic stent placement with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma by comparing it with permanent stent placement with concurrent radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Covered retrievable expandable nitinol stents were placed in 47 patients with esophageal carcinoma 1 week before starting radiation therapy; the stents were electively removed 4 weeks after placement in 24 patients (group A), while not electively removed in the other 23 patients (group B). In cases of complications, the stents were also removed from patients in groups A and B. The dysphagia score, complications (severe pain, granulation tissue formation, stent migration, esophagorespiratory fistula, and hematemesis), tumor overgrowth/regrowth, reintervention rates, and dysphagia-progression-free and overall survival rates were compared in the two groups.

RESULTS

Stent placement or removal was technically successful and well tolerated in all patients. The dysphagia score was significantly improved in both groups after stent placement (P < .01). Each of the stent-related complications was less in group A than in group B but there was no significant difference. However, the total number of patients with one or more than one complications and who needed related reinterventions was significantly less in group A than in group B (P = .042 and .030, respectively). Tumor overgrowth/regrowth and the total number of patients who required related reinterventions was not significantly different (P = 1.00 and .517, respectively). Dysphagia-progression-free and overall survival rates were significantly longer in group A than in group B (P = .005 and .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Temporary placement of a covered retrievable expandable metallic stent with concurrent radiation therapy for patients with esophageal carcinoma is beneficial for reducing complications and related reinterventions and for increasing resultant survival rates compared with permanent esophageal stent placement.

Endoscopic palliative treatment for esophageal and gastric cancer: techniques, complications, and survival in a population-based cohort of 948 patients

BACKGROUND

Under the auspices of the Scottish Audit of Gastric and Esophageal Cancer, we investigated treatment techniques, complications, and survival in a population-based cohort of patients undergoing endoscopic palliative therapy for esophageal or gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 948 patients undergoing endoscopic palliative therapy were identified prospectively and followed for a minimum of 1 year.

RESULTS

Expandable metal stent placement (506 patients) and LASER (117 patients) were the most frequently used treatment options. Stent placement was more common for grade 3 or 4 dysphagia. Delivery of endoscopic palliative therapy varied by region of residence (from 18% to 38% of patients, p < 0.001) but not by deprivation category. Complications were recorded in 16% of patients (155 of 948). Overall survival was 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36-43) at 6 months, 17% (95% CI, 14-19) at 12 months, and 10% (95% CI, 8-12%) at 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

These data define the reality of endoscopic palliative therapy for patients with advanced esophageal or gastric cancer and provide a baseline against which future improvements in care can be measured.

High dose rate brachytherapy for the palliation of malignant dysphagia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is a commonly used palliative treatment for esophageal carcinoma. We evaluated the outcome of HDR brachytherapy in patients with malignant dysphagia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis over a 10-year period was performed of 149 patients treated with HDR brachytherapy, administered in one or two sessions, at a median dose of 15Gy. Patients were evaluated for functional outcome, complications, recurrent dysphagia, and survival.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks after HDR brachytherapy, dysphagia scores had improved from a median of 3 to 2 (n=104; P<0.001), however, dysphagia had not improved in 51 (49%) patients. Procedure-related complications occurred in seven (5%) patients. Late complications, including fistula formation or bleeding, occurred in 11 (7%) patients. Twelve (8%) patients experienced minor retrosternal pain. Median survival of the patients was 160 days with a 1-year survival rate of 15%. Procedure-related mortality was 2%. At follow-up, 55 (37%) patients experienced recurrent dysphagia. In 34 (23%) patients a metal stent was placed to relieve persistent or recurrent dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

HDR brachytherapy is a moderately effective treatment for the palliation of malignant dysphagia. The incidence of early major complications is low, however, persistent and recurrent dysphagia occur frequently, and require often additional treatment.

Methods of palliation of esophageal and gastric cancer

Esophageal and gastric malignancies are common worldwide. Less than half are amenable to curative treatment at the time of diagnosis because of advanced or metastatic disease. Palliation is often required for symptoms, such as dysphagia, gastrointestinal bleeding, aspiration caused by tracheoesophageal fistula, nausea and emesis secondary to gastric outlet obstruction, and malnutrition. This article reviews the gastric outlet obstruction, and malnutrition. This article reviews the medical, endoscopic, and surgical options for palliative treatment.

Palliation of advanced/recurrent esophageal carcinoma with high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The aim was to assess the improvement in swallowing status, complication rate, and overall survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with advanced/recurrent esophageal carcinoma were treated for palliation with high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (HDR-ILRT) with a remote afterloading microSelectron unit (192Ir source) with or without external radiation from November 1994 to May 2000 at the Tata Memorial Hospital. The mean age was 64 years. The mid-third of the esophagus was involved in 38 patients (66%). The group was comprised of 37 previously untreated patients (29 with < or = 50% Karnofsky performance status and old age, 4 with metastatic disease, and 4 with second primary esophageal lesions) and 21 patients with post-treatment recurrent tumors. Thirty-eight patients (65%) received intraluminal brachytherapy alone, whereas the remaining 20 patients (35%) received a combination of external and intraluminal radiation therapy. All patients received 2 fractions of HDR-ILRT 1 week apart with 600 cGy per fraction at 1 cm off axis.

RESULTS

Overall improvement in swallowing status was seen in 22 patients (48%), and 24 (41%) maintained pretreatment swallowing status. Median dysphagia-free survival was 10 months. Overall complication rates were 30%, with stricture seen in 9 patients (15%), ulceration in 6 (10%), and tracheo-esophageal fistula in 3 patients (5%). Complication rates were higher in the post-treatment group (38%) than in the previously untreated group (27%) (p = 0.29). The median overall survival for the entire group was 7 months. Median survival was better, although not significantly, for the previously untreated cohort: 7.8 months vs. 6 months for the post-treatment group (p = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

HDR-ILRT brachytherapy achieves good palliation with acceptable complications in advanced/recurrent esophageal carcinoma.

Chemoradiation in conservation therapy for esophageal cancer

Irradiation alone can be highly beneficial for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer, but external beam irradiation alone is now usually reserved for patients only requiring palliation. Higher cure rates are achieved with irradiation delivered with radiosensitizing chemotherapy based on clinical trials performed over the last decade. Chemoradiation programs based on the modest success with infusional 5-FU, cisplatin, and 50 Gy are justified for either palliative or curative treatment as long as the toxicity is acceptable. One challenge is to increase the incidence of pathologic complete response rates without incurring unacceptable acute toxicity, which is the major dose-limiting factor in current trials. Newer methods that may ameliorate acute injury are different dose schedules for chemoradiation and different methods of dose delivery. Infusional administration of chemotherapy and new dose planning and delivery systems for irradiation (conformal irradiation) are currently under study. Organ preservation for larger numbers of patients may be possible if any of these methods hold up to the early indications of success.

Combined modality therapy for esophageal cancer

Whereas many patients with esophageal carcinoma present with what appears to be localized disease, cure rates with surgical resection alone remain low. Although surgical resection, where feasible, affords patients the best chance of cure, the primary tumor has often invaded local tissues or structures, and occult micrometastases often exist at the time of presentation. In an effort to improve treatment results, various combinations of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy have been used. The results of combined modality therapy are reviewed in this article. The importance of accurate pretreatment staging is discussed, and ongoing prospective randomized trials are reviewed.

Late esophageal toxicity using a combination of external beam radiation, intraluminal brachytherapy and 5-fluorouracil infusion in carcinoma of the esophagus

One hundred patients with potentially curable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus were treated using a combination of external beam radiation, medium-dose intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT), and 5-fluorouracil infusion (as a radiosensitizer) from January 1990 to December 1993. The main objective was to determine late toxicity and optimization of the dose of intraluminal radiation. All patients had external radiation of 50 Gy over 5 1/2 weeks, followed by ILBT of 20 Gy for 50 patients (group 1) and 15 Gy for a subsequent 50 patients (group 2), using a dose rate of 315-330 cGy/h with the prescription at 1 cm off axis. The 5-fluorouracil infusion was 500 mg/m2 administered 12 h prior to ILBT. The treatment-related complications among groups 1 and 2 were strictures 24% vs. 8% (p = 0.029), ulceration 30% vs. 28% (p = 0.8), and tracheoesophageal fistulae 12% for both groups. The overall survival for groups 1 and 2 was 8% and 23% at 5 years. The development of life-threatening complications is a major concern and extreme caution is urged before selecting patients for a combination of ILBT and 5-fluorouracil treatment.

External beam radiotherapy and intraluminal brachytherapy in advanced inoperable esophageal cancer: JIPMER experience

From January 1994 to September 1998, all inoperable cases of cancer of the esophagus at Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India were given external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) 36 Gy/18 times by anteroposterior pair. After EBRT, those patients who could be intubated with 16 F Levine's tube either directly or after endoscopic dilatation were given intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) 36 Gy in 48 hours at 1 cm. Others were treated by EBRT by posterior oblique fields 24 Gy/12 times. Fifty-eight patients who received EBRT and ILBT formed the study group. Fifty percent had middle one third growth and except for three, all were squamous cell carcinoma (95%). Fifty-nine percent required postradiation endoscopic dilatation. The overall survival rate was 24% at the end of 1 year. In one patient, tracheoesophageal fistula developed 4 months after treatment. Mild-to-moderate acute esophagitis developed in 10% of the patients, and 2% had slight hemoptysis, but these were not significant enough to interrupt treatment. There was no treatment-related mortality. Thirty-four patients (59%) were followed up for 6 months to 5 years (mean, 9.6 months). Three patients had follow-up of more than 3 years with no evidence of disease. EBRT with ILBT, with intermittent esophageal dilatations as required, offers very good palliation in advanced inoperable cancer of the esophagus.

Use of metallic stents and balloons in the esophagus and gastrointestinal tract

The majority of malignant and benign strictures in the esophagus and GI tract can be treated with use of minimally invasive alternatives to surgery such as balloon dilation or metallic stents. Virtually any obstructing lesion in the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, colon, and rectum can be treated with these methods with use of interventional radiologic or endoscopic techniques. In general, metallic stents are reserved for malignant strictures and balloon dilation is indicated for benign lesions. Patients with malignant esophageal fistulas and perforations can be palliated effectively and promptly by sealing the fistula or leak by deployment of a covered stent. Patients with malignant disease may benefit from a treatment regime that includes metallic stent placement, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and/or brachytherapy, although the efficacy of such combined therapies has yet to be defined. Further refinements to stent design are required. The ideal stent would be resistant to tumor ingrowth and migration. Placing a coating material on uncovered stents to prevent tumor ingrowth may achieve these aims. Finally, a biodegradable stent that dissolves before the development of intimal hyperplasia might enable stents to be used to treat benign strictures.

An update in the palliative management of malignant dysphagia

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer is generally associated with late presentation and poor prognosis. Therefore palliative surgery has been largely superseded by less invasive non-surgical techniques. Once palliation is indicated, the aims of the management should be: the maintenance of oral intake, minimizing hospital stay, relief of pain, elimination of reflux and regurgitation and the prevention of aspiration.

METHODS

This study was a review of all published English language data on the palliation of malignant dysphagia between 1994-1999. The Medline and Bids databases were searched and other references were derived from the material perused.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Palliative treatment for oesophageal cancer should be individualized and relate to tumour stage, size and location, the patient's medical condition and his/her personal wishes. The palliative treatment largely includes self-expanding metal stents (SEMS), laser (including photodynamic therapy (PDT)) or a combination of the two to relieve symptoms, this may be employed with or without other treatments such as radiotherapy/chemotherapy (RT/CT) with the aim of reducing tumour bulk and possibly prolonging survival. A multi-disciplinary approach is vital in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.

A non-randomized comparison of two radiotherapy protocols in inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus

We report an audit of two different telebrachytherapy schedules in inoperable carcinoma of the oesophagus. Between October 1990 and December 1996, 108 patients with a Karnofsky performance status > or = 50 were selected from our database on the basis of intention to treat by telebrachytherapy. Teletherapy in the low dose group L (55 patients) consisted of 35 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks, while that in the high dose group H (53 patients) consisted of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. The choice of teletherapy dose was based on physician preference. The high dose rate intraluminal radiotherapy that followed 2 weeks later was identical in both groups and consisted of two applications of 6 Gy, a week apart. The pretreatment disease characteristics of the patients in both arms were similar. Relief of dysphagia was obtained in 49% of the patients in group L and in 75% of those in group H (chi2: P = 0.004). The median dysphagia-free interval was 0 and 7 months in groups L and H respectively (log-rank: P = 0.06), while the median overall survival was identical at 8 months (log-rank: P = 0.21) for both groups. The probability of survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 34.8% versus 35.8%, 14.5% versus 13.9% and 0% versus 10% for groups L and H respectively. Morbidity in the form of ulcers, strictures and fistulae were observed in 9%, 7% and 5% of patients in group L compared with 8%, 8% and 13% in groups H respectively. This audit suggests that the protocol used in group H, when compared with group L, results in a greater proportion of patients being rendered dysphagia free, with a statistical trend towards a greater sustainment of dysphagia relief on follow-up.

The clinical effectiveness of the Gianturco oesophageal stent in malignant oesophageal obstruction

Between January 1994 and December 1996 72 patients were treated with 76 Gianturco oesophageal stents for oesophageal obstruction or perforation. The patients were followed prospectively in order to determine the effectiveness in improving dysphagia, to establish long term patency, survival times and complications. The mean dysphagia score prior to stenting was 3, improving to a mean score of 1 after stenting. Swallowing failed to improve in three patients. No serious complications were seen at stent insertion. Patients tolerated the procedure well with no complications in 63%. The most frequent immediate complication was chest pain occurring in 15 patients (21%). This settled in all patients with appropriate analgesia, however, four patients required long-term pain relief. In no cases was the chest pain due to perforation. Re-intervention was required in 16.7% of patients, the commonest cause being tumour overgrowth, and this was seen primarily in patients with long survival. The migration rate was low, despite the fact that 45 of 76 stents had been placed with the distal end in the stomach. Only four stents (5.6%) migrated completely, all of which had been deployed across the cardia. In our series the use of the Gianturco oesophageal stents for provided effective palliation of malignant oesophageal obstruction.

Delayed esophageal hemorrhage caused by a metal stent: treatment with embolization

We report a case of life-threatening esophageal hemorrhage after metal stent implantation successfully treated by arterial embolization. An 85-year-old woman was admitted in shock secondary to massive hematemesis and melena. Recent medical history revealed esophageal cancer treated 8 weeks previously by endoesophageal radiotherapy (40 Gy) and endoscopic placement of a covered Wall-stent prosthesis. Selective arteriography of the fifth posterior right intercostal artery showed massive contrast extravasation in the esophagus. Embolization was performed with 150-250-micron polyvinyl alcohol particles. Follow-up at 5 months was uneventful. Arteriography and embolization are advised when severe hemorrhage occurs after esophageal implantation of metal stents.

Variability of target volume delineation in cervical esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy (CRT) assumes and requires the precise delineation of the target volume. To assess the consistency of target volume delineation by radiation oncologists, who treat esophageal cancers, we have performed a transCanada survey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One of three case presentations, including CT scan images, of different stages of cervical esophageal cancer was randomly chosen and sent by mail. Respondents were asked to fill in questionnaires regarding treatment techniques and to outline boost target volumes for the primary tumor on CT scans, using ICRU-50 definitions.

RESULTS

Of 58 radiation oncologists who agreed to participate, 48 (83%) responded. The external beam techniques used were mostly anterior-posterior fields, followed by a multifield boost technique. Brachytherapy was employed by 21% of the oncologists, and concurrent chemotherapy by 88%. For a given case, and the three volumes defined by ICRU-50 (i.e., gross tumor volume [GTV], clinical target volume [CTV], and planning target volume [PTV]) we determined: 1. The total length in the cranio-caudal dimension; 2. the mean diameter in the transverse slice that was located in a CT slice that was common to all participants; 3. the total volume for each ICRU volume; and 4. the (5, 95) percentiles for each parameter. The PTV showed a mean length of 14.4 (9.6, 18.0) cm for Case A, 9.4 (5.0, 15.0) cm for Case B, 11.8 (6.0, 16.0) cm for Case C, a mean diameter of 6.4 (5.0, 9.4) cm for Case A, 4.4 (0.0, 7.3) cm for Case B, 5.2 (3.9, 7.3) cm for Case C, and a mean volume of 320 (167, 840) cm3 for Case A and 176 (60, 362) cm3 for Case C. The results indicate variability factors (95 percentile divided by 5 percentile values) in target diameters of 1.5 to 2.6, and in target lengths of 1.9 to 5.0.

CONCLUSION

There was a substantial inconsistency in defining the planning target volume, both transversely and longitudinally, among radiation oncologists. The potential benefits of 3D treatment planning with high-precision dose delivery could be offset by this inconsistency in target-volume delineation by radiation oncologists. This may be particularly important for multicenter clinical trials, for which quality assurance of this step will be essential to the interpretation of results.

Age has no impact on acute and late toxicity of curative thoracic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiotherapy is a treatment method frequently employed in the management of thoracic tumours. Although the highest incidence of these tumours is found in elderly people, tolerance to radiotherapy is not well documented in older age groups. Many physicians are tempted to alter the radiotherapy planning in a population with a supposed lower life expectancy in order to prevent acute reactions whereas late reactions are often ignored. The current study aimed to determine the influence of age on the frequency and severity of acute and late side-effects and also whether the prognosis of tumours sufficiently differed between ages to justify different attitudes towards their management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 1208 patients receiving chest irradiation and included in arms designed with RT of six EORTC randomized trials were evaluated. Data were extracted by a computer program elaborated for each study and were merged in a single database for analysis. Patients were split into six age ranges from 50 to 70 years and over. Survival and late toxicity were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and comparison between age groups was performed with the logrank test. The gamma-statistic test was used to test the impact of age on acute toxicity occurrence.

RESULTS

Survival adjusted for the primary location of the tumour was comparable in each age group (P = 0.82). Data regarding age and acute toxicity were available for 1208 patients who experienced 640 grade > or =1 toxicities. The difference in distribution over age was not significant for acute nausea, dyspnea, oesophagitis, weakness and WHO performance status alteration. Weight loss was significantly different with regards to age with a trend toward increased weight loss in older age groups (P = 0.002). To minimize actuarial bias, only patients surviving more than 90 days were analyzed for late effect risks. Late toxicities were examined only if they occurred before an eventual tumour failure in order to avoid confusion between effects of first and second line treatments. In such conditions, 1082 grade > or =1 late toxicities were recorded in 935 patients of 1106 available for analysis. The mean time to complication was 13 months and was similar in all age groups. Forty percent of patients were free of complication at 4 years, the logrank test showing no significant difference between age groups (P = 0.57). For grade >2 side-effects, the calculation did not show any difference between each age group (P = 0.1). A detailed analysis of late dyspnea and late weakness studied with the same method did not demonstrate any difference between age groups. Only grade >2 late oesophagitis demonstrated a significant trend to be more frequent in older patients (P = 0.01), but this difference disappeared after adjustment on study (P = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

The absence of toxicity observed in the current study regardless of age reinforces the conviction that age per se is not a sufficient reason to exclude patients in good general condition with thoracic tumour from curative radiotherapy when medically indicated.

Management of malignant oesophageal obstruction with self-expanding metallic stents

BACKGROUND

The use of self-expanding metal stents for palliation of malignant dysphagia is increasing. Experience in 70 patients was reviewed with respect to the value of stenting and management of the complications encountered.

METHODS

Oesophageal stents were inserted in 70 patients (42 men) of mean age 73 years with malignant oesophageal obstruction. Data regarding stent insertion and degree of dysphagia were gathered prospectively.

RESULTS

Seventy-six stents were placed in 70 patients. By the end of the study 57 patients had died and 13 were still alive. Three patients died within 3 days of stent insertion and dysphagia was relieved in 64 of the 67 patients remaining. Stent migration, tumour ingrowth and overgrowth, and food impaction were encountered during follow-up in eight patients.

CONCLUSION

Insertion of self-expanding metal stents for the palliation of malignant oesophageal obstruction is a successful therapy which can be carried out with relative ease. Palliation of dysphagia with an appropriate stent can be expected in up to 95 per cent of patients.

Fractionated high dose rate intraluminal brachytherapy in palliation of advanced esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To optimize the dose of fractionated brachytherapy for palliation of advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred and seventy-two patients with advanced esophageal cancer were randomized to receive 12 Gy/2 fractions (group A); 16 Gy/2 fractions (group B), and 18 Gy/3 fractions (group C) by high dose rate intraluminal brachytherapy (HDRILBT). Treatment was given weekly and dose prescribed at 1 cm from the source axis. Patients were followed up monthly and assessed for dysphagia relief and development of complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients died before completing treatment due to advanced disease and poor general condition. The overall survival was 19.4% at the end of 12 months for the whole group (A--9.8%, B--22.46%, C--35.32%; p > 0.05). The dysphagia-free survival was 28.9% at 12 months for the whole group (A--10.8%, B--25.43%, C--38.95%; p > 0.05). Forty-three patients developed fibrotic strictures needing dilatation (A--5 of 35, B--15 of 60, C--23 of 55; p = 0.032). Twenty-seven patients had persistent luminal disease (A--11, B--6, C--10), 15 of which progressed to fistulae (A--7, B--2, C--6; p = 0.032). There was no effect of age, sex, race, histology, performance status, previous dilation, presenting dysphagia score, presenting weight, grade, tumor length, and stage on overall survival, dysphagia-free, and complication-free survival (p > 0.05). On a multivariate analysis, brachytherapy dose (p = 0.002) and tumor length (p = 0.0209) were found to have a significant effect on overall survival; brachytherapy dose was the only factor that had an impact on local tumor control (p = 0.0005), while tumor length was the only factor that had an effect on dysphagia-free survival (p = 0.0475). When compared to other forms of palliation currently available (bypass surgery, laser, chemotherapy, intubation, external radiotherapy), fractionated brachytherapy gave the best results with a median survival of 6.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Fractionated brachytherapy is the best modality for palliation of advanced esophageal cancer. It offers the best palliation to patient when compared to all other modalities currently available. The optimal brachytherapy dose ranges between 16 Gy in two fractions and 18 Gy in three fractions given a week apart.

The role of radiotherapy in the surgical management of gastrointestinal cancer

Surgery is the main mode of treatment in most gastrointestinal malignancies. Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy is playing an increasing role as an adjunct to improve local control, survival and palliation. The principles of radiotherapy and the rationale for combination therapy are presented. The current role of radiation therapy in the GI tract is discussed by various sites. New and investigational radiotherapy techniques are outlined.

The management of patients with advanced cancer (II)

In this second article in the series, obstruction of hollow viscera in patients with advanced malignant disease is discussed. The obstruction of such structures can be associated with the development of painful and incapacitating symptoms, often in patients who have a limited life expectancy. This obstruction may be caused by the primary tumour, compression from adjacent tumour-draining lymph nodes, the presence of metastases distant from the site of the primary tumour or to adhesions within the abdominal compartment (usually as a result of previous surgery). The organs most often affected are the oesophagus, the intestine (small and large), the biliary tree and the genito-urinary tract. Obstruction of each of these organs and its management is discussed in more detail below.