The Dijon clinical staging system for early rectal carcinomas amenable to intracavitary treatment techniques

Management of locally advanced rectal cancer in the elderly: a critical review and algorithm

Colorectal cancer incidence and death rates have been declining over the past 10 years. However, it remains the second leading cause of death in men ages 60-79 and the third leading cause of death in men over 80 and in women over 60 years old. However, there is little data specific to the treatment of the elder patient, since few of these patients are included in trials. With the advent of improved therapies, there are many alternative options available. Still, no definitive consensus or guidelines have been defined for this particular patient population. The goal of this study is to review the literature on the management of rectal cancer in the elderly and to propose treatment algorithms to help the oncology team in treatment decision-making.

Design and dosimetric characteristics of a new endocavitary contact radiotherapy system using an electronic brachytherapy source

PURPOSE

To present design aspects and acceptance tests performed for clinical implementation of electronic brachytherapy treatment of early stage rectal adenocarcinoma. A dosimetric comparison is made between the historically used Philips RT-50 unit and the newly developed Axxent(®) Model S700 electronic brachytherapy source manufactured by Xoft (iCad, Inc.).

METHODS

Two proctoscope cones were manufactured by ElectroSurgical Instruments (ESI). Two custom surface applicators were manufactured by Xoft and were designed to fit and interlock with the proctoscope cones from ESI. Dose rates, half value layers (HVL), and percentage depth dose (PDD) measurements were made with the Xoft system and compared to historical RT-50 data. A description of the patient treatment approach and exposure rates during the procedure is also provided.

RESULTS

The electronic brachytherapy system has a lower surface dose rate than the RT-50. The dose rate to water on the surface from the Xoft system is approximately 2.1 Gy∕min while the RT-50 is 10-12 Gy∕min. However, treatment times with Xoft are still reasonable. The HVLs and PDDs between the two systems were comparable resulting in similar doses to the target and to regions beyond the target. The exposure rate levels around a patient treatment were acceptable. The standard uncertainty in the dose rate to water on the surface is approximately ±5.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Philips RT-50 unit is an out-of-date radiotherapy machine that is no longer manufactured with limited replacement parts. The use of a custom-designed proctoscope and Xoft surface applicators allows delivery of a well-established treatment with the ease of a modern radiotherapy device. While the dose rate is lower with the use of Xoft, the treatment times are still reasonable. Additionally, personnel may stand farther away from the Xoft radiation source, thus potentially reducing radiation exposure to the operator and other personnel.

Can we increase the chance of sphincter saving surgery in rectal cancer with neoadjuvant treatments: lessons from a systematic review of recent randomized trials

PURPOSE

A common hypothesis is that neo-adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer, is able to increase sphincter saving surgery. This review studies data relevant to this question.

STUDY SELECTION

A total of 17 randomized trials were analysed.

RESULTS

Since 1976, the rate of sphincter saving surgery increased from 20% to 75%. In none of the 17 trials it was possible to demonstrate a significant benefit of the neo-adjuvant regimens on the rate of sphincter saving surgery. There was a reduction in the risk of 5-year local recurrence partly due to these neo-adjuvant treatments. These neo-adjuvant regimens had no significant impact on the overall 5-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the neo-adjuvant treatments tested was able to demonstrate an increase in the rate of sphincter saving surgery. The improvement in conservative surgery is mainly due to technical changes in surgery. Organ preservation after complete clinical response appears as an interesting hypothesis to test.

Endocavitary contact radiation therapy for ultrasonographically staged T1 N0 and T2 N0 rectal cancer

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing endocavitary contact radiation therapy (ECR) for stage I rectal cancer.

Methods

A database of patients treated with ECR for biopsy-proven rectal adenocarcinoma from July 1986 to June 2006 was reviewed retrospectively. Only patients with primary, non-metastatic, ultrasonographically staged T1 N0 and T2 N0 cancer who had no adjuvant treatment were included. Patients received a median of 90 (range 60–190) Gy contact radiation, delivered transanally by a 50-kV X-ray tube in two to five fractions.

Results

Of 149 patients, 77 (40 T1, 37 T2) met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 74 (range 38–104) years, and median follow-up 69 (range 10–219) months. ECR failed in 21 patients (27 per cent) (persistent disease, four; recurrence, 17), of whom ten remained disease free after salvage therapy. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate was 74 (95 per cent confidence interval 63 to 83) per cent after ECR alone, and 87 (76 to 93) per cent when survival after salvage therapy for recurrence was included.

Conclusion

ECR is a minimally invasive treatment option for early-stage rectal cancer. However, similar to other local therapies, ECR has a worse oncological outcome than radical surgery.

External Beam Radiotherapy and High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Medically Unfit and Elderly Patients

In the treatment of rectal cancer, total mesorectal excision surgery is now the standard of care. In most patients, surgery will be preceeded by radiotherapy, either in a short course (25 Gy/five fractions) or in a conventional schedule (45-50 Gy/25 fractions) with chemotherapy. For patients unfit for surgery or unwilling to undergo a procedure resulting in a permanent colostomy, radiotherapy without surgery is the alternative. From published studies it is clear that for relatively small tumours, local treatment with either contact X-rays or intraluminal brachytherapy is a reasonable option. For patients with larger tumours, the risk of nodal involvement makes the combination of local radiotherapy with external beam radiotherapy necessary. So far, this combination has mainly been given with contact X-rays and only sporadically with intraluminal brachytherapy. In this overview, a summary of published studies will be given, with a proposal for a trial for medically unfit patients with T2-T4 tumours.

Combined Modality Treatment of Early Rectal Cancer — the UK Experience

With the introduction of colorectal screening in the UK, more patients will probably be diagnosed with early rectal cancer. The UK has an increasingly elderly population and not all patients diagnosed with early rectal cancer will be suitable for radical surgery. Therefore, a national plan is needed to develop the provision of alternative local treatment with equity of access across the country. Here we review the Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology multimodality treatment policy, which has been in clinical practice since 1993 and we discuss its rationale. Clatterbridge is the only centre in the UK offering Papillon-style contact radiotherapy. In total, 220 patients have been treated over 14 years, most of whom were referred from other centres. One hundred and twenty-four patients received Papillon (contact radiotherapy) as part of their multimodality management. The guidelines of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland recommend local treatment for T1 tumours<3 cm in diameter, but this refers to treatment by surgery alone. There are no published national guidelines for radiotherapy. We plan each treatment in stages and achieve excellent local control (93% at 3 years) with low morbidity. We conclude that radical local treatment for cure can be offered safely to carefully selected elderly patients. Close follow-up is necessary so that effective salvage treatment can be offered. Because of a lack of randomised trial evidence, at present local radiotherapy is not yet accepted as an alternative option to the gold standard surgical treatment. Even with international collaboration, a randomised trial will be difficult to complete as the number of cases requiring local radiotherapy is small due to the highly selective nature of the treatment involved. However, an observational phase II trial is planned. In addition, the Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Users Group is also planning a phase II trial using preoperative radiotherapy. These studies will provide evidence to help establish the true role of radiotherapy in early rectal cancer.

French experience with contact X-ray endocavitary radiation for early rectal cancer

This paper is an overview of the French experience with contact X-ray radiation for rectal cancer. The analysis was mainly carried out on 50 years of experience in Lyon or since 1980 in the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud. The results obtained in Dijon and Nancy are also reported. In early rectal cancer, contact X-ray radiation can play an important role in three different situations: (1) small T1 less than 2 cm: adjuvant contact X-ray radiotherapy after local excision; (2) T2 N0 or large T1: first-line contact X-ray radiotherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy (+/- chemotherapy) followed by surgery (anterior resection or local excision); (3) early T3 N0 in frail patients: the same approach as for T2 N0 with, in case of clinical complete response, local excision or follow-up.

High dose rate afterloading intraluminal brachytherapy for advanced inoperable rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

High dose rate intraluminal brachytherapy for tumours of the rectal and anal canal which were inoperable either because of the age and frailty of the patient or because of advanced disease has been evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients the two main indications for brachytherapy were as part of a radical radiation programme in those unfit for major surgery (26 patients) or as palliation for advanced or metastatic disease (22 patients). Radical treatment was either sole treatment delivering 6 Gy fraction 2 to 3 times weekly up to 36 Gy or as a boost of 12 Gy after 45 Gy in 25 fractions external beam chemoradiation. Palliative treatments were given predominantly as a single dose of 10 Gy.

RESULTS

This was predominantly a group of frail elderly patients with a median age of 82 years (range 35-91). Local tumour response was seen in 21/25 assessable patients with 14 complete responses. Median survival for the entire population was 6 months (range 1-54 months); in patients treated with 'radical' intent this was 25 months (range 1.5-54) and in the palliative group 7.2 months (range 1-37). The most common presenting symptom was bleeding per rectum for which a 64% response rate was obtained with 57% complete responses. Mucous discharge responded in 64% with 28% complete responses. The median duration of response was 7 months.

CONCLUSION

Intraluminal HDR brachytherapy is an effective local treatment for patients otherwise unfit for radical surgery both as a component of radical treatment, or as a simple single palliative procedure.

Treatment of T1–T2 rectal tumors by contact therapy and interstitial brachytherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We retrospectively analysed our experience of contact therapy alone and/or combined with interstitial brachytherapy as exclusive treatment of low lying rectal tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1971 to 2001, 124 patients (103 adenocarcinomas, 21 villous tumours) were treated by contact therapy alone or combined with interstitial brachytherapy. All patients were staged according to the Dijon classification. The average size of the lesions was 2.4 cm (max 7 cm), clinical aspect was polypoïd in 75% of the cases, flat in 17%. Sixty four patients received contact therapy in three fractions and 44 patients received four fractions, for an average delivered dose of 95 Gy. Interstitial brachytherapy boost delivered 24 Gy on a reference isodose of 55 cGy/h in 10 patients.

RESULTS

The local control was 83% for T1 and 38% for T2 tumours (p=0.004). For mobile tumours, the local control rate is 76%, significantly higher than for tumours with impaired mobility (55%, P=0.03). Thirty-nine patients experienced a local failure (31%). For patients amenable to surgery, a Miles procedure was performed in 25 patients. Ultimate local control rate is 93% for T1, 69% for T2 (P<0.05), 15 patients failed despite treatment for local recurrence (15%). No significant differences were observed in a comparison of adenocarcinoma and villous tumours according to initial and ultimate local control. The mean disease free survival rate for the whole population is 66 months. The 5-year disease free survival for T1a and T1b is, respectively, 82 and 78%, 40 and 25% for T2a and T2b, respectively. The overall 5-year survival for the whole group is 62.4%. At the end of the treatment, 75% of the patients described a very good sphincter function. No deleterious effect on continence was reported during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The control rate for T1 rectal cancer treated with contact therapy with or without brachytherapy is comparable to surgical series. The sphincter was preserved in 80% of the patients. Radiotherapy remains an efficient and cheap alternative to surgery, mainly for old and fragile patients, or refusing colostomy. The results of these approaches for tumors larger than 3 cm (T2) are not satisfactory. For patients not amenable to surgery, external beam radiation therapy and/or combined modality with chemoradiation should be discussed to increase the loco-regional control rate. A careful selection of patients based on rectal examination and trans-rectal ultrasound could select more accurately patients amenable to such an approach.

Endocavitary Radiation Therapy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma

Local control, survival, and toxicity in patients treated with endocavitary radiation therapy for rectal cancer were evaluated. Thirty-five patients received a total of 20 to 155 Gy in 1 to 5 fractions with 50 kV x-rays through a treatment proctoscope. Twenty-nine of the 35 patients were treated with curative intent. Median follow-up was 102 months. Local control was achieved in 23 of the 29 patients treated curatively and in 3 of the 6 treated palliatively. Local control for patients treated curatively was 76% at 10 years. No local failures occurred after 21 months. For patients treated curatively, survival was 65% at 5 years and 42% at 10 years. Toxicity within 90 days after treatment was observed in 77% of the patients. Toxicity occurring more than 90 days after treatment was observed in 80%, but only 1 patient needed a colostomy, which was for a perforation after the biopsy of a benign ulcer. In conclusion, radiation therapy resulted in a local control rate of 76% at 10 years in curatively treated patients. Although most patients experience toxicity from this treatment, loss of sphincter function is rare.

Long-term control of T2-T3 rectal adenocarcinoma with radiotherapy alone

PURPOSE

To analyze the long-term result of patients presenting with T2-T3 rectal adenocarcinoma treated with curative intent by radiotherapy (RT) alone, using a combination of contact RT, external beam RT, and brachytherapy with an iridium implant. Patients were considered unsuitable for surgery because of the presence of severe comorbidity or because they did not consent to surgery and the possibility of a permanent stoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1986 and 1998, 63 patients (56 staged with endorectal ultrasonography) were entered into a pilot study. Patients had to have T2-T3, N0-N1, M0 adenocarcinoma of the middle or lower rectum involving less than two-thirds of the circumference. RT began with contact X-rays (80 Gy in 3 fractions for 21 days), followed by external beam RT (39 Gy in 13 fractions for 17 days) with a concomitant boost (4 Gy in 4 fractions). After a 4-6-week interval, an iridium implant delivered a completion dose of 20 Gy to the tumor. No chemotherapy was given.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 72 years. Of the 63 patients, 41 had T2 and 22 had T3 tumors. The mean distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 3.6 cm. All patients completed treatment according to the protocol, except for 7 for whom brachytherapy was not performed. With a median follow-up time of 54 months, the primary local tumor control rate was 63%; after salvage surgery, the ultimate pelvic control was 73% (46 of 63). The 5-year overall survival rate was 64.4%, and for 42 patients aged <80 years, it was 78% with 10 patients alive and well at > or =10 years. No severe Grade 3-4 toxicity was seen. Acute proctitis was seen in most patients but did not require treatment interruption. Late rectal bleeding occurred in 24 patients. Only 1 required blood transfusion. Good anorectal function was maintained in 92% of living patients. The T stage was a strong prognostic factor, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 84% and 53% for T2 and T3 lesions, respectively, in patients <80 years old.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of long-term local control and survival for ultrasound-staged T2-T3 rectal adenocarcinoma treated by RT alone, showing that high-dose irradiation to a small volume can provide a high therapeutic ratio for such tumors.

Factors affecting local control and survival after treatment of carcinoma of the rectum by endocavitary radiation: a retrospective study of 97 cases

PURPOSE

Endocavitary radiation therapy constitutes an alternative to surgical therapy for some early rectal carcinomas. We studied the prognostic factors for locoregional or metastatic relapse after endocavitary radiation, and their impact for therapeutic strategy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Our study reports the outcome of 97 patients with adenocarcinomas of the rectum treated from 1978 to 1998 by endocavitary irradiation (100 Gy), exclusive or combined with an interstitial brachytherapy boost of 20 Gy. The indications consisted mostly of polypoid, mobile tumors, less than 4 cm in diameter, and well differentiated. But the indications were extended to elderly patients, who presented with a high surgical risk or who refused mutilating surgery.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 82 months. One patient presented with an isolated distant metastatic relapse, and 27 patients presented with locoregional recurrence, surgically salvaged in 16 cases. Disease-free survival was 71% at 5 years and 68% at 10 years. Multifactorial analysis suggests that clinical stage T1A, well-differentiated tumors, and early and complete response are favorable prognostic factors for disease-free survival. Response to therapy is the most powerful prognostic factor for relapse.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study confirms the efficacy of endocavitary radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy as a safe conservative treatment in well-selected patients.

Local methods of treatment of rectal cancer

Over 11 000 new cases of rectal cancer are reported in the UK each year. Recent technical advances have increased interest in local management of the disease. The introduction of screening for colorectal cancer will potentially lead to an increased number of early rectal cancers suitable for local curative treatment. In addition, as the proportion of elderly patients in the population rises, local methods of treatment of rectal cancer will become increasingly important in this group of patients with comorbid disease. A literature search was performed on Medline database for English language publications on local treatments of rectal carcinoma. Preoperative assessment, selection of patients, local therapeutic and palliative methods of treatment were evaluated. Local methods of treatment can be used for potentially curative operations for rectal cancer. Preoperative endoanal ultrasound appears to be the most useful investigation for determining depth of local invasion. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery has extended the boundaries of local surgery and permits access to the mid and upper rectum with results similar to those of conventional local techniques. Laser therapy and transanal resection provide the best form of palliation for more advanced rectal carcinomas.

Treatment systems guidelines for primary rectal cancer from the 1996 Patterns of Care Study

PURPOSE

The Patterns of Care Rectal Cancer Committee was formed to develop consensus recommendations for patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum limited to the pelvis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Committee was composed of a multidisciplinary group of oncologists, and clinical scenarios were chosen to address most of the major treatment controversies in the combined modality treatment of rectal cancer. A literature search was then conducted and the major articles were identified. A modified Delphi technique was used to arrive at consensus. Serial surveys were conducted by distributing questionnaires to the Committee members to consolidate expert opinion. Voting was conducted using a scoring system and opinions were unified to the highest degree possible.

RESULTS

Consensus voting was performed for 4 clinical scenarios. Acceptability ratings for treatment were grouped into 3 broad categories: not acceptable, acceptable, and most acceptable. Based on the treatment options, a decision tree was developed that reflects the consensus of the committee.

CONCLUSION

These options may help guide treatment decisions in rectal cancer.

Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer. Endocavitary radiation therapy

Endocavitary radiation therapy (Endo RT) is performed mainly with a contact x-ray tube. Interstitial brachytherapy is a supplementary method to boost the tumor bed. Only strictly selected patients can be treated for cure by Endo RT. More than 1,000 patients have been treated in Europe and North America since 1950. In T1 N0 adenocarcinoma, the primary local control rate is close to 90%. The overall 5-year survival is between 60% and 90% depending on patient selection. Careful follow-up is necessary because the majority of local failures can be salvaged, usually by radical surgery. The main advantages of Endo RT are a fully ambulatory and simple treatment that can be applied even in frail or elderly inoperable patients, a low risk of complications, and an inexpensive treatment. Results show it is possible to perform curative treatment in patients with more advanced rectal carcinoma. With the combination of external-beam radiation therapy and Endo RT in stage T2-3 N0-1 tumors, the primary local control rate is around 70%, and the incidence of severe radiation toxicity is less than 5%. Overall 5-year survival is between 50% and 70%. Endo RT can also be used as an adjuvant treatment after local excision, in the treatment of villous adenomas, and for palliation of advanced inoperable tumors.

Endocavitary irradiation for early rectal carcinomas T1 (T2). A series of 101 patients treated with the Papillon's technique

PURPOSE

This work is a retrospective analysis of a series of patients treated with endocavitary irradiation stressing the role of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), which has been used routinely in the staging since 1987.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1977 and 1993, 101 patients with infiltrating adenocarcinomas were treated. Clinical staging was 65 T1 N0 and 36 T2 N0. TRUS used in 36 patients showed: 22 UT1 N0, 10 UT2 N0, and 3 UT2 N1. Contact x-ray was delivered with a 50 kV radiotherapy unit. The median dose was 92 Gy (60-125) in five fractions, 55 days. In 28 patients a boost was given with 192Ir implant delivering a median dose of 25 Gy/21 h.

RESULTS

Complete response was observed in all patients at the completion of treatment. Loco-regional failures were seen in 14 patients (local in 7 patients, nodal pararectal in 6 patients, and local + nodal in 1 patient). A curative salvage treatment was attempted in 13 patients and resulted in an ultimate pelvic control rate of 99 patients. Rectal preservation was possible in 92 patients. Overall and specific 5-year survival was 83.3% and 94.4%. No serious complication was observed. TRUS was more sensitive than digital rectal examination to detect involvement of pararectal metastatic nodes (N1). No loco- regional relapse was observed out of 22 UT1 N0.

CONCLUSION

Endocavitary irradiation can cure early adenocarcinoma of the rectum without complication. TRUS appears as a significant improvement in the selection of patients amenable to this treatment. If restricted to UT1 N0 tumors, endocavitary irradiation should control locally more than 90% of these patients. Any UN1 is a contraindication for endocavitary irradiation alone.

Combined curative radiation therapy alone in (T1) T2-3 rectal adenocarcinoma: a pilot study of 29 patients

AIM

Analysis of a pilot study including 29 consecutive patients with high surgical risk or refusal of colostomy treated with radiation therapy alone with curative intent.

PATIENTS

Between 1986 and 1992, 29 patients were treated for infiltrating adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Median age was 72 years. Transrectal ultrasound staging was used in 24 patients (T1, 2; T2, 14; T3, 13; N0, 23; N1, 6). In 20 patients the lower border of the tumor was at 5 cm or less from the anal verge and in 19 patients the diameter exceeded 3 cm. CEA was elevated in seven cases.

TREATMENT

Contact X-ray (50 kV) was given first (70 Gy/3 fractions). External beam radiation therapy used a three-field technique in the prone position. Accelerated schedule (39 Gy/13 fractions/17 days) with a concomitant boost "field within the field' (4 Gy/4 fractions). Six weeks later an iridium-192 implant was performed in 21 (20 Gy/22 h).

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 46 months. Overall and specific survival at 5 years was 68% (SE = 0.09) and 76% (SE = 0.08). Local control was obtained in 21/29 patients (72%). There was one grade 2 rectal bleeding and five grade 2 rectal necroses. The overall tolerance was good in these frail patients.

DISCUSSION

For T2. T3 or T1 > 3 cm diameter rectal adenocarcinoma, where contact X-ray alone is not recommended, a combined treatment with radiation therapy alone is able to give good local control with acceptable toxicity. This treatment should be restricted to inoperable patients.

Conservative and curative management of rectal adenocarcinomas by local radiotherapy alone

Two hundred patients with well-differentiated adenocarcinomas of the rectum stages T1, T2 (113 T1, 87 T2) were accrued in two French institutions (Lyon-Sud and Dijon). Treatment consisted of intracavitary 50 kV X-rays (90-120 Gy in 3-4 fractions and 4-6 weeks). A 20-30 Gy interstitial brachytherapy boost was given after 2-3 fractions when a limited infiltration of the rectal wall was present. Local failure occurred in 4.4% of T1, 19.5% of T2; nodal failure in 0.9% of T1, 9.2% of T2. Ultimate local control after salvage of failures is 94.5%. A functional sphincter was preserved in 95% of patients with local control.

The use of radiotherapy for patients with low rectal cancer: an overview of the Lyon experience

In France, the late Jean Papillon was responsible for much of the pioneering work in the radiotherapy treatment of patients with rectal cancer. This review is written in tribute to his contribution to, and vast experience in, the conservative management of this common tumour. It describes his protocols with minor modifications currently used at the Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, France. In Lyon, pre-operative adjuvant irradiation is the preferred treatment for patients with T2 and T3 rectal cancer. Initial results suggest that this combined approach significantly improves the likelihood of successful sphincter preservation for patients with carcinoma of the lower third of the rectum. To date, the technique has given good local control with minimal postoperative morbidity and low mortality.