From radiotherapy to stereotactic radiosurgery: physical and dosimetrical considerations

Dosimetric evaluation of a new collimator insert system for stereotactic radiotherapy

The prototype of a stereotactic collimator set developed in our department is evaluated for clinical use. This set consists of three cylindrical blocks mounted on a tray which slides in the wedge insert of a Siemens Primus accelerator. Each block has a collimating hole along its long axis to produce radiation fields of circular cross-section at the isocentre plane with diameters of 15 mm, 20 mm and 25 mm. Different geometric and dosimetric quality assurance tests were performed and results are found within the limits set for stereotactic radiotherapy. Dosimetry results measured using Kodak EDR-2 radiographic film and a pinpoint ion chamber also show good agreement with corresponding results calculated by Monte Carlo simulation of the linear accelerator head and the collimators. Measured dosimetry data were used to adapt a conventional PLATO treatment planning system for stereotactic radiotherapy using the prototype collimator set. Treatment planning system calculations and film measurements for treatment of an intracranial lesion in an anthropomorphic head phantom using coplanar 180 degrees arcs are compared and found to agree within 2 mm. This supports the accuracy of dose delivery using the prototype stereotactic collimators. Despite their increased penumbra (2.5-3.5 mm relative to 2-2.5 mm for commercially available collimators) the ease of construction makes the proposed stereotactic collimators an interesting alternative for accomplishing cost effective stereotactic treatments.

Dynamic collimator optimization compared with fixed collimator angle in arc-based stereotactic radiotherapy: a dosimetric analysis

Object

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of static and dynamic collimator optimization when using a micromultileaf collimator (mMLC) in dynamic-arc stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) by evaluating the dose to healthy peritumoral tissue.

Methods

Thirty patients previously treated for intracranial lesions with the BrainLAB mMLC underwent retrospective replanning. Three collimator optimization strategies were compared for a simulated SRS treatment plan, as follows: Strategy 1, static collimation fixed at 90° throughout arcs; Strategy 2, static collimator settings optimized for each arc; and Strategy 3, dynamic collimator settings optimized every 10° throughout treatment arcs. Dose–volume histograms for a 0.7-cm shell of healthy peritumoral tissue were quantitatively compared.

Collimator optimization schemes (Strategies 2 and 3) significantly decreased the volume of peritumoral tissue that is irradiated when compared with static collimation at 90° (Strategy 1). The volume was reduced by 40.6% for Strategy 2 (95% confidence interval [CI] ± 11) and by 47.1% for Strategy 3 (95% CI ± 8.1) at the 95% isodose; by 28.4% for Strategy 2 (95% CI ± 4.9) and 39.1% for Strategy 3 (95% CI ± 6) at the 90% isodose; and by 18.2% for Strategy 2 (95% CI ± 8.1) and 25.4% for Strategy 3 (95% CI ± 7.1) at the 80% isodose. Serial collimator optimization throughout the treatment arcs (Strategy 3) reduced the mean volume of peritumoral tissue irradiated when compared with static collimator optimization (Strategy 2), by 16.1% (95% CI ± 1.5) at 95% isodose, by 11.7% (95% CI ± 1) at 90% isodose, and by 8.2% (95% CI ± 1.2) at 80% isodose regions. In specific cases, linear or polynomial functions were formulated to optimize collimator settings dynamically throughout treatment arcs.

Conclusions

Dynamic collimator optimization during arc-based SRS decreases the volume of healthy peritumoral tissue treated with high doses of radiation and appears to be an effective method of improving target conformality. This study is the first step toward determination of a smoothing function algorithm to allow for true dynamic collimation during SRS.

Commissioning an image-guided localization system for radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To describe the design and commissioning of a system for the treatment of classes of tumors that require highly accurate target localization during a course of fractionated external-beam therapy. This system uses image-guided localization techniques in the linac vault to position patients being treated for cranial tumors using stereotactic radiotherapy, conformal radiotherapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques. Design constraints included flexibility in the use of treatment-planning software, accuracy and precision of repeat localization, limits on the time and human resources needed to use the system, and ease of use.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A commercially marketed, stereotactic radiotherapy system, based on a system designed at the University of Florida, Gainesville, was adapted for use at the University of Washington Medical Center. A stereo pair of cameras in the linac vault were used to detect the position and orientation of an array of fiducial markers that are attached to a patient's biteblock. The system was modified to allow the use of either a treatment-planning system designed for stereotactic treatments, or a general, three-dimensional radiation therapy planning program. Measurements of the precision and accuracy of the target localization, dose delivery, and patient positioning were made using a number of different jigs and devices. Procedures were developed for the safe and accurate clinical use of the system.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the target localization is comparable to that of other treatment-planning systems. Gantry sag, which cannot be improved, was measured to be 1.7 mm, which had the effect of broadening the dose distribution, as confirmed by a comparison of measurement and calculation. The accuracy of positioning a target point in the radiation field was 1.0 +/- 0.2 mm. The calibration procedure using the room-based lasers had an accuracy of 0.76 mm, and using a floor-based radiosurgery system it was 0.73 mm. Target localization error in a phantom was 0.64 +/- 0.77 mm. Errors in positioning due to couch rotation error were reduced using the system.

CONCLUSION

The system described has proven to have acceptable accuracy and precision for the clinical goals for which it was designed. It is robust in detecting errors, and it requires only a nominal increase in setup time and effort. Future work will focus on evaluating its suitability for use in the treatment of head-and-neck cancers not contained within the cranial vault.

A phantom for dosimetric characterization of small radiation fields: design and use

An acrylic phantom was designed and constructed for the acquisition and verification of basic dosimetric data of narrow fields in stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery (SRT/SRS) using thermoluminescent (TL) dosimetry. An array of holes to accommodate up to 426 dosimeters was used to allow the assessment of dose distribution in circular fields with a 1-mm spatial dose resolution with minimal field perturbation. It was found experimentally that there must be a minimum gap of 1 mm between neighboring dosimeters in 6-MV photon fields. Most of the dosimetric characteristics of a 6-MV x-ray SRS/SRT unit assessed using TL dosimetry and ion chamber dosimetry were in good agreement when the longitudinal axis of the chamber was parallel to the central beam axis. TL dosimetry showed that the penumbra width increased with increasing collimator aperture. The low cost of the phantom and the widespread use and familiarity of TL dosimetry in radiotherapy departments offer a significant advantage in the use of the proposed methodology.