The influence of intravesical photodynamic therapy on subsequent bladder irradiation tolerance

Using X-rays in photodynamic therapy: an overview

Photodynamic therapy is a therapeutic option to treat cancer and other diseases.

ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context

This report provides a review of early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs with respect to radiation protection. It was instigated following a recommendation in Publication 103 (ICRP, 2007), and it provides updated estimates of 'practical' threshold doses for tissue injury defined at the level of 1% incidence. Estimates are given for morbidity and mortality endpoints in all organ systems following acute, fractionated, or chronic exposure. The organ systems comprise the haematopoietic, immune, reproductive, circulatory, respiratory, musculoskeletal, endocrine, and nervous systems; the digestive and urinary tracts; the skin; and the eye. Particular attention is paid to circulatory disease and cataracts because of recent evidence of higher incidences of injury than expected after lower doses; hence, threshold doses appear to be lower than previously considered. This is largely because of the increasing incidences with increasing times after exposure. In the context of protection, it is the threshold doses for very long follow-up times that are the most relevant for workers and the public; for example, the atomic bomb survivors with 40-50years of follow-up. Radiotherapy data generally apply for shorter follow-up times because of competing causes of death in cancer patients, and hence the risks of radiation-induced circulatory disease at those earlier times are lower. A variety of biological response modifiers have been used to help reduce late reactions in many tissues. These include antioxidants, radical scavengers, inhibitors of apoptosis, anti-inflammatory drugs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, growth factors, and cytokines. In many cases, these give dose modification factors of 1.1-1.2, and in a few cases 1.5-2, indicating the potential for increasing threshold doses in known exposure cases. In contrast, there are agents that enhance radiation responses, notably other cytotoxic agents such as antimetabolites, alkylating agents, anti-angiogenic drugs, and antibiotics, as well as genetic and comorbidity factors. Most tissues show a sparing effect of dose fractionation, so that total doses for a given endpoint are higher if the dose is fractionated rather than when given as a single dose. However, for reactions manifesting very late after low total doses, particularly for cataracts and circulatory disease, it appears that the rate of dose delivery does not modify the low incidence. This implies that the injury in these cases and at these low dose levels is caused by single-hit irreparable-type events. For these two tissues, a threshold dose of 0.5Gy is proposed herein for practical purposes, irrespective of the rate of dose delivery, and future studies may elucidate this judgement further.

The role of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of recurrent superficial bladder cancer

Photodynamic therapy is an exciting area of research for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer. Significant responses have been seen in patients resistant to standard intravesical treatments. New areas of research are focused on the development of new sensitizers and light distribution methods with less dermal and bladder toxicity.

A comparison of functional bladder damage after intravesical photodynamic therapy with three different photosensitizers

The influence of type of photosensitizer, drug and light dose, and time interval between photosensitizer and illumination on the extent of photodynamic therapy (PDT)-induced bladder damage and recovery was investigated using a mouse model. The three photosensitizers studied were Photofrin, meso-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (m-THPC) and bacteriochlorin a (BCA). Functional bladder damage was quantitatively assessed from increases in urination frequency index (FI) at 1-35 weeks after illumination and histological damage was qualitatively assessed at 1 day, 1, 2 and 12 weeks. Photofrin-mediated PDT caused an acute increase in FI at 1 week, with recovery within 2-8 weeks after light doses of 2.7-8.2 J/cm2. After higher light doses there was only partial recovery. Previous results indicated that the acute response and rate of recovery was the same whether Photofrin was given at 1 day or up to 7 days before illumination. The m-THPC-mediated PDT at drug doses of > or = 0.3 mg/kg also resulted in a marked acute response with good recovery, even after 10.8 J/cm2. Lower drug doses in combination with 5.4 J/cm2 did not result in acute or late damage. There was no significant difference in acute response when m-THPC was given 1, 3 or 7 days before illumination, although recovery was faster for the longer illumination intervals (3 or 7 days). Illumination at 1 h after 20 mg/kg BCA induced an acute response within 2 days after illumination, with recovery within 4-8 weeks. Lower drug doses did not result in damage. The most prominent histological changes during the acute period with all three photosensitizers were submucosal edema and vessel dilation, with epithelial denudation (depending on drug/light dose). We conclude that BCA and m-THPC are both potent new photosensitizers. They can induce a moderate to severe acute bladder response with complete healing over a period of a few weeks. The photosensitizer m-THPC is very effective with low doses of photosensitizer and light, whereas relatively high doses of BCA and light are required to obtain equivalent functional bladder damage in our mouse model.