Active minimisation of radiation scatter during breast radiotherapy: management implications for young patients with good-prognosis primary neoplasms

Damage to sebaceous gland and the efficacy of moisturizer after whole breast radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial

Background

We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of heparinoid moisturization for radiation dermatitis. We report the time-course of sebum content after whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) and the efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer.

Methods

Patients receiving adjuvant breast RT were randomly assigned into three groups; prophylaxis, post-WBRT and control groups. Patients used moisturizer on the irradiated breast from the beginning of RT in the prophylaxis group, 2 weeks post-RT in the post-WBRT group, and no moisturizer in the control group. Sebum content of the irradiated and non-irradiated breast was measured to assess sebaceous gland damage. Sebum composition was also analyzed.

Results

A total of 76 patients were analyzed; 30 in the post-WBRT group, 32 in the control group, 14 in the prophylaxis group. The sebum content in the irradiated breast significantly decreased after WBRT in the post-WBRT and control groups. The decrease was sustained in the control group. In the non-irradiated breast, sebum content also decreased after WBRT in the post-WBRT and control groups. After moisturizer application, sebum content by sebumeter returned to pre-RT level in the post-WBRT group, while the decrease was sustained in the control group. Sebum content measured by evaporative light scattering detector and sebumeter was similar in the control group, but the dissociation was observed after moisturizer application in the post-WBRT group. The proportion of wax esters decreased in the irradiated breast after WBRT.

Conclusions

Radiotherapy significantly reduced sebum content in both irradiated and non-irradiated breast, indicating that RT caused quantifiably persistent sebaceous gland damage in irradiated sites and the surrounding tissue. Combined with the results from our previous study, heparinoid moisturizer treatment effectively prevents water loss by retaining oil contents on the skin surface.

Trial registration

UMIN, UMIN000005532. Registered 1 April 2011.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5334-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer as a prophylactic agent for radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Background

The application of heparinoid moisturizer for 2 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) was previously reported to significantly increase skin water content (WC) and help improve skin dryness and desquamation. The prospective open-label, randomized trial included an exploratory arm to investigate the preventive efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer for acute radiation dermatitis (ARD).

Methods

Between April 2011 and April 2013, patients receiving WBRT were assigned (1:2:2) to receive either: moisturizer for prophylaxis (group P), moisturizer starting 2 weeks after WBRT for treatment (group M), and no moisturizer (group C). This paper presents the results of comparison between the exploratory arm and no moisturizer group. Skin WC was measured prior to WBRT, on the last day of WBRT, and 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 3 months following WBRT. Signs and symptoms were also assessed.

Results

Comparing two groups, WC values were significantly higher in group P until 4 weeks following WBRT. At 2 weeks following WBRT, mean WC values in group P and C were 38.5 ± 6.1 arbitrary units (a.u.) and 30.2 ± 7.8 a.u., respectively (P < 0.001). In group C, dryness was more severe at 2 and 4 weeks following WBRT and desquamation more severe until 3 months following WBRT. However, the erythema score showed no difference between the two groups. Regarding symptoms, group C pain scores on the last day of WBRT were significantly higher than in group P (P < 0.030).

Conclusions

The preventive application of heparinoid moisturizer has the potential of reducing skin desquamation and dryness in patients receiving WBRT.

MEASUREMENT OF THE CONTRALATERAL BREAST PHOTON AND THERMAL NEUTRON DOSES IN BREAST CANCER RADIOTHERAPY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN PHYSICAL AND DYNAMIC WEDGES

This research aimed to measure the received photon and thermal neutron doses to contralateral breast (CB) in breast cancer radiotherapy for various field sizes in presence of physical and dynamic wedges. The measurement of photon and thermal neutron doses was carried out on right breast region of RANDO phantom (as CB) for 18 MV photon beams. The dose measurements were performed by thermoluminescent dosimeter chips. These measurements obtained for various field sizes in presence of physical and dynamic wedges. The findings of this study showed that the received doses (both of the photon and thermal neutron) to CB in presence of physical wedge for 11 × 13, 11 × 17 and 11 × 21 cm2 field sizes were 5.92, 6.36 and 6.77% of the prescribed dose, respectively as well as for dynamic wedge were 2.92, 4.63 and 5.60% of the prescribed dose, respectively. The results showed that the received photon and thermal neutron doses to CB increase with increment of field sizes. The received photon and thermal neutron doses to CB in presence of physical wedge were more than dynamic wedge. According to obtained findings, it is suggested that using a dynamic wedge is preferable than physical wedge, especially for medial tangential field.

Randomized, prospective assessment of moisturizer efficacy for the treatment of radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery

Objective

The effect of heparinoid moisturizer use after acute skin damage for patients receiving whole-breast radiotherapy after lumpectomy is understudied.

Methods

A total of 30 patients were randomly assigned to receive heparinoid moisturizer (Group M), and 32 patients comprised the control group (Group C). Patients in Group M were instructed to apply heparinoid moisturizer from 2 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy, and to continue to use the moisturizer until 3 months after completion of whole-breast radiotherapy. Group C patients were instructed to not apply any topical moisturizer during the study period. The relative ratio of skin water content ratio (RWCR_(t)= (I_t/N_t)/(I₀/N₀)) between irradiated and non-irradiated field was calculated. Signs and symptoms were also assessed. The primary endpoint was the difference in relative ratio of skin water content ratio between 2 and 4 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy.

Results

In Group C, relative ratio of skin water content ratio dropped to 0.80 ± 0.15 at 2 weeks and maintained the low level at 4 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy. Similarly, in Group M, relative ratio of skin water content ratio dropped to 0.81 ± 0.19 at 2 weeks (prior to application), however, it returned to baseline level (1.05 ± 0.23) at 4 weeks (2 weeks after application). The arithmetic difference of relative ratio of skin water content ratio in Group M was 0.24 ± 0.23 and was significantly larger than in Group C (0.06 ± 0.15; P < 0.01). Skin dryness and desquamation were less severe in Group M.

Conclusions

The application of heparinoid moisturizer for 2 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy significantly increased water content and helped improve skin dryness and desquamation compared with no use of moisturizer.

A review of the impact of photon and proton external beam radiotherapy treatment modalities on the dose distribution in field and out-of-field; implications for the long-term morbidity of cancer survivors

The use of untraditional treatment modalities for external beam radiotherapy such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy is increasing. This review focuses on the changes in the dose distribution and the impact on radiation related risks for long-term cancer survivors. We compare conventional radiotherapy, IMRT, and proton beam therapy based on published treatment planning studies as well as published measurements and Monte Carlo simulations of out-of-field dose distributions. Physical dose parameters describing the dose distribution in the target volume, the conformity index, the dose distribution in organs at risk, and the dose distribution in non-target tissue, respectively, are extracted from the treatment planning studies. Measured out-of-field dose distributions are presented as the dose equivalent as a function of distance from the treatment field. Data in the literature clearly shows that, compared with conventional radiotherapy, IMRT improves the dose distribution in the target volume, which may increase the probability of tumor control. IMRT also seems to increase the out-of-field dose distribution, as well as the irradiated non-target volume, although the data is not consistent, leading to a potentially increased risk of radiation induced secondary malignancies, while decreasing the dose to normal tissues close to the target volume, reducing the normal tissue complication probability. Protons show no or only minor advantage on the dose distribution in the target volume and the conformity index compared to IMRT. However, the data consistently shows that proton beam therapy substantially decreases the OAR average dose compared to the other two techniques. It is also clear that protons provide an improved dose distribution in non-target tissues compared to conventional radiotherapy and IMRT. IMRT and proton beam therapy may significantly improve tumor control for cancer patients and quality of life for long-term cancer survivors.

Assessment and minimization of contralateral breast dose for conventional and intensity modulated breast radiotherapy

Breast radiotherapy is associated with an increased risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in women under age 45 at the time of treatment. This risk increases with increasing absorbed dose to the contralateral breast. The use of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is expected to substantially reduce the dose to the contralateral breast by eliminating scattered radiation from physical beam modifiers. The absorbed dose to the contralateral breast was measured for 5 common radiotherapy techniques, including paired 15 degrees wedges, lateral 30 degrees wedge only, custom-designed physical compensators, aperture based (field-within-field) IMRT with segments chosen by the planner, and inverse planned IMRT with segments chosen by a leaf sequencing algorithm after dose volume histogram (DVH)-based fluence map optimization. Further reduction in contralateral breast dose through the use of lead shielding was also investigated. While shielding was observed to have the most profound impact on surface dose, the radiotherapy technique proved to be most important in determining internal dose. Paired wedges or compensators result in the highest contralateral breast doses (nearly 10% of the prescription dose on the medial surface), while use of IMRT or removal of the medial wedge results in significantly lower doses. Aperture-based IMRT results in the lowest internal doses, primarily due to the decrease in the number of monitor units required and the associated reduction in leakage dose. The use of aperture-based IMRT reduced the average dose to the contralateral breast by greater than 50% in comparison to wedges or compensators. Combined use of IMRT and 1/8-inch-thick lead shielding reduced the dose to the interior and surface of the contralateral breast by roughly 60% and 85%, respectively. This reduction may warrant the use of IMRT for younger patients who have a statistically significant risk of contralateral breast cancer associated with breast radiotherapy.

A study on contralateral breast surface dose for various tangential field techniques and the impact of set-up error on this dose

The risk of inducing contralateral breast (CLB) cancer in patients undergoing tangential field irradiation for the treatment of breast cancer is a serious concern in radiation oncology. A bilateral breast phantom made of wax attached onto the Alderson Rando phantom was used for studying the CLB dose for techniques using physical wedges, EDWs, IMRT and open fields. The skin dose to the CLB was measured at four different points (3 cm from the medial border of the tangential field (P1), nipple (P3), axilla (P4), midpoint between P3 and P1 (P2)). The highest measured dose occurred at P1 with the 60 degrees physical wedges; it was 15.3% of the dose at isocentre. Similarly, the dose measured at P3 (nipple) with 60 degrees physical wedges was 1.90 times higher than the dose with 60 degrees EDWs. The dose at P1 for IMRT (7.8%) was almost the same as that for the open field (8.7%). The skin dose measured at the nipple was 2.1 - 10.9 % of the isocentre dose. The highest CLB doses were contributed by medial wedged fields. The dose to the CLB can be reduced by using IMRT or avoiding wedging the medial tangential fields. A set-up error in the longitudinal direction has little impact on the CLB dose. Set-up errors > 1 cm in the vertical and lateral directions have significant impact on the CLB dose.

Multileaf field-in-field forward-planned intensity-modulated dose compensation for whole-breast irradiation is associated with reduced contralateral breast dose: a phantom model comparison

PURPOSE

Static multileaf collimated field-in-field forward-planned intensity-modulated radiation treatment (FiF-IMRT) has been shown to improve dose homogeneity compared to conventional wedged fields. However, a direct comparison of the scattered dose to the contralateral breast resulting from wedged and FiF-IMRT plans remains to be documented.

METHODS

The contralateral scattered breast dose was measured in a custom-designed anthropomorphic breast phantom in which 108 thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were volumetrically placed every 1-2cm. The target phantom breast was treated to a dose of 50Gy using three dose compensation techniques: No medial wedge and a 30-degree lateral wedge (M0-L30), 15-degree lateral and medial wedges (M15-L15), and FiF-IMRT. TLD measurements were compared using analysis of variance.

RESULTS

For FiF-IMRT, the mean doses to the medial and lateral quadrants of the contralateral breast were 112cGy (range 65-226cGy) and 40cGy (range 18-91 cGy), respectively. The contralateral breast doses with FiF-IMRT were on average 65% and 82% of the doses obtained with the M15-L15 and M0-L30 techniques, respectively (p<0.001). Compared to the M15-L15 technique, the maximum dose reduction obtained with FiF-IMRT was 115cGy (range 13-115cGy).

CONCLUSIONS

The dose to the contralateral breast is significantly reduced with FiF-IMRT compared to wedge-compensated techniques. Although long-term follow-up is needed to establish the clinical relevance of this finding, these results, along with the previously reported improvement in ipsilateral dose homogeneity, support the use of FiF-IMRT if resources permit.

Shielding of the Contralateral Breast During Tangential Irradiation

The purpose of this study was to investigate both optimal and practical contralateral breast shielding during tangential irradiation in young patients. A shaped sheet of variable thickness of lead was tested on a phantom with rubber breasts, and an optimized shield was created. Testing on 18 consecutive patients 50 years or younger showed shielding consistently reduced contralateral breast dose to at least half, with small additional reduction after removal of the medial wedge. For younger patients in whom radiation exposure is of considerable concern, a simple shield of 2 mm lead thickness proved practical and effective.

Survey of tangential field planning and dose distribution in the UK: background to the introduction of the quality assurance programme for the START trial in early breast cancer

A background survey of UK breast radiotherapy techniques was performed prior to the introduction of the quality assurance programme for the Standardization of Radiotherapy (START) trial in breast cancer, a UK multicentre randomized trial of different dose fractionations for breast radiotherapy. Analysis of patient treatment plans was performed at this initial stage of the quality assurance programme to ensure eventual uniformity of treatment within the randomized trial and hence ensure reliable end results. As an integral part of this initial survey, three patient outlines of different size and shape were circulated between November 1997 and January 1998 to 56 UK radiotherapy centres. Dose distributions were produced according to the routine planning protocol of each department to provide information on treatment planning techniques. Criteria used for treatment plan production and the resultant dose distributions were analysed. The dose distributions varied between centres. Dose inhomogeneity of no more than 10% was achieved, on the central axis, for all chest wall and medium breast size plans. The number of larger breast size distributions exceeding a 10% dose gradient across the treatment volume was 54% (26). Most centres in the UK determine the breast dose distribution by planning on a two-dimensional contour taken along the central plane of the breast. Variation in the breast contour either side of this central plane is not taken into account. Care with plan optimization by selecting the most appropriate beam parameters can lead to an improvement in breast dosimetry.

Definitive intraoperative very high-dose radiotherapy for localized osteosarcoma in the extremities

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome and adverse effects in patients with osteosarcoma treated with very high-dose definitive intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), with the intention of saving the affected limb.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-nine patients with osteosarcoma in their extremities were treated with definitive IORT. The irradiation field included the tumor plus an adequate wide margin and excluded the major vessels and nerves. Forty-five to 80 Gy of electrons or X-rays were delivered. The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 124 months.

RESULTS

The cause-specific and relapse-free 5-year survival rate was 50% and 43%, respectively. Distant metastasis developed in 23 patients; 19 died and 4 were alive for >10 years. Nine local recurrences were found 4-29 months after IORT in the affected limb. No radiation-induced skin reaction or nerve palsy was observed in the patients treated with X-rays. Experiments using phantoms also confirmed that the scatter dose was below the toxic level in the IORT setting with X-rays.

CONCLUSIONS

Very high-dose definitive IORT combined with preventive nailing and chemotherapy appeared to be a promising quality-of-life-oriented alternative to treating patients with osteosarcomas in the extremities, although the problem of recurrences from the surrounding unirradiated soft tissue remains to be solved.

The risks of treating keloids with radiotherapy

The risk of carcinogenesis from radiation exposure is well known. It has been questioned for some time therefore, whether it is wise to treat benign disease with radiotherapy. We report a case of a patient who developed bilateral breast carcinomas almost 30 years after treatment of chest wall keloids with radiotherapy. There are only anecdotal reports in the literature of malignancies following treatment of keloids with radiotherapy. We review these reports and discuss the safety of this approach to the management of keloid scars.

Intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation of the intact breast

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential benefits of intensity modulated tangential beams in the irradiation of the intact breast.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Three-dimensional treatment planning was performed on five left and five right breasts using standard wedged and intensity modulated (IM) tangential beams. Optimal beam parameters were chosen using beams-eye-view display. For the standard plans, the optimal wedge angles were chosen based on dose distributions in the central plane calculated without inhomogeneity corrections, according to our standard protocol. Intensity-modulated plans were generated using an inverse planning algorithm and a standard set of target and critical structure optimization criteria. Plans were compared using multiple dose distributions and dose volume histograms for the planning target volume (PTV), ipsilateral lung, coronary arteries, and contralateral breast.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in the doses to critical structures were achieved using intensity modulation. Compared with a standard-wedged plan prescribed to 46 Gy, the dose from the IM plan encompassing 20% of the coronary artery region decreased by 25% (from 36 to 27 Gy) for patients treated to the left breast; the mean dose to the contralateral breast decreased by 42% (from 1.2 to 0.7 Gy); the ipsilateral lung volume receiving more than 46 Gy decreased by 30% (from 10% to 7%); the volume of surrounding soft tissue receiving more than 46 Gy decreased by 31% (from 48% to 33%). Dose homogeneity within the target volume improved greatest in the superior and inferior regions of the breast (approximately 8%), although some decrease in the medial and lateral high-dose regions (approximately 4%) was also observed.

CONCLUSION

Intensity modulation with a standard tangential beam arrangement significantly reduces the dose to the coronary arteries, ipsilateral lung, contralateral breast, and surrounding soft tissues. Improvements in dose homogeneity throughout the target volume can also be achieved, particularly in the superior and inferior regions of the breast. It remains to be seen whether the dosimetric improvements achievable with IMRT will lead to significant clinical outcome improvements.

The use of compensators to optimise the three dimensional dose distribution in radiotherapy of the intact breast

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dose heterogeneity in tangential breast irradiation has been shown to be as high as 20% and may lead to problems in local control and cosmesis. In this study, dose heterogeneity in three dimensions (3D) in the breast irradiated with wedged tangential beams is assessed and the improvement which can be made by the use of individualised two dimensional (2D) compensators is established. The compensation required is calculated in two ways: (I) by an iterative technique giving a uniform dose on a plane through the isocentre normal to the central axis of each beam, and (II) by inverse planning using an optimisation technique based on simulated annealing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 17 patients with histologically proven T0-3, N0, N1, M0 breast cancer undergoing breast irradiation following wide local excision, were CT scanned using contiguous 1 cm slices from approximately 2 cm superior to 2 cm inferior of the irradiated volume. The dose distributions are determined using a 3D algorithm that calculates primary and scatter dose separately using a differential scatter air ratio method and corrects both for the presence of heterogeneities. The iterative technique achieves a dose variation of better than 0.5% on the plane through the isocentre with compensation on both beams. Compensation for the lateral beam only is calculated using the optimisation technique in order to minimise the scatter dose to the contralateral breast. The optimisation algorithm minimises the dose variance over the target and sets upper dose limits for the lung and the remainder of the irradiated volume.

RESULTS

For the group of patients the average dose heterogeneity in 3D using wedges is 12% (range 8-17%), which reduces to 8% (5-16%) using compensation on a plane and to 5% (4-7%) using the optimisation technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Inverse planning is normally used for complex radiotherapy techniques but when applied to tangential breast irradiation, can reduce the dose heterogeneity through the breast as a whole to as little as 4%, with potential benefits in local control and cosmesis.

Influence of modifications in breast irradiation technique on dose outside the treatment volume

PURPOSE

There is increasing interest in potential long-term effects of radiotherapy (RT) in patients treated for breast cancer, particularly those in whom long-term survival can be expected. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of treatment techniques, including patient positioning (supine vs. prone) on the absorbed dose in organs at a distance from the treatment volume in breast RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Dose distribution was studied in a Rando-Alderson phantom, modified with a simulated left breast of tissue-equivalent material. RT delivery was studied using 60Co and 6 MV x-ray beams, as well as electrons and a 192Ir source for tumor bed boost RT. Doses were measured in several organs and tissues of interest using LiF thermoluminescent dosimeters. Tangential breast RT was simulated using both supine and prone positioning.

RESULTS

Peripheral doses generally decreased approximately exponentially with distance from the edge of the treatment field. Peripheral doses in various target organs were significantly higher for supine than for prone tangential breast RT (for 50 Gy prescribed dose): 0.50 Gy vs. 0.25 Gy for the upper abdomen, 0.05 Gy vs. 0.02 Gy for pelvic organs, 0.17 Gy vs. 0.08 Gy for active bone marrow, and 0.47 Gy vs. 0.12 Gy for ipsilateral lung (discounting lung in primary beam).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that peripheral doses in several organs and tissues of interest can be reduced by 40 to 75% by prone tangential breast RT. These results may have implications for future strategies in the treatment of screen-detected breast cancer.