Evaluation of diluents and media for enumerating Zygosaccharomyces rouxii in blueberry syrup

Comparison of dichloran 18% glycerol (DG18) agar with general purpose mycological media for enumerating food spoilage yeasts

Dichloran 18% glycerol (DG18) agar was originally developed to enumerate xerophilic foodborne moulds. However, some laboratories are using DG18 agar as a general medium to enumerate foodborne moulds and yeasts. A collaborative study, with the participation of seven laboratories, was undertaken to compare DG18 agar with dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol (DRBC) agar, tryptone glucose yeast extract chloramphenicol (TGYC) agar, and plate count agar supplemented with chloramphenicol (PCAC) for enumerating 14 species of common food spoilage yeasts. Comparison of the mean values of populations of all yeasts recovered on each medium revealed no significant differences among DRBC agar, PCAC, and TGYC agar, while each of these media supported the development of significantly (P < or = 0.05) higher numbers of colonies than DG18 agar. However, differences were only 0.08 to 0.10 log10 cfu/ml, making the practical significance questionable. The overall coefficient of variation (CV) for within laboratory repeatability was 1.71%, while the CV for reproducibility of counts obtained among laboratories was 6.96%. Compared to DRBC agar, TGYC agar, and PCAC, yeast colonies were smaller on DG18 agar. Growth of Brettanomyces anomalus, Cryptococcus albidus, and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa was particularly retarded or inhibited on DG18 agar. Based on the performance of media in supporting colony development and ease of counting colonies, the use of DG18 agar as a general enumeration medium for foodborne yeasts cannot be recommended.

Osmotic stress on dilution of acid injured Escherichia coli O157:H7

To determine surviving numbers of Escherichia coli from cultures or food systems, dilution with 0.1% peptone is regularly used. Higher numbers of survivors could be obtained from an acid-treated culture if 0.5 mol l-1 sucrose was added to the 0.1% peptone. Sorbitol, glucose or sodium chloride, but not glycerol, could be used in place of sucrose. Using electron microscopy distinct differences could be seen between acid-treated and untreated cells. The osmolarity of the diluents ranged from 5 to 500 mosmol kg-1 H2O for the 0.5 mol l-1 sugar or glycerol solutions, to about 1000 mosmol kg-1 H2O for the salt solution. Maximum recovery diluent has an osmolarity of about 300 mosmol kg-1 H2O and resulted in recovery of similar numbers of injured cells as a 0.5 mol l-1 solution of sugar in 0.1% peptone. Taking into account the observed damage to acid-treated cells and the differences in osmolarity of the diluents, it is likely that dilution in 0.1% peptone imposed additional stress on the acid-injured cells which caused further cell damage. Dilution in a more osmotically stable solution alleviated this osmotic stress.