SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. III. Dipole source localization analysis

Spinal and supraspinal modulation of pain responses by hypnosis, suggestions, and distraction

The mechanisms underlying pain modulation by hypnosis and the contribution of hypnotic induction to the efficacy of suggestions being still under debate, our study aimed, (1) to assess the effects of identical hypoalgesia suggestions given with and without hypnotic induction, (2) to compare hypnotic hypoalgesia to distraction hypoalgesia and (3) to evaluate whether hypnotic suggestions of increased and decreased pain share common psychophysiological mechanisms. To this end, pain ratings, nociceptive flexion reflex amplitude, autonomic responses and electroencephalographic activity were measured in response to noxious electrical stimulation of the sural nerve in 20 healthy participants, who were subjected to four conditions: suggestions of hypoalgesia delivered with and without hypnosis induction (i.e. hypnotic-hypoalgesia and suggested-hypoalgesia), distraction by a mental calculation task and hypnotic suggestions of hyperalgesia. As a result, pain ratings decreased in distraction, suggested-hypoalgesia and hypnotic-hypoalgesia, while it increased in hypnotic-hyperalgesia. Nociceptive flexion reflex amplitude and autonomic activity decreased during suggested-hypoalgesia and hypnotic-hypoalgesia but increased during distraction and hypnotic-hyperalgesia. Hypnosis did not enhance the effects of suggestions significantly in any measurement. No somatosensory-evoked potential was modulated by the four conditions according to strict statistical criteria. The absence of a significant difference between the hypnotic hypoalgesia and hyperalgesia conditions suggests that brain processes as evidenced by evoked potentials are not invariably related to pain modulation. Time-frequency analysis of electroencephalographic activity showed a significant differentiation between distraction and hypnotic hypoalgesia in the theta domain. These results highlight the diversity of neurophysiological processes underlying pain modulation through different psychological interventions.

A connectionist modeling study of the neural mechanisms underlying pain's ability to reorient attention

Connectionist modeling was used to investigate the brain mechanisms responsible for pain's ability to shift attention away from another stimulus modality and toward itself. Different connectionist model architectures were used to simulate the different possible brain mechanisms underlying this attentional bias, where nodes in the model simulated the brain areas thought to mediate the attentional bias, and the connections between the nodes simulated the interactions between the brain areas. Mathematical optimization techniques were used to find the model parameters, such as connection strengths, that produced the best quantitative fits of reaction time and event-related potential data obtained in our previous work. Of the several architectures tested, two produced excellent quantitative fits of the experimental data. One involved an unexpected pain stimulus activating somatic threat detectors in the dorsal posterior insula. This threat detector activity was monitored by the medial prefrontal cortex, which in turn evoked a phasic response in the locus coeruleus. The locus coeruleus phasic response resulted in a facilitation of the cortical areas involved in decision and response processes time-locked to the painful stimulus. The second architecture involved the presence of pain causing an increase in general arousal. The increase in arousal was mediated by locus coeruleus tonic activity, which facilitated responses in the cortical areas mediating the sensory, decision, and response processes involved in the task. These two neural network architectures generated competing predictions that can be tested in future studies.

Neural mechanisms underlying pain's ability to reorient attention: evidence for sensitization of somatic threat detectors

Pain typically signals damage to the body, and as such can be perceived as threatening and can elicit a strong emotional response. This ecological significance undoubtedly underlies pain's well-known ability to demand attention. However, the neural mechanisms underlying this ability are poorly understood. Previous work from the author's laboratory has reported behavioral evidence suggesting that participants disengage their attention from an incorrectly cued visual target stimulus and reorient it toward a somatic target more rapidly when the somatic target is painful than when it is nonpainful. Furthermore, electrophysiological data suggest that this effect is mediated by a stimulus-driven process, in which somatic threat detectors located in the dorsal posterior insula activate the medial and lateral prefrontal cortex areas involved in reorienting attention toward the painful target. In these previous studies, the painful and nonpainful somatic targets were given in separate experiments involving different participants. Here, the nonpainful and painful somatic targets were presented in random order within the same block of trials. Unlike in the previous studies, both the nonpainful and painful somatic targets activated the somatic threat detectors, and the times taken to disengage and reorient attention were the same for both. These electrophysiological and behavioral data suggest that somatic threat detectors can become sensitized to nonpainful somatic stimuli that are presented in a context that includes painful stimuli.

Individual differences in pain sensitivity vary as a function of precuneus reactivity

Although humans differ widely in how sensitive they are to painful stimuli, the neural correlates underlying such variability remains poorly understood. A better understanding of this is important given that baseline pain sensitivity scores relate closely to the risk of developing refractory, chronic pain. To address this, we used a matched perception paradigm which allowed us to control for individual variations in subjective experience. By measuring subjective pain, nociceptive flexion reflexes, and, somatosensory evoked brain potentials (with source localization analysis), we were able to map the brain's sequential response to pain while also investigating its relationship to pain sensitivity (i.e. change in the stimulation strength necessary to experience pain) and spinal cord activity. We found that pain sensitivity in healthy adults was closely tied to pain-evoked responses in the contralateral precuneus. Importantly, the precuneus did not contribute to the actual representation of pain in the brain, suggesting that pain sensitivity and pain representation depend on separate neuronal sub-systems.

Pain relief through expectation supersedes descending inhibitory deficits in fibromyalgia patients

In healthy adults, expectations can modulate the activity of inhibitory bulbo-spinal projections, and can even block the analgesic properties of counter-irritation - a phenomenon that triggers descending inhibition. Since descending inhibition is known to be deficient in fibromyalgia (FM) patients, we tested the possibility that expectancy-mediated analgesia would improve, or even kick-start, the deficient inhibitory responses of FM patients. By measuring subjective pain ratings, spinal withdrawal reflexes, and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), it was possible to test whether or not expectancy-mediated analgesia involved descending inhibition in FM patients. Here, we show that expectations of analgesia radically change the subjective experience of pain, but do not eliminate evidence of spinal hyperexcitability in FM patients. We found that expectations of analgesia reduce subjective pain ratings and decrease SEP amplitudes, confirming that expectations influence thalamocortical processes. However, even when analgesia was experienced, the spinal activity of FM patients was abnormal, showing heightened reflex responses. This demonstrates that, unlike healthy subjects, the modulation of pain by expectations in FM fails to influence spinal activity. These results indicate that FMs are capable of expectancy-induced analgesia but that, for them, this form of analgesia does not depend on the recruitment of descending inhibitory projections.

EEG indices of tonic pain-related activity in the somatosensory cortices

OBJECTIVE

To identify EEG features that index pain-related cortical activity, and to identify factors that can mask the pain-related EEG features and/or produce features that can be misinterpreted as pain-specific.

METHODS

The EEG was recorded during three conditions presented in counterbalanced order: a tonic cold pain condition, and pain anticipation and arithmetic control conditions. The EEG was also recorded while the subjects made a wincing facial expression to estimate the contribution of scalp EMG artifacts to the pain-related EEG features.

RESULTS

Alpha amplitudes decreased over the contralateral temporal scalp and increased over the posterior scalp during the cold pain condition. There was an increase in gamma band activity during the cold pain condition at most electrode locations that was due to EMG artifacts.

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in alpha over the contralateral temporal scalp during cold pain is consistent with pain-related activity in the primary somatosensory cortex and/or the somatosensory association areas located in the parietal operculum and/or insula. This study also identified factors that might mask the pain-related EEG features and/or generate EEG features that could be misinterpreted as being pain-specific. These include (but are not limited to) an increase in alpha generated in the visual cortex that results from attention being drawn towards the pain; the widespread increase in gamma band activity that results from scalp EMG generated by the facial expressions that often accompany pain; and the possibility that non-specific changes in the EEG over time mask the pain-related EEG features when the pain and control conditions are given in the same order across subjects.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study identified several factors that need to be controlled and/or isolated in order to successfully record EEG features that index pain-related activity in the somatosensory cortices.

Neural mechanisms of detecting and orienting attention toward unattended threatening somatosensory target stimuli. II. Intensity effects

Negative potentials evoked by painful electrical stimulation of the sural nerve that occur at 100-180 ms poststimulus over the contralateral temporal scalp (CTN100-180) and at 130-200 ms over the fronto-central scalp (FCN130-200) exhibit unusual attention effects. That is, their amplitudes are larger when the painful evoking stimulus is unattended than when it is attended. In this experiment, I show that attention has no effect on the CTN100-180 evoked by a weak, nonthreatening sural nerve electrical stimulus. These data suggest that the generators of the CTN100-180, which include the somatosensory association areas in the parietal operculum, are specifically involved in detecting threatening somatosensory stimuli. The FCN130-200 showed a small increase in the unattended condition, which is consistent with the role of its medial prefrontal cortex generators in monitoring any situation that might require a change in attentional control.

Neural mechanisms of detecting and orienting attention toward unattended threatening somatosensory targets. I. Intermodal effects

Our previous work has identified four components of the somatosensory-evoked potential elicited by painful electrical stimulation of the sural nerve that might index an involuntary process that detects and orients attention toward threatening somatosensory stimuli. These components include a negativity over the central scalp at 70-110 ms poststimulus (CN70-110), a contralateral temporal negativity at 100-180 ms (CTN100-180), a frontocentral negativity at 130-200 ms, and a positive potential at 270-340 ms (the pain-related P2). The results of the endogenous cuing experiment used here suggest that the CN70-110 and CTN100-180 index somatosensory cortex activity that detects a threatening somatosensory stimulus when the subject's attention is focused on another stimulus modality but not another location. The P2, on the other hand, appears to index inferior parietal cortex activity that is specifically involved in orienting spatial attention.

Central processing of acute muscle pain in chronic low back pain patients: an EEG mapping study

The presence of perceptual sensitization and related brain responses was examined in 14 chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients and 13 healthy controls comparable in age and sex. Multichannel EEG recordings and pain ratings were obtained during the presentation of 800 painful electrical intramuscular and intracutaneous stimuli each to the left m. erector spinae and the left m. extensor digitorum. Perception and pain thresholds were not significantly different between the two groups, though patients showed significantly more perceptual sensitization. Across all stimulation conditions, a larger EEG component 80 milliseconds after stimulation was observed in the CLBP group. No significant group differences were found for the N150. The component 260 milliseconds after stimulus onset was significantly smaller in the CLBP group. N80, N150, and perceptual sensitization were significantly positively correlated. These results indicate enhanced perceptual sensitization and enhanced processing of the sensory-discriminative aspect of pain, as expressed in the N80 component, in CLBP patients. This may be one neurophysiologic basis of sensitization and the chronicity process. The lower P260 component in the patients may be explained in terms of tonic pain inhibiting phasic pain or may be related to the affective distress observed in this patient group.

A simultaneous EEG–fMRI study of painful electric stimulation

Together with a detailed behavioral analysis, simultaneous measurement of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) permits a better elucidation of cortical pain processing. We applied painful electrical stimulation to 6 healthy subjects and acquired fMRI simultaneously with an EEG measurement. The subjects rated various stimulus properties and the individual affective state. Stimulus-correlated BOLD effects were found in the primary and secondary somatosensory areas (SI and SII), the operculum, the insula, the supplementary motor area (SMA proper), the cerebellum, and posterior parts of the anterior cingulate gyrus (ACC). Perceived pain intensity was positively correlated with activation in these areas. Higher unpleasantness rating was associated with suppression of activity in areas known to be involved in stimulus categorization and representation (ventral premotor cortex, PCC, parietal operculum, insula) and enhanced activation in areas initiating, propagating, and executing motor reactions (ACC, SMA proper, cerebellum, primary motor cortex). Concordant dipole localizations in SI and ACC were modeled. Using the dipole strength in SI, the network was restricted to SI. The BOLD signal change in ACC was positively correlated to the individual dipole strength of the source in ACC thus revealing a close relationship of BOLD signal and possibly underlying neuronal electrical activity in SI and the ACC. The BOLD signal change decreased in SI over time. Dipole strength of the ACC source decreased over the experiment and increased during the stimulation block suggesting sensitization and habituation effects in these areas.

Descending analgesia--when the spine echoes what the brain expects

Changes in pain produced by psychological factors (e.g., placebo analgesia) are thought to result from the activity of specific cortical regions. However, subcortical nuclei, including the periaqueductal gray and the rostroventral medulla, also show selective activation when subjects expect pain relief. These brainstem regions send inhibitory projections to the spine and produce diffuse analgesic responses. Regrettably the precise contribution of spinal mechanisms in predicting the strength of placebo analgesia is unknown. Here, we show that expectations regarding pain radically change the strength of spinal nociceptive responses in humans. We found that contrary to expectations of analgesia, expectations of hyperalgesia completely blocked the analgesic effects of descending inhibition on spinal nociceptive reflexes. Somatosensory-evoked brain potentials and pain ratings further confirmed changes in spino-thalamo-cortical responses consistent with expectations and with changes in the spinal response. These findings provide direct evidence that the modulation of pain by expectations is mediated by endogenous pain modulatory systems affecting nociceptive signal processing at the earliest stage of the central nervous system. Expectation effects, therefore, depend as much about what takes place in the spine as they do about what takes place in the brain. Furthermore, complete suppression of the analgesic response normally produced by descending inhibition suggests that anti-analgesic expectations can block the efficacy of pharmacologically valid treatments which has important implications for clinical practice.

Human intracranially-recorded cortical responses evoked by painful electrical stimulation of the sural nerve

Intracranial recordings were obtained from 5 epilepsy patients to help identify the generators of the scalp somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) components that appear to be involved in orienting attention towards a potentially threatening, painful sural nerve electrical stimulus. The intracranial recording data support, for the most part, the generators suggested by our scalp SEP studies. The generators of the central negativity at 70-110 ms post-stimulus and the contralateral temporal negativity at 100-180 ms are located in the somatosensory association areas in the medial wall of the parietal cortex and in the parietal operculum and insula, respectively. The negative potential at 130-200 ms recorded from over the fronto-central scalp appears to be generated in the medial prefrontal cortex and primary somatosensory cortex foot area. The intracranial recording data suggest that the positive scalp potential at 280-320 ms, which corresponds to the pain-related P2, has multiple generators, including the anterior cingulate cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and possibly the somatosensory association areas in the medial wall of the parietal cortex. Finally, the positive scalp potential at 320-400 ms has generators in brain areas that others have shown to generate the P3a, including the dorsolateral and medial prefrontal cortices, temporal parietal junction, and the posterior hippocampus, which supports our hypothesis that this potential is a pain-evoked P3a. The putative functional roles of the brain areas generating these components and the response properties of the intracranial peaks recorded from these brain areas are in most cases consistent with the attention- and pain-related properties of their corresponding scalp SEP components. The intracranial recordings also demonstrate that the source configuration underlying the SEP components are often more complex than was suggested from the scalp studies. This complexity implies that the dipole source localization analysis of these components will at best provide only a very crude estimate of source location and activity, and that caution must be used when interpreting a change in the scalp component amplitude.

Evidence for early activation of primary motor cortex and SMA after electrical lower limb stimulation using EEG source reconstruction

Compared to median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), less is known about activity evoked by nerve stimulation of the lower limb. To understand the mechanisms and the physiology of sensor- and motor control it is useful to investigate the sensorimotor functions as revealed by a standardized functional status. Therefore, we investigated SEPs of the lower limb in 6 healthy male volunteers. For each side, tibial and peroneal nerves were stimulated transcutaneously at the fossa poplitea. The tibial nerves were also stimulated further distally at the ankle joint. Source localization was applied to 64-EEG-channel data of the SEPs. In contrast to somatosensory areas, which are activated after median nerve stimulation, we found dipoles adjacent to motor areas near Brodmann area 4 (BA 4) for SEP components P 32/40 and P 54/60 and near the supplementary motor area (SMA) for the N 75/83 component. These sources could reliably be distinguished for each individual subject as well as for the grand mean data set. Our data show that afferent projections from the lower limb mainly reach primary motor areas (BA 4) and only subsequently, with a delay of 40 ms, higher order motor areas such as SMA. We conclude that a focused view on SEP of the lower limb could be a useful tool to investigate pathological states in motor control or peripheral deafferentiation.

Brain generators of laser-evoked potentials: from dipoles to functional significance

In this work we review data on cortical generators of laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) in humans, as inferred from dipolar modelling of scalp EEG/MEG results, as well as from intracranial data recorded with subdural grids or intracortical electrodes. The cortical regions most consistently tagged as sources of scalp LERs are the suprasylvian region (parietal operculum, SII) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Variability in opercular sources across studies appear mainly in the anterior-posterior direction, where sources tend to follow the axis of the Sylvian fissure. As compared with parasylvian activation described in functional pain imaging studies, LEP opercular sources tended to cluster at more superior sites and not to involve the insula. The existence of suprasylvian opercular LEPs has been confirmed by both epicortical (subdural) and intracortical recordings. In dipole-modelling studies, these sources appear to become active less than 150 ms post-stimulus, and remain in action for longer than opercular responses recorded intracortically, thus suggesting that modelled opercular dipoles reflect a "lumped" activation of several sources in the suprasylvian region, including both the operculum and the insula. Participation of SI sources to explain LEP scalp distribution remains controversial, but evidence is emerging that both SI and opercular sources may be concomitantly activated by laser pulses, with very similar time courses. Should these data be confirmed, it would suggest that a parallel processing in SI and SII has remained functional in humans for noxious inputs, whereas hierarchical processing from SI toward SII has emerged for other somatosensory sub-modalities. The ACC has been described as a source of LEPs by virtually all EEG studies so far, with activation times roughly corresponding to scalp P2. Activation is generally confined to area 24 in the caudal ACC, and has been confirmed by subdural and intracortical recordings. The inability of most MEG studies to disclose such ACC activity may be due to the radial orientation of ACC currents relative to scalp. ACC dipole sources have been consistently located between the VAC and VPC lines of Talairach's space, near to the cingulate subsections activated by motor tasks involving control of the hand. Together with the fact that scalp activities at this latency are very sensitive to arousal and attention, this supports the hypothesis that laser-evoked ACC activity may underlie orienting reactions tightly coupled with limb withdrawal (or control of withdrawal). With much less consistency than the above-mentioned areas, posterior parietal, medial temporal and anterior insular regions have been occasionally tagged as possible contributors to LEPs. Dipoles ascribed to medial temporal lobe may be in some cases re-interpreted as being located at or near the insular cortex. This would make sense as the insular region has been shown to respond to thermal pain stimuli in both functional imaging and intracranial EEG studies.

Simultaneous electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging of primary and secondary somatosensory cortex in humans after electrical stimulation

Simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements were performed in six healthy subjects to determine the representation of stimulation of the right thumb in somatosensory cortex. In all subjects EEG-based dipole locations could be determined in primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortex. The stimulus-induced blood oxygenation level dependent response of the fMRI showed deviations of 23.5 mm (standard deviation, SD = 6.9) for S1 and 15.7 mm (SD = 3.5) for S2 cortex. fMRI constrained dipole searches lead to higher residual variances. The data show that simultaneous EEG and fMRI measurements of somatosensory activity are feasible and yield reliable and valid results.

The role of operant conditioning in chronic pain: an experimental investigation

The role of operant conditioning for the development and maintenance of chronic pain was examined in 30 chronic back pain patients (CBP) and 30 matched healthy controls. Half of each group was reinforced for increased, half for decreased pain reports while EEG, EOG, heart rate, skin conductance and muscle tension levels were recorded. Both groups showed similar learning rates, however, the CBP patients displayed slower extinction of both the verbal and the cortical (N150) pain response. In addition, the CBP group displayed prolonged elevated electromyogram levels to the task. These data suggest that CBP patients are more easily influenced by operant conditioning factors than healthy controls and this susceptibility may add to the maintenance of the chronic pain problem.

Mapping of early and late human somatosensory evoked brain potentials to phasic galvanic painful stimulation

In the present study, we modeled the spatiotemporal evolution of human somatosensory evoked cortical potentials (SEPs) to brief median-nerve galvanic painful stimulation. SEPs were recorded (-50 to +250 ms) from 12 healthy subjects following nonpainful (reference), slight painful, and moderate painful stimulations (subjective scale). Laplacian transformation of scalp SEPs reduced head volume conduction effects and annulled electric reference influence. Typical SEP components to the galvanic nonpainful stimulation were contralateral frontal P20-N30-N60-N120-P170, central P22-P40, and parietal N20-P30-P60-P120 (N = negativity, P = positivity, number = latency in ms). These components were observed also with the painful stimulations, the N60, N120, P170 having a longer latency with the painful than nonpainful stimulations. Additional SEP components elicited by the painful stimulations were parietomedian P80 as well as central N125, P170 (cP170), and P200. These additional SEP components included the typical vertex negative-positive complex following transient painful stimulations. Latency of the SEP components exclusively elicited by painful stimulation is highly compatible with the involvement of A delta myelinated fibers/spinothalamic pathway. The topography of these components is in line with the response of both nociceptive medial and lateral systems including bilateral primary sensorimotor and anterior cingulate cortical areas. The role of attentive, affective, and motor aspects in the modulation of the reported SEP components merits investigation in future experiments.

Characterizing somatosensory evoked potential sources with dipole models: Advantages and limitations

Several methods have been developed to investigate the cerebral generators of scalp somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), because simple visual inspection of the electroencephalographic signal does not allow for immediate identification of the active brain regions. When the neurons fired by the afferent inputs are closely grouped, as usually occurs in SEP generation, they can be represented as a dipole, that is, as a linear source with two opposite poles. Several techniques for dipolar source modeling, which use different algorithms, have been employed to build source models of early, middle-latency, and late cognitive SEPs. Modifications of SEP dipolar activities after experimental maneuvers or in pathological conditions have also been observed. Although the effectiveness of dipolar source analysis should not be overestimated due to the intrinsic limitations of the approach, dipole modeling provides a means to assess SEPs in terms of cerebral sources and voltage fields that they produce over the head.

Pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields induced by controlled ballistic mechanical impacts

The purpose of this study was to investigate cortical processing of painful compared with tactile mechanical stimulation by means of magnetoencephalography (MEG) using the novel technique of mechanical impact loading. A light, hard projectile is accelerated pneumatically in a guiding barrel and elicits a brief sensation of pain when hitting the skin in free flight. Controllable noxious and innocuous impact velocities facilitate the generation of different, predetermined stimulus intensities. The authors applied painful as well as tactile mechanical impacts to the dorsum of the second, third, and fourth digit of the nondominant hand. Pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SSEFs) were compared with those following tactile stimulation in seven healthy volunteers. Contralateral primary sensory cortical area activation was observed within the first 70 msec after tactile as well as painful stimulus intensities. Only painful impacts elicited SSEF responses assigned to the bilateral secondary sensory cortical regions and to the middle part of the contralateral cingulate gyrus, which were active at latency ranges of 55 to 155 msec and 90 to 220 msec respectively. Additional long-latency responses occurred in these cortical areas as long as 280 msec after painful stimulation in three subjects. In contrast to tactile stimulation, painful mechanical impacts elicited SSEF responses in cortical areas demonstrated to be involved in central pain processing by previous MEG and neuroimaging studies. Because of its similarity to natural noxious stimuli and the possibility of adjustable painful and tactile impact velocities, the technique of mechanical impact loading provides a useful method for the neurophysiologic evaluation of cortical pain perception.

Dipolar source modeling of somatosensory evoked potentials to painful and nonpainful median nerve stimulation

Dipolar source modeling might help in clarifying whether somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after electrical stimulation at painful intensity contain any information related to the nociceptive processing. SEPs were recorded after left median nerve stimulation at three different intensities: intense but nonpainful (intensity 2); slightly painful (pain threshold; intensity 4); and moderately painful (intensity 6). Scalp SEPs at intensities 2, 4, and 6 were fitted by a five-dipole model. When the strength modifications of the source activities up to 40 ms were examined across the different stimulus intensities, no significant difference was found. In the later epoch (40-200 ms), a posterior parietal dipole and two bilateral sources probably located in the second somatosensory (SII) areas increased significantly their dipole moments when the stimulus was increased from 2 to 4 and became painful. Since no difference was found when the stimulus intensity was increased from 4 to 6, the observed increase of the dipolar strengths is probably related to a variation of the stimulus quality (nonpainful vs. painful), rather than of the stimulus intensity per se. Our findings lead us to conclude that a large convergence of nociceptive and non-nociceptive afferents probably occurs bilaterally in the SII areas.

Korrelate der kortikalen Schmerzverarbeitung - eine Übersicht

Zusammenfassung: Schmerz ist ein kompliziertes Resultat verschiedener neuronaler Aktivitäten unseres Gehirns und nicht nur das einfache Ergebnis der Tätigkeit des peripheren nozizeptiven Systems. Schmerz resultiert aus dem Zusammenspiel verschiedener Module im Gehirn, die sich in verschiedenen Hirnarealen befinden. Er wird durch Erwartungen, Lernprozesse, Erfahrungen und Coping modifiziert. Elektrophysiologische Begleiterscheinungen, die mit der zentralnervösen Schmerzverarbeitung assoziiert sind, erlauben dabei eine Charakterisierung der ablaufenden Informationsverarbeitungsprozesse. Neben der grundlagentheoretischen Bedeutung spielt hier die Evaluation verschiedener Therapieansätze eine herausragende Rolle. Darüber hinaus konnte mit Hilfe der Hirnelektrizität nachgewiesen werden, daß auch die kortikalen Module des nozizeptiven Systems im Zusammenhang mit Schmerzverarbeitung funktionell reorganisiert werden. Die relativ neuen quellenanalytischen Ansätze lassen einen weiteren, deutlichen Erkenntnisgewinn über die Rolle einzelner Hirnstrukturen bei der Verarbeitung und Behandlung von Schmerz erwarten.

After-effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain-related evoked potentials and magnetic fields in normal subjects

OBJECTIVES

The after-effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain-related brain responses was investigated using electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG).

METHODS

We studied 13 healthy volunteers for the main experiment and 7 for the control experiment. The pain-related evoked cerebral potentials (PREP) at Cz and magnetic cortical fields (PRCF) on both hemispheres following painful electrical finger stimulation were simultaneously recorded before and after TENS on the right forearm of the median nerve territory at 50 Hz for 30 min. PREP and PRCF were similarly recorded without TENS in the control experiment.

RESULTS

The PREP components, N150 and P220, were significantly attenuated after TENS, compared to those before TENS (P<0.01, two-way repeated ANOVA). However, there was no consistent change of the PRCF components. Eleven of 13 subjects reported no change of pain sensation after TENS. There was no change of PREP in control experiment without TENS.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that TENS reduced PREP following painful electrical stimulation, and that the origin of PREP was, at least partially, different from that of PRCF which was not changed after TENS. An after-effect of TENS significantly affected the generation process of PREP, but it was not enough to relieve the subjective painful feeling.

The pain-related negative difference potential: a direct measure of central pain pathway activity or of interactions between the innocuous somatosensory and pain pathways?

Negative difference potential (NDP) is a sural nerve-evoked scalp potential derived by subtracting potentials elicited at the pain threshold level from those elicited at supra-pain threshold levels. Our recent work examined the possibility that the NDP reflects a pain-related inhibition of neurons in the innocuous somatosensory pathways. Although failing to find any evidence for this inhibition, these studies do present the possibility that the NDP reflects an attention- and/or task-related decrease in the innocuous somatosensory activity that is elicited by the noxious electrical stimulus. To test this hypothesis, 35 healthy subjects were given three attention/task relevance conditions presented in counterbalanced order: rate the subjective magnitude of the painful aspects of the noxious electrical stimulus; rate the subjective magnitude of the non-painful aspects of the noxious electrical stimulus; and, ignore the stimulus. Neither changes in attention nor the task relevance of the non-painful aspects of the stimulus had any effect on NDP amplitude. These data demonstrate that the NDP does not reflect an attention- or task-related modulation of innocuous somatosensory activity. Rather, our evidence to date suggests that the NDP is generated by activity in the central pain pathways.

Neurophysiological evaluation of pain

Neurophysiological techniques for the evaluation of pain in humans have made important advances in the last decade. A number of features of neuroanatomy and physiology of nociception qualifies pain as a multidimensional phenomenon which is rather unique among the sensory systems and which poses a number of technical and procedural requirements for its appropriate diagnostic assessment. Various stimulation techniques to induce defined pain in humans and used in combination with the methodology of evoked electrical brain potentials and magnetic fields are presented. Most recent knowledge gathered from scalp topography and dipole source analysis of pain-relevant evoked potentials and fields is discussed. Particular emphasis is put upon laser-evoked potentials and their application for diagnosis, pathophysiological description and monitoring of patients with neurological disorders and abnormal pain states. Future perspectives in this growing field of research are discussed briefly.

Pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following lower limb stimulation

Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) following painful electrical stimulation of the sural nerve were examined in 6 normal subjects. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of the deflections shorter than 100 ms in latency were located in the foot area of the primary sensory cortex (SI) in the contralateral hemisphere following both weak and painful stimulations. Two main deflections, N150m-P150m and N250m-P250m, were independently identified only following painful stimulation. ECDs of the N150m-P150m were considered to be located in bilateral second sensory cortices (SII). ECDs of the N250m-P250m were identified in multiple areas including bilateral cingulate cortices and SII. These findings were consistent with the pain-related SEFs following upper limb stimulation. Therefore, we considered that bilateral SII and the cingulate cortices were activated by the painful stimulation and that pain-specific brain activities in those areas did not depend on the stimulation site.

Negative difference potential isolates scalp potentials generated by activity in supraspinal nociceptive pathways

A negative difference potential (75-240 ms poststimulus) was computed by subtracting the sural nerve-evoked somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) elicited at the pain threshold level from SEPs elicited at noxious levels. The effects of stimulus intensity and interstimulus interval on the negative difference potential amplitude plus conduction velocity measurements and a dipole source localization analysis all suggest that the negative difference potential reflects the response of neurons in the primary somatosensory cortex to inputs that arise from the nociceptive A delta peripheral afferents. Furthermore, a comparison of these results with our earlier sural nerve-evoked SEP studies suggests that these pain-related inputs to the primary somatosensory cortex are largely inhibitory.

Effects of interstimulus interval on scalp topographies evoked by noxious sural nerve stimulation

The amplitude of the late pain-related negative-positive peak complex, which we have labeled SP3 (134-150 ms) and SP6 (277-331 ms), respectively, increased with increasing interstimulus interval (ISI). This contrasts with the nociceptive spinal withdrawal reflex and subjective pain rating data, which implied that nociceptive somatosensory processes were unaffected by ISI at stimulus levels that were well within the pain range. A scalp topographic analysis strongly suggested that none of the brain areas responsible for SP3 or SP6 are involved exclusively in nociception. We also observed a pain-related positive potential approximately 161-177 ms following sural nerve stimulation that has not been reported by others. A dipole source localization analysis and the effects of ISI and stimulus intensity on this potential suggest that it is generated by the response of primary somatosensory cortex neurons to inputs arising from the innocuous peripheral afferents and that this response is inhibited by noxious inputs.

Scalp topography and dipolar source modelling of potentials evoked by CO2 laser stimulation of the hand

CO2 laser evoked potentials to hand stimulation recorded using a scalp 19-channel montage in 11 normal subjects consistently showed early N1/P1 dipolar field distribution peaking at a mean latency of 159 ms. The N1 negativity was distributed in the temporoparietal region contralateral to stimulation and the P1 positivity in the frontal region. The N1/P1 response was followed by 3 distinct components: (1) N2a reaching its maximal amplitude at the vertex and ipsilaterally to the stimulated hand, (2) N2b mostly distributed in the frontal region, and (3) P2 with a mid-central topography. Brain electrical source analysis showed that this sequence was explained, with a residual variance below 5%, by a model including two dipoles in the upper bank of the Sylvian fissure of each hemisphere, a frontal dipole close to the midline, and two anterior medial temporal dipoles, thus suggesting a sequential activation of the two second somatosensory areas, anterior cingulate gyrus and the amygdalar nuclei or the hippocampal formations, respectively. This model fitted well with the scalp field topography of grand average responses to stimulation of left and right hand obtained across all subjects as well as when applied to individual data. Our findings suggest that the second somatosensory area contralateral to the stimulation is the first involved in the building of pain-related responses, followed by ipsilateral second somatosensory area and limbic areas receiving noxious inputs from the periphery.

Pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields

Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) following painful electrical stimulation of the finger were investigated in 5 normal subjects. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of deflections shorter than 100 msec in latency were located in the primary sensory cortex (SI) in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated finger following either non-painful or painful stimulation. Two main deflections, N100m-P100m and N250m-P250m, were independently identified following painful stimulation, although they were not found in SEFs following non-painful weak stimulation. ECDs of the N100m-P100m were considered to be located in the bilateral second sensory cortices (SII). ECDs of the N250m-P250m were identified in the bilateral cingulate cortices and SII, but the intersubject difference was large. Therefore, we considered that contralateral SI and bilateral SII were initially activated by painful noxious stimulation, and then multiple areas including bilateral SII and cingulate cortices were activated. In EEG recordings (evoked potentials), no potential corresponding to N100m-P100m was found, probably because it was difficult to record activation in SII by EEG recordings. The P250 potential which corresponded to the N250m-P250m was clearly identified, probably because activation of multiple areas generated large long-duration EEG potentials which were maximal around the vertex, unlike MEG recordings.

Pain-related cerebral potentials in patients with frontal or parietal lobe lesions

The present study investigated the processing of painful electrical stimuli in patients with unilateral frontal or parietal lobe damage and matched control subjects. Patients with frontal lesions showed increased pain thresholds when the stimuli were administered contralateral to the lesion. While the peak-to-peak amplitudes of the N150/P250 components of the somatosensory potentials increased linearly with stimulus intensity in the control subjects, the responses in the frontal group did not change significantly between stimulation at pain and tolerance threshold. There was no evidence for altered pain processing in patients with parietal lobe lesions. The findings of the present study support the hypothesis of an involvement of the frontal cortex in pain perception in humans.

Effects of a selective A beta afferent block on the pain-related SEP scalp topography

This study examined the effects of a selective ischemic block of the A beta peripheral afferents on the pain-related somatosensory evoked potential (SEP). Pain descriptions given during the A beta block suggest that the SEP elicited by noxious sural nerve stimulation arises from activity in the A delta and not the C peripheral afferents. The SEP recorded during the A beta block was characterized by a potential whose latency and topographic pattern was very similar to a late pain-related positive potential (SP6) that we have described in previous work. These results provide further evidence for SP6 being generated by brain areas (sources) that receive noxious inputs and make it very unlikely that sources involved exclusively in innocuous somatosensory processes contribute to SP6.

SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. I. Identification of stable periods and individual differences

Scalp potential topographies evoked by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation were obtained from 15 human subjects. The SEP scalp topography could be separated into 6 different stable periods (SP), that is, consecutive time points where there were no major changes in the topographic pattern. SP1 (occurring 58-90 msec post stimulus) was characterized by a contralateral frontal positivity and a central negativity oriented ipsilateral to the evoking stimulus; SP2 (92-120 msec) by a bilateral frontal positivity and a symmetrical central negativity; SP3 (135-158 msec) by a widespread negativity with a minimum at the contralateral temporo-frontal region; and SP4 (178-222 msec), SP5 (223-277 msec) and SP6 (282-339 msec) by a widespread positivity with a maximum located along the centro-parietal midline. SP4, SP5, and SP6 could be distinguished by changes in the orientation of the isovoltage contour lines and/or by changes in the location of the maximum. The stable periods had similar onset and offset latencies and the same major features across subjects. However, the topographic patterns were not identical across subjects. These individual differences are likely due to the expected variability in the orientation of the equivalent regional dipole sources generating these potentials.