Somatostatin and octreotide for variceal bleeding

Pharmacologic efficacy in gastric variceal rebleeding and survival: including multivariate analysis

BACKGROUND

Therapy with beta-blocker and nitrate has been reported to improve survival of patients with bleeding esophageal varices and to decrease esophageal rebleeding. However, there is little information available concerning the efficacy of these medications on rebleeding risk and survival in gastric variceal bleeding after initial hemostasis.

METHODS

We conducted an open trial to observe the roles of beta-blocker and nitrate in the long-term outcome of bleeding gastric varices. Eighty-three patients were included and evaluated on the basis of age, gender, gastric variceal size, associated esophageal variceal size, Child-Pugh classification, existence of hepatoma and portal vein thrombosis, beta-blocker or nitrate therapy, and follow-up histoacryl injection. Survival analysis and multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model were performed to evaluate independent risk factors.

RESULTS

Larger gastric varices have been shown to be the only risk factor for rebleeding (adjusted odds ratio, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.30-15.59). beta-Blocker and nitrate did not significantly reduce the incidence of rebleeding (adjusted odds ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.08-1.66). Although medical treatment was shown to improve the overall survival by Kaplan-Meier method (p < 0.01), multivariate analysis showed Child-Pugh class B or C and advanced hepatoma with portal vein thrombosis to be the real independent risk factors that influence survival (Child-Pugh class B or C odds ratio, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.53-4.84; portal vein thrombosis odds ratio, 6.99; 95% CI, 2.42-20.16). beta-Blocker and nitrate did not significantly prolong survival independently.

CONCLUSIONS

beta-Blocker and nitrate did not decrease the risk of rebleeding and did not improve the overall survival independently. The poor prognosis was correlated with Child-Pugh class B or C, and the advance hepatoma, with portal vein thrombosis.

Current management of oesophageal varices

Patients with chronic liver disease and large varices with endoscopic features which put them at high risk of bleeding, especially if they have a HVPG of more than 12 mmHg, should be treated with beta-blockers at a dose which lowers their pulse by 25%, as prophylaxis against future bleeding. Once a patient bleeds from oesophageal varices, emergency treatment with octreotide should be commenced until endoscopic sclero- or ligation therapy is performed. If these treatments are not readily available, or if bleeding continues in spite of treatment, balloon tamponade is employed to arrest bleeding. In the event of recurrent bleeding, further sclero- or ligation therapy should be attempted, but continued bleeding would dictate surgical therapy or insertion of a TIPS. What operation is performed would depend on the local expertise. In a suitable candidate, liver transplantation would be considered. If bleeding is controlled by sclero- or ligation therapy, chronic sclerotherapy should be continued until the varices are obliterated, and beta-blockers commenced. Regular follow-up should be arranged to encourage abstinence from alcohol if appropriate, and to decide the most opportune time for transplantation if indicated.

Short-term cardiovascular effects of somatostatin in patients with cirrhosis

Somatostatin is used to treat variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Its systemic hemodynamic effects, however, are not yet well defined. Since cardiomyopathy or pulmonary artery hypertension may occur in patients with cirrhosis, definition of the systemic hemodynamic effects of somatostatin or its analogue octreotide is of clinical importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of somatostatin, at different doses and under different conditions of administration, on the systemic hemodynamics in 17 patients with cirrhosis. Two sets of experiments were performed. In the first, eight patients received two different bolus doses (100 and 250 micrograms) of somatostatin. The second set of experiments was designed to study the hemodynamic effects of the combination of a bolus and an infusion of somatostatin. Nine other patients received one bolus of 250 micrograms of somatostatin, followed by a 250 micrograms/h infusion for 65 min. A second bolus of 250 micrograms of somatostatin was injected in these patients after 35 min of infusion. Before and for 30 min after each bolus, systemic hemodynamics were measured. Following a bolus of somatostatin, a dose-dependent decrease in heart rate (from 77 +/- 3 to 73 +/- 5 beats/min with 100 micrograms, and from 78 +/- 4 to 68 +/- 5 beats/min with 250 micrograms, p < 0.05) and increases in systemic and pulmonary artery pressures were observed. The combination of an infusion and a bolus of somatostatin significantly reduced the increases in systemic and pulmonary artery pressures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Vasoconstrictors in the management of bleeding from oesophageal varices. A clinico-economic appraisal in the UK

BACKGROUND

Bleeding from oesophageal varices is an uncommon but potentially fatal condition that often leads to expensive hospitalizations in intensive care or high-dependency units.

METHODS

To assess the clinical and economic impact of this condition, we have devised a management plan illustrating current clinical practice in the UK.

RESULTS

Approximately 6.1 million pounds of NHS resources are devoted to the treatment of 3000 acute hospital admissions for variceal bleeding every year. Vasoconstrictors like vasopressin may save approximately 36 lives per annum for an additional 145 thousand pounds. However, current clinical practice requires vasopressin to be concurrently administered with intravenous glyceryl trinitrate, increasing overall costs by 582 thousand pounds to a total of 6.7 million pounds. The additional cost for each extra life saved is estimated at 16,180 pounds.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of current vasoconstrictors requires further confirmation. In particular, new agents like octreotide (Sandostatin) should be carefully assessed to determine their potential clinical and economic benefits.

Randomized, controlled study of various agents for endoscopic injection sclerotherapy of bleeding canine gastric varices

The purpose of this study was to compare the relative efficacy and technical ease of use of eight different agents for endoscopic hemostasis and obliteration of bleeding gastric varices in a canine model, as no comparative data are available on gastric variceal sclerotherapy. Large bleeding gastric varices in 20 heparinized dogs were randomized to endoscopic injection treatment with one of the following agents: cyanoacrylate; a 1:1:1 mixture of sodium tetradecyl sulfate 3%, ethanol 98%, and normal saline solution; ethanolamine oleate 5%; sodium morrhuate 5%; sodium tetradecyl sulfate 1.5%; polidocanol 1%; normal saline solution with epinephrine 1:10,000; or normal saline solution (control). The number and volume of injections and the time required to achieve complete hemostasis were evaluated; follow-up endoscopy was performed at 1 month to assess gastric variceal obliteration. Cyanoacrylate was the best agent overall in terms of immediate efficacy, low volume requirement, time required for initial hemostasis, and reduction of gastric variceal size. Cyanoacrylate, tetradecyl sulfate, and polidocanol were the most effective agents for reducing gastric variceal size. Epinephrine was effective for controlling induced or secondary bleeding caused by puncture of the gastric varices with the sclerotherapy needle during intravariceal injections. Ongoing studies are evaluating combinations of agents with different mechanisms of action, such as epinephrine (for vasoconstriction to minimize secondary bleeding) plus alcohol, and/or tetradecyl sulfate (for variceal thrombosis and sclerosis).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Treatment of acute gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage

About 30% to 35% of patients with portal hypertension bleed from gastroesophageal varices and mortality remains high reflecting the challenges of effectively dealing with the bleeding event itself and the problems of underlying liver disease. Careful resuscitation and control of risk of complications is the most essential element of medical therapy (Fig. 2). Use of newer, more effective drug combinations with vasopressin or somatostatin permit control of hemorrhage in the majority of patients with fewer drug-induced complications. Endoscopic sclerotherapy and, more recently, banding therapy provide immediate control of hemorrhage and eradication of varices and rebleeding in up to 90% of patients. Persistent, recurrent bleeding in the small number of remaining patients can be effectively managed by "portacaval shunt rescue" or orthotopic liver transplantation in selected cases with acceptable surgical morbidity and mortality. The contribution and role of the TIPS procedure is unknown but very promising; at least as a bridge procedure in patients awaiting transplantation. Until appropriate prospective, comparative trials are performed, the role of TIPS as a long-term alternative to portacaval shunt surgery or other endoscopic or surgical options remains unknown.

A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of somatostatin with injection sclerotherapy in the control of bleeding oesophageal varices

Since previous reports have suggested that somatostatin may be of value in the control of acute variceal haemorrhage, we compared its efficacy with that of injection sclerotherapy in a randomised controlled clinical trial. Eighty consecutive patients with endoscopically-proven severe variceal bleeding were randomised to injection sclerotherapy (n = 41) or somatostatin (n = 39) given as a continuous infusion of 250 micrograms/h for 5 days plus daily bolus administration of 250 micrograms. The efficacy of injection sclerotherapy and somatostatin infusion in controlling haemorrhage and preventing rebleeding (censored at 5 days), mortality (censored at 28 days) and complications was compared. The aetiology of the portal hypertension and transfusion requirements was similar between the two groups, but there were more patients with severe liver disease (Child's C) in the somatostatin group. There was no significant difference between the two treatments in the initial (p = 1.0) or overall control of bleeding (p = 0.58). Furthermore, somatostatin was as effective as injection sclerotherapy in controlling bleeding in patients with severe liver disease or in those actively bleeding at the time of their endoscopy. The relative risk of rebleeding whilst receiving somatostatin compared to injection sclerotherapy was 1.39 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 3.73; 0.52], but this was reduced to 0.98 (95% CI 0.37; 2.67) when readjusted for Child's grading, the only prognostic factor shown to be of significance. Mortality was not significantly different between the two groups of patients (p = 0.31). The relative risk of dying whilst receiving somatostatin compared to injection sclerotherapy was 1.6 (95% CI 3.93; 0.66) but was reduced to 1.03 (95% CI 0.47; 2.47) when adjusted for Child's grading, the only significant prognostic factor. Complications in the somatostatin group were minor and less frequent than after injection sclerotherapy. The results of this study indicate that somatostatin is a safe treatment, which is as effective an endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for acute variceal bleeding.