Wen J, Li Y, Li Y, Wang L, Zhou J, Ba L, Shen S, Wu Y. Comparative cost-effectiveness of three intrauterine devices: a multi-center randomized trial.
J Evid Based Med 2010;
3:76-82. [PMID:
21349048 DOI:
10.1111/j.1756-5391.2010.01075.x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of three intrauterine devices (IUDs), MLCu375, TCu380A, and YuangongCu365.
METHODS
Cost-effectiveness of three IUDs, namely MLCu375, TCu380A, and YuangongCu365, was analyzed from the provider's perspective by means of a randomized trial with one-year follow-up carried out in six centers in China.
RESULTS
YuangongCu 365 had the lowest termination and pregnancy rates (4.17% and 0.54%, respectively), followed by TCu380A (8.59% and 1.11%, respectively) and MLCu375 (14.17% and 2.04%, respectively). YuangongCu365 was more effective yet more costly than the MLCu375. There was a favorably dominating trend of cost-effectiveness for TCu380A comparing with MLCu375 when taking continuation rate as the effectiveness indicator, but there was no difference in cost-effectiveness between the two IUDs when using the pregnancy avoidance rate as the effectiveness measure.
CONCLUSIONS
TCu380A is slightly more cost-effective than the MLCu375. YuangongCu365 is the most effective of the three devices and be used provided it is economically affordable. The comparative long-term safety and cost-effectiveness of these devices need to be further investigated.
Collapse