Intensive chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer

Role of radiation therapy in the combined-modality treatment of patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: A randomized study

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin/etoposide (PE) chemotherapy (CHT) with or without accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy (ACC HFX RT) and concurrent daily carboplatin/etoposide (CE) in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 210 patients were treated with three cycles of standard PE. Patients with a complete response (CR) at both the local and distant levels (CR/CR) or a partial response (PR) at the local level and CR at the distant level (PR/CR) received either thoracic ACC HFX RT with 54 Gy in 36 fractions over 18 treatment days in combination with CE followed by two cycles of PE (group 1, n = 55) or an additional four cycles of PE (group 2, n = 54). Patients who experienced less response were treated nonrandomly (groups 3, 4, and 5). All patients with a CR at the distant level received prophylactic cranial irradiation.

RESULTS

For 206 assessable patients, the median survival time (MST) was 9 months and the 5-year survival rate was 3.4%. Patients in group 1 had significantly better survival rates than those in group 2 (MST, 17 v 11 months; 5-year survival rate, 9.1% v 3.7%, respectively; P =.041). Local control was also better in group 1, but the difference was only marginally not significant (P =.062). There was no difference in distant metastasis-free survival between groups 1 and 2. Acute high-grade toxicity was higher in group 2 than in group 1.

CONCLUSION

The addition of ACC HFX RT to the treatment of the most favorable subset of patients led to improved survival over that obtained with CHT alone.

Infusion cisplatin chemotherapy and hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

Sixty patients, 29 with limited disease and 31 with extensive disease, received an infusion cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen and, where applicable, subsequent hyperfractionated thoracic radiation therapy (HTRT). Of the patients with limited disease, the response rate was 100% (76% complete response); median survival 26.5 months; 1- and 2-year survival 90 and 55%, respectively. Of those with extensive disease,96% responded (36% complete response) with median survival 12.0 months and 1- and 2-year survival 48 and 29%, respectively. Thirty-five percent of extensive disease patients were downstaged to a "limited" status. with a median survival of 20.3 months. Grade IV leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were seen in 25 and 7% of patients, respectively, with one patient dying of radiation pneumonitis. Within the constraints of the study, infusion cisplatin-based chemotherapy and HTRT appear to be a safe and effective program for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer.

A study of dose escalation of teniposide (VM-26) plus cisplatin (CDDP) with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer

A dose escalation study of teniposide (VM-26) plus cisplatin (CDDP) was carried out using recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) in 46 previously untreated patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The dose of CDDP was 80 mg/m2/day intravenously (i.v.) (day 1) and VM-26 was escalated from 60 mg/m2/day to 80, 100 and 120 mg/m2/day i.v. x 5 days for four cycles. The dose of rhG-CSF was 90 micrograms/m2/day subcutaneously for 13 days. The feasibility of the regimen at the starting dose level of VM-26 with or without rhG-CSF was initially examined in 10 patients chosen through random allocation. WHO grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 17% (three out of 18 courses) of patients in the rhG-CSF group and in 63% (12 out of 19 courses) of the control group (P < 0.01). The number of patients with febrile episodes (> 38 degrees C) over the four courses of chemotherapy was 1 in the rhG-CSF group and 4 in the control group. According to these results, all 36 patients received rhG-CSF in the dose escalation stage. The incidence of WHO grade 4 neutropenia at the dose levels of 60, 80, 100 and 120 mg/m2/day of VM-26 was 66, 57, 76 and 85%, respectively (P > 0.1). The incidence of grade 4 thrombocytopenia was 19, 31, 18 and 46%, respectively (P > 0.1). The overall response rate was 100% in patients with limited stage SCLC and 83% in patients with extensive stage SCLC. The actual administered VM-26 dose per week at the dose level of 100 mg/m2/day was 1.6-fold higher than the planned starting dose (60 mg/m2/day) per week. At the dose level of 120 mg/m2/day, 50% of patients developed WHO grade 4 leucopenia, which lasted longer than 1 week and 67% of the patients had WHO grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea. At this same dose, all patients had at least one febrile episode (> 38 degrees C), and 1 patient died of cerebral bleeding with severe thrombocytopenia. The median survival time of all patients was 451 days (411 days, extensive disease; 497 days, limited disease). VM-26 plus CDDP with rhG-CSF was active in previously untreated patients with SCLC. The recommended dose of VM-26 in combination with CDDP for a phase II study is 100 mg/m2/day for 5 days with rhG-CSF support.

Small cell lung cancer: etiology, biology, clinical features, staging, and treatment

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 20% to 25% of all bronchogenic carcinoma and is associated with the poorest 5-year survival of all histologic types. SCLC differs in its etiologic, pathologic, biologic, and clinical features from non-SCLC, and these differences have translated to distinct approaches to its prevention and treatment. Compared with other histologic types of lung cancer, exposures to tobacco smoke, ionizing radiation, and chloromethyl ethers pose a substantially greater risk for development of SCLC. The histologic classification of SCLC has been revised to include three categories: (1) small cell carcinoma, (2) mixed small cell/large cell, and (3) combined small cell carcinoma. Ultrastructurally, SCLC displays a number of neuroendocrine features in common with pulmonary neuroendocrine cells, including dense core vesicles or neurosecretory granules. These dense core vesicles are associated with a variety of secretory products, cell surface antigens, and enzymes. The biology of SCLC is complex. The activation of a number of dominant proto-oncogenes and the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in SCLC have been described. Dominant proto-oncogenes that have been found to be amplified or overexpressed in SCLC include the myc family, c-myb, c-kit, c-jun, and c-src. Altered expression of two tumor suppressor genes in SCLC, p53 and the retinoblastoma gene product, has been demonstrated. Cytogenetic and molecular evidence for chromosomal loss of 3p, 5q, 9p, 11p, 13q, and 17p in SCLC has intensified the search for other tumor suppressor genes with potential import in this malignancy. Bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide, insulin-like growth factor I, and transferrin have been identified as autocrine growth factors in SCLC, with a number of other peptides under active investigation. Several mechanisms of drug resistance in SCLC have been described, including gene amplification, the recently described overexpression of multi-drug resistance-related protein (MRP), and the expression of P-glycoprotein. The classic SCLC staging system has been supplanted by a revised TNM staging system where limited disease and extensive disease are equivalent to the TNM stages I through III and stage IV, respectively. Therapeutically, recent strategies have attained small improvements in survival but significant reductions in the toxicities of chemotherapeutic regimens. Presently, the overall 5-year survival for SCLC is 5% to 10%, with limited disease associated with a significantly higher survival rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

High dose-intensity chemotherapy, with accelerated cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, in the treatment of small cell lung cancer

15 patients with small-cell lung cancer were treated with an "accelerated" chemotherapy consisting of standard-dose cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide administered every 15 days (as opposed to the usual 21-day intervals) along with granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (10 micrograms/kg/day) administered prophylactically subcutaneously from day 4 to 13. The primary objective of this study was to examine the possibility of achieving a 50% dose-intensity increase by a shortening of chemotherapy intervals. 9 patients were not able to complete the planned six courses of chemotherapy owing to cumulative haematological toxicity. In fact, while leukopenia was acceptable and constant during treatment, both thrombocytopenia and anaemia progressively worsened with subsequent courses, becoming particularly severe after the 4th cycle when interruption of the treatment was often required. 13 patients who completed four courses of chemotherapy received a median of 96% of the planned dose-intensity. This corresponded with an average relative dose-intensity actually delivered of 1.44 compared with the planned dose-intensity of a standard cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide every 21 days. In conclusion, acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide chemotherapy combined with granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor can lead to a significant increase of dose-intensity but it is feasible only for a limited number of courses.