Further evidence in favour of chemotherapy for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer

Exponential decay nonlinear regression analysis of patient survival curves: preliminary assessment in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

For processes that follow first order kinetics, exponential decay nonlinear regression analysis (EDNRA) may delineate curve characteristics and suggest processes affecting curve shape. We conducted a preliminary feasibility assessment of EDNRA of patient survival curves.

METHODS

EDNRA was performed on Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) and time to relapse (TTR) curves for 323 patients with resected NSCLC and on OS and progression-free survival (PFS) curves from selected publications.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

In our resected patients, TTR curves were triphasic with a "cured" fraction of 60.7% (half-life [t1/2] >100,000 months), a rapidly relapsing group (7.4%, t1/2=5.9 months) and a slowly relapsing group (31.9%, t1/2=23.6 months). OS was uniphasic (t1/2=74.3 months), suggesting an impact of co-morbidities; hence, tumor molecular characteristics would more likely predict TTR than OS. Of 172 published curves analyzed, 72 (42%) were uniphasic, 92 (53%) were biphasic, 8 (5%) were triphasic. With first-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC, 87.5% of curves from 2 to 3 drug regimens were uniphasic vs. only 20% of those with best supportive care or 1 drug (p<0.001). 54% of curves from 2 to 3 drug regimens had convex rapid-decay phases vs. 0% with fewer agents (p<0.001). Curve convexities suggest that discontinuing chemotherapy after 3-6 cycles "synchronizes" patient progression and death. With postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, the PFS rapid-decay phase accounted for a smaller proportion of the population than in controls (p=0.02) with no significant difference in rapid-decay t1/2, suggesting adjuvant chemotherapy may move a subpopulation of patients with sensitive tumors from the relapsing group to the cured group, with minimal impact on time to relapse for a larger group of patients with resistant tumors. In untreated patients, the proportion of patients in the rapid-decay phase increased (p=0.04) while rapid-decay t1/2 decreased (p=0.0004) with increasing stage, suggesting that higher stage may be associated with tumor cells that both grow more rapidly and have a higher probability of surviving metastatic processes than in early stage tumors. This preliminary assessment of EDNRA suggests that it may be worth exploring this approach further using more sophisticated, statistically rigorous nonlinear modelling approaches. Using such approaches to supplement standard survival analyses could suggest or support specific testable hypotheses.

Second-line weekly paclitaxel in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer who fail combination chemotherapy with cisplatin

This phase II study was designed to assess single-agent paclitaxel (Taxol), as second-line chemotherapy.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

pathological diagnosis of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) relapsing or refractory to standard front-line platinum (P)-based chemotherapy, performance status < or = 3, normal lab tests, informed consent. Ineligibility criteria: history of second or third cancer (unless surgically cured), mental instability or impairment, pre-existing moderate/severe peripheral neuropathy, previous chemotherapy non-including cisplatin, and previous second-line chemotherapy. Paclitaxel was given by intravenous infusion at a dose of 100 mg/m2 every week, until completion of the treatment plan of 21 weeks, disease progression, persistent toxicity, or patient refusal. Thirty-eight patients (32 males) entered the study; median age was 63 years (range 44-74); cell types were: adenocarcinoma (20), squamous (14), large cell (4). Previous chemotherapies: P and vinorelbine (31 patients) and P, mitomycin C and vinblastine (7 subjects), followed by 21 objective responses. Two patients had one course of paclitaxel; six other patients had early treatment suspensions. The median number of weekly infusions was 12 (range 1-21); median dose-intensity was 75% of projected. Toxicity was generally mild, mainly neurological and never life threatening (only 2 grade 4 toxicity out of 468 pre-chemotherapy evaluations). Six patients obtained a partial response; 7 others showed some tumor regression, 3 had tumor stabilization, and 13 disease progression. From the start of paclitaxel, the estimated median time to progression was 20 weeks, the median survival 58 weeks. Second-line treatment with single-agent paclitaxel is well-tolerated, active, and associated to long survivals.

Are Chemotherapy Response Rates Related to Treatment-Induced Survival Prolongations in Patients With Advanced Cancer?

Purpose

Patients with incurable cancer are faced with difficult decisions regarding whether to take chemotherapy in an attempt to preserve the quality and/or prolong the quantity of their lives. The average prolongation in survival with chemotherapy compared with best supportive care has not been well described.

Methods

We performed a literature search using PUBMED combined with expert inquiry to identify trials comparing cytotoxic chemotherapy with best supportive care. Twenty-five randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing cytotoxic chemotherapy with best supportive care were identified. Sixteen trials (64%) were in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data were extracted and analyzed.

Results

Sufficient data for statistical modeling were available for NSCLC trials. The mean sample size of the NSCLC trials was 175 patients. Response rates in the treatment arms for NSCLC ranged from 7% to 42%. A relationship between response rate and survival was observed for NSCLC. The estimated relationship for NSCLC suggested that each 3.3% increase in response rate correlated, on average, with a 1-week increase in median survival, and each 2% increase in response rate correlated, on average, with a 1% increase in 1-year survival. The mean increase in 1-year survival for trials of agents with at least a 20% response rate in NSCLC was 16%. Formulas are provided to help estimate how a given response rate may effect median and 1-year survival relative to best supportive care alone for NSCLC.

Conclusion

We found a relationship between response rate and both median and 1-year survival in NSCLC. This information may help oncologists estimate how an NSCLC chemotherapy regimen with a given response rate can, on average, impact survival relative to supportive care alone.

Vinorelbine in elderly patients with inoperable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Cancer in the elderly is becoming a complex and frequent issue. At least 30% of lung carcinomas are expected to arise each year in elderly patients, who often have significant comorbidity. The most appropriate treatment for this large portion of cancer patients remains unknown. The purpose of this Phase II trial was to make a comprehensive evaluation of the activity, toxicity, and tolerability of single-agent vinorelbine in elderly and relatively poorly performing patients with inoperable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients age 70 years or older were eligible to participate in this trial if they had a pathologic diagnosis, a performance status lower than 4 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] scale), and gave informed consent. Vinorelbine was given intravenously (i.v.) at a dose of 25 mg/m(2) every week until progression, persistent toxicity, or refusal.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients entered the study; their median age was 75 years (range, 70-83 years). Five patients never started on vinorelbine; 27 others had early treatment suspensions. The median number of weekly infusions was 5 (range, 0-28); the median dose intensity was 70% of projected. Toxicity was generally mild, mainly hematologic, and never life-threatening. ECOG performance status, body weight, and almost all the scores from the quality-of-life questionnaires remained constant during the first 6 weeks of treatment. Two patients obtained partial response, 10 patients had some tumor regression, and 26 had tumor stabilization. The estimated median time to progression was 19 weeks (quartile range, 11-23 weeks), and the median survival 34 weeks (quartile range, 16-63 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

In our group of patients who had poor prognoses, vinorelbine was well tolerated, moderately active, and capable of ensuring relatively long survival. It may represent a valuable therapeutic option for the treatment of nonresectable NSCLC in elderly patients.

Prognostic value of stage grouping and TNM descriptors in lung cancer

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The International Staging System for Lung Cancer (ISSLC) was revised in 1997. Validation studies are numerous but include only selected surgical patients. This study aims to verify the following: (1) the reliability of the ISSLC in an unselected lung cancer population; (2) the likely improvement in prognostic capability of the new classification; and (3) the possibilities for further improvements.

DESIGN

Analysis of a single institution database over a 16-year period from 1983 to 1998.

SETTING

Community-based hospital and second referral level institution for a province of 500,000 people.

PATIENTS

The study included 1,296 consecutive patients (1,117 men), with pathologically documented lung cancer (46% with squamous cell cancer), staged both clinically (77%) and pathologically (23%), and treated, for the most part, with chemotherapy (52%).

INTERVENTIONS

Anthropometric, clinical, and laboratory data were recorded prospectively. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariate regression analysis.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

The 1997 revised ISSLC classification fit well with the cohort studied. Each stage and substage significantly differed from each other, except for stage IIA. In this stratum, there were only 13 patients. Comparing the 1986 and the 1997 classifications, no substantial differences were observed (log-rank statistics, 295 vs 293, respectively; p < 0.0001). Independent of the classification used, the Cox models were always highly predictive of the outcome. The only way to increase their efficiency was to replace the variable stage with the original TNM descriptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Since grouping different TNM subsets into one stage is not really helpful, we might choose to use TNM descriptors in clinical practice and in research.

A multicenter, randomized, phase III study of docetaxel plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic or non-resectable localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

This was an open-label randomized Phase III study of 207 patients with either unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with docetaxel plus best supportive care (BSC) or best supportive care alone. Patients in the chemotherapy arm of the study received docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) as a 1 h intravenous infusion every 21 days until they showed evidence of progressive disease, or estimated maximum benefit obtained or unacceptable side effects. Patients who received docetaxel were pretreated with oral dexamethasone. Patients in the BSC arm should not receive chemotherapy or anticancer therapy except for palliative radiotherapy. Overall survival obtained in the docetaxel arm was significantly longer than in the BSC arm (P=0.026). Two-year survival in the docetaxel arm was 12%, whereas none of the BSC patients survived after 20 months. The response rate was 13.1% (95% CI, 7.5-18.8%). There was a significantly longer time to progression in the docetaxel versus the BSC arm (P<0.001), and statistically significant improvement of clinical symptoms with docetaxel compared to BSC. The quality-of-life descriptors were in favor of docetaxel, and the difference was significant for pain, dyspnea and emotional functioning. The safety profile of docetaxel for this study was similar to that already reported in this patient population.

Quality of life and survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving supportive care plus chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide or supportive care only. A multicentre randomised phase III trial. Joint Lung Cancer Study Group

The aim of the present trial was to evaluate the effects of chemotherapy on the quality of life and survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (stage IIIB or IV). In a controlled multicentre trial, patients were randomised to receive supportive care only or supportive care plus chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of intravenous (i.v.) carboplatin 300 mg/m2 on day 1 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 orally on days 1-5 every 4 weeks for a maximum of eight courses. Quality of life was measured at randomisation and prior to each treatment course and at corresponding 4-week intervals in the control arm, using the EORTC QLQ-C30 + LC13 questionnaire. 48 patients were randomised (supportive care 26, chemotherapy 22), being eligible for comparative analyses. Another 102 patients, 97 of which received chemotherapy, were subsequently included in the study on an individual treatment preference basis. Data from these patients were used for confirmative purposes. Patients in the chemotherapy group reported better overall physical functioning and symptom control compared with the supportive care group. Group differences were smaller within the psychosocial domain, although trends were seen in favour of the chemotherapy group. No significant differences were seen in favour of the supportive care group, except for hair loss. Median survival times were 29 weeks in the chemotherapy group versus 11 weeks in the supportive care group, and 1-year survival rates were 28% versus 8%. Quality of life and survival outcomes were similar in the randomised and non-randomised patients receiving chemotherapy. No treatment-related deaths occurred. In conclusion, treatment with carboplatin and etoposide can improve both the quality of life and the survival of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Efficacy of platinum-based regimens in non-small cell lung cancer. A negative report from the Cuneo Lung Cancer Study Group

Combination chemotherapy with cytotoxic agents is the regular treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), good performance status, and no major clinical contraindications. Since the early 1980s, platinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of this treatment, while combinations containing long-acting alkylating agents have been nearly abandoned, and represent a sort of historical treatment. Nevertheless, the real survival benefits of cisplatin are uncertain and still debated. To attempt an answer, the Cuneo Lung Cancer Study Group (CuLCaSG) carried out a clinical trial comparing a platinum (MVP) versus a non-platinum-based combination chemotherapy (MACC). The study comprised 156 patients with advanced NSCLC randomly assigned to the two treatment arms. MACC and MVP chemotherapies were given as originally described and continued until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or refusal by the patient. For a medium of four cycles of MVP and three cycles of MACC, the median dose intensity (DI) reached was, respectively, 95% and 100% of the intended (P = 0.0132). In all, 27 objective responses (1 complete and 16 partial responses in patients allocated to MVP versus 10 partial responses of the MACC group) were observed. Median progression-free and global survivals were, respectively, 21 and 34 weeks for MVP and 20 and 31 weeks for MACC (non-significant differences). The treatment plan was found non-significant also multivariate analysis of survival. Toxicity was rather similar in the two arms, except for more severe neurological toxicity, anemia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting in patients on MVP. Alopecia was more common after MACC. Subjective tolerance to treatment, and perception of physical and psychological well-being were rated similarly by patients of both groups. In conclusion, MVP was moderately more active than MACC, and showed a foreseeable and reversible toxicity, of a low-medium grade. However, this CuLCaSG study failed to substantiate any survival benefit from the use of platinum in combination with other cytotoxic agents.

Improving quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: research experience with gemcitabine

Alongside objective response rate, quality of life of patients is important in the treatment of cancer, particularly in the palliative setting. Quality of life is difficult to define precisely and is correspondingly difficult to assess. However, a number of methods have been devised and self-report questionnaires are now widely used. Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor prognosis with few patients surviving longer than 8 or 9 months. Curative treatment is often not possible and few patients receive active treatment. Although some patients will accept toxic treatments in return for increased survival, it is generally hoped that any treatment, curative or palliative, will not adversely affect patients' quality of life. In three studies in which gemcitabine was used as a single agent in metastatic NSCLC, objective response rates of 20% were obtained. Gemcitabine was well tolerated. Symptoms improved in the studies where disease-related symptoms were assessed. The degree of improvement compared well with historical data on the relief offered by standard radiotherapy and combination chemotherapy. These findings have led to the initiation of a randomised trial to compare the relief offered by gemcitabine plus best supportive care with best supportive care, using quality of life assessments as a primary endpoint.

Non-small cell lung cancer: an overview of diagnosis, staging, and treatment

OBJECTIVES

To review the current status, recent advances and ongoing research efforts related to screening, diagnosis and staging, and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

DATA SOURCES

Research studies, review articles, and abstracts relating to NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery is curative in a small number of patients. Radiation therapy can often control local disease and palliate symptoms; however, it does not impact overall survival. Current chemotherapy regimens have demonstrated ability to prolong survival when compared to "best supportive care"; however, survival benefit is limited to a period of a few weeks or months.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

An understanding of treatment modalities and new therapies for NSCLC will help nurses assist patients to make educated decisions about the potential risks and benefits of their therapeutic options.

Therapeutic options for regionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The optimal treatment for regionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, Stage IIIa/IIIb) remains unknown. Proposed approaches include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and combinations of these. No treatment modality, however, has ever shown other than modest or minimal beneficial effects. When differences between new and old treatments appear trivial, as in the management of the locally advanced NSCLC, controlled studies are necessary to select the best approach. This review is based on a systematic overview of data from randomized trials comparing different treatment modalities. The following six points emerged from the cited literature. (1) It is sufficiently proved that chemotherapy alone prolongs survival in patients with both locally advanced and metastatic disease. (2) Although it is probably true that radiation therapy is better than no active treatment, this idea is supported by very limited evidence. (3) Although it is probably also true that radiotherapy alone is not worse than chemotherapy alone, this is another insufficiently proved issue. (4) The possible superiority of chemo-radiotherapy to chemotherapy alone or to supportive care is also poorly documented. (5) There is abundant evidence that chemo-radiotherapy is better than radiotherapy alone (however, this information may be unhelpful if point 2, or 3 remains unclarified). (6) Although neoadjuvant treatments have improved resectability and may ensure overall better results, the surgical cure, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy, is another unproved option. Based on the above six points, it was concluded that new randomized studies are urgently needed to confirm the possible superiority of chemo-radiotherapy to chemotherapy. Only after such a validation, will the many ongoing trials, designed to prove the possible superiority of local surgical control to the more traditional approaches based on thoracic irradiation, have a practical sense.

Aggressive vs nonaggressive therapy for metastatic NSCLC

Clinicians tend to underestimate potential modest benefits of chemotherapy. They are often reluctant to refer patients for chemotherapy, perhaps because they expect the side effects to outweigh any perceived benefits. However, patients are much more ready to accept chemotherapy, even when the likely benefits are small. Quality of life, change in performance status, and relief of tumor-related symptoms are important additional parameters of treatment assessment. Taking account of these other factors will help clinicians balance quality and quantity of life in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Is the MVP regimen less active than previously described? Results of a phase II study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Combination chemotherapy with anti-proliferative agents is often used in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in good performance status. The mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin (MVP) regimen has been the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) standard for several years because of high response rates in spite of significant toxicity. In a phase II study, we observed 55 consecutive patients treated with MVP chemotherapy using the same dosage, schedule, and precautions as used by the ECOG group. The dose intensity reached for each drug was 85% of the projected dose. Fifty-one patients were assessable for response and toxicity, while all subjects were evaluable for survival. There was no complete remissions, 8 partial (15%), 34 stable (66%) and 9 progressive (17%) in patients. The median survival rate was 34 weeks (95% confidence interval 28-37 weeks). There were no treatment-related deaths and no grade 4 toxicity. Alopecia and emesis were the most significant adverse effects. Haematological toxicity was minimal. Other side-effects, such as neuropathy and nephrotoxicity, were also rare. Hence, response rates and toxic complications were lower than previously reported. We conclude that the MVP regimen has to be re-evaluated.

Combination chemotherapy with vindesine-ifosfamide-cisplatin (VIP) in locally advanced unresectable stage III and in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

The efficacy and toxicity of a regimen adding ifosfamide to the more classical cisplatin-vindesine combination was studied in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Sixty-four good performance patients with inoperable stage III or stage IV were treated with VIP: vindesine 3 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 and platinum 30 mg/m2 days 1, 2 and 3, repeated every 4 weeks, up to a maximum of six cycles. Response rate, clinical data and radiological tests were rigourously reviewed by a panel. Overall response rate was 39% (95% confidence interval, 27%-51%) with three patients achieving a complete response; response rate in stage III was 48%. Median survival was 9 months. Toxicity consisted mainly of bone marrow toxicity and nausea/vomiting, but was manageable. There was no renal toxicity greater than grade 2, four severe infections, but no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

VIP as mentioned above is very active in good performance patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Its activity, together with its manageable toxicity--without severe renal or pulmonary toxicity--makes it an attractive candidate for induction chemotherapy.

Single-agent chemotherapy versus combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a quality and meta-analysis study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To estimate the quality of the studies and to compare single-agent with combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

DESIGN

Identification of published randomized trials and extraction of essential results directly from the published reports.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Survival probability at 1 year, as estimated from the published survival curves, has been considered as the end-point of interest. Quality scoring of the studies has also been performed. Arithmetical calculation, concerning the estimation of quantities necessary for the meta-analysis of the literature, has been addressed. The estimated pooled Odds Ratio of death was 0.8, with 95% confidence interval of 0.6-1.0, thus favoring combination chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our meta-analysis favor combination chemotherapy. They must, however, be considered in the light of their clinical relevance and of the balance between quality of life, toxicity and costs of chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer can no longer be regarded as resistant to chemotherapy, and there have recently been considerable improvements in the use of the older agents and advances in the identification of new drugs. Recent meta-analysis has also confirmed the view that chemotherapy can have small but modest survival benefits. Although in the treatment of stage IV disease the criteria of efficacy have concentrated on tumour response rates, more recently it has become obvious that these patients can also benefit in terms of improved symptom control.

RECENT ADVANCES

For patients with locally advanced stage III disease there have been important developments indicating the benefit of combined modality treatment with chemotherapy and thoracic irradiation. Furthermore, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy indicates that resection is possible in about half the patients, and on pathological examination of 15%-20% of the resected specimens there is no evidence of residual tumour. These results justify an increase in the use of systemic chemotherapy in this disease.

New drugs in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer accounts for 75% of all lung tumours, and only about 10% of patients will remain alive 5 years after diagnosis. Few cytotoxic drugs currently registered produce more than a 15% response rate as a single agent or 30%-35% in combination, with only modest survival benefits. New cytotoxic drugs entering phase II and III studies, however, appear to have more than 20% activity against this disease. They include the taxanes (taxol and taxotere), camptothecin analogues (CPT-11 and topotecan), antimetabolites (edatrexate and gemcitabine) and the vinca alkaloid, navelbine. Taxol produces response rates of about 25% in previously untreated patients and is currently undergoing trials at higher doses in combination with cisplatin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Taxotere produces response rates of 33% in previously untreated patients and 21% in patients previously refractory to platinum-containing regimens. The camptothecin analogues, which are inhibitors of topoisomerase I, may produce response rates of up to 41% in previously untreated patients, but these results have varied considerably between different trials (response rates as low as 13.5% have been reported for topotecan). A phase II study with edatrexate produced a response rate of 32% but subsequent trials using combination chemotherapy including this agent have been disappointing. The activity of gemcitabine as a single agent is 20%-25%. Three ongoing phase II studies combining cisplatin and gemcitabine have shown response rates of up to 50%. Gemcitabine has minimal subjective toxicity. Navelbine produces response rates of 22%-33% as a single agent and up to 65% in combination. These new cytotoxic agents with significant activity in non-small cell lung cancer provide exciting potential for developing novel combination regimens in the advanced setting and as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy.

A randomised trial of MACC chemotherapy with or without lonidamine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cuneo Lung Cancer Study Group (CuLCaSG)

Combination chemotherapy with anti-proliferative agents is the usual treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), good performance status and no major clinical contraindications. Lonidamine (LND), a new drug with an innovative mechanism of action, might potentiate anti-cancer activity of conventional cytotoxic drugs, with no increase of specific toxicity. Following a pilot study of feasibility, we now report the results of a randomised trial evaluating MACC chemotherapy, as originally described, versus the same regimen+LND. 151 patients with advanced NSCLC were assigned at random to the two treatment arms. LND 150 mg was given orally three times daily. Treatment was continued until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity or refusal by the patient (median number of cycles of MACC, three for both arms; median duration of LND administration, 8 weeks in the arm concerned). Actual dose intensities (DI) of MACC and LND were, respectively, 100 and 83% of those intended (median values). There was a negative correlation between duration of chemotherapy and the DI of MACC reached in each patient, but no correlation between the duration of treatment with LND and its DI. DIs of LND and MACC were not correlated with each other. In all, 15 objective responses (one complete and four partial responses in the MACC group, 10 partial responses in patients on MACC+LND) were observed. Median progression-free survivals were 20 weeks (confidence interval, CI 14-22) for the group on LND and 17 weeks (CI 12-17) for the control group (non-significant difference). Median overall survivals were, respectively, 30 weeks (CI 23-40) and 27 weeks (CI 22-34), P = non-significant. Toxicity was as expected by the use of MACC, and similar in both arms, except for more severe anaemia and gastric toxicity in the group on MACC+LND. Other uncommon side-effects, seen only in this latter group, were mild to moderate and reversible and included myalgia, asthenia, testicle pain, headache, visual troubles, incubi and dizziness. Subjective tolerance to the treatment, and perception of physical and psychological well-being were rated similarly by patients of both groups. MACC plus LND is a moderately active regimen in advanced NSCLC, with a foreseeable and reversible toxicity of low-medium grade. Potential enhancements of anti-tumour efficacy of chemotherapy, and possible host survival benefits derived from the use of LND are not substantiated by the results of this trial.

Neuroendocrine differentiation as a prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer

The prognostic value of clinical and pathological factors in 97 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), were analyzed through immunohistochemical methods. The impact on response rate and survival of age, Karnofsky performance status (PS), sex, NSCLC subtype and grade, extent of disease, objective chemotherapy response, LDH values, metastatic sites involved and immunohistochemical markers of neuroendocrine differentiation (neuron specific enolase (NSE), synaptophysin (Sy 38), chromogranin (Chr A) and Leu-7) were analyzed. Median age was 61 years and seven patients were women. Histologically, 58 had squamous cell carcinoma, 28 adenocarcinoma and 11 large cell undifferentiated carcinoma. One patient had Stage II, 35 Stage IIIa, 19 Stage IIIb and 42 Stage IV. Six patients achieved complete response, 18 partial response, 34 stable disease and 39 progressive disease. NSE was negative in 54.3% of cases as was Sy 38 (77.4%), Chr A (97.8%) and Leu-7 (95.8%). We have found correlation between neuroendocrine differentiation and absence of P-Glycoprotein expression; patients included in this subset had a higher response rate but no evidence of longer survival. The univariate analysis showed that four parameters had significant adverse effect on survival: non-responders, poor PS, abnormal LDH value and absence of NSE expression. Multivariate analysis showed that the best combination of independent prognostic factors in predicting survival was: PS and NSE expression by immunohistochemical methods.

A phase II study of methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and lomustine chemotherapy and lonidamine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy with conventional antiproliferative drugs is becoming the treatment of choice for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a good performance status, and no major clinical contraindications. Lonidamine (LND), a new drug with an innovative mechanism of action, might potentiate anticancer activity, without increasing toxicity.

METHODS

In a Phase II study, 46 patients with advanced NSCLC were assigned to receive chemotherapy with the methotrexate, doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), cyclophosphamide, and lomustine (MACC) regimen, as originally described, plus LND, 150 mg orally, three times per day. Treatment was continued until progression of disease, occurrence of unacceptable toxic effects, or refusal by the patient (the median duration of MACC treatment was 6 weeks; 7 weeks for LND).

RESULTS

For the whole group of patients, actual dose intensities (DI) of MACC and LND were 95% and 67% of those projected (median values), respectively. There was a negative correlation between duration of chemotherapy and the DI of MACC reached in each patient. On the contrary, there was no correlation between the duration of treatment with LND and its DI. The DI of LND and MACC were not correlated with each other. In all, seven objective responses (only partial responses) were observed. The overall median survival time was 42 weeks (confidence limits [CL], 20-52). The median survival length of patients receiving the full dose of LND (450 mg daily for at least 1 week) was 46 weeks (CL, 28-67), as compared with the median survival of 19 weeks (lower CL, 9 weeks) for the remaining patients; this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05, Breslow test). Toxic effects were as expected with the use of MACC. They were mainly gastrointestinal (any grade of toxicity occurring in 64% of the patients), hematologic (anemia, 44%; leukopenia, 36%; thrombocytopenia, 8%), oral (25%), renal (14%), and cardiac (11%). There was only one treatment-related death, from myocardial infarction and neutropenic sepsis. Uncommon side effects, which were attributed to LND, were mild to moderate and reversible; they included myalgia (26%), asthenia (15%), testicle pain (11%), visual problems (7%), and gastric intolerance (7%).

CONCLUSIONS

MACC plus LND is a moderately active regimen in advanced NSCLC, with foreseeable and reversible toxic effects of low-medium grade. Potential enhancements of antitumor activity and possible host survival benefits may be expected by the addition of LND to MACC, but a Phase III study must be performed to identify them.

Current treatment of unresectable lung cancer

The treatment of choice for most cases of non-small-cell lung cancer is surgical resection; however, which patients with stage IIIA disease are surgical candidates is debatable. For many patients with stage IIIA or IIIB disease, the preferred modality is thoracic radiotherapy. In several randomized prospective trials, the addition of chemotherapy to thoracic radiotherapy produced a significant but clinically small survival advantage over radiotherapy alone. For patients with stage IV lung cancer, no curative treatment or "standard therapy" is available. Accordingly, many patients are offered investigational agents in phase I or II clinical trials. Small-cell lung cancer has a 60 to 90% rate of initial response to available chemotherapeutic agents. Patients with limited disease are generally given combination chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy, approximately 50% of whom have a complete clinical remission. Patients with extensive disease (spread beyond one radiation port) also have a high rate of initial response to chemotherapy, but only 20 to 40% have a complete remission and few survive for 5 years. New agents are being tested in previously untreated patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer. Promising new chemotherapeutic agents for lung cancer are being studied in clinical trials. Currently, only 1% of patients with lung cancer in the United States are enrolled in prospective clinical trials. Primary-care physicians are urged to encourage their patients to consider participation in approved prospective clinical trials at reputable medical centers, in an effort to discover new, effective agents with novel mechanisms of action. Information about such studies is available through Physician Desk Query (PDQ) or the cancer hotline (1-800-4-CANCER).