Results of whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases of small cell lung cancer

Treatment of brain metastases of small-cell lung cancer: comparing teniposide and teniposide with whole-brain radiotherapy--a phase III study of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group

PURPOSE

Approximately 60% of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) develop brain metastases. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) gives symptomatic improvement in more than 50% of these patients. Because brain metastases are a sign of systemic progression, and chemotherapy was found to be effective as well, it becomes questionable whether WBRT is the only appropriate therapy in this situation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a phase III study, SCLC patients with brain metastases were randomized to receive teniposide with or without WBRT. Teniposide 120 mg/m(2) was given intravenously three times a week, every 3 weeks. WBRT (10 fractions of 3 Gy) had to start within 3 weeks from the start of chemotherapy. Response was measured clinically and by computed tomography of the brain.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty eligible patients were randomized. A 57% response rate was seen in the combined-modality arm (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 69%), and a 22% response rate was seen in the teniposide-alone arm (95% CI, 12% to 34%) (P<.001). Time to progression in the brain was longer in the combined-modality group (P=.005). Clinical response and response outside the brain were not different. The median survival time was 3.5 months in the combined-modality arm and 3.2 months in the teniposide-alone arm. Overall survival in both groups was not different (P=.087).

CONCLUSION

Adding WBRT to teniposide results in a much higher response rate of brain metastases and in a longer time to progression of brain metastases than teniposide alone. Survival was poor in both groups and not significantly different.

Chemotherapy for brain metastases of lung cancer: a review

In lung cancer patients brain metastases develop with a high frequency. For years radiotherapy has been the standard treatment for these patients. Here we review the experience with chemotherapy for brain metastases in lung cancer patients. The concept of the brain as pharmacological sanctuary site when brain metastases are present is challenged and it is argued that chemotherapy does play a role in this situation. Recent clinical trials indicate that the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy may become the standard treatment for lung cancer patients with brain metastases. It is unclear whether for micrometastatic disease to the brain, blood brain barrier function is of importance for the outcome of chemotherapy in lung cancer patients with respect to the development of overt brain metastases. Areas of improvement of delivery of cytotoxic agents to the brain when brain metastases have not yet developed are discussed.

National survey on prophylactic cranial irradiation: differences in practice patterns between medical and radiation oncologists

PURPOSE

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients remains controversial in the oncology community because of its potential for long-term toxicity and unproven survival benefit in randomized trials. A national survey of 9176 oncologists was conducted to characterize the use of PCI with regard to physician demographics, patient characteristics, and oncologists' beliefs.

METHODS

Data was collected via a questionnaire letter survey. Biographical data, treatment patterns, and clinical impressions were analyzed by the generalized linear model and generalized estimating equations method.

RESULTS

There were 1231 responders overall (13.4% of those surveyed), including 628 (51%) radiation oncologists (RO), 587 (48%) medical oncologists (MO), 8 (0.6%) surgical oncologists, and 8 (0.6%) from other oncology subspecialties. Of respondents, 74% overall recommend PCI in limited-stage patients, including 65% of MO and 82% RO (p = 0.001). Of responders who recommend PCI in limited-stage patients, 67% do so only after complete response to initial therapy. Only 30% of respondents recommend PCI for extensive-stage SCLC patients (p = 0.001), and 94% of these recommend PCI only when those patients have a complete response after initial therapy. Interestingly, 38% of responding MO feel that PCI improves survival of limited-stage patients, but only 11% believe PCI improves quality of life. Of the RO, 48% believe PCI improves survival in limited-stage SCLC, and 36% feel PCI improves quality of life (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). MO responders believe PCI causes late neurological sequelae more often than do RO responders (95% vs. 84%, p < 0.05), with impaired memory (37%), chronic fatigue (19%), and loss of motivation (13%) as most commonly seen side effects. Only 1.5% overall, however, routinely obtain neuropsychiatric testing in PCI patients, and 42% overall never obtain them.

CONCLUSION

Results confirm that oncologic subspecialists have statistically significant differences in opinion regarding the use of PCI. However, these differences may not translate into large differences in clinical practice. Most oncologists continue to recommend PCI in limited-stage SCLC patients, despite many believing PCI may not provide a survival advantage nor improve quality of life.

Brain-only metastases of small cell lung cancer; efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy. An EORTC phase II study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of WBRT as a single treatment modality in patients with brain metastases of small cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The patients had brain metastases of small cell lung cancer without any sign of tumour outside the brain and were treated with 10 x 3.0 Gy WBRT. Response and neurological functions were evaluated after 6, 18 and 36 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty of 22 eligible patients were evaluable for response. In six patients a complete response was seen and in five patients a partial response was seen giving a response rate of 50% (95% CI 28-72%). Response duration was 5.4 months (range 63-260 days) and median survival was 4.7 months (range 14-743 days). In the majority of patients the first site of progression after WBRT was in the central nervous system. Twelve of the patients had stabilization or improvement of the neurological function.

CONCLUSION

WBRT for brain metastases of small cell lung cancer gives a 50% response rate with stabilization or improvement of neurological function. Response duration and survival are short.

Brain relapses in chemotherapy-treated small cell lung cancer: a retrospective review of two time-dose regimens of therapeutic brain irradiation

The incidence of brain metastases secondary to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is about 35% and the treatment strategy of brain irradiation with respect to dose and fractionation is controversial. In order to evaluate treatment outcome of brain irradiation in SCLC patients with brain relapse, we retrospectively evaluated all patients treated with brain irradiation in the eastern part of Denmark from 1988 to 1992 (PCI patients excluded). During this 5-year period, 101 evaluable patients were included (44 females, 57 males) (median age 61 years; range, 39-75 years). Forty-four patients, of whom 43 were in extracerebral complete remission (CR), received extended course (EC) brain irradiation (> 45 Gy, treatment schedule > 4 weeks). Fifty-seven patients received short course (SC) brain irradiation (< 30 Gy, treatment schedule < 1 week). Among the SC treated patients, 14 were in CR, 20 had partial remission or stable disease and 23 had progressive extracerebral disease. The median survival (from diagnosis of brain metastases) in the group receiving irradiation with EC (44 patients) was 160 days (range, 74-2021 days), while the 57 patients treated with SC had a median survival of 88 days (range, 20-948 days) (P = 0.00001, Log-Rank analysis). In a subgroup of 14 patients in extracerebral CR, receiving SC irradiation, the median survival was 83 days (range, 15-948 days). When the latter patients were compared to the 43 patients in CR in the group treated with EC, a statistically significant difference was shown (P = 0.034, Log-Rank analysis). Using Cox-hazard regression analysis with backward elimination, liver metastases and poor performance status were adverse prognostic signs, although the only significant parameters of survival were gender (female vs. male, relative risk of dying 1 and 1.52, P = 0.05) and schedule of brain irradiation (extended course vs. short course, relative risk of dying, 0.36 and 1, P < 0.001). Extended course irradiation of brain relapse secondary to SCLC seems in general to be of limited value, although a significant prolonged survival at approximately 7 weeks, was obtained. The prolongation of survival does not seem worthwhile considering the length of treatment time (5-6 weeks) compared to SC treatment (1 week). However, the data do not permit evaluation of the quality of life of the patients. This retrospective evaluation suggests the need for randomized trials with carefully planned quality-of-life assessments.

Outcome of patients with brain metastases after combined modality therapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC): a retrospective study

The authors evaluated the role of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) on the outcome of brain metastasis and survival in 41 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated in their department. In addition to chemotherapy, radiotherapy was given to the primary site in all responder patients. Six patients presented brain metastasis initially and 10 patients after the fourth course of chemotherapy. Brain metastases were symptomatic in 12 of 16 patients with a median time of 5 months (1-14) until symptoms developed. All patients but 2 with brain metastasis received WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) in addition to chemotherapy. The median survival time of patients with brain metastasis was 8.3 months (3.5 to 16) compared to 12 months (4 to 34+) for patients without brain metastasis. In addition, the median survival time for patients with brain metastasis who responded to systemic chemotherapy was better than that of nonresponders. The authors found no improvement in survival in patients who received concomitant WBRT after chemotherapy compared to patients who received WBRT after completion of chemotherapy. In conclusion, the role of consolidating cranial irradiation in addition to chemotherapy in SCLC patients is unclear and warrants prospective randomized studies.