Establishment and characterization of a new human lung poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma cell line, GLL-1, producing carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA19-9

The diagnostic value of CEA for lung cancer-related malignant pleural effusion in China: a meta-analysis

Objective: To accurately evaluate the diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for malignant pleural effusion associated with lung cancer in the Chinese population.Methods: Three English databases, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science, and two Chinese databases, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Data, up to 5 November 2020, were searched. The literature on the diagnosis of lung cancer-related malignant pleural effusion by CEA in the Chinese population were collected. The data was analyzed by Stata15.0 software.Results: A total of 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.95), 10.46 (95% CI: 7.29-15.00), 0.22 (95% CI: 0.17-0.28), 47.26 (95% CI: 28.84-77.44), respectively . The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95). No significant publication bias was found (P > 0.05)Conclusion: CEA has anexcellent diagnostic value for patients with lung cancer-related malignant pleural effusion in the Chinese population.

Roles of immunohistochemical staining in diagnosing pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Differentiating morphologic features based on hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining is the most common method to classify pathological subtypes of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its accuracy and inter-observer reproducibility in pathological diagnosis of poorly differentiated NSCLC remained to be improved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We attempted to explore the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining in diagnosing pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) with poorly differentiated features by HE staining or with elevated serum adenocarcinoma-specific tumor markers (AD-TMs). We also compared the difference of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation rate between patients with confirmed SQCC and those with revised pathological subtype. Logistic regression analyses were used to test the association between different factors and diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients who met the eligible criteria and had adequate specimens for IHC confirmation were included. Pathological revised cases in poor differentiated subgroup, biopsy samples and high-level AD-TMs cases were more than those with high/moderate differentiation, surgical specimens and normal-level AD-TMs. Moreover, biopsy sample was a significant factor decreasing diagnostic accuracy of pathological subtype (OR, 4.037; 95% CI 1.446-11.267, p=0.008). Additionally, EGFR mutation rate was higher in patients with pathological diagnostic changes than those with confirmed SQCC (16.7% vs 4.4%, p=0.157).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis based on HE staining only might cause pathological misinterpretation in NSCLC patients with poor differentiation or high-level AD-TMs, especially those with biopsy samples. HE staining and IHC should be combined as pathological diagnostic standard. The occurrence of EGFR mutations in pulmonary SQCC might be overestimated.

Significance of combined detection of LunX mRNA and tumor markers in diagnosis of lung carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the significance of combined detection of LunX mRNA, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and cytokeratin 21-1 fragment (CYFRA21-1) in clinical diagnosis of lung carcinoma.

METHODS

Based on the quantitative RT-PCR and chemiluminescence immunoassay, the expression levels of LunX mRNA, CEA, NSE, and CYFRA21-1 in 113 patients with lung carcinoma (case group) and 30 healthy participants (control group) were detected. Meantime, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the combination detection were also explored.

RESULTS

The positive rates of LunX mRNA in peripheral blood and CEA, NSE, and CYFRA21-1 in serum were significantly higher in case group than those in control group ((χ) (2)=17.295, 16.825, 19.148, and 17.450; P<0.05). There was no statistical significance when positive rate of LunX mRNA was evaluated among different pathological types ((χ) (2)=0.047, P>0.05). The positive rate of LunX mRNA in stage I + II, III, and IV had a significantly increasing tendency ((χ) (2)=10.565, 32.462, P<0.05). The positive rate of CYFRA21-1 was highest in squamous carcinoma (78.5%), the positive rate of NSE was highest in small cell carcinoma (86.7%), and the positive rate of CEA wag highest in lung adenocarcinoma (80.4%). The sensitivity and accuracy of the combination detection were 91.1% and 88.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined detection of LunX mRNA and tumor markers (TMs) including CEA, NSE, and CYFRA21-1 in peripheral blood is helpful to increase the diagnostic accuracy of lung cancer. Also, it can inform the pathological typing of lung carcinoma.