The role of induction chemotherapy before radiation therapy in non-operative management of stage III NSCLC

Concurrent chemotherapy with hyperfractionated accelerated thoracic irradiation in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effect of hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy combined with low dose radiosensitisers followed by standard dose chemotherapy in the treatment of unresectable stage III non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Forty-seven patients received thoracic radiotherapy (1.5 bid x 5 days x 4 weeks) in combination with low dose daily (3-6 mg/m2) cisplatin +/- weekly vinblastine chemotherapy (step I), followed by three cycles of standard dose chemotherapy alone consisting of cisplatin (75-80 mg/m2) and vinblastine (8-16 mg/m2) given at 3-4 week intervals (step II).

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 70% (21% CR). The progression free interval and the median survival duration were 10.4 months and 17.3 months, respectively. The 3 year survival rate was 21%. The site of first progression was local in 44%, distant in 41%, and simultaneous in 15% of patients. Levels of esophageal toxicity were significant but acceptable with the use of prophylactic therapy. Grade 3 or 4 esophageal toxicity was observed in 28 and 19% of patients during step I and II of the study, respectively. There were three deaths associated with esophageal toxicity. All occurred prior to the implementation of the prophylactic therapy for esophagitis. Acute pulmonary symptoms were reported in 25% of patients in step I, and pulmonary fibrosis, primarily asymptomatic, was observed in 51% of patients. Hematological toxicity was moderate. Two patients died of neutropenic sepsis/pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemotherapy and hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy appears moderately effective in controlling tumour growth as measured by response rates and survival estimates. Toxicity is considerable but manageable and compatible with results from other combined modality studies.

Alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy for inoperable Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: long-term results of two Phase II GOTHA trials. Groupe d'Oncologie Thoracique Alpine

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

To report on two consecutive Phase II cooperative trials in which we evaluated the combination of alternating hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy and cisplatin-based chemotherapy in inoperable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS & METHODS

Between February 1986 and September 1989, 65 patients were entered in the first trial (GOTHA I), and between December 1989 and October 1992 67 were enrolled in the second trial (GOTHA II). In both protocols, radiotherapy (RT) was administered twice daily, at 6 h intervals, 5 days a week, to a total dose of 63 Gy in 42 fractions of 1.5 Gy. RT was given during weeks 2, 3, 6, and 7, over an elapsed time of 6 weeks. In GOTHA I, three cycles of cisplatin, 60 mg/m2 day 1, mitomycin, 8 mg/m2 day 1, and vindesin 3 mg/m2 day 1 and the first day of the following week, were given during weeks 1, 5, and 9; in GOTHA II, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 day 1 and vinblastin 5 mg/m2 day 1 and the first day of the following week were given during weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, and 21.

RESULTS

With a minimum follow-up of 3 years, the 1-, 2-, 5-, and 8-year overall survival probability was 56% (95% CI 47-64%), 27% (20-35%), 12% (7-18%) and 9% (3-16%), respectively, with a median survival of 13.6 months (11.4-16.8). Median follow-up for survivors was 6 years (3.3-9.9). There were no survival differences between Stages IIIA and IIIB (p = 0.84), performance status 0, 1, 2 (p = 0.87), sex (p = 0.45) or between the two treatment protocols. At this time, 14 patients are alive, and 118 have died: 102 from NSCLC, 4 from acute toxicity, 2 from secondary surgery, 4 from other medical causes, and 6 from unknown causes. Correlation between response and long-term survival was poor, since of the 24 patients who survived 3 years or more, only 6 (25%) were classified as having a complete response; the remainder having either a partial response (11, 46%), no change (6, 25 %), or "progressive disease" (1, 4 %). First site of relapse was local in 31% of these cases, distant in 43%, local and distant in 15 %, and unknown in 11%. Main grade 3-4 acute toxicities were nausea-vomiting (17%), mucositis (15%), leukopenia (41%), and thrombocytopenia (11%). Eight patients presented with grade 3-4 symptomatic lung radiation pneumopathy.

CONCLUSION

Based on this experience with 132 patients, this combination of alternated RT and chemotherapy (CT) for inoperable Stage III NSCLC is feasible with acceptable toxicity, and long-term results suggest a gain in survival when compared to those obtained with conventional RT alone. However, the still high local and distant failure rates indicate that both local and systemic therapies need to be improved.

Non-surgical therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) denotes those of TNM stage III and IV. NSCLC has its specific characteristics in respect of oncological behaviour, molecular biology, sensitivity to chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT), and requires different therapeutic strategies in comparison with small cell lung cancer. The therapies include: (1) surgery in combination with new effective drugs is resulted in improved RR from 15% a decade ago to 40-60% today. Cisplatin (C-DDP) is the most attractive drug in the treatment of NSCLC, in lengthening the life-span of Stage IV NSCLC patients and as an indispensable sensitizer in RT. Taxinol, Gemcitabine (GEM), Navelbine (NVB), Edatrexate (ETX), CPT-11 and high dose Epirubicin (EPI HD) are recommended as new effective drugs. Response rates recently reported for the combination CT with the drugs mentioned above for NSCLC are from 30-65%, and with 8-42 weeks of MST. Induction or neoadjuvant therapies for advanced NSCLC, with 40-69% of RR, 25-29% of complete resection rate, 8-34% of CR and 17-45% of one year SR are reviewed. Eight random studies comparing MST between CT with C-DDP and best supportive care for NSCLC are statistically significant. (2) RT for Stage III NSCLC with 2 year and 5 year survivals of 20 and 5% respectively. Although such outcome is hardly acceptable, RT sensitizer, modified RT techniques and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are imperative to improve the effect of RT in advanced NSCLC. Clinical literature suggest that CRT is better than RT, though without marked difference. Further studies and sufficient follow-up are necessary to judge the efficacy in terms of long-term survival and toxic reaction. (3) Biological therapy: gene therapy of NSCLC is still in the experimental and developmental stage. Of biological response modifier (BRM), alpha IFN in 11 cases of NSCLC with RR of 9% and MST of 14 months, IL-2 and LAK cell treatment in 11 cases with RR of 9% and MST of 18 months are reported. Instillation of BRM such as IL-2 or alpha-IFN into the pleura after drainage of cancerous effusion has been reported as the most effective for those whose RR is of 80-90% and the clinical response time is fairly long. Hematological cytokine as a protective adjuvant therapy against CT/RT toxicity makes high dose of CT possible and raises the response and patient tolerance. In multimodality therapy, it plays an important role to reduce post CT infection and septicemia.