A four-drug combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, mitomycin, vindesine and 5 fluorouracile: a regimen associated with major toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Melatonin as an adjuvant treatment modality with doxorubicin

Combination chemotherapy seems to be a beneficial choice for some cancer patients particularly when the drugs target different processes of oncogenesis; patients treated with combination therapies sometimes have a better prognosis than those treated with single drug chemotherapy. However, research has shown that this is not always the case, and this approach may only increase toxicity without having a significant effect in augmenting the antitumor actions of the drugs. Doxorubicin (Dox) is one of the most common chemotherapy drugs used to treat many types of cancer, but it also has serious side effects, such as cardiotoxicity, skin necrosis, testicular toxicity, and nephrotoxicity. Many studies have examined the efficiacy of melatonin (MLT) as an anticancer agent. In fact, MLT is an anti-cancer agent that has various functions in inhibiting cancer cell proliferation, inducing apoptosis, and suppressing metastasis. Herein, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of the literature concerned with the role of MLT as an adjuvant in Dox-based chemotherapies and discuss how MLT may enhance the antitumor effects of Dox (e.g., by inducing apoptosis and suppressing metastasis) while rescuring other organs from its adverse effects, such as cardio- and nephrotoxicity.

A three-arm phase III randomised trial comparing combinations of platinum derivatives, ifosfamide and/or gemcitabine in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine, in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), if the combination of gemcitabine-a new active drug-with ifosfamide (IG) or with the cisplatin-carboplatin association (CCG) will improve survival (primary end point) in comparison with a first-generation regimen, cisplatin-carboplatin-ifosfamide (CCI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 284 chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic NSCLC were randomised. Four were ineligible and 16 were not assessable for responses. Cisplatin was given at 60 mg/m2 on day 1, carboplatin AUC 3 mg.min/ml on day 1, ifosfamide 4.5 g/m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1 g/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Response was assessed after three courses and chemotherapy was continued in responding patients until best response. There were 94 eligible patients in the CCI arm, 92 in CCG and 94 in the IG arm.

RESULTS

The objective response rates for CCI, CCG and IG were 23% [95% confidence interval (CI) 15% to 32%], 29% (95% CI 20% to 39%) and 25% (95% CI 16% to 33%), respectively ( P = 0.61). Median survival time was 24, 34 and 30 weeks, respectively (P = 0.20). One-year survival was 23, 33 and 35%, and 2-year survival was 11, 14 and 17%, respectively. In some subgroups (older patients, women), there was a significant survival advantage for CCG and IG compared with CCI. Toxicity was tolerable: severe alopecia was less frequent in the CCG arm, and IG was associated with significantly more thrombopenia while CCG was associated with more leucopenia.

CONCLUSION

In stage IV NSCLC, treatment with regimens including the new drug gemcitabine were associated with a better but not statistically significant observed survival compared with a classical first-generation cisplatin-containing regimen. The non-platinum combination of gemcitabine was as effective as its combination with platinum.

The value of lung function measurements for the assessment of chemotherapy in lung cancer patients

A retrospective analysis of lung function changes in lung cancer patients (NSCLC and SCLC) receiving various chemotherapy regimens, showed--statistically non significant--improvements of some parameters in responders, especially FEV1 and VC (mean increase of 230 and 310 ml after three cycles of chemotherapy), while stable values were observed in non responders. The majority of patients suffered from a decline in diffusing capacity, irrespective of response. Although the specificity and sensitivity of this functional evaluation are too low to allow lung function parameters to replace more conventional staging procedures, improvement in lung function in responders might indicate that chemotherapy can improve quality of life.

Prognostic factors for response to chemotherapy containing platinum derivatives in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. (NSCLC)

PURPOSE

To identify pretreatment variables predicting response to platinum derivatives containing chemotherapy in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients included in one of the 7 consecutive clinical trials conducted by the European Lung Cancer Working Party between December 1980 and August 1991. All patients received a cisplatin or carboplatin containing chemotherapy. We analyzed 22 potential prognostic factors including sex, age, histology, performance status, weight loss, type of lesions, extent of disease, main metastatic sites and several biological parameters, namely white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count, platelet count, hemoglobinemia, creatininemia, serum alkaline phosphatases and LDH.

RESULTS

On 1052 eligible patients. 107 were not assessable for response. The objective response rate was 26% (95% C.I.: 23, 29%). Univariate analysis identified as statistically significantly associated with a higher objective antitumoral response rate the following characteristics: a normal platelet count, the absence of skin metastasis, the absence of adrenal metastasis, a higher creatininemia, a normal hemoglobinemia, an older age and a normal WBC count. On a restricted set of variables including data from 777 patients, a multivariate logistic regression model disclosed age and platelet count as significantly and independently related to response rate.

CONCLUSION

Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with unresectable NSCLC, as well as routine laboratory parameters, could not accurately predict response to chemotherapy in a population of patients selected for a clinical trial. Future studies on this subject should include more sophisticated variables as new biomolecular makers.