1
|
Petrella F, Rizzo S, Attili I, Passaro A, Zilli T, Martucci F, Bonomo L, Del Grande F, Casiraghi M, De Marinis F, Spaggiari L. Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Overview of Treatment Options. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:3160-3175. [PMID: 36975452 PMCID: PMC10047909 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30030239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is the second-most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The most common histological type is non-small-cell lung cancer, accounting for 85% of all lung cancer cases. About one out of three new cases of non-small-cell lung cancer are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage—mainly stage III—consisting of a widely heterogeneous group of patients presenting significant differences in terms of tumor volume, local diffusion, and lymph nodal involvement. Stage III NSCLC therapy is based on the pivotal role of multimodal treatment, including surgery, radiotherapy, and a wide-ranging option of systemic treatments. Radical surgery is indicated in the case of hilar lymphnodal involvement or single station mediastinal ipsilateral involvement, possibly after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; the best appropriate treatment for multistation mediastinal lymph node involvement still represents a matter of debate. Although the main scope of treatments in this setting is potentially curative, the overall survival rates are still poor, ranging from 36% to 26% and 13% in stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC, respectively. The aim of this article is to provide an up-to-date, comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art treatments for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Petrella
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +0039-0257489362
| | - Stefania Rizzo
- Service of Radiology, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), EOC, Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Italian Switzerland, Via Buffi 13, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Ilaria Attili
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Passaro
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Italian Switzerland, Via Buffi 13, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Radiation Oncology, Oncological Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Martucci
- Radiation Oncology, Oncological Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Luca Bonomo
- Service of Radiology, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), EOC, Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Filippo Del Grande
- Service of Radiology, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), EOC, Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Italian Switzerland, Via Buffi 13, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Monica Casiraghi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo De Marinis
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rusch VW, Nicholas A, Patterson GA, Waqar SN, Toloza EM, Haura EB, Raz DJ, Reckamp KL, Merritt RE, Owen DH, Finley DJ, McNamee CJ, Blasberg JD, Garon EB, Mitchell JD, Doebele RC, Baciewicz F, Nagasaka M, Pass HI, Schulze K, Johnson A, Bunn PA, Johnson BE, Kris MG, Kwiatkowski DJ, Wistuba II, Chaft JE, Carbone DP, Lee JM. Surgical results of the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium 3 trial: A phase II multicenter single-arm study to investigate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with stages IB-select IIIB resectable non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 165:828-839.e5. [PMID: 36369159 PMCID: PMC10288861 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Multimodality treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer has long remained at a therapeutic plateau. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are highly effective in advanced non-small cell lung cancer and promising preoperatively in small clinical trials for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. This large multicenter trial tested the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant atezolizumab and surgery. METHODS Patients with stage IB to select IIIB resectable non-small cell lung cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 were eligible. Patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for 2 cycles or less followed by resection. The primary end point was major pathological response in patients without EGFR/ALK+ alterations. Pre- and post-treatment computed tomography, positron emission tomography, pulmonary function tests, and biospecimens were obtained. Adverse events were recorded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0. RESULTS From April 2017 to February 2020, 181 patients were entered in the study. Baseline characteristics were mean age, 65.1 years; female, 93 of 181 (51%); nonsquamous histology, 112 of 181 (62%); and clinical stages IIB to IIIB, 147 of 181 (81%). In patients without EGFR/ALK alterations who underwent surgery, the major pathological response rate was 20% (29/143; 95% confidence interval, 14-28) and the pathological complete response rate was 6% (8/143; 95% confidence interval, 2-11). There were no grade 4/5 treatment-related adverse events preoperatively. Of 159 patients (87.8%) undergoing surgery, 145 (91%) had pathologic complete resection. There were 5 (3%) intraoperative complications, no intraoperative deaths, and 2 postoperative deaths within 90 days, 1 treatment related. Median disease-free and overall survival have not been reached. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant atezolizumab in resectable stage IB to IIIB non-small cell lung cancer was well tolerated, yielded a 20% major pathological response rate, and allowed safe, complete surgical resection. These results strongly support the further development of immune checkpoint inhibitors as preoperative therapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie W Rusch
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dan J Raz
- Cedars Sinai (previously City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center), Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Karen L Reckamp
- Cedars Sinai (previously City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center), Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Robert E Merritt
- The Ohio State Medical Center and the Pelotonia Institute for Immune Oncology, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Dwight H Owen
- The Ohio State Medical Center and the Pelotonia Institute for Immune Oncology, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | | | - Edward B Garon
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Paul A Bunn
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colo
| | | | - Mark G Kris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Jamie E Chaft
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - David P Carbone
- The Ohio State Medical Center and the Pelotonia Institute for Immune Oncology, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jay M Lee
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eberhardt WEE, De Ruysscher D, Weder W, Le Péchoux C, De Leyn P, Hoffmann H, Westeel V, Stahel R, Felip E, Peters S. 2nd ESMO Consensus Conference in Lung Cancer: locally advanced stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:1573-88. [PMID: 25897013 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 277] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2014] [Accepted: 04/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
To complement the existing treatment guidelines for all tumour types, ESMO organises consensus conferences to focus on specific issues in each type of tumour. The 2nd ESMO Consensus Conference on Lung Cancer was held on 11-12 May 2013 in Lugano. A total of 35 experts met to address several questions on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in each of four areas: pathology and molecular biomarkers, first-line/second and further lines of treatment in advanced disease, early-stage disease and locally advanced disease. For each question, recommendations were made including reference to the grade of recommendation and level of evidence. This consensus paper focuses on locally advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W E E Eberhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| | - D De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - W Weder
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C Le Péchoux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - P De Leyn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Hoffmann
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - V Westeel
- Department of Chest Disease, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - R Stahel
- Clinic of Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - E Felip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Peters
- Département d'Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baik CS, Vallières E, Martins RG. The role of chemotherapy in the management of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2013:320-325. [PMID: 23714535 DOI: 10.14694/edbook_am.2013.33.320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Patients with confirmed stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represent a very heterogeneous group which includes those with limited microscopic ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement discovered after a surgical resection, as well as those who have radiologically evident bulky subcarinal lymph node involvement at presentation. Different therapeutic options in stage IIIA disease include neoadjuvant chemo- or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, primary surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with or without sequential adjuvant radiation therapy or definitive chemoradiation without surgery. The roles of surgery and radiation in stage IIIA disease are controversial, and there is inadequate data from randomized trials to inform the optimal therapeutic strategy. In contrast, chemotherapy has a clear indication in the curative setting. Data from randomized trials indicates that cisplatin-based chemotherapy should be given in either adjuvant or neoadjuvant settings to patients who are undergoing curative surgical resection and who are candidates for cisplatin therapy. In definitive chemoradiotherapy, cisplatin-based therapy is recommended although a carboplatin-based regimen may be given if patients cannot receive cisplatin. Finally, all patients with stage IIIA NSCLC should be evaluated early in a multidisciplinary setting that includes medical and radiation oncologists and thoracic surgeons with experience in lung cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina S Baik
- From the University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
So T, Osaki T, Nakata S, Hanagiri T, Sugio K, Yasumoto K. Carinal resection after induction bronchial arterial infusion for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2004; 52:143-7. [PMID: 15077849 DOI: 10.1007/s11748-004-0131-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
We herein describe 3 cases of a carinal resection after induction bronchial arterial infusion (BAI) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Case 1 was a 44-year-old man with T1N2M0 adenocarcinoma. After undergoing Nd-YAG laser treatment (5079 J) and BAI [cis-diamminedichloro platinum (CDDP) 100 mg/body], a right sleeve upper lobectomy with a carinal resection and reconstruction (Montage type) was performed. Case 2 was a 67-year-old man with T4N1M0 squamous cell carcinoma. After BAI (CDDP 120 mg/body), an operation (same as case 1) was performed. Case 3 was a 72-year-old man with T4N2M0 squamous cell carcinoma. After BAI (CDDP 120 mg/body), a right sleeve peumonectomy was performed. There was neither BAI-related intraoperative nor postoperative complications. BAI with CDDP was thus found to be a useful and effective therapeutic modality for locally advanced NSCLC invading the carina.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya So
- Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maas KW, van der Lee I, Bolt K, Zanen P, Lammers JWJ, Schramel FMNH. Lung function changes and pulmonary complications in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with gemcitabine/cisplatin as part of combined modality treatment. Lung Cancer 2003; 41:345-51. [PMID: 12928125 DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(03)00237-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality. Chemotherapy, ideally a platinum-based regimen as part of combined modality treatment, is appropriate for selected patients with locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have a good performance status. However, chemotherapy can induce side effects including lung function changes. AIM OF THE STUDY Retrospective analysis of lung function changes in 44 patients with stage III NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS NCT consisted of three cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin. The following data were analysed: age, sex, the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), smoking behaviour, response, complications after surgery and/or radiotherapy, and VC, FEV(1), DL(co) and K(co) before and after chemotherapy. DL(co) values were corrected for haemoglobin concentrations. RESULTS We found a significant decline of K(co) (-13.5% of pred; 95% CI: -16.6 to -10.4; P<0.0001), independent of tumor response or presence and severity of COPD. FEV(1) and FEV(1)/VC showed significant increases irrespective of tumor response. Significantly more pulmonary complications were recorded in the radiotherapy group after NCT (P=0.009) compared to patients who underwent surgical therapy after NCT. CONCLUSIONS Patients diagnosed with NSCLC stadium III who were treated with NCT consisting of cisplatin and gemcitabine showed a significant decline of DL(co) and K(co), irrespective of tumor response, presence and severity of COPD, sex and number of cycles of chemotherapy. Significantly more pulmonary complications were seen in patients treated with NCT and radiotherapy compared with patients treated with NCT and surgery. Questions concering the pathophysiological mechanisms of lung function changes and long term follow-up of pulmonary toxicity due to NCT remain still unanswered and have to be subject of future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K W Maas
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, St. Antonius Hospital, P.O. Box 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Niwa H, Nakamae K, Yamada T, Kani H, Maemoto K, Mizuno T. Assessment of extensive surgery for locally advanced lung cancer. Safety and efficacy of induction therapy. THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION FOR THORACIC SURGERY = NIHON KYOBU GEKA GAKKAI ZASSHI 1999; 47:411-8. [PMID: 10513134 DOI: 10.1007/bf03218036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Locally advanced lung cancer has a poor prognosis, despite extensive surgery conducted in an effort to improve survival. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of induction therapy prior to extensive surgery for locally advanced lung cancer. METHODS Primary resection for lung cancer was done in 549 consecutive patients divided into three groups; 446 undergoing standard pulmonary resection (no extensive surgery), 87 undergoing extensive surgery without induction therapy, and 16 undergoing surgery after induction therapy. RESULTS Morbidity was 23.5%, 28.6%, and 43.8%, respectively. The rate was significantly higher in the induction group compared with the no extensive surgery group (P < 0.05). Surgical mortality was 0.67%, 3.4%, and 6.3%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant between the no extensive surgery and extensive surgery groups (P < 0.02), and between the no extensive surgery and induction groups (P < 0.02). Hospital mortality was 2.2%, 9.2%, and 6.3%, respectively. The rates were significantly higher in the extensive surgery (P < 0.01) and induction (P < 0.05) groups compared to the no extensive surgery group. Five-year survival was 50.3% for the patients who received induction therapy, and 14.7% for the patients who did not receive induction therapy. CONCLUSIONS Survival differences between the induction and non induction groups were not significant, but some patients with T3 or T4 disease may benefit from induction therapy. The high morbidity of induction treatment should be recognized, and strict candidate selection and careful postoperative care used to help prevent increased mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Niwa
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Disease Center, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|