A survey of glove preferences of general and orthopaedic surgeons in North West Thames Regional Health Authority

Parastomal hernias after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion

Parastomal hernia, defined as an "incisional hernia related to an abdominal wall stoma", is a frequent complication after conduit urinary diversion that can negatively impact quality of life and present a clinically significant problem for many patients. Parastomal hernia (PH) rates may be as high as 65% and while many patients are asymptomatic, in some series up to 30% of patients require surgical intervention due to pain, leakage, ostomy appliance problems, urinary obstruction, and rarely bowel obstruction or strangulation. Local tissue repair, stoma relocation, and mesh repairs have been performed to correct PH, however, long-term results have been disappointing with recurrence rates of 30%–76% reported after these techniques. Due to high recurrence rates and the potential morbidity of PH repair, efforts have been made to prevent PH development at the time of the initial surgery. Randomized trials of circumstomal prophylactic mesh placement at the time of colostomy and ileostomy stoma formation have shown significant reductions in PH rates with acceptably low complication profiles. We have placed prophylactic mesh at the time of ileal conduit creation in patients at high risk for PH development and found it to be safe and effective in reducing the PH rates over the short-term. In this review, we describe the clinical and radiographic definitions of PH, the clinical impact and risk factors associated with its development, and the use of prophylactic mesh placement for patients undergoing ileal conduit urinary diversion with the intent of reducing PH rates.

The persistent challenge of parastomal herniation: a review of the literature and future developments

AIM

The aim of this review article was to outline current evidence relating to the treatment and prevention of parastomal herniation with a view to guide surgeons dealing with patients potentially affected by this complication.

METHOD

Medline and PubMed databases were searched using the keywords 'parastomal hernia/herniation', 'stoma hernia/herniation' and 'stoma complications'. Evidence was obtained from randomized and non-randomized studies. Case reports and articles not written in English were excluded. Qualitative assessment of all included studies was performed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 levels of evidence.

RESULTS

The search revealed a total of 228 publications of which 115 fulfilled the selection criteria. Stoma formation through the rectus muscle is complicated by parastomal herniation in up to 50% of cases. There is no conclusive evidence that alternative techniques (e.g. extraperitoneal, lateral rectus abdominis positioned stoma) are superior. Open and laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair have similar recurrence rates up to 50%. The 'Sugarbaker' technique appears to be superior to the 'keyhole' technique when a laparoscopic approach is used. Prophylactic mesh reinforcement of the stoma trephine appears to reduce the herniation rate to approximately 15% and is accompanied by a decrease in symptomatic hernias requiring repair without any difference in stoma-related morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Large prospective controlled trials are required to compare surgical techniques of stoma formation in reducing the incidence of parastomal herniation. Despite limited evidence, routine prophylactic mesh reinforcement of the stoma trephine should be offered to all patients undergoing permanent stoma formation.

Radiological incidence of parastomal herniation in cancer patients with permanent colostomy: what is the ideal size of the surgical aperture?

BACKGROUND

Parastomal herniation frequently complicates stoma formation. Aperture size has been shown to be an independent predictor of hernia development but there is a paucity of data regarding the ideal stoma diameter. The aim of this study was to establish the radiological incidence of herniation in patients with a permanent colostomy and correlate it with the size of the abdominal wall defect in order to identify an aperture diameter associated with a reduced herniation risk.

METHODS

All patients who underwent permanent colostomy formation for colorectal cancer over a five-year period in a single institution were recruited to the study. Patient demographics, operative details and stoma-related symptoms were recorded. Post-operative CT scans were reviewed for evidence of parastomal herniation. The diameter of the abdominal wall defect was measured radiologically.

RESULTS

43 patients (mean age 69 years) were included in the analysis. Radiologically, 25/43 (58%) had evidence of a parastomal hernia. The median aperture diameter was 35 mm (range 25-58 mm) in patients with a parastomal hernia and 22 mm (range 10-36 mm) in patients without herniation (p < 0.0001). There were no cases of herniation with an abdominal wall defect size <25 mm. The median follow up was 26.0 months (range 6-55) in patients with herniation as opposed to 16.0 months (range 7-36) in patients without herniation (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients with a permanent colostomy develop a parastomal hernia within the first two post-operative years. Parastomal herniation appears unlikely to develop with an abdominal wall defect diameter ≤25 mm provided this does not enlarge with time. Surgical techniques that utilise stapling devices to form a 'custom-made' and rigid trephine might reduce the herniation risk.