Cyclo (Leu-Gly) + haloperidol: effects on dopamine receptors and conditioned avoidance responding

Effects of peptides on animal and human behavior: a review of studies published in the first twenty years of the journal Peptides

This review catalogs effects of peptides on various aspects of animal and human behavior as published in the journal Peptides in its first twenty years. Topics covered include: activity levels, addiction behavior, ingestive behaviors, learning and memory-based behaviors, nociceptive behaviors, social and sexual behavior, and stereotyped and other behaviors. There are separate tables for these behaviors and a short introduction for each section.

CNS effects of peptides: a cross-listing of peptides and their central actions published in the journal Peptides, 1986-1993

The centrally mediated effects of peptides as published in the journal Peptides from 1986 to 1993 are tabulated in two ways. In one table, the peptides are listed alphabetically. In another table, the effects are arranged alphabetically. Most of the effects observed after administration of peptides are grouped, wherever possible, into categories such as cardiovascular and gastrointestinal. The species used in most cases has been rats; where other animals were used, the species is noted. The route of administration of peptides and source of information also are included in the tables, with a complete listing provided at the end. Many peptides have been shown to exert a large number of centrally mediated effects.

Prevention and reversal of dopamine receptor supersensitivity by cyclo(leucyl-glycyl) (CLG): biphasic dose-response curves

Chronic administration (21 days) of haloperidol (HAL) (IP, 1.0 mg/kg/day) induced a behavioral supersensitivity (stereotypic sniffing) to dopamine (DA) agonists (apomorphine) and upregulation (increased Bmax for sulpiride-inhibitable [3H]spiroperidol binding) of striatal and limbic D2 DA receptors (DAr). Coadministration of cyclo(leucyl-glycyl) (CLG; 8mg/kg, SC; every third day, every other day, but not every day) with HAL attenuated the behavioral supersensitivity. D2-DAr binding assays showed 1) that CLG-induced changes in Bmax parallel these behavioral changes and 2) that the biphasic CLG dose-response curve may involve CLG failure at high cumulative doses to lower Bmax. CLG also reversed an already established D2 DAr supersensitivity/upregulation (i.e., when CLG was injected daily for four days after the withdrawal of HAL). CLG alone did not alter behavior or binding. CLG's ability to both prevent and reverse D2 DAr upregulation/supersensitivity in animal models suggests that CLG may be useful, within a therapeutic window, in clinical disorders that are thought to involve upregulated DAr (e.g., tardive dyskinesia, L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias, and schizophrenia).

Long-lasting dopamine receptor up-regulation in amphetamine-treated rats following amphetamine neurotoxicity

Amphetamine (A) (9.2 mg/kg, IP), in combination with iprindole (I) (10.0 mg/kg, IP), caused long-lasting dopamine (DA) depletions in striatum (-49%, 4 weeks) but not in nucleus accumbens following one A/I injection. Striatal DA had recovered by 4 months. DA receptors (DAr) were up-regulated: 1) behavioral responses to a DA receptor agonist (apomorphine) were significantly elevated. These included apomorphine-induced locomotor activity (+103% and +160%, on weeks 3 and 10) and apomorphine-induced stereotypy (day 10). 2) Bmax for [3H]spiroperidol binding to striatal D2 DAr (12 weeks) increased (+53%, week 12). Injection of the DAr neuromodulator cyclo(leucyl-glycyl) (8 mg/kg/day x 4 days, SC) reversed the Bmax increase. Thus toxicity (DA depletion) following high-dose amphetamine appears to induce compensatory changes in DAr. This DAr upregulation may explain the lack of abnormal movements despite enduring DA depletion. Additionally, the A/I paradigm as an animal model of long-lasting DAr up-regulation, could be used to screen neuromodulatory agents, like CLG, that might treat disorders (e.g., tardive dyskinesia and schizophrenia) thought to involve up-regulated DAr.

The effects of cyclo(leucyl-glycyl) on nigrostriatal dopaminergic supersensitivity--inhibition of apomorphine-induced climbing

In a previous study we showed that cyclo(leu-gly) (CLG) prevents the behavioural supersensitivity induced in the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) tract (in mice) by chronic haloperidol (HAL). In the current study, we evaluated the effects of CLG on supersensitivity to DA agonists in the nigrostriatal DA tract induced by chronic HAL (1.0 mg/kg, i.p. x 21 days--Experiment 1) or by acute injection of a high dose of apomorphine (APO) (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1 CLG was given at doses of either (a) 0 mg/kg/day (b) 1 mg/kg every third day (30 minutes prior to HAL), (c) 1 mg/kg every day, or (d) 8 mg/kg every third day. In Experiment 2 the dose of CLG was 8 mg/kg, s.c., given 24h after APO. Co-administration of CLG with HAL attenuated the development of HAL-induced supersensitivity in both paradigms (b) and (c) above, although the attenuation was significantly greater in (c) compared to (b). This biphasic dose response (D-R) curve for CLG in Experiment 1 indicates that a therapeutic window exists for CLG (bell-shaped D-R curve) and is similar to previous curves for CLG effects on the mesolimbic DA tract. In Experiment 2, CLG attenuated the DA receptor supersensitivity caused by acute high dose APO. The capacity of CLG to down-regulate DA receptors and attenuate dopaminergic supersensitivity in these experiments suggests a potential therapeutic use in the prevention of tardive and/or L-dopa-induced dyskinesias.

Block of conditioned avoidance responding in the rat by substituted phenylpiperazines

Ortho-methoxyphenylpiperazine (OMPP) and meta-substituted chlorophenylpiperazine (MCPP) blocked conditioned avoidance responding (CAR) in the rat (ED50 values = 5.6 (4.6, 7.3) and 2.4 (1.9, 2.9) mg/kg i.p. (95% confidence limits), respectively) without markedly altering escape responding. Since this test predicts antipsychotic efficacy, the piperazines were examined in radioligand binding assays and found to have no affinity for dopamine (DA) binding sites, but were active at serotonin binding sites. OMPP displaced ligands for the 5-HT1A binding site with high affinity (Ki = 9.5 (5.4, 17.9) nM) but was inactive at 5-HT2 sites (Ki greater than 1000 nM). MCPP, on the other hand, displaced ligands for 5-HT1, 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 binding sites with similar potencies (Ki values = 25 (3, 67), 23 (14, 40) and 40 (33, 48) nM, respectively). Pretreatment with metergoline (1.0 mg/kg i.p. -30 min) reduced MCPP- but not OMPP-induced block of CAR. OMPP, on the other hand, acted as a DA receptor antagonist in vivo blocking amphetamine-induced stereotyped behavior, whereas MCPP did not. Neither produced catalepsy even given in doses 8-10 times those required to block CAR. Insofar as these compounds lack antidopaminergic activity in vivo, yet are active in a test (CAR) predictive of antipsychotic activity in which DA receptor antagonists are active, they may be novel antipsychotic agents, or, perhaps, false positives in the CAR paradigm.