Isotretinoin-basal cell carcinoma prevention trial. Design, recruitment results, and baseline characteristics of the trial participants. The ISO-BCC Study Group

Is early detection of basal cell carcinoma worthwhile? Systematic review based on the WHO criteria for screening

The incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has risen three- to fourfold over the last 30 years and is expected to continue to increase with ageing of the population. Although BCC has a good prognosis, it causes significant morbidity and has an important impact on the public health budget due to direct treatment costs. Based on the existing evidence, a systematic evaluation of the World Health Organization criteria was performed to determine whether earlier detection of BCC could reduce morbidity and cost. BCC slowly increases in size, with a median increase in diameter of 0·5 mm over 10 weeks. There is an important delay in diagnosis ranging from 19 to 25 months. In several studies BCC size was the main determinant of treatment cost, surgical complexity, reconstruction technique and the specific surgical procedure performed, such as Mohs micrographic surgery or surgical excision. One study showed that size also seems to affect the cost per treatment for other nonsurgical options. The use of vismodegib, an inhibitor of the hedgehog pathway, is confined to locally advanced or metastatic BCC. Delays in diagnosis and appropriate treatment are the most important underlying causes in the occurrence of giant BCC and/or BCC with metastasis. Although the latter represent only a very small fraction of all BCCs, the majority of them are located in the facial region. The available data point to a slow increase in the size of BCCs over time. Size is one of the major determinants in choice of treatment and the associated cost, especially for facial BCC. Therefore we conclude that current data support early detection and adequate management of BCCs on the face.

Basal cell carcinoma chemoprevention with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in genetically predisposed PTCH1+/- humans and mice

In vitro and epidemiologic studies favor the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in preventing skin squamous photocarcinogenesis, but there has been relatively little study of their efficacy in preventing the more common skin basal cell carcinoma (BCC) carcinogenesis. We first compared the relative anti-BCC effects of genetic deletion and NSAID pharmacologic inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes in the skin of Ptch1(+/-) mice. We then assessed the effects of celecoxib on the development of BCCs in a 3-year, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial in 60 (PTCH1(+/-)) patients with the basal cell nevus syndrome. In Ptch1(+/-) mice, genetic deletion of COX1 or COX2 robustly decreased (75%; P < 0.05) microscopic BCC tumor burden, but pharmacologic inhibition with celecoxib reduced microscopic BCCs less efficaciously (35%; P < 0.05). In the human trial, we detected a trend for oral celecoxib reducing BCC burden in all subjects (P = 0.069). Considering only the 60% of patients with less severe disease (<15 BCCs at study entry), celecoxib significantly reduced BCC number and burden: subjects receiving placebo had a 50% increase in BCC burden per year, whereas subjects in the celecoxib group had a 20% increase (P(difference) = 0.024). Oral celecoxib treatment inhibited BCC carcinogenesis in PTCH1(+/-) mice and had a significant anti-BCC effect in humans with less severe disease.

Interventions for preventing non-melanoma skin cancers in high-risk groups

BACKGROUND

Some groups of people have a greater risk of developing common non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate interventions for preventing NMSC in people at high risk of developing NMSC.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register (March 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2007, MEDLINE (from 2003 to March 2007), EMBASE (from 2005 to March 2007), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (February 2007). References from trials and reviews were also searched. Pharmaceutical companies were contacted for unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of adults and children at high risk of developing NMSC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies and assessed their methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 10 trials (7,229 participants) that assessed a variety of interventions. One trial found T4N5 liposome lotion significantly reduced the rate of appearance of new BCCs in people with xeroderma pigmentosum. One of three trials of renal transplant recipients showed a significantly reduced risk of new NMSCs when acitretin was compared to placebo (relative risk (RR) 0.22 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.90) and no significant difference in risk of adverse events in two trials (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.70 to 4.61). In three trials conducted in people with a history of NMSC, the evidence was inconclusive for the development of BCCs for retinol or isoretinoin. However the risk of a new SCC in one trial (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.76) and adverse events in another trial (RR 1.76 95% CI 1.57 to 1.97) were significantly increased in the isotretinoin group compared with placebo. In one trial selenium showed a reduced risk of other types of cancer compared with placebo (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.85) but also a significantly elevated risk of a new NMSC (HR 1.17 95% CI 1.02 to 1.34). The evidence for one trial of beta-carotene was inconclusive; and there was a trend towards fewer new NMSC in a trial of a reduced fat diet (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.31), p=0.09.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Some preventative treatments may benefit people at high risk of developing NMSC, but the ability to draw firm conclusions is limited by small numbers of trials, often with one trial per intervention or with inconsistent results between studies.

Serum Carotenoids and α-Tocopherol and Risk of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer

Background: Carotenoids and tocopherols have been hypothesized to protect against cancer. Methods: We prospectively evaluated associations of several carotenoids and α-tocopherol with risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer using serum collected at baseline from 302 subjects in the Isotretinoin-Basal Cell Carcinoma Prevention Trial. All subjects had at least two BCCs in the 5 years prior to randomization. During 5 years of follow-up, 70 subjects did not develop a nonmelanoma skin cancer, 221 developed a BCC, and 85 developed a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate risk ratios. Models were stratified by clinical center and gender and adjusted for age, solar damage, skin type, number of prior BCCs and/or SCCs, treatment group, body mass index, and serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Results: Risk of developing a subsequent BCC was not related to serum levels of any of the carotenoids measured or to α-tocopherol. Serum levels of α-carotene, β-carotene, lycopene, and α-tocopherol also were not independently related to risk of a subsequent SCC. However, serum lutein, zeaxanthin, and β-cryptoxanthin were positively related to SCC risk; risk ratios for subjects in the highest versus lowest tertiles of these micronutrients were 1.63 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.88-3.01; P for trend = 0.01], 2.40 (95% CI 1.30-4.42; P for trend = 0.01), and 2.15 (95% CI 1.21-3.83; P for trend = 0.09), respectively. Conclusion: Additional research is needed on the relationship of carotenoids to SCC risk in the general population and in subsets of the population who are at increased risk.

Risk factors for the development of placebo adverse reactions in a multicenter clinical trial

In this report, we examine the potential risk factors for both the incidence and the number of placebo adverse reactions among patients who were enrolled in the placebo control group in a multicenter clinical trial (n = 491). Of the nine baseline covariates analyzed, only clinical center was significantly related to both the presence and the number of adverse reactions. Placebo group patients at clinical centers 5 and 7 were more than twice as likely to experience an adverse reaction than were patients at clinical center 1. This finding, in light of the intensive effort we made to standardize the methods for adverse reaction detection and management, points out the difficulty in controlling for the inherent differences in the characteristics of the patient populations and clinic personnel at the clinical centers in a multicenter trial, and reinforces the need to stratify by clinical center prior to randomization.

Recruitment experience in the full-scale phase of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study

The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study is a randomized, multicenter clinical trial testing the effects of three different levels of dietary protein and phosphorus intake and two levels of blood pressure control on the rate of loss of kidney function in persons with various chronic kidney diseases. During a 27-month recruitment period, 2507 persons who had objective evidence of impaired kidney function were screened at 15 centers. Eight hundred and forty men and women aged 18-70 with a glomerular filtration rate between 13 and 55 ml/min/1.73 m2 were randomized. Medical record review was the primary means of identifying study participants at the beginning of recruitment. Later, use of mass media was instrumental in alerting both the public and the medical community of the need for MDRD Study participants. Overall, the most important sources of randomized participants were referral by personal physician (45.4%) and relative/friend (5.6%), and self-referral after hearing about the trial from newspapers (23.9%) and television (5.2%). Review of medical records from defined patient populations was the source of 22.3% of the randomized study participants. A total of 9.4% of the randomized participants called a toll-free (800) telephone number before contacting the centers.