Effect of HLA incompatibility on graft-versus-host disease, relapse, and survival after marrow transplantation for patients with leukemia or lymphoma

The rationale behind grafting haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells

The ability to perform hematopoietic cell transplant across major histocompatibility complex barriers can dramatically increase the availability of donors and allow more patients across the world to pursue curative transplant procedures for underlying hematologic disorders. Early attempts at haploidentical transplantation using broadly reactive T-cell depletion approaches were compromised by graft rejection, graft-versus-host disease and prolonged immune deficiency. The evolution of haploidentical transplantation focused on expanding transplanted hematopoietic progenitors as well as using less broadly reactive T-cell depletion. Significant outcome improvements were identified with technology advances allowing selective depletion of donor allospecific T cells, initially ex-vivo with evolution to its current in-vivo approach with the infusion of the highly immunosuppressive chemotherapy agent, cyclophosphamide after transplantation procedure. Current approaches are facile and portable, allowing expansion of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients across the world, including previously underserved populations.

Targeted Radiation Delivery before Haploidentical HCT for High-risk Leukemia or MDS Patients Yields Long-term Survivors

PURPOSE

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has curative potential for myeloid malignancies, though many patients cannot tolerate myeloablative conditioning with high-dose chemotherapy alone or with total-body irradiation (TBI). Here we report long-term outcomes from a phase I/II study using iodine-131 (131I)-anti-CD45 antibody BC8 combined with nonmyeloablative conditioning prior to HLA-haploidentical HCT in adults with high-risk relapsed/ refractory acute myeloid or lymphoid leukemia (AML or ALL), or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00589316).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received a tracer diagnostic dose before a therapeutic infusion of 131I-anti-CD45 to deliver escalating doses (12-26 Gy) to the dose-limiting organ. Patients subsequently received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (CY), and 2 Gy TBI conditioning before haploidentical marrow HCT. GVHD prophylaxis was posttransplant CY plus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (20 with AML, 4 ALL and 1 high-risk MDS) were treated; 8 had ≥ 5% blasts by morphology (range 9%-20%), and 7 had previously failed HCT. All 25 patients achieved a morphologic remission 28 days after HCT, with only 2 patients showing minimal residual disease (0.002-1.8%) by flow cytometry. Median time to engraftment was 15 days for neutrophils and 23 days for platelets. Point estimates for overall survival and progression-free survival were 40% and 32% at 1 year, and 24% at 2 years, respectively. Point estimates of relapse and nonrelapse mortality at 1 year were 56% and 12%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

131I-anti-CD45 radioimmunotherapy prior to haploidentical HCT is feasible and can be curative in some patients, including those with disease, without additional toxicity.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Part I: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations

Chronic graft-versus-host disease is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and a leading cause of long-term morbidity, nonrelapse mortality, and impaired health-related quality of life. The skin is commonly affected and presents heterogeneously, making the role of dermatologists critical in both diagnosis and treatment. In addition, new clinical classification and grading schemes inform treatment algorithms, which now include 3 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, and evolving transplant techniques are changing disease epidemiology. Part I reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Part II discusses disease grading and therapeutic management.

A dynamic time-to-event model for prediction of acute graft-versus-host disease in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a major cause of death for patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Effective management of moderate to severe aGvHD remains challenging despite recent advances in HSCT, emphasizing the importance of prophylaxis and risk factor identification.

METHODS

In this study, we analyzed data from 1479 adults who underwent HSCT between 2005 and 2017 to investigate the effects of aGvHD prophylaxis and time-dependent risk factors on the development of grades II-IV aGvHD within 100 days post-HSCT.

RESULTS

Using a dynamic longitudinal time-to-event model, we observed a non-monotonic baseline hazard overtime with a low hazard during the first few days and a maximum hazard at day 17, described by Bateman function with a mean transit time of approximately 11 days. Multivariable analysis revealed significant time-dependent effects of white blood cell counts and cyclosporine A exposure as well as static effects of female donors for male recipients, patients with matched related donors, conditioning regimen consisting of fludarabine plus total body irradiation, and patient age in recipients of grafts from related donors on the risk to develop grades II-IV aGvHD. Additionally, we found that higher cumulative hazard on day 7 after allo-HSCT are associated with an increased incidence of grades II-IV aGvHD within 100 days indicating that an individual assessment of the cumulative hazard on day 7 could potentially serve as valuable predictor for later grades II-IV aGvHD development. Using the final model, stochastic simulations were performed to explore covariate effects on the cumulative incidence over time and to estimate risk ratios.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the presented model showed good descriptive and predictive performance and provides valuable insights into the interplay of multiple static and time-dependent risk factors for the prediction of aGvHD.

Relapse after allogeneic transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide: Shattering myths and evolving insight

Early studies in allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) demonstrated that HLA-mismatching was protective again relapse. However, benefits in relapse reduction were outweighed by a high risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) when using conventional pharmacological immunosuppression. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide(PTCy)-based platforms abated the risk of GVHD thereby overcoming the negative effects of HLA-mismatching on survival. However, since its inception, PTCy has been shadowed by a reputation for a greater risk of relapse when compared with traditional GVHD prophylaxis. Specifically, whether PTCy reduces the anti-tumor efficacy of HLA-mismatched alloBMT by killing alloreactive T cells has been the subject of debate since the early 2000's. Here we review the many studies demonstrating the potent graft-versus-malignancy (GVM) properties of alloBMT with PTCy. We discuss the laboratory data from PTCy platforms supporting that T regulatory cells may be a major mechanism of prevention of GVHD and that natural killer (NK) cells may be early effectors of GVM. Finally, we propose potential paths to optimize GVM through selecting for class II mismatching and augmenting NK cell activity.

Haploidentical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs matched related and unrelated donor transplant in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic neoplasm

Hematopoietic cell transplantation from haploidentical donors (haploHCT) has facilitated treatment of AML and MDS by increasing donor availability and became more feasible since the introduction of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (ptCY). In our single-center retrospective analysis including 213 patients with AML or MDS, we compare the outcome of haploHCT (n = 40) with ptCY with HCT from HLA-identical MRD (n = 105) and MUD (n = 68). At 2 years after transplantation, overall survival (OS) after haploHCT was not significantly different (0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.79) compared to MRD (0.77; 0.67-0.88) and MUD transplantation (0.72; 0.64-0.82, p = 0.51). While progression-free survival (PFS) was also not significantly different (haploHCT: 0.60; 0.46-0.78, MRD: 0.55; 0.44-0.69, MUD: 0.64; 0.55-0.74, p = 0.64), non-relapse mortality (NRM) was significantly higher after haploHCT (0.18; 0.08-0.33) vs. MRD (0.029; 0.005-0.09) and MUD (0.06; 0.02-0.12, p < 0.05). Higher NRM was mainly caused by a higher rate of fatal infections, while deaths related to GvHD or other non-relapse reasons were rare in all groups. As most fatal infections occurred early and were bacterial related, one potential risk factor among many was identified in the significantly longer time to neutrophil engraftment after haploHCT with a median of 16 days (interquartile range; 14.8-20.0) vs. 12 days (10.0-13.0) for MRD and 11 days (10.0-13.0) for MUD (p = 0.01).

A fully validated flow cytometry method to quantitatively analyze active rATG in human serum and its application in pharmacokinetic study for therapeutic drug monitoring

Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) has been widely used to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The therapeutic window of rATG is narrow, and it may increase the risk of relapse, viral reactivation, delayed immune reconstitution and GvHD when overexposed or underexposed. Therefore, a reliable method for detecting the rATG concentration in human serum by flow cytometry was established and fully validated for therapeutic drug monitoring. In this method, Jurkat T cells were used to capture active rATG in human serum, and PE-labeled donkey anti-rabbit IgG was used as a secondary antibody. The method showed good specificity, selectivity and excellent linearity at concentration of 0.00300-20.0 AU/mL. The intra- and interday precision values were all within 20% at four concentration levels for the analyte. The stock solutions of rATG showed no significant degradation after storage at ambient temperature for 8 h and at - 80 °C for 481 days. No significant degradation of rATG in serum was observed at ambient temperature for 6 h, during six freezethaw cycles and at - 80 °C for at least 373 days. This method was fully validated and successfully applied to monitor active rATG concentration in serum of patients with haploid-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Impact of HLA-mismatched unrelated transplantation in patients with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma

This Japanese nationwide retrospective study investigated the impact of HLA-mismatched unrelated transplantation for adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL) patients who received transplantation between 2000 and 2018. We compared 6/6 antigen-matched related donor (MRD), 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donor (8/8MUD), and 1 allele-mismatched unrelated donor (7/8MMUD) in the graft-versus-host direction. We included 1191 patients; 449 (37.7%) were in the MRD group, 466 (39.1%) in the 8/8MUD group, and 276 (23.7%) in the 7/8MMUD group. In the 7/8MMUD group, 97.5% of patients received bone marrow transplantation, and no patients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide. The cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse at 4 years, and the probabilities of overall survival at 4 years in the MRD group were 24.7%, 44.4%, 37.5%, in the 8/8MUD group were 27.2%, 38.2%, and 37.9%, and in the 7/8MMUD group were 34.0%, 34.4%, and 35.3%, respectively. The 7/8MMUD group had a higher risk of NRM (hazard ratio (HR) 1.50 [95% CI, 1.13-1.98; P = 0.005]) and a lower risk of relapse (HR 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53-0.87; P = 0.003]) than the MRD group. The donor type was not a significant risk factor for overall mortality. These data suggest that 7/8MMUD is an acceptable alternative donor when an HLA-matched donor is unavailable.

Blood components utilization in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Thirteen-year analysis from an apex oncology center of India

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment modality for a range of hematological disorders including malignancies. The increasing volumes of HSCTs impact transfusion services and the requirement of blood products vary depending on the primary disease, type and phase of transplant, and the HSCT donor type.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study analyzed the factors affecting blood component requirements in patients undergoing HSCT. The authors studied the transfusion requirement of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and platelets (PLT) up to 100 days post-transplant among 617 adult patients undergoing HSCT during the study period (2007-2019).

RESULTS

Requirement of PRBC and PLT was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in allogenic HSCT cases across all three phases of transplant compared to autologous HSCT. Unlike PRBC requirement, the PLT requirement was significantly higher during peri-transplant period for haploidentical HSCT and major ABO-incompatible HSCT group compared to matched related donor HSCT and ABO identical HSCT, respectively. In subset analysis based on diagnosis with leukemia as reference, the multiple myeloma group required less while the anemia group required more PRBC and PLT transfusions. The leukemia group required more PRBC than lymphoma group, while the PLT requirement was vice-versa.

CONCLUSION

Factors such as allogeneic HSCT, haploidentical donor type, major ABO-incompatible HSCT, and primary diagnosis as leukemia or anemia were the predictors for increased need of blood products. As higher transfusion requirements may translate into increased costs of treatment, a study like this can help in managing blood component inventory and planning treatment costs of a HSCT program.

Immunopathogenic mechanisms and modulatory approaches to graft-versus-host disease prevention in acute myeloid leukaemia

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only potential cure for intermediate to high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). The therapeutic effect of HSCT is largely dependent on the powerful donor-derived immune response against recipient leukaemia cells, known as graft-versus-leukaemia effect (GvL). However, the donor-derived immune system can also cause acute or chronic damage to normal recipient organs and tissues, in a process known as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). GvHD is a leading cause of non-relapse mortality in HSCT recipients. There are many similarities and cross talk between the immune pathways of GvL and GvHD. Studies have demonstrated that both processes require the presence of mismatched alloantigens between the donor and recipient, and activation of immune responses centered around donor T-cells, which can be further modulated by various recipient or donor factors. Dissecting GvL from GvHD to achieve more effective GvHD prevention and enhanced GvL has been the holy grail of HSCT research. In this review, we focused on the key factors that contribute to the immune responses of GvL and GvHD, the effect on GvL with different GvHD prophylactic strategies, and the potential impact of various AML relapse prevention therapy or treatments on GvHD.

Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease

Background: Steroid-refractory acute graft-vs.-host disease (SR-aGVHD) is a complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a dismal prognosis and for which there is no consensus-based second-line therapy. Ruxolitinib is not easily accessible in many countries. A possible therapy is the administration of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Methods: In this retrospective study, 52 patients with severe SR-aGVHD were treated with MSCs from umbilical cord (UC-MSCs) in nine institutions. Results: The median (range) age was 12.5 (0.3–65) years and the mean ± SD dose (×106/kg) was 4.73 ± 1.3 per infusion (median of four infusions). Overall (OR) and complete response (CR) rates on day 28 were 63.5% and 36.6%, respectively. Children (n = 35) had better OR (71.5% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.12), CR (48.6% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.03), overall survival (p = 0.0006), and relapse-free survival (p = 0.0014) than adults (n = 17). Acute adverse events (all of them mild or moderate) were detected in 32.7% of patients, with no significant difference in children and adult groups (p = 1.0). Conclusions: UC-MSCs are a feasible alternative therapy for SR-aGVHD, especially in children. The safety profile is favorable.

The Benefits of the Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Both Haploidentical and Mismatched Unrelated Donor Setting in Allogeneic Stem Cells Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a standard therapeutic approach for acute leukemias and many other hematologic malignancies. The proper choice of immunosuppressants applicable to different types of transplantations still requires strict and careful consideration, and data in this regard are divergent. For this reason, in this single-centered, retrospective study, we aimed to compare the outcome of 145 patients who received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for MMUD and haplo-HSCT or GvHD prophylaxis for MMUD-HSCT alone. We attempted to verify if PTCy is an optimal strategy in MMUD setting. Ninety-three recipients (93/145; 64.1%) underwent haplo-HSCT while 52 (52/145; 35.9%) underwent MMUD-HSCT. There were 110 patients who received PTCy (93 in haplo and 17 in MMUD group) and 35 patients received conventional GvHD prophylaxis based on antithymocyte globulin (ATG), cyclosporine (CsA), and methotrexate (Mtx) in the MMUD group only. Our study revealed that patients receiving post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) show decreased acute GvHD rates and CMV reactivation as well as a statistically lower number of CMV copies before and after antiviral treatment compared to the CsA + Mtx + ATG group. Taking into account chronic GvHD, the main predictors are donor age, ≥40 years, and haplo-HSCT administration. Furthermore, the survival rate of patients following MMUD-HSCT and receiving PTCy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil was more than eight times greater in comparison to patients receiving CsA + Mtx + ATG (OR = 8.31, p = 0.003). These data taken together suggest that the use of PTCy displays more benefits in terms of survival rate compared to ATG regardless of the type of transplantation performed. Nevertheless, more studies with a larger sample size are required to confirm the conflicting results in the literature studies.

How I prevent GVHD in high-risk patients: posttransplant cyclophosphamide and beyond

Advances in conditioning, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and antimicrobial prophylaxis have improved the safety of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), leading to a substantial increase in the number of patients transplanted each year. This influx of patients along with progress in remission-inducing and posttransplant maintenance strategies for hematologic malignancies has led to new GVHD risk factors and high-risk groups: HLA-mismatched related (haplo) and unrelated (MMUD) donors; older recipient age; posttransplant maintenance; prior checkpoint inhibitor and autologous HCT exposure; and patients with benign hematologic disorders. Along with the changing transplant population, the field of HCT has dramatically shifted in the past decade because of the widespread adoption of posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), which has increased the use of HLA-mismatched related donors to levels comparable to HLA-matched related donors. Its success has led investigators to explore PTCy's utility for HLA-matched HCT, where we predict it will be embraced as well. Additionally, combinations of promising new agents for GVHD prophylaxis such as abatacept and JAK inhibitors with PTCy inspire hope for an even safer transplant platform. Using 3 illustrative cases, we review our current approach to transplantation of patients at high risk of GVHD using our modern armamentarium.

Low-Dose Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Plus Low-Dose Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide as an Effective Regimen for Prophylaxis of Graft Versus Host Disease After Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation With Maternal/Collateral Related Donors

Maternal and collateral donors were associated with a higher incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). A more effective regimen for GvHD prophylaxis after haplo-HSCT with maternal/collateral donors needed to be explored. A retrospective study was performed on 62 patients after haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) with maternal/collateral donors, which included 35 patients with low-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus low-dose posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based (low-dose ATG/PTCy-based) and 27 with ATG-based regimens for GvHD prophylaxis. The 180-day cumulative incidences (CIs) of grades II-IV and III-IV acute GvHD (aGvHD) were 17.7% and 6.8% in low-dose ATG/PTCy-based group, which were significantly lower than that in ATG-based group (55.4% and 31.9%) (P = 0.003 for grade II-IV and P = 0.007 for III-IV aGvHD). In low-dose ATG/PTCy-based group, the 1-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 80.0%and 80.4%, which were higher than that in ATG-based group with OS of 59.4% and RFS of 62.0%. In multivariate analysis, the low-dose ATG/PTCy-based regimen significantly reduced the risk of grade II-IV (HR = 0.357; P = 0.049) and grade III-IV aGvHD (HR = 0.190; P = 0.046) as an independent risk factor. The results suggested that the low-dose ATG/PTCy-based regimen could effectively prevent the occurrence of aGvHD after haplo-PBSCT with maternal/collateral donors compared with the ATG-based regimen.

HLA Diversity in Saudi Population: High Frequency of Homozygous HLA Alleles and Haplotypes

Human leukocyte antigens (HLA) diversity has a tremendous impact on shaping the transplantation practices, transfusion-associated graft versus host disease prevention strategies, and host-pathogen interactions. Here, we conducted a retrospective study of HLA class I and class II homozygosity at allelic and haplotype levels in unrelated individuals genotyped from 2012 to 2016 in a tertiary hospital in the capital of Saudi Arabia. Among 5,000 individuals, 2,773 individuals meet inclusion criteria and were retrospectively analyzed for HLA-A, -B, -C-DRB1, and -DQB1 homozygosity at allelic and haplotype levels. HLA molecular typing was performed using a commercial reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide (rSSO) kit. We were able to identify 15 HLA-A, 20 HLA-B, 11 HLA-C, 13 HLA-DRB1, and five HLA-DQB1 homozygous alleles demonstrating a very low genetic diversity in the Saudi population. The highest homozygosity in HLA class I was found in locus C followed by A and B (20.3% > 16.1% > 15.5%; p < 0.001) where the most homozygote alleles were A*02 (9.2%), B*51 and B*50 (5.7% and 3.7%), and C*07, C*06, and C*15 (7.2%, 5.48%, and 3.3%) and in HLA class II, the highest homozygosity was found in locus DQB1 compared to DRB1 (31.71% > 19.2%; p < 0.001), with the most common homozygote alleles being DRB1*07 and DRB1*04 (5.33% and 4.2%) and DQB1*02, DQB1*06, and DQB1*03 (13.55%, 7.92%, and 7.64%). The frequency of finding an individual with one homozygote allele was (24.6%), two homozygote alleles (13.5%), three homozygote alleles (4.7%), four homozygote alleles (3.4%), and five alleles were (4.8%). The most frequent homozygote haplotypes are A*23∼C*06∼B*50∼DRB1*07∼DQB1*02 and A*02∼C*06∼B*50∼DRB1*07∼DQB1*02. This study shows low diversity of both class I and II alleles and haplotypes in the Saudi population, which would have a significant impact on shaping the transplantation practices, transfusion-associated graft versus host disease prevention strategies, and host-pathogen interactions.

Association between the pharmacokinetics of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin and acute graft-versus-host disease in patients who received haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is an important prophylactic drug against acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). This study analyzed the pharmacokinetics of rabbit ATG 2.5 mg/kg and its effect against aGVHD in 24 patients undergoing unmanipulated haplo-HSCT. All patients had hematological malignancies not in remission. The median absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) before rabbit ATG administration was 9.5/µL (range 0-41/µL). The grade ≥ II aGVHD group had a significantly lower median rabbit ATG concentration on days 0 (C₀) and 7 (C₇) and areas under the curve on days 0-7 (AUC_0-7) and 0-32 (AUC_0-32) than the grade 0-I aGVHD group. Among the four parameters, C₀ was the most optimal for predicting aGVHD according to the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (area under the ROC curve 0.893; 95% confidence interval 0.738-1.000). The high C₀ (≥ 27.8 µg/mL) group had significantly lower cumulative incidence of grade ≥ II aGVHD on day 100 than the low C₀ (< 27.8 µg/mL) group (13.8% vs. 88.9%, p < 0.001). In haplo-HSCT, the C₀ of rabbit ATG is a good predictor of grade ≥ II aGVHD, even though ALC before rabbit ATG administration is not a predictor of aGVHD.

KIR in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Need for a Unified Paradigm for Donor Selection

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is a lifesaving therapy for hematological malignancies. For years, a fully matched HLA donor was a requisite for the procedure. However, new immunosuppressive strategies have enabled the recruitment of viable alternative donors, particularly haploidentical donors. Over 95% of patients have at least two potential haploidentical donors available to them. To identify the best haploidentical donor, the assessment of new immunogenetic criteria could help. To this end, the clinical benefit of KIR genotyping in aHSCT has been widely studied but remains contentious. This review aims to evaluate the importance of KIR-driven NK cell alloreactivity in the context of aHSCT and explain potential reasons for the discrepancies in the literature. Here, through a non-systematic review, we highlight how the studies in this field and their respective predictive models or scoring strategies could be conceptually opposed, explaining why the role of NK cells remains unclear in aHCST outcomes. We evaluate the limitations of each published prediction model and describe how every scoring strategy to date only partly delivers the requirements for optimally effective NK cells in aHSCT. Finally, we propose approaches toward finding the optimal use of KIR genotyping in aHSCT for a unified criterion for donor selection.

Outcome of Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Allografts Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Compared to Matched Sibling and Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow Allografts in Pediatric Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: A Single-Center Analysis

The introduction of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has made haploidentical (haplo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) a common approach in adults, but pediatric experience is limited. Based on the encouraging adult data and with the aim of decreasing the risk of graft failure, our center is increasingly using peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) from haplo donors with PTCy. Here we compare outcomes of bone marrow (BM) transplantation with traditional donor choices, including matched sibling donors (MSDs) and 10/10 HLA matched unrelated donors (MUDs), with those of haplo PBSC grafts in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. In this retrospective single-center study, the primary endpoint was the comparison of GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS; defined as absence of acute GVHD [aGVHD] grade III-IV, relapse, death, or chronic GVHD [cGVHD] requiring systemic therapy) for the 3 cohorts. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD). A total of 104 consecutive patients underwent first allogeneic (allo)-HSCT for a hematologic malignancy or myelodysplastic syndrome between January 2014 and December 2020 using a haplo family donor (PBSCs; n = 26), an MSD (BM; n = 31), or an MUD (BM; n = 47). Patient demographic and transplantation characteristics were not significantly different across the cohorts, apart from remission status, with the haplo cohort having more patients in third or later complete remission before HSCT (P < .01). The median duration of follow-up for the entire cohort was 573 days. The cumulative incidence of aGVHD (grade II-IV or grade III-IV) was not significantly different among the cohorts; however, the cumulative incidence of cGVHD at 18 months was highest in the MUD cohort (31.7%, versus 10.0% in the MSD cohort and 9.2% in the haplo cohort; P = .02). There were no differences in the 18-month cumulative incidence of relapse or NRM. OS and RFS at 18 months were 80.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.7% to 100%) and 73.8% (95% CI, 55.5% to 98.1%) for the haplo cohort, 83.4% (95% CI, 72.8% to 95.5%) and 70.3% (95% CI, 57.9% to 85.3%) for the MUD cohort, and 80.9% (95% CI, 66.9% to 97.7%) and 66.5% (95% CI, 50.5% to 87.5%) for the MSD cohort, with no statistically significant differences among the cohorts. GRFS at 18 months was 61% (95% CI, 43.3% to 85.9%) for the haplo cohort, 44.6% (95% CI, 31.8% to 62.5%) for the MUD cohort, and 62.1% (95% CI, 45.7% to 84.3%) for the MSD cohort (P = .26). Haploidentical PBSC HSCT with PTCy had comparable outcomes to MSD and MUD BM HSCT and less cGVHD compared with MUD BM HSCT in children. The logistical advantages and lower resource burden of haplo HSCT with PBSCs make it a feasible alternative to MUD HSCT in children with hematologic malignancies. Nonetheless, given that this is a retrospective comparison of transplantation platforms rather than donor types, further prospective studies are warranted. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Comparison of haploidentical and umbilical cord blood transplantation after myeloablative conditioning

Three-year survival is similar after PTCy haplo- and UCB transplant.

Lower relapse but higher nonrelapse mortality in ≤5/8 matched UCB as compared with haplo- and 6-8/8 UCB transplant.

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) has emerged as an important treatment modality. Most reports comparing haplo-HSCT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and other donor sources have focused on outcomes in older adults treated with reduced intensity conditioning. Therefore, in the current study, we evaluated outcomes in patients with hematological malignancy treated with myeloablative conditioning prior to haplo- (n = 375) or umbilical cord blood (UCB; n = 333) HSCT. All haplo recipients received a 4 of 8 HLA-matched graft, whereas recipients of UCB were matched at 6-8/8 (n = 145) or ≤5/8 (n = 188) HLA antigens. Recipients of 6-8/8 UCB transplants were younger (14 years vs 21 and 29 years) and more likely to have lower comorbidity scores compared with recipients of ≤5/8 UCB and haplo-HSCT (81% vs 69% and 63%, respectively). UCB recipients were more likely to have acute lymphoblastic leukemia and transplanted in second complete remission (CR), whereas haplo-HSCT recipients were more likely to have acute myeloid leukemia in the first CR. Other characteristics, including cytogenetic risk, were similar. Survival at 3 years was similar for the donor sources (66% haplo- and 61% after ≤5/8 and 58% after 6-8/8 UCB). Notably, relapse at 3 years was lower in recipients of ≤5/8 UCB (21%, P = .03) compared with haplo- (36%) and 6-8/8 UCB (30%). However, nonrelapse mortality was higher in ≤5/8 UCB (21%) compared with other groups (P < .0001). These data suggest that haplo-HSCT with PTCy after myeloablative conditioning provides an overall survival outcome comparable to that after UCB regardless HLA match group.

Effective Immunosurveillance After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The number of patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) has increased constantly over the last years due to advances in transplant technology development, supportive care, transplant safety, and donor availability. Currently, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most frequent indication for alloHCT. However, disease relapse remains the main cause of therapy failure. Therefore, concepts of maintaining and, if necessary, reinforcing a strong graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect is crucial for the prognosis and long-term survival of the patients. Over the last decades, it has become evident that effective immunosurveillance after alloHCT is an entangled complex of donor-specific characteristics, leukemia-associated geno- and phenotypes, and acquired resistance mechanisms. Furthermore, adoption of effector cells such as natural killer (NK) cells, alloreactive and regulatory T-cells with their accompanying receptor repertoire, and cell–cell interactions driven by messenger molecules within the stem cell and the bone marrow niche have important impact. In this review of pre- and posttransplant elements and mechanisms of immunosurveillance, we highlight the most important mechanisms after alloHCT.

Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide Versus Thymoglobulin in HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donor Transplant for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Limited information is available on the efficacy of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTcy) or thymoglobulin for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) transplants. We retrospectively compared outcomes of 76 adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who underwent 7/8 HLA-MMUD transplantation and received either PTcy (50 mg/kg on day 3 and 4) or thymoglobulin (total dose 4.5 mg/kg) for GVHD prophylaxis. In addition, tacrolimus and mycophenolate were used in both groups. Propensity score-based multivariable analyses (PSCA) were performed to adjust confounding effects of patient characteristics between both groups. Between January 2006 and June 2019, 25 patients received PTcy, and 51 received thymoglobulin. Median age of the population was 57 years, 78% of patients had AML, most common graft source was peripheral blood (96%), and 46% received myeloablative conditioning regimens. Median time to neutrophil (15 versus 11 days, P < .001) and platelet engraftment (21 versus 15 days, P = .002) was prolonged in the PTcy group. The cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD at day 100 was similar (12% versus 19.6%, P = .38), whereas chronic GVHD at 1 year was lower with PTcy compared to thymoglobulin (16% versus 49%, P = .006). Using PSCA, no difference in survival, relapse, relapse-free survival, and GVHD-free relapse-free survival was seen between groups. However, thymoglobulin was associated with higher incidence of acute (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.63, P = .01) and chronic GVHD (HR = 4.43, P = .03), and non-relapse mortality (HR 3.38, P = .04) compared to PTcy. Our study demonstrated that PTcy resulted in significantly lower rates of acute and chronic GVHD and non-relapse mortality compared to thymoglobulin in 7/8 HLA-MMUD transplants for AML and MDS.

Genetics of HLA Peptide Presentation and Impact on Outcomes in HLA-Matched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Minor histocompatibility antigens (mHAs), recipient-derived peptide epitopes presented on the cell surface, are known to mediate graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); however, there are no current methods to associate mHA features with GVHD risk. This deficiency is due in part to the lack of technological means to accurately predict, let alone confirm, the tremendous number of potential mHAs in each individual transplant. Previous studies have shown that different HLA molecules present varying fractions of candidate peptide epitopes; however, the genetic "distance" between HLA-matched donors and recipients is relatively constrained. From these 2 observations, it is possible that the HLA type for a donor-recipient pair (DRP) would provide a surrogate measurement of the number of predicted mHAs, which could be related to GVHD risk. Because different HLA molecules present variable numbers of peptide antigens, a predicted cumulative peptide-binding efficiency can be calculated for individual DRP based on the pair's HLA type. The purpose of this study was to test whether cumulative peptide-binding efficiency is associated with the risk of acute GVHD (aGVHD) or relapse. In this retrospective Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research study, a total of 3242 HLA-matched DRPs were analyzed for predicted cumulative peptide-binding efficiency using their HLA types and were divided into tertiles based on their scores. Univariable and multivariable analyses was performed to test for associations between cumulative peptide-binding efficiency for DRPs, divided into the HLA-matched related donor (MRD) and HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) cohorts, and the primary outcomes of aGVHD and relapse. Secondary outcomes investigated included overall survival, disease-free survival, and transplantation-related mortality. Using a computationally generated peptidome as a test dataset, the tested series of HLA class I displayed peptide-binding frequencies ranging from 0.1% to 3.8% of the full peptidome, and HLA class II molecules had peptide-binding frequencies of 12% to 77% across the HLA-DRB1 allotypes. By increasing binding efficiency tertile, the cumulative incidence of aGVHD at 6 months for MUD patients was 41%, 41%, and 45% for HLA class I (P = .336) and 44%, 41%, and 42% for HLA class II (P = .452). The cumulative incidences of relapse at 3 years for MUD transplant recipients were 36%, 38%, and 38% for HLA class I (P = .533) and 37%, 37%, and 38% for HLA class II (P = .896). The findings were similar for MRD transplant recipients. Multivariable analysis did not identify any impact of peptide-binding efficiency on aGVHD or relapse in MUD or MRD transplant recipients. Whereas GVHD is mediated by minor antigen mismatches in the context of HLA-matched allo-HCT, peptide-binding efficiency, which was used as a surrogate measurement for predicted number of binding antigens, did not provide additional clinical information for GVHD risk assessment. The negative result may be due to the limitations of this surrogate marker, or it is possible that GVHD is driven by a subset of immunogenic mHAs. Further research should be directed at direct mHA epitope and immunogenicity prediction.

Comparative Efficacy and Clinical Outcomes of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation to Other Stem Sources for Treatment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is recommended during the first complete remission of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, only 30% of these cases have fully matched sibling donors (MSDs). Alternatively, matched unrelated donors (MUDs) and haploidentical (haplo) donors from first-degree relatives increase the access to transplantation, with some reported differences in outcomes. The current systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim of summarizing the results of those studies to compare the efficacy and toxicity of MSD-HSCT and MUD-HSCT versus haplo-HSCT for patients with AML or MDS. Articles published before September 15, 2018, were individually searched for in two databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) by two investigators. The effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each eligible study were combined using the Mantel–Haenszel method. A total of 14 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The overall survival rates were not significantly different between the groups, with pooled odds ratios of the chance of surviving at the end of the study when comparing haplo-HSCT to MSD-HSCT and comparing haplo-HSCT to MUD-HSCT of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.70 to 1.04; I² = 0%) and 1.12 (95% CI: 0.89 to 1.41; I² = 33%), respectively. The pooled analyses of other outcomes also showed comparable results, except for the higher grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) for patients who received haplo-HSCT than those who received MSD-HSCT, and the better GvHD-free, relapse-free survival and the lower chronic GvHD than the patients in the MUD-HSCT group. These observations suggest that haplo-HSCT is a reasonable alternative with comparable efficacy if MSD-HSCT and MUD-HSCT cannot be performed. Nonetheless, the primary studies included in this meta-analysis were observational in nature, and randomized-controlled trials are still needed to confirm the efficacy of haplo-HSCT.

Effectiveness of T-Cell Replete Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Refractory/Relapsed B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children and Adolescents

Background: The prognosis of refractory/relapsed B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) remains dismal owing to acquired resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of T-cell replete HLA haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (TCR-haplo-HSCT) for pediatric refractory/relapsed BCP-ALL (RR-BCP-ALL). Methods: Nineteen pediatric patients with RR-BCP-ALL underwent TCR-haplo-HSCT between 2010 and 2019 at the Fukushima Medical University Hospital. The disease status at TCR-haplo-HSCT included complete remission (CR) in eight patients and non-CR with active disease in 11 patients. Total body irradiation-based, busulfan-based, and reduced-intensity conditioning regimens were employed in 11, 6, and 2 patients, respectively. Low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin, 2.5 mg/kg) was used in all patients. Graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was administered with tacrolimus, methotrexate, and prednisolone. Results: All patients received peripheral blood stem cells as the stem cell source. The HLA disparities in graft vs. host directions were 2/8 in one, 3/8 in five, and 4/8 in 13 patients. Among 18 patients who achieved primary engraftment, acute GVHD occurred in all 18 evaluable patients (grade II, 9; grade III, 8; grade IV, 1), and chronic GVHD was observed in 10 out of 15 evaluable patients. Three patients died because of transplant-related mortality. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival rates were 57.4 and 42.1%, respectively. Compared to patients older than 10 years in age (N = 10), those younger than 10 years in age (N = 9) showed an excellent OS rate (3-year OS rate: patients < 10 years old, 100%; patients > 10 years old, 20% [95% confidence interval, 3.1-47.5]; p = 0.002). Conclusions: We suggest that TCR haplo-HSCT with low-dose ATG conditioning has the potential to improve the transplantation outcomes in patients with RR-BCP.

Current Preventions and Treatments of aGVHD: From Pharmacological Prophylaxis to Innovative Therapies

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is one of the main causes of mortality and the reason for up to 50% of morbidity after hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) which is the treatment of choice for many blood malignancies. Thanks to years of research and exploration, we have acquired a profound understanding of the pathophysiology and immunopathology of these disorders. This led to the proposition and development of many therapeutic approaches during the last decades, some of them with very promising results. In this review, we have focused on the recent GVHD treatments from classical chemical and pharmacological prophylaxis to more innovative treatments including gene therapy and cell therapy, most commonly based on the application of a variety of immunomodulatory cells. Furthermore, we have discussed the advantages and potentials of cell-free therapy as a newly emerging approach to treat GVHD. Among them, we have particularly focused on the implication of the TNFα-TNFR2 axis as a new immune checkpoint signaling pathway controlling different aspects of many immunoregulatory cells.

Helper Innate Lymphoid Cells in Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Graft Versus Host Disease

Helper Innate Lymphoid Cells (hILCs), including ILC1s, ILC2s, and ILC3s, are mainly localized at the mucosal barriers where they play an important role in tissue regeneration and homeostasis through the secretion of specific sets of cytokines. The recent identification of a circulating ILC precursor able to generate all ILC mature subsets in physiological conditions, suggests that “ILC-poiesis” may be important in the context of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Indeed, in HSCT the conditioning regimen (chemotherapy and radiotherapy) and Graft vs Host Disease (GvHD) may cause severe damages to mucosal tissues. Therefore, it is conceivable that rapid reconstitution of the hILC compartment may be beneficial in HSCT, by promoting mucosal tissue repair/regeneration and providing protection from opportunistic infections. In this review, we will summarize the evidence for a role of hILCs in allogenic HSCT for the treatment of hematological malignancies in all its steps, from the preparative regimen to the immune reconstitution in the recipient. The protective properties of hILCs at the mucosal barrier interfaces make them an attractive target to exploit in future cellular therapies aimed at improving allogenic HSCT outcome.

Evolution of the role of haploidentical stem cell transplantation: past, present, and future

INTRODUCTION

The accessibility to haplo-donors has led to an increase in the number of haplo-HSCT worldwide. A systematic search of the PubMed database between 2000 to present was performed.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors discussed the most used approaches to perform haplo-HSCT and its results: T-cell depletion (TCD, including Perugia platform and its modifications) and T-cell repleted haplo (TCR, including the high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide strategy (Baltimore protocol) and the Beijing protocol). The improvements and modifications made to the different strategies have increased the indications of haplo-HSCT, including both malignant and nonmalignant disorders. Focusing on the Baltimore protocol, the authors review the results of the retrospective studies that have compared it to other donor transplants. The limitations of this strategy in terms of toxicity, graft complications, and GVHD are also discussed in detail. Finally, possible approaches to improve the outcomes of TCR haplo-HSCT are presented.

EXPERT OPINION

The recent advances in the field of haplo-HSCT have allowed a large number of patients with incurable diseases to benefit from this procedure despite not having a matched donor. With all available strategies, virtually no patient who needs an allogeneic transplant should be excluded by the absence of a donor.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation efficacy in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukemia (Ph+ AML) confers a dismal prognosis when treated with chemotherapy alone. Data on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) outcomes are limited. We retrospectively analyzed 4649 AML patients who received allo-HCT and were in complete remission. Outcomes of Ph+ AML (n = 30), intermediate-risk, and poor-risk AML patients were compared. The 3-year overall survival after allo-HCT was similar in intermediate-risk (62.7%; 95% CI: 61.0-64.3%) and Ph+ AML (73.3%; 95% CI: 51.5-86.4%) groups (P = 0.42); however, it differed significantly between the poor-risk (49.7%; 95% CI: 45.9-53.4%) and Ph+ AML (73.3%; 95% CI: 51.5-86.4%) groups (P = 0.049). Disease-free survival in Ph+ AML patients was comparable to that in intermediate-risk patients but better than that in poor-risk patients. Relapse rates were significantly lower in Ph+ AML patients than in other groups. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates were similar among groups. Multivariate analysis showed that Ph+ AML was not a significant predictor of poor prognosis in terms of overall survival, disease-free survival, relapse, and NRM. Our data showed better post-transplant outcomes for Ph+ AML patients than for those with poor-risk AML. Hence, allo-HCT could be a feasible treatment option for Ph+ AML patients.

Key Aspects of the Immunobiology of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a haploidentical donor is increasingly used and has become a standard donor option for patients lacking an appropriately matched sibling or unrelated donor. Historically, prohibitive immunological barriers resulting from the high degree of HLA-mismatch included graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) and graft failure. These were overcome with increasingly sophisticated strategies to manipulate the sensitive balance between donor and recipient immune cells. Three different approaches are currently in clinical use: (a) ex vivo T-cell depletion resulting in grafts with defined immune cell content (b) extensive immunosuppression with a T-cell replete graft consisting of G-CSF primed bone marrow and PBSC (GIAC) (c) T-cell replete grafts with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). Intriguing studies have recently elucidated the immunologic mechanisms by which PTCy prevents GVHD. Each approach uniquely affects post-transplant immune reconstitution which is critical for the control of post-transplant infections and relapse. NK-cells play a key role in haplo-HCT since they do not mediate GVHD but can successfully mediate a graft-vs.-leukemia effect. This effect is in part regulated by KIR receptors that inhibit NK cell cytotoxic function when binding to the appropriate HLA-class I ligands. In the context of an HLA-class I mismatch in haplo-HCT, lack of inhibition can contribute to NK-cell alloreactivity leading to enhanced anti-leukemic effect. Emerging work reveals immune evasion phenomena such as copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity of the incompatible HLA alleles as one of the major mechanisms of relapse. Relapse and infectious complications remain the leading causes impacting overall survival and are central to scientific advances seeking to improve haplo-HCT. Given that haploidentical donors can typically be readily approached to collect additional stem- or immune cells for the recipient, haplo-HCT represents a unique platform for cell- and immune-based therapies aimed at further reducing relapse and infections. The rapid advancements in our understanding of the immunobiology of haplo-HCT are therefore poised to lead to iterative innovations resulting in further improvement of outcomes with this compelling transplant modality.

Mechanisms of Graft-versus-Host Disease Prevention by Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide: An Evolving Understanding

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been highly successful at preventing severe acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The clinical application of this approach was based on extensive studies in major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-matched murine skin allografting models, in which cyclophosphamide was believed to act via three main mechanisms: (1) selective elimination of alloreactive T cells; (2) intrathymic clonal deletion of alloreactive T-cell precursors; and (3) induction of suppressor T cells. In these models, cyclophosphamide was only effective in very specific contexts, requiring particular cell dose, cell source, PTCy dose, and recipient age. Achievement of transient mixed chimerism also was required. Furthermore, these studies showed differences in the impact of cyclophosphamide on transplanted cells (tumor) versus tissue (skin grafts), including the ability of cyclophosphamide to prevent rejection of the former but not the latter after MHC-mismatched transplants. Yet, clinically PTCy has demonstrated efficacy in MHC-matched or partially-MHC-mismatched HCT across a wide array of patients and HCT platforms. Importantly, clinically significant acute GVHD occurs frequently after PTCy, inconsistent with alloreactive T-cell elimination, whereas PTCy is most active against severe acute GVHD and chronic GVHD. These differences between murine skin allografting and clinical HCT suggest that the above-mentioned mechanisms may not be responsible for GVHD prevention by PTCy. Indeed, recent work by our group in murine HCT has shown that PTCy does not eliminate alloreactive T cells nor is the thymus necessary for PTCy's efficacy. Instead, other mechanisms appear to be playing important roles, including: (1) reduction of alloreactive CD4⁺ effector T-cell proliferation; (2) induced functional impairment of surviving alloreactive CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ effector T cells; and (3) preferential recovery of CD4⁺ regulatory T cells. Herein, we review the history of cyclophosphamide's use in preventing murine skin allograft rejection and our evolving new understanding of the mechanisms underlying its efficacy in preventing GVHD after HCT. Efforts are ongoing to more fully refine and elaborate this proposed new working model. The completion of this effort will provide critical insight relevant for the rational design of novel approaches to improve outcomes for PTCy-treated patients and for the induction of tolerance in other clinical contexts.

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs antithymocyte globulin in HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplantation

The use of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) has represented the standard of care in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in patients undergoing a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) transplant. The safety and feasibility of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) in this setting have been reported recently, but no study has compared the outcomes of PTCY vs ATG in 9/10 MMUD transplants. Using the registry data of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we performed a matched-pair analysis comparing those 2 strategies in a 9/10 MMUD setting. Ninety-three patients receiving PTCY were matched with 179 patients receiving ATG. A significantly lower incidence of severe acute GVHD was observed with PTCY compared with ATG. Recipients of the former also showed higher leukemia-free survival and GVHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS). When performing a subgroup analysis including patients receiving peripheral blood stem cells, being in complete remission, or receiving the same associated immunosuppressive agents, superiority of PTCY over ATG was confirmed. Similar to the haploidentical setting, use of PTCY is an effective anti-GVHD prophylaxis in the 9/10 MMUD transplant. Use of PTCY may also provide better outcomes in long-term disease control. These results need confirmation in large prospective randomized trials.

Clinical Features of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Haploidentical Transplantation Combined with Infusion of a Cord Blood

Our previous studies demonstrated promising outcomes after haploidentical donor transplant combined with unrelated umbilical cord blood (haplo-cord- hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [HSCT]) for hematological disorders. However, clinical profiling regarding chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) has not yet been fully described under this protocol. This study analyzed the clinical characteristics of cGVHD among 300 patients with hematological malignancies who received haplo-cord-HSCT between January 2012 and July 2016 at our center. During the follow-up, the 5-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD based on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria was 32.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.7-35.7); the 5-year cumulative incidence of moderate to severe cGVHD was 11.4% (95% CI, 9.4-13.4). After the multivariate analysis, the GVHD overall survival (GOS) was associated with relapse, thrombocytopenia, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, and steroid-refractory cGVHD. The infused CD34⁺ cells (≥3.46 × 10⁶/kg) from haploidentical grafts were a protective factor affecting GOS. This study proposed a nomogram for predicting GOS using the aforementioned five variables. The concordance index was 0.877 (95% CI, 0.859-0.895) for the accuracy evaluation of the nomogram. Our results suggested that the 5-year cumulative incidence of NIH-defined cGVHD after haplo-cord-HSCT was 32.2%, and this nomogram may help clinicians select reasonable treatment strategies.

Review of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Use of haploidentical (haplo) donors for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has significantly increased in the last decade. The major advantage with this strategy is universal availability and faster acquisition of the donor, along with affordability and provision of immunotherapy in post-transplantation period. Historically, haplo-HCT was associated with compromised outcomes because of high rates of graft-versus-host disease and graft failure, but after the development of a post-transplantation high-dose cyclophosphamide strategy, which results in selective T-cell depletion, these issues have been addressed to a large extent. Nevertheless, graft failure, high treatment-related mortality due to graft-versus-host disease, infections, delayed immune reconstitution, and disease relapse remain significant concerns. As the experience with haplo-HCTs grows, the clinical outcomes are becoming more at par with those seen with fully matched unrelated donor allogeneic HCTs.

The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) consensus recommendations for donor selection in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation

The number of HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplants continues to increase worldwide due to recent improvements in outcomes, allowing more patients with hematological malignancies and non-malignant disorders to benefit from this procedure and have a chance to cure their disease. Despite these encouraging results, questions remain as multiple donors are usually available for transplantation, and choosing the best HLA-haploidentical donor for transplantation remains a challenge. Several approaches to haploidentical transplantation have been developed over time and, based on the graft received, can be grouped as follows: T-cell depleted haploidentical transplants, either complete or partial, or with T-cell replete grafts, performed with post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, or G-CSF-primed bone marrow graft and enhanced GVHD prophylaxis. Carefully selecting the donor can help optimize transplant outcomes for recipients of haploidentical donor transplants. Variables usually considered in the donor selection include presence of donor-specific antibodies in the recipient, donor age, donor/recipient gender and ABO combinations, and immunogenic variables, such as natural killer cell alloreactivity or KIR haplotype. Here we provide a comprehensive review of available evidence for selecting haploidentical donors for transplantation, and summarize the recommendations from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) on donor selection for different transplant platforms.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant with HLA-mismatched grafts: impact of donor, source, conditioning, and graft versus host disease prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is frequently used to treat malignant and non-malignant conditions, and many patients lack a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched related or unrelated donor. For those patients, available alternative graft sources include HLA mismatched unrelated donors, cord blood, or haplo-identical donors. These graft sources have unique characteristics and associated outcomes requiring graft-specific variations to conditioning regimens, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, and post-transplant care. Areas covered: This manuscript will cover approaches in selecting donors, conditioning regimens, graft versus host disease prophylaxis, post-transplant care, and ongoing clinical trials related to mismatched grafts. Expert commentary: In the setting, haplo-identical grafts are increasingly popular due to low graft versus host disease (GVHD) risk and control of cellular dose. We recommend young male donors, utilizing bone marrow with post-transplant cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis. Cord blood transplant is appropriate for young healthy patients, and we recommend 6/8 HLA matched grafts with at least 2.0 × 10⁷/kg total nucleated cell dose. For mismatched unrelated donors we recommend young male donors, utilizing bone marrow with in vivo T-cell conditioning with post-transplant cyclophosphamide, alemtuzumab, or ATG. With these transplants, significant post-transplant surveillance and infectious prophylaxis is key to reducing treatment-related mortality.

Sequential HLA-haploidentical transplantation utilizing post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for GvHD prophylaxis in high-risk and relapsed/refractory AML/MDS

This study evaluates the role of sequential therapy in HLA-haploidentical transplantation (haplo-HSCT) of high-risk, relapsed/refractory AML/MDS. We analyzed the course of 33 adults with active disease at time of transplantation (AML n = 30; MDS n = 3; median age 58 years, range: 32-71). Sequential therapy consisted of cytoreductive chemotherapy (FLAMSA n = 21; clofarabine n = 12) applied shortly prior to reduced intensity conditioning for T-cell-replete haplo-HSCT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as GvHD prophylaxis. No graft rejection was observed. Complete remission at day +30 was achieved in 97% of patients. CI of acute GvHD grade II-IV and chronic GvHD was 24% (no grade IV) and 23%, respectively. NRM at 1 and 3 years was 15%, each. Severe regimen-related toxicities (grade III-IV) were observed in 58%, predominantly involving the gastrointestinal tract (diarrhea 48%, mucositis 15%, transient elevation of transaminases 18%). Probability of relapse at 1 and 3 years was 28% and 35%. At a median follow-up of 36 months, the estimated 1- and 3-year overall survival was 56% and 48%. Disease-free survival was 49% and 40%, respectively. At 3 years, GvHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 24% while chronic GvHD and relapse-free survival (CRFS) was 29%. Thus, our results indicate that sequential haplo-HSCT is an effective salvage treatment providing high anti-leukemic activity, favorable tolerance, and acceptable toxicity in patients suffering from advanced AML/MDS.

Who is the best donor for haploidentical stem cell transplantation?

Recent advances in haploidentical stem cell transplantation have enabled the use of human leukocyte antigen-half matched related donors for allogeneic stem cell transplantation and helped overcome one of the most important limitation in transplantation, which is donor availability, especially for the non-Caucasian population and mixed race individuals, extending allogeneic stem cell transplant for almost all patients in need. As many multiple potential related donors may now be available, it is increasingly clear that not all of these donors can provide equivalent transplant outcomes. Here we review the current available evidence of donor characteristics known to be associated with transplant outcomes for different types of haploidentical transplants using unmanipulated grafts (with post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-vs-host prophylaxis and G-CSF and anti-thymocyte globulin approach) as well as modified grafts (with either selective or complete T-cell depletion). While various platforms use haploidentical donors, graft manipulation and approach to prevent graft-vs-host post-transplant may impact on donor selection and transplant outcomes.

Novel full-length major histocompatibility complex class I allele discovery and haplotype definition in pig-tailed macaques

Pig-tailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina, Mane) are important models for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) studies. Their infectability with minimally modified HIV makes them a uniquely valuable animal model to mimic human infection with HIV and progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). However, variation in the pig-tailed macaque major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and the impact of individual transcripts on the pathogenesis of HIV and other infectious diseases is understudied compared to that of rhesus and cynomolgus macaques. In this study, we used Pacific Biosciences single-molecule real-time circular consensus sequencing to describe full-length MHC class I (MHC-I) transcripts for 194 pig-tailed macaques from three breeding centers. We then used the full-length sequences to infer Mane-A and Mane-B haplotypes containing groups of MHC-I transcripts that co-segregate due to physical linkage. In total, we characterized full-length open reading frames (ORFs) for 313 Mane-A, Mane-B, and Mane-I sequences that defined 86 Mane-A and 106 Mane-B MHC-I haplotypes. Pacific Biosciences technology allows us to resolve these Mane-A and Mane-B haplotypes to the level of synonymous allelic variants. The newly defined haplotypes and transcript sequences containing full-length ORFs provide an important resource for infectious disease researchers as certain MHC haplotypes have been shown to provide exceptional control of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) replication and prevention of AIDS-like disease in nonhuman primates. The increased allelic resolution provided by Pacific Biosciences sequencing also benefits transplant research by allowing researchers to more specifically match haplotypes between donors and recipients to the level of nonsynonymous allelic variation, thus reducing the risk of graft-versus-host disease.

Comparison of efficacy between HLA6/6- and HLA3/6-matched haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant in T-cell-replete transplants between parents and children

To compare the efficacy of HLA6/6-matched haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (haplo-HSCT) with that of HLA3/6-matched HSCT in T-cell-replete transplants, we recruited 27 consecutive recipients from multiple centers who received HLA6/6-matched haplo-HSCT from a parent or child donor between February 2010 and May 2016. A matched-pair analysis was designed. For each recipient from the study cohort, two recipients were randomly selected from the control cohort and matched (according to patient age, patient sex, disease type, disease status, donor age, donor sex, and recipient-donor relationship). No significant differences were found in hematopoietic recovery. The incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute graft versus host disease was similar (18.5% vs. 31.5%, P=0.216; 11.1% vs. 9.3%, P=0.792) in the HLA6/6 and HLA3/6 groups, respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 14.8% and 17.0% (P=0.800). The 3-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 12.1% and 17.6% (P=0.751). The estimated 3-year disease-free survival was 73.1% and 65.5% (P=0.489). The estimated 3-year overall survival was 74.7% and 74.0% (P=0.946). The data suggested the efficacy and safety of the HLA6/6- and the HLA3/6-matched haplo-HSCT between parents and children are comparable. That HLA-mismatch disparity is not correlated with T-cell-replete haplo-HSCT outcome was substantiated.

Autoimmune hematological diseases following haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell Transplant compared with matched sibling and unrelated donor

Autoimmune hematological diseases (AHDs) occur more frequently than other autoimmune complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and are often refractory to treatment. This study was to analyze the incidence and risk factors of AHDs as well as their response to treatment. Four hundred and forty-five adult malignant hematopoietic disorders underwent allo-HSCT were enrolled in this retrospective study, including 124 haploidentical donor (HRD), 140 unrelated donor (MUD) and 181 HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) transplants. Twelve patients developed AHDs, including 6 autoimmune hemolytic anemia and 6 Evans syndrome. Evans syndrome all occurred in HRD transplants. The 3-year cumulative incidence of AHDs was 4.0 ± 1.3%, and HRD had higher incidence than MUD (8.7 ± 3.0% vs 1.8 ± 1.2%, P = 0.012) and MSD (8.7 ± 3.0% vs 3.5 ± 2.6%, P = 0.004 ). The steroids combined with Cyclosporine A were acted as the first line treatment, and the response rate was 73%. No patients experienced recurrence at a median follow up of 313 days after stopping treatment. HRD transplants (vs MUD: HR, 5.87; CI, 1.24 to 27.73; ^p = 0.026 and vs MSD: HR, 7.70; CI, 1.63 to 36.44; P = 0.010) and concurrent chronic graft versus host disease (HR, 3.76; CI, 1.18 to 11.92; P = 0.025) were risk factors for AHDs.

Single Antigen-Mismatched Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using High-Dose Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Is a Suitable Alternative for Patients Lacking HLA-Matched Donors

The optimal prophylaxis regimen for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the setting of mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is not defined. The use of high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in haploidentical transplantation has proven feasible and effective in overcoming the negative impact of HLA disparity on survival. We hypothesized that PTCy could also be effective in the setting of MMUD transplantation. We retrospectively analyzed 86 consecutive adult recipients of alloHSCT in our institution, comparing 2 contemporaneous groups: PTCy MMUD (n = 26) versus matched unrelated donor (MUD) (n = 60). Graft source was primarily peripheral blood (92%). All PTCy MMUD were HLA 7/8 (differences in HLA class I loci in 92% of patients) and received PTCy plus tacrolimus ± mofetil mycophenolate as GVHD prophylaxis. No differences were observed between PTCy MMUD and MUD in the 100-day cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grades II to IV (31% versus 22%, respectively; P = .59) and III to IV (8% versus 10%, P = .67). There was a trend for a lower incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD at 1 year after PTCy MMUD in comparison with MUD (22% versus 41%, P = .098). No differences between PTCy MMUD and MUD were found regarding nonrelapse mortality (25% versus 18%, P = .52) or relapse rate (11% versus 19%, P = .18). Progression-free survival and overall survival at 2 years were similar in both cohorts (67% versus 54% [HR, .84; 95% CI, .38 to 1.88; P = .68] and 72% versus 57% [HR, .71; 95% CI, .31 to 1.67; P = .44], respectively). The 2-year cumulative incidence of survival free of moderate to severe chronic GVHD and relapse tended to be higher in the PTCy MMUD group (47% versus 24%; HR, .60; 95% CI, .31 to 1.14; P = .12). We conclude that HLA 7/8 MMUD transplantation using PTCy plus tacrolimus is a suitable alternative for those patients who lack a MUD.

Grade II Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease and Higher Nucleated Cell Graft Dose Improve Progression-Free Survival after HLA-Haploidentical Transplant with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Compared with standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis platforms, post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) after T cell-replete HLA-haploidentical (haplo) bone marrow transplantation (BMT) reduces the risk of grades III to IV acute (a) and chronic (c) GVHD, but maintains similar rates of grade II aGVHD. Given that mild GVHD has been associated with reduced treatment failure in HLA-matched BMT, we evaluated the risk factors for and effects of GVHD on survival in 340 adults with hematologic malignancies who engrafted after nonmyeloablative haplo-BMT with PTCy, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. The cumulative incidence at 100 days of grade II and grades III to IV aGVHD were 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 35%) and 2% (95% CI, 1% to 4%), respectively. The 1-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 10% (95% CI, 7% to 13%). In landmark analyses at 100 days, the 4-year probabilities of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were, 48% (95% CI, 41% to 56%) and 39% (95% CI, 32% to 47%) for patients without grades II to IV aGVHD, compared with 63% (95% CI, 53% to 73%) and 59% (95% CI, 50% to 71%) for patients with grade II aGVHD (P = .05 and P = .009). In multivariable modeling, when compared with patients who never experienced GVHD, the hazard ratio (HR) for OS and PFS in patients with grade II aGVHD was .78 (95% CI, .54 to 1.13; P = .19) and .69 (95% CI, .48 to .98; P = .04). Higher nucleated cell graft dose was also associated with improved OS (HR, .88; 95% CI, .78 to 1.00; P = .05) and PFS (HR, .89; 95% CI, .79 to 1.0; P = .05) and decreased risk of grades III to IV aGVHD (subdistribution HR, .66; 95% CI, .46 to .96; P = .03). PTCy reduces grades III to IV aGVHD and cGVHD, but retains similar incidence of grade II aGVHD, the development of which improves PFS. Higher nucleated cell graft dose goals may also improve survival after nonmyeloablative haplo-BMT with PTCy.

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult acute myeloid leukemia: a position statement from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Allogeneic blood or marrow hematopoietic cell transplantation continues to be the most potent anti-leukemic treatment for adult patients with standard, high-risk, or chemo-refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Until recently, this procedure was generally limited to those recipients who had an available matched-sibling donor or matched-unrelated donor. Technical advances in graft cell processing and manipulation, control of bidirectional T cell alloreactivity, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, and other supportive measures in haploidentical transplantation now enable nearly all patients with acute myeloid leukemia to benefit from the graft-versus-leukemia effect with substantial reduction in procedure-related mortality. Over recent years, haploidentical donors have been increasingly adopted as a valid donor source in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in the absence of an HLA-matched donor. Among centers of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, the use of haploidentical related donor transplantation has increased by 250% since 2010, and 291% since 2005. On behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we summarize recent utilization trends in haploidentical transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and describe the transformative changes in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation techniques over the past decade, which have led to the current widespread use of this procedure. Furthermore, we review the efficacy of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia from available studies, including preliminary comparative studies, and bring attention to remaining unanswered questions and directions for future research. We conclude this report with our recommendations for the role of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Single-agent GvHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus after post-transplant high-dose cyclophosphamide is a valid option for haploidentical transplantation in adults with hematological malignancies

Eighty-one patients with high-risk hematological malignancies received unmanipulated haploidentical stem cell transplants (haploSCT) using the same protocol at four Spanish institutions. The conditioning regimen was thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine; following bone marrow or peripheral blood infusion. GvHD prophylaxis with high-dose cyclophosphamide on days +3 and +4, and IV tacrolimus from day +5 was administered. 62% were in complete remission, 17% had received previous allogeneic SCT and 44% had a high-very high refined disease risk index. One patient had primary graft failure and three more died before +21. The median days to neutrophil and platelet recoveries were +18 and +23, respectively, and 93% achieved a full donor chimerism on day +30. At 1 year, cumulative incidences (CumInc) of non-relapse mortality and relapse were 27 and 19%. One-year overall survival and PFS were 61 and 51%. CumInc of grade II-IV and III-IV were 23 and 14%. At 30 months, CumInc of limited and extensive GvHD were 20 and 22%. In conclusion, patients with hematological malignancies who receive an unmanipulated haploSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide may benefit from less intense pharmacological prophylaxis for GvHD prophylaxis. Whether this approach potentiates the graft-versus-tumor effect and decreases relapses requires further investigation.