[Chronic myeloid leukemia, biological aspects]

Downregulation of survivin and aurora A by histone deacetylase and RAS inhibitors: a new drug combination for cancer therapy

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, such as valproic acid (VPA), constitute a novel class of anticancer agents that cause an increase in acetylated histones and thus restore the expression of dormant tumor-suppressor and other genes related to cell differentiation, cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis of tumor cells. The Ras inhibitor farnesylthiosalicylic acid (FTS, salirasib) attenuates cancer cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo and, under certain circumstances, induces cell death. FTS by itself does not induce differentiation or complete growth arrest. The abovementioned activity of VPA as a differentiation agent suggested that it might be worth investigating its possible therapeutic potential in synergistic combination with FTS. Here, we examined whether the combined application of VPA and FTS could synergistically inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells that express oncogenic K-Ras (A549 nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma cells), DLD1 (colon carcinoma cells) or chronically active wild-type K-Ras and constitutively active B-Raf (ARO, thyroid carcinoma cells). The results showed that combined treatment with VPA and FTS synergistically reduces proliferation in all of these cancer cell lines by downregulating Ras and blocking the expression of Survivin and Aurora A. These alterations, which were most pronounced following the combined treatment, led to a mitotic crisis, as reflected by mislocalization of the chromosomal passenger complex. Our findings thus demonstrate that combination therapy with VPA and FTS might offer a promising therapeutic approach to the treatment of epithelial tumors.

[Mechanisms of tumor escape from immunologic response]

INTRODUCTION

The rationale for immune control of cancer is now better defined via the immunovirology of transforming viruses, definition of human tumor antigens recognized by T-lymphocytes, and cellular and humoral components of the anticancer response. Nonetheless tumors can escape from immune surveillance. To better define immunomodulation strategies, we describe some of the various strategies developed by transformed cells to evade the immune response.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Both the lack of specific tumor antigen and down-regulation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule expression hamper recognition of neoplastic cells by T-lymphocytes. In presence of defective expression of ligands for the T-cell co-stimulatory receptors, tumor recognition may lead to the development of tolerance instead of specific cytotoxic activity. Tumor cell counter-attack against effector T-cells has also been described, using either inhibitory cytokines (IL-10), apoptosis induction (via Fas signalling), functional inactivation (disruption of normal CD40/CD40 ligand interactions), or induction of anergy.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Despite the many different mechanisms of tumor escape, the immune system has developed efficient counter-attacks. For instance, natural killer cells may detect and destroy tumor cells that lack class 1 MHC molecules and thus escape from specific T-lymphocyte cytolysis. Moreover, immunogenicity can be restored, at least in vitro, by different means such as tumor cell stimulation by cytokines or CD40, suggesting that therapeutic strategies will soon be developed in order to stimulate an efficient antitumoral immune response.