Immunogenicity of glutaraldehyde inactivated pertussis vaccine

Study on Toxicity Reduction and Potency Induction in Whole-cell Pertussis Vaccine by Developing a New Optimal Inactivation Condition Processed on Bordetella pertussis

Background

Whooping cough is caused by Bordetella pertussis, and it remains a public health concern. Whole-cell pertussis vaccines have been commonly employed for expanded immunization. There is no doubt of the efficacy of whole cell pertussis vaccine, but it is necessary to improve the vaccine to decrease its toxicity.

Objectives

In this study, an inactivation process of dealing with pertussis bacteria is optimized in order to decrease the bacteria content in human doses of vaccines and reduce the vaccine’s toxicity.

Materials and Methods

The bacterial suspensions of pertussis strains 509 and 134 were divided into 21 sample parts from F₁ to F₂₁ and inactivated under different conditions. The inactivated suspensions of both strains were tested for opacity, non-viability, agglutination, purity, and sterility; the same formulation samples that passed quality tests were then pooled together. The pool of inactivated suspensions were analyzed for sterility, agglutination, opacity, specific toxicity, and potency.

Results

The harvest of both bacterial strains showed purity. The opacity of various samples were lost under different treatment conditions by heat from 8% to 12%, formaldehyde 6% to 8%, glutaraldehyde 6% to 8%, and thimerosal 5% to 8%. Tests on suspensions after inactivation and on pooled suspensions showed inactivation conditions not degraded agglutinins of both strains. The samples of F₂, F₄, F₈, F₁₂, F₁₅, and F₁₇ passed the toxicity test. The potency (ED50) of these samples showed following order F₁₇ > F₁₂ > F₈ > F₁₅, F₄ > F₂, and F₁₇ revealed higher potency compared to other formulations.

Conclusions

It can be concluded that F₁₇ showed desirable outcomes in the toxicity test and good immunogenicity with a low bacterial number content. Consequently, lower adverse effects and good immunogenicity are foreseeable for vaccine preparation with this method.

Improved immunogenicity of a novel third-generation recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in patients with end-stage renal disease

Hepatitis B (HBV) infection remains a significant epidemiological problem in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population. Vaccination programs using second-generation vaccines lead to effective seroprotection in only 50-60% of these patients. The purpose of this case series was to describe our experience with a novel third-generation vaccine, Bio-Hep-B, in ESRD patients who had not developed protective anti-HBs titers following a second-generation HBV vaccination protocol. Twenty-nine ESRD patients who had not responded in the past to a standard second-generation HBV vaccination protocol were included in this series. Each patient received 10 microg of Bio-Hep-B) intramuscularly at 0, 1 and 6 months. A month after completion of the vaccination protocol, anti-HBs antibody levels were measured. Following immunization, 25 of 29 patients (86%) developed seroprotective anti-HBs levels > or =10 mIU/ml. There was a significant difference in the titers of anti-HBs antibodies prior to and following vaccination (p < 0.0001). Statistical analysis of the variables age, gender, diagnosis, dialysis mode, weight, hemoglobin, albumin, and KT/V failed to detect predictors of antibody response. A retrospective analysis of the results of a second-generation vaccination program for the years 1999-2001 in our department showed that 19 of 36 (56.4%) ESRD patients developed seroprotection. In conclusion, the results of this study show that the third-generation HBV vaccine Bio-Hep-B is highly immunogenic in the population of ESRD patients who did not respond in the past to a second-generation vaccine. This enhanced seroprotection offers hope that the new vaccine will reduce the rate of non-responders and help to eliminate HBV infection from dialysis centers.

Adjuvant properties of aluminum and calcium compounds

It is likely that aluminum compounds will continue to be used with human vaccines for many years as a result of their excellent track record of safety and adjuvanticity with a variety of antigens. For infections that can be prevented by induction of serum antibodies, aluminum adjuvants formulated under optimal conditions are the adjuvants of choice. It is important to select carefully the type of aluminum adjuvant and optimize the conditions of adsorption for every antigen since the degree of adsorption of antigens onto aluminum adjuvants markedly affects immunogenicity. The mechanism of adjuvanticity of aluminum compounds includes formation of a depot at the site of injection from which antigen is released slowly; stimulation of immune-competent cells of the body through activation of complement, induction of eosinophilia, and activation of macrophages; and efficient uptake of aluminum-adsorbed antigen particles by antigen-presenting cells because of their particulate nature and optimal size (< 10 microns). Limitations of aluminum adjuvants include local reactions, production of IgE antibodies, ineffectiveness for some antigens, and inability to elicit cell-mediated immune responses especially cytotoxic T-cell responses. Calcium phosphate, which has adjuvant properties similar to aluminum adjuvants, has the potential advantages of being a natural component of the body and of not increasing IgE production. There is a need for alternative adjuvants, particularly for diseases in which cell-mediated immune responses are important for prevention or cure.

Adjuvants--a balance between toxicity and adjuvanticity

Adjuvants have been used to augment the immune response in experimental immunology as well as in practical vaccination for more than 60 years. The chemical nature of adjuvants, their mode of action and the profile of their side effects are highly variable. Some of the side effects can be ascribed to an unintentional stimulation of different mechanisms of the immune system whereas others may reflect general adverse pharmacological reactions. The most common adjuvants for human use today are still aluminium hydroxide, aluminium phosphate and calcium phosphate although oil emulsions, products from bacteria and their synthetic derivatives as well as liposomes have also been tested or used in humans. In recent years monophosphoryl lipid A, ISCOMs with Quil-A and Syntex adjuvant formulation (SAF) containing the threonyl derivative of muramyl dipeptide have been under consideration for use as adjuvants in humans. At present the choice of adjuvants for human vaccination reflects a compromise between a requirement for adjuvanticity and an acceptable low level of side effects.

Adverse reactions after injection of adsorbed diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) vaccine are not due only to pertussis organisms or pertussis components in the vaccine

Reactions to adsorbed diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) vaccine have mostly been attributed to the pertussis organisms or pertussis components in the vaccine. Nevertheless reactions may also be due to other factors such as sensitization induced by aluminium adjuvants and impurities present in crude toxoids that cannot be removed by purification of toxoids after formalinization. Aluminium compounds such as aluminium phosphate and aluminium hydroxide are the most commonly used adjuvants with vaccines for human use. Due to the increasing concern about the toxicity of aluminium, other adjuvants like calcium phosphate may be evaluated as an alternative to aluminium adjuvants. To minimize reactions after immunization with DPT vaccine due to impurities in the toxoids, the use of toxoided purified toxins is suggested.