Small plate osteosynthesis of mandibular fractures

Frequency and Reasons for Fixation Hardware Removal After Orthognathic Surgery in Patients Treated in One Center

Background and Objectives: Despite the well-established position of orthognathic surgery as a field of surgical treatment of deformities within the facial skeleton, it has not been possible to develop unanimous recommendations on how to approach fixation hardware after the healing period. In the absence of clear guidelines from opinion leaders and scientific societies on how to approach osteosynthesis after surgery, the decision to leave or remove fixation hardware is made individually by treatment centers, mostly based on their own experience. It is also important whether or not surgical procedures are financed by public funds. This issue extends beyond orthognathic surgery, affecting all facial skeleton procedures involving osteosynthesis materials. The aim of this study is to analyze the frequency and reasons for fixation hardware removal after orthognathic surgery in patients treated in one center. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study examined the medical records from 2015 to 2020 of patients treated surgically for skeletal deformities at the Department and Clinic of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery of Collegium Medicum (formerly the Otolaryngology Department of the Provincial Hospital in Zielona Góra). This study analyzed the age and sex of patients, the type of orthognathic procedure, and the type of skeletal deformity, as well as the reasons for fixation hardware removal in the groups of patients. Results: During this period, 124 orthognathic procedures were performed, including 56 one-jaw operations (BSSO or Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy), 2 one-jaw operations with genioplasty, 55 bimaxillary operations (BSSO + Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy), 6 bimaxillary surgery with genioplasty and 5 isolated genioplasty procedures. Fixation hardware was removed in 77 cases (62.10% of procedures), comprising 57 women and 20 men. Reasons for osteosynthesis removal were divided into three groups: complications such as the occurrence of inflammatory reaction/infection (n = 17), subjective discomfort (n = 23), and patient requests (n = 37). Conclusions: The findings underscore the need for scientific societies to establish unified guidelines on managing post-surgical fixation hardware to standardize care and enhance patient outcomes.

Comparative Assessment of Double Y-Shaped Versus Conventional Miniplates in Fixation of Mandibular Fractures

Aims

The study aims to enhance the patient's quality of life by assessing and contrasting the effectiveness of traditional miniplates and double Y-shaped titanium plates in the treatment of mandibular anterior fractures.

Method

Ten patients with anterior mandibular fractures participated in the study and were randomly divided into two groups (Group A and Group B). The arch bar was inserted once the patient was prepared, and IMF was performed as necessary. An intraoral vestibular incision was made to expose and reduce the fracture site, leaving a 5 mm gingival cuff in place. Group A received fixation using 2 mm double Y-shaped titanium plates and 2 * 8 mm titanium screws, while Group B received fixation using two conventional miniplates and 2 * 8 mm titanium screws. Metrogyl wash was administered, and closure was achieved using 3.0 Vicryl, ensuring sufficient hemostasis. After 48 hours, Dynaplast was used to stabilize the fixation, and IMF was released.

Result

Clinical and radiographic parameters like pain scale, neurosensory dysfunction, wound problems, fracture line width, teeth related to fracture line, and healing progression were assessed at immediate postop, 3 months, and 6 months intervals. Pain was reduced similarly till 3 months where Group A did not report pain at 6 months showing significant differences. On assessing neurosensory disturbance, Group A showed superior difference (p 0.03*). Wound healing, stability of fractured segments, fracture reduction, teeth related to fracture line, and healing improvement were adequate in both groups.

Conclusion

Our study concluded that the use of double Y-shaped titanium plate provides a promising and alternative technique over conventional in the management of anterior mandibular fractures.

Risk Factors Contributing to Symptomatic Miniplate Removal following Orthognathic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: The use of miniplates for stabilizing bones post orthognathic surgery has surged in popularity due to their efficacy in ensuring stability and hastening recovery. However, controversy exists regarding what should be done with these miniplates after surgery. Some surgeons advocate for their removal, while others suggest leaving them in place. This study sought to assess the frequency, causes, and potential risk factors linked with miniplate removal in orthognathic procedures. Methods: A thorough meta-analysis was conducted by scrutinizing studies from various databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus, focusing on publications spanning from 1989 to 2023. Results: Ten studies meeting the inclusion criteria, encompassing 1603 patients, were chosen for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The male-to-female ratio varied from 0.7:1 to 4:1. Overall, 5595 miniplates were inserted, with 294 (5.3%) being subsequently removed. Primary reasons for miniplate removal included infection (161 cases, 2.9%), exposure of miniplates (34 cases, 0.6%), and palpable plates (23 cases, 0.4%). Other indications comprised pain, patient preference, and temperature sensitivity. Less frequent causes for miniplate removal included sinusitis, secondary surgery, and dental pathology. The mean duration of miniplate removal was 5.5 months, with the majority (56.1%) being removed from the mandible rather than the maxilla. In conclusion, this meta-analysis underscores the importance of miniplate removal when hardware causes complications and physical discomfort. The primary reasons for removing miniplates were infection and plate exposure, with the mandible being the most common removal site. Conclusions: These findings emphasize the need for continued monitoring to assess the fate of miniplates in orthognathic surgery and provide valuable information for future clinical decision-making.

Infection Rates of an Intraoral Versus Extraoral Approach to Mandibular Fracture Repairs are Equal: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This study investigates whether the intraoral approach to mandibular open reduction and internal fixation, through exposure to the oral cavity's microbiome, results in higher infection rates compared to the extraoral approach, thus addressing a critical public health concern, potentially offering an opportunity to reduce health-care costs, and aiming to guide effective clinical practice.

METHODS

In this systematic review with meta-analyses, a review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Embase and PubMed for articles published between 1989 and 2023. Inclusion criteria targeted studies on open reduction and internal fixation mandibular fractures comparing intraoral and extraoral approaches and reporting infection rates. Exclusion criteria eliminated non-English articles, case reports, and studies with insufficient approach-specific data. The primary outcome was the postoperative infection rate, with surgical approach as the predictor. Covariates such as age, sex, diabetes, and smoking status were included when reported. Data were analyzed using R software, employing random-effects models due to anticipated heterogeneity (I2 statistics).

RESULTS

From 61 studies, 11 provided direct comparisons involving 1,317 patients-937 intraoral and 380 extraoral. Infection rates were 5.9% for intraoral and 10% for extraoral approaches. Pooled relative risk was 0.94 [95% confidence interval, 0.63, 1.39], suggesting no significant risk difference. Prevalence of infections was estimated at 9% for intraoral and 6.1% for extraoral procedures, with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 84% for intraoral and 56% for extraoral).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis found no significant difference in infection rates between the two approaches. There is opportunity to expand on reporting complication rates comparing the various approaches to mandibular fixation. Until these data are presented, surgeon preference may dictate the operative approach to expose the mandible for reduction and fixation.

Outcome Study of Mandibular Fractures Treated by Surgical Stabilization With Plates and Screws

This study aims to assess the outcomes of mandibular fractures treated through surgical stabilization using plates and screws, focusing on factors such as postoperative complications, patient satisfaction, and functional recovery. A total of 42 patients were included in the study. Surgical interventions involved the application of plates and screws at the fracture sites. Postoperative complications, including infection, hardware failure, and malocclusion, were recorded. Surgical stabilization of mandibular fractures using plates and screws demonstrates favorable outcomes in terms of stability, occlusal alignment, and patient satisfaction. The findings of this study contribute valuable insights into the efficacy of this surgical approach, highlighting its role in achieving successful outcomes for mandibular fracture management. Further prospective studies and randomized controlled trials are recommended to strengthen the evidence base and refine treatment protocols.

The Effect of Duration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Infections Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

AIM

To evaluate the benefits of a long-term prophylactic antibiotic regimen following treatment of fractured mandibles with open reduction and internal fixation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized controlled trial was undertaken at Wits Oral Health Centre. Patients with mandibular fractures who were managed with open reduction and internal fixation using miniplates were randomized into 2 groups. The control group, the perioperative antibiotic (POA) group, was composed of patients who received intravenous (IV) antibiotic cover intraoperatively and a further 3 IV doses 24 hours postoperatively. The study group, the extended postoperative antibiotic (EPOA), was composed of patients who received similar doses as the control group but with an additional 5 days of oral antibiotics upon discharge. The patients were then evaluated for evidence of infection 1, 4, and 6 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients were included in the study, 41 in the POA and 36 in the EPOA groups. Fourteen patients had evidence of infection noted within the 6-week follow-up period (10 in the POA and 4 in the EPOA groups). Statistical analysis with the Pearson Chi-square and Student t test showed no statistically significant difference ( P =0.399) between POA and EPOA groups. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to site and etiology of fracture, duration of operation, and presence of infection ( P >0.05) during the 6-week review period.

CONCLUSIONS

The extended use of antibiotic prophylaxis when managing mandibular fractures with open reduction and internal fixation offers no additional benefit in reducing postoperative infections.

Assessment of CAD/CAM Customized V Pattern Plate Versus Standard Miniplates Fixation in Mandibular Angle Fracture (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Background

Mandibular angle is the most common site for fractures, accounting for 23-42% of all cases of mandibular fractures. A customized fixation system is designed directly for a specific patient, which reduces the time spent bending and fixing the plate during the operation. This study was designed to assess the effect of CAD/CAM customized V pattern plate versus standard miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture.

Materials and Methods

This prospective randomized clinical trial included 26 patients suffering from mandibular angle fracture. Patients were selected from Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University and Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital. Study group (13) needed open reduction and internal fixation by using CAD/CAM V plate with surgical guide, while control group (13) needed open reduction and internal fixation by using standard superior-inferior miniplate fixation. The patients were then followed up for one year postoperatively.

Results

It showed that there was a statistical difference between the study group and the control group regarding postoperative pain, occlusion, and maximal interincisal opening (p value < 0.05%). There was no statistical difference (p value > 0.05%) in the postoperative panoramic radiograph that was taken within the postoperative 1st week in both groups, while the increase in mean bone density was statistically significant (p value < 0.05%) from 6 months to one year postoperatively.

Conclusion

CAD/CAM customized V pattern plate is a suitable plate design because it offers sufficient stability for normal bone healing, the creation of an ideal occlusion, an early return to function, and adequate postoperative radiographic outcomes.

Trial Registration

It was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration number: NCT03761524. Registration date: 03.12.2018.

Nine Years of Retrospective Study of Mandibular Fractures in Semi-urban Teaching Hospital, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India

Study Design

Retrospective study.

Objective

To evaluate current trends in maxillofacial trauma, a retrospective study of mandibular fractures at Government Dental College and Hospital Shimla H.P was carried out.

Methods

In this retrospective study, records of 910 patients with mandibular fractures were reviewed between 2007 and 2015 in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery out of total 1656 facial fractures. These mandibular fractures were assessed according to age, sex, aetiology in addition to monthly and yearly distribution. Post-operative complications such as malocclusion, neurosensory disturbances and infection were recorded.

Results

It was observed that mandibular fractures were most frequent in males (67.5%) and in the age group of 21-30 years; accidental fall was the most common etiological factor (43.8%) in the present study and in stark difference to already published reports. The most common fracture site was that of condylar region 239 (26.2%). Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were done in 67.3% cases whereas 32.6% were managed by maxillomandibular fixation and circummandibular wiring. Miniplate osteosynthesis was the most favoured technique. The complication with ORIF was 16%.

Conclusions

To treat mandibular fractures, currently there are many techniques. However, in minimizing complications and in achieving satisfactory functional and aesthetic results experienced surgical team plays an important role.

INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS IN COMPOUND MANDIBULAR FRACTURES UNDERGOING A DELAYED SURGICAL INTERVENTION - A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

The aim of this prospective study was to analyse if a delay in the time from injury to definitive surgical intervention of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of compound mandibular fractures predisposed to an increase in postoperative infectious complications. ORIF beyond 72 hours from injury was considered to be delayed intervention. Postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) and non-infectious complications (NIC) were recorded. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the delay in ORIF with SSI. The chi squared test/Fisher's exact test was used to find the association of the infectious complication status with predetermined risk factors. Eighty-three patients underwent a delayed ORIF with a median (range) of 8 (4-19) days. SSI was documented in eight patients (9.6%) and could be managed as outpatient medical and surgical intervention. Two patients needed repeat surgical intervention due to non-union of the fracture. The median (range) time to ORIF was 6.5 (5-12) days in patients who developed SSI; the Mann-Whitney U test did not show a statistically significant association between delayed ORIF and SSI (p = 0.7). The univariate analysis did not establish a significant relationship between SSI and predetermined risk factors. The delay to definitive surgical intervention was not observed to be an independent attributing factor in postoperative infectious complications of compound mandibular fractures.

Titanium Internal Fixator Removal in Maxillofacial Surgery: Is It Necessary? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Titanium plates and screws are essential devices in maxillofacial surgery since late 1980s, but despite their wide use there is no consensus in titanium internal fixators removal after bone healing. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted on seventeen retrospective studies. Effect size and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for plate removal (per plate and per patient) and for removal causes (infection, pain, screws complications, exposition, palpability). Odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals, and χ 2 test were measured for sex, smoking, and implant site. Heterogeneity was evaluated with Cochran and Inconstancy test. Obtained data were used to design Forest and Funnel plots. The aim of the study is to identify and clarify reasons and risk factors for plates and screws removal. Infection is the most frequent reason; the habit of tobacco usage and implant site (mandibula) are the main risk factors. The administration of antibiotic prophylaxis is essential, and patients must quit smoking before and after surgery. In conclusion there is no scientific evidence supporting the removal of internal devices as mandatory step of the postoperative procedure.

Application of Anatomically Designed 2-Dimensional V Plate in Management of Mandible Fracture: A Pilot Study

Background

Mandible is the only mobile facial jaw bone and it aides in various functions such as phonation and mastication. Therefore, management of mandible fracture becomes inevitable due to its functional and anatomical importance. Fracture fixation methods and techniques have steadily evolved with various osteosynthesis systems. In this article, we discuss the management of mandible fracture using a newly designed two-dimensional (2D) hybrid V-shaped plate.

Purpose

In this paper, we have evaluated the efficacy of the newly developed 2D V-shaped locking plate in the management of mandibular fractures.

Method

We have assessed 12 cases of different mandibular fractures ranging from symphysis, parasymphysis, angle and subcondylar region. Treatment outcome was assessed both clinically and radiologically at regular intervals with various intraoperative and postoperative parameters.

Result

Results of this study suggest that fixation of mandible fracture with the 2D hybrid V-shaped plate facilitates anatomic reduction and functional stability and carries a low morbidity and infection rate.

Conclusion

The 2D anatomic hybrid V-shaped plate can be a suitable alternative to conventional miniplate and 3D plates as it offers satisfactory anatomic reduction and functional stability. Positioning the plate in relation to the mental nerve and plate adaptation along the angle region are much easier.

Analysis of the risk factors influencing complications in surgical treatment of mandibular fractures: A retrospective study

The study aim was to identify risk factors associated with complications following open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients who were treated for mandibular fractures in a single center between January 2010 and December 2020. Authors classified postoperative complications as overall complications, infections, and reoperations. Factors that may be associated with these complications were grouped as patient, wound, and management variables. Statistical analysis was performed to determine whether these factors influenced complications. Among 175 patients, 125 underwent open reduction and internal fixation. Among patient variables, alcohol consumption was a risk factor for overall complications (p = 0.03) and reoperation (p = 0.02). Among wound variables, the more severe the external wound, the greater the incidence of overall complications (p = 0.001) and infections (p < 0.001). Presence of two or more fracture sites was a risk factor for reoperation (p = 0.038). Among management variables, intraoral and extraoral approaches increased the rates of overall complications, infections, and reoperation. In the multivariate analysis, only intraoral and extraoral approaches were associated with significant risks for overall complications (OR = 5.63, p = 0.017) and infections (OR = 11.53, p = 0.005). Alcohol consumption, external wound severity, multiple fracture site, and incision approach were related to postoperative complications. These findings can help guide surgical decisions and manage patient expectations after surgery.

Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures Using Single Y-Shaped Titanium Miniplate at the Superior Border: A Prospective Clinical Study

Treatment of angle fractures remains controversial. The various techniques documented for the treatment are: wire osteosynthesis, one miniplate at superior border (2.0 mm), a single plate on inferior border (2.3 or 2.7 mm) along with tension band in the form of arch bar at the upper border, 2 miniplates (1 at superior border and 1 at inferior border), 3-D strut plates or lag screw. To evaluate the efficacy of single Y-shaped titanium miniplate at the superior border in the management of mandibular angle fractures. Total of 15 healthy adult patients reporting to the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures was randomly selected. All the cases were assessed clinically at 1st post-operative day, 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th week post-operatively for pain, status of occlusion, neurosensory deficit and postoperative hard & soft tissue healing. Radiographic assessment was also done at 1st postoperative day, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Postoperative pain, infection, wound dehiscence, neurosensory deficit were not evident during the follow- up periods. Radiographically, the fracture reduction was good and plate fracture was not seen in any case. Y- shaped titanium miniplate is an effective method in the management of the mandibular angle fractures and provided satisfactory results.

Management of Maxillofacial Trauma in Road Traffic Accident (RTA) at Tertiary Care Center

Road traffic accidents (RTA) are the major cause of maxillofacial injuries (MFIs) in developing countries (Akama et al. 2007). Road traffic accidents were reported to be the 9th most common cause of death and morbidity in the world and are expected to rise to 3rd position by 2020 (Peden et al. 2002). Maxillofacial injuries remain a serious clinical problem because of the involvement of complex anatomic region. Facial fractures occur most commonly in males in the third decade of life (Motamedi et al. 2014). The goal of treatment in facial fractures is to achieve anatomic reduction and restore function while increasing patient comfort and making postoperative care easier (Lachner et al. 1991). The aim of the study was to evaluate the cases of Maxillofacial injuries with the existing literature on its different presentation and management. An observational study was done from the patients of RTA with Maxillofacial injuries in ENT department and trauma centre of Sir T General hospital and Government Medical College, Bhavnagar for a period of 2 year. A total of 315 patients were included. Males are more commonly affected than females. The main etiological factor for RTA was motorcycle accidents. The trend of MFIs especially due to MCAs was on the rise after the age of 20 year. Anatomically the lower 1/3 section of the face was the most affected. Mandibular fractures were most common isolated fracture in MFIs. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) by plating and screw was the treatment of choice for displaced, comminuted and multiple fractures of face. Facial trauma remains a major source of injury in all parts of the world. Its management involves many disciplines in the hospital setting, but knowledge of occlusion, the masticatory apparatus and anatomy is important for the best outcomes. This study was an analysis of demographic variables and outcome of the management adopted in patients presented to our department.

Comparative Evaluation of Conventional Miniplates, Three-Dimensional Miniplates and Lag Screws for Internal Fixation of Parasymphysis Fracture of Mandible-A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Study

Purpose

The aim of this study is to clinically and radiographically evaluate the stability of parasymphysis fracture managed with lag screws, miniplates and 3D miniplates.

Materials and Method

Ninety- eight patients diagnosed with parasymphysis fracture were treated using lag screws in group 1, two 4-hole miniplates in group 2 and 3D miniplates in group 3. Intraoperative stability and duration of fixation was assessed. Postoperative clinical evaluation was done at 1 week, 1 month, 3rd month, 6th month and 1 year for complications and oral function. Radiological evaluation was done at 3rd and 6th month. Only 92 patients were considered for statistical analysis since 6 patients were lost during follow-up.

Results

Road traffic accident (65.3%) was the primary cause of mandibular fractures. Postoperative pain score showed a statistically significant difference after 1 week and 1 month duration (P value < 0.001). ANOVA test showed VAS was significantly higher at pre-op followed by 1st day and 1 week, but no significant difference after 3 months in all groups. Radiographic analysis did not show significant difference in approximation of fracture segment among 3 groups after 6 months (P-value = 0.117). Chewing efficiency at 6 months and occlusion by surgeon evaluation at 3 months showed a significant difference (P value < 0.001).

Conclusion

Lag screw fixation was technique-sensitive, relatively inexpensive and was less time consuming method when compared to miniplates and 3D plates. Lag screws and 3D plates are superior in reducing the incidence of complications and better in oblique or sagitally displaced mandibular fractures.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12663-021-01647-5.

Comparison Between Conventional Titanium Miniplates and Indigenous Detachable Custom made 3D Titanium Plates (VAS 3D Bone Plate) for Fixation of Mandibular Fracture in Mental Foramen Region: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Finite Element Analysis

Purpose

To overcome limitation of 3D plate for fracture fixation in mental foramen region, by designing an indigenous custom made detachable 3D titanium plate (VAS 3D bone plate) and comparing it with two miniplate fixations for fractures of aforementioned region.

Methodology

Finite element analysis (FEA) of VAS plate and randomised clinical trial was performed and compared with miniplates. Twenty fractures in 19 patients with fracture in mental foramen region were divided randomly into two groups (Group I-fixation by miniplates and Group II with VAS plate) and evaluated for ease of fixation, neurosensory deficit, bite forces, occlusion and adequacy of fracture fixation.

Results

FEA of VAS plate revealed better performance for stress distribution, deformation and rigidity. A total of 20 mental foramen region fractures in 19 patients (18 male and 1 female) were treated. Group II had better results for bite forces and lingual control. Except for two patients with screw exposure in Group II and transient neurosensory deficit (resolved by 6 months), no other complications were observed. Ease of fixation was significantly better in miniplate group.

Conclusion

VAS plate was successful in providing satisfactory fixation and was observed to be better in terms of lingual control and masticatory efficiency.

Is Outpatient Management of Mandibular Fractures Associated With Inflammatory Complications? An ACS-NSQIP Study

PURPOSE

Timing of mandibular fracture repair has long been debated. The purpose of the present study was to assess the incidence of postoperative inflammatory complications (POICs) following open repair of mandibular fractures managed non-urgently in the outpatient setting versus urgently in the inpatient setting.

METHODS

The authors utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to enroll a sample of patients with mandibular fractures who underwent open repair. The primary independent variable was treatment protocol: outpatient (elective) versus inpatient (urgent/non-elective). The primary dependent variable was POIC (yes/no). Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were utilized to evaluate the relationship between treatment protocol and POICs.

RESULTS

The study cohort was comprised of 1,848 subjects with 1,134 outpatients and 714 inpatients. The incidence of POICs was 6.53% for the outpatient group compared to 8.96% for the inpatient group, with no significant difference between groups (P= .052). However, subjects treated as inpatients were 1.51 times more likely to experience any complication (P = .008) due to an increase in non-POICs (P = .028), in particular urinary tract infections (P = .035). After adjusting for age, hypertension requiring medical treatment, and smoking, classification as ASA II (P = .046, OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.83), ASA III (P = .020, OR = 2.88, 95% CI 1.18 to 7.02), diabetes (P = 0.004, OR = 3.11, 95% CI 1.43 to 6.74), and preoperative hematocrit (P = 0.010, OR = 0.950, 95% CI 0.913 to 0.988) were independent predictors of POICs. Length of stay was 0.83 ± 2.61 days compared to 2.36 ± 3.63 days for the outpatient and inpatient groups, respectively (P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in POICs between patients treated as outpatients versus inpatients, though outpatients had fewer non-POICs and a shorter length of hospital stay.

Body Weight Loss After Orthognathic Surgery: Comparison Between Postoperative Intermaxillary Fixation with Metal Wire and Elastic Traction, Factors Related to Body Weight Loss

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare body weight loss between postoperative intermaxillary fixation with metal wire and elastic traction and to investigate factors related to body weight loss after orthognathic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects were 59 patients with dentofacial deformity, comprising 31 patients treated with intermaxillary fixation (IMF) and 28 patients treated with elastic traction without IMF (ELT) just after surgery. Body weight loss was measured at 1 week (T1) and 2 weeks (T2) after surgery. Body weight loss was compared between IMF and ELT, and factors related to body weight loss were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Body weight loss ratio was significantly increased in IMF (2.6%) rather than in ELT (1.4%) at T1, but only tended to be increased in both groups at T2, showing no statistical difference. Body weight loss ratio was significantly increased at T2 compared to T1 in both groups. Body weight loss was significantly greater at T2 than at T1.

CONCLUSION

Both IMF and ELT cause body weight loss after orthognathic surgery, but IMF causes body weight loss earlier than ELT and increased early body weight loss increases continuous body weight loss after orthognathic surgery.

Significance of Microbial Analysis during Removal of Miniplates at Infected Sites in the Craniomaxillofacial Region - An Evaluative Study

Introduction:

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) can be complicated by miniplate exposure, loosening, or infection. Infected miniplates lead to exposure, extrusion, fistula formation, bony nonunion, and osteomyelitis. Whenever any posttreated cases of ORIF become infected, it is treated blindly with a high dose of antibiotics and surgical removal of infected miniplates or screws. The aim and objectives of the study were to identify the frequency and site of infection in craniomaxillofacial implants and significance of microbes isolated from the infected region.

Materials and Methods:

Removal of miniplates was being performed on 19 patients. Among them, 14 had infection or sinus opening, 3 had plate exposure, and 2 were removed asymptomatically according to patient willingness. Aspirated fluid/pus was collected and sent for microbial culture and sensitivity test. Test of significance of individual microbes was done using Z-test and the value of P was calculated.

Results:

Among 14 patients associated with miniplate infection, 11 (78%) had infection in the mandible and 3 at zygoma. The bacteria isolated were mainly Staphylococcus aureus (7) along with coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (2), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3), Escherichia coli (2), Streptococcus salivarius (2), and Acinetobacter genre (1). S. aureus was predominantly present in majority of the samples and statistically significant at P = 0.023.

Discussion:

The present study observed that in contrast to other sites in the body, there is versatility in microbial flora in the craniomaxillofacial region. It is essential for routine microbial analysis of samples and antibiotic susceptibility test for proper treatment of such cases.

Complications of Mandibular Fracture Repair and Secondary Reconstruction

Mandibular fractures are common facial injuries. Their treatment varies as do postoperative complications. This paper discusses the common complications that are associated with the treatment of mandibular fractures and presents management strategies.

Nutritional intervention during maxillomandibular fixation of jaw fractures prevents weight loss and improves quality of life

Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) for the management of jaw fractures leads to compromised nutritional intake and consequent weight loss and poor quality of life (QoL). The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a home-based dietary plan to prevent weight loss, and its effect on the QoL of patients who underwent four weeks of MMF for the treatment of maxillofacial fractures. A total of 50 patients were randomised into nutritional intervention (Group1) and non-intervention groups (Group 2). Patients in Group1 were counselled by a dietitian and given a diet plan. Patients in Group 2 were advised to take a liquid diet of their own choice in the form of shakes, juices, and milk, along with protein supplements. Patients in Group1 lost significantly less weight than those in Group 2 (p=0.001) at week four of follow up. Group1 patients had significantly better oral health-related QoL in the 'physical pain' domain during the two weeks of MMF, and in the 'physical discomfort' and 'psychological disability' domains two weeks after the release of MMF. They had significantly better nutrition-related QoL in all the domains during the two weeks of MMF and, except for the 'physical' domain, also during the two weeks after its release. Individual home-based diet plans effectively helped the patients maintain their weight and improved QoL.

Efficacy of Microplates versus Miniplates in the Management of Maxillofacial Fractures

Introduction:

Increased facial trauma has led to advances in techniques of internal fixation, improvements in plating system, refinements in exposure of facial skeleton fueling the rapid use of internal fixation for the management of facial fractures. Evaluating 40 patients with confirmed midfacial (Le Fort I and II) and mandibular fractures, this study presents the efficacy of microplate in comparison with miniplate in terms of load bearing capacity, stability at the fracture site and postoperative palpability.

Objectives:

To evaluate the efficacy of microplates in comparison with miniplates in maxillofacial trauma.

Materials and Methods:

Study sample consists 40 subjects, 20 each in two groups clinically and radiographically diagnosed with Group 1 (maxillary) and Group 2 (mandibular fractures) which were subdivided into 10 each treated with miniplate and microplate respectively. Postoperatively, stability of fracture, bite force, need for postop MMF, pain, infection, wound dehiscence, mouth opening, occlusion and palpability was noted. All cases have been evaluated clinically for various parameters for minimum of 3 months to assess any postoperative complications.

Results:

We found microplates are stable enough and have adequate load bearing capacity. Due to close adaptability and less hardware, postoperative palpability is less but larger sample study with long term follow up is necessary to conclude its efficacy in load bearing fracture sites.

Comparative Evaluation of 3d Locking Versus Non-Locking Titanium Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Fracture

The introduction of 3-dimension systems for the treatment of mandibular fractures and continuity has offered certain advantages over other plating system. The present study was undertaken to compare 2.0 mm 3D titanium locking and non-locking miniplates in the management of mandibular fractures. A prospective study was conducted on 40 patients (20 in each group) of mandibular fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Group A patients underwent osteosynthesis using 2.0 mm 3-D titanium locking miniplates while Group B used non-locking miniplates. Subsequent follow-up was assessed for pain, swelling, infection, paresthesia, malocclusion, mobility between fracture fragments and hardware failure in these patients. Functional occlusion was achieved postoperatively in all the patients. At 12 weeks of the time intervals, significant pain was observed in group B. At 1 week interval, 6 (30%) patients in both groups reported with swelling. Only one (10%) patient in each group had paresthesia which got resolved gradually over a period of 3 months. Infection was observed in only 2 (10%) patient in Group B at 3 months. Only 2 (10%) patient in Group B had hardware failure at 3 months interval. Statistically, there was no significant difference between both the groups at any time interval (p > 0.05). 3D titanium locking miniplates are effective in the treatment of mandibular fractures with lesser overall complications as compared to non-locking miniplates.

Miniplate removal in operated cases of maxillofacial region in a dental institute in Rajasthan, India

Background

The long term management of miniplate fixation osteosynthesis remains debatable and controversial with few authors advocating routine removal of the miniplates after 3–6 months of placement, while others recommend retention of the miniplates unless their removal is clinically indicated.

Objective

The aim was to study the incidence, indications, time gap, role of metallic composition and site of removal of miniplates in operated cases of maxillofacial region over a two-year period.

Methods

Patients undergoing removal of miniplates over 2-year period were studied and evaluated regarding the number of miniplates removed, time gap present between fixation and removal of miniplates, indications for removal, metallic composition of miniplates removed, sites of removal and complications. Correlations between indications for miniplate removal based upon time gap, metallic composition, age group and number of miniplates present were determined using Chi-square test. Correlation between metallic composition of miniplate and time gap was also determined using Chi-square test.

Results

The miniplates were removed in 20 patients (16 males and 4 females). Most common indication for removal was infection (45%). Forty-five percent of the patients underwent miniplate removal within 1 year of placement. Thirty-four miniplates and 118 screws were removed. The correlation between indications for miniplate removal and time gap was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.04).

Conclusion

Most of the hardware removal is performed subsequent to complications associated with hardware and local factors play more important role than metallic composition. Routine asymptomatic miniplates do not require removal and is not recommended.

Factors related to patients' nutritional state after orthognathic surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' nutritional state after orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

The subjects were 40 female patients with dentofacial deformity aged 17-33 years who were undergoing bilateral sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy. Twenty patients were treated with intermaxillary fixation, and 20 patients were treated without intermaxillary fixation. Age and body mass index (kg/m²) were assessed as physical factors, operation time, blood loss, and amount of mandibular movement with or without intermaxillary fixation were assessed as operation stress factors, and the following laboratory data, total protein, serum albumin, total cholesterol, total lymphocytes, and cholinesterase were assessed as nutritional state factors at 1 and 2 weeks after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed for body weight loss and relationship between body weight loss and examination factors.

RESULTS

Body weight significantly decreased 2.3% at 1 week and 3.9% at 2 weeks after surgery rather than preoperation. All laboratory data except total lymphocyte were decreased at 1 week after surgery and still remained significantly decreased at 2 weeks after surgery. There was a statistically significant relationship between body weight loss at 1 week after surgery and operation time.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that long operation time caused body weight loss in orthognathic surgery.

Use of oral screen for preventing soft tissue injuries associated with use of arch bars: a prospective randomized clinical study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to access the efficacy of oral screen in protection of arch bar-induced soft tissue injury after achieving maxillomandibular fixation (MMF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a randomized clinical trial. The study sample was derived from the population of patients who required MMF and reported from January 2017 to December 2017. A total of 60 patients in whom application of an Erich arch bar was indicated for MMF were selected for the study. The patients were divided into two groups. In group I, only MMF was done; however, in group II, oral screen was used after MMF. The patients were assessed for soft tissue injury, pain, and maintenance of oral hygiene. All parameters were compared statistically using the chi-square test and Student's t test.

RESULTS

The soft tissue injury in group I (73.33%) was greater than that in group II (3.33%). The pain was worse in group I than in group II. The mean value of plaque index in group II is 1.20 and in group I is 2.89. It signifies that plaque deposition was more in group I.

CONCLUSION

Soft tissue injury and pain were less, as well as oral hygiene maintenance is better in patients who used oral screen after the placement of Erich arch bars.

Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on mandibular fracture healing: A randomized control trial, (RCT)

INTRODUCTION

Currently, the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) method is utilized for the treatment of nonunion long bone fractures. Considering the established effect of the PEMF on the acceleration of the bone healing process, we conducted this study to evaluate the effect of PEMF on the healing process in mandibular bone fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This research was a randomized control trial (RCT) study. The sample consisted of patients with a mandibular fracture who were hospitalized in order to receive closed reduction treatment. The participants were randomly selected and then sequentially divided into two groups of 16 participants each (controls = 16, cases = 16). The patients in the control group received conventional therapy without any extra treatment, while the patients in the case group received PEMF therapy in addition to conventional therapy. For the PEMF therapy, patients in the case group received immediate post-surgery PEMF therapy for 6 h. Next, they received 3 h of exposure for the next 6 d, and finally, the same process was repeated for 1.5 h for post-surgery days 8-13. The maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) device was removed at post-surgery week 4. The patients in the control group, however, did not receive any extra treatment. The efficiency of the treatment modalities was evaluated clinically and radiographically. For the radiographical assessment, we employed a direct digital panoramic machine to calculate the computerized density of the bone, and those measurements were used for comparison of the results between the control group and the study patients.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the mean bone density values between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the percentage of changes in bone density of the two groups revealed that the case group had insignificant decreases at post-surgery day 14 and a significant increase at post-surgery day 28 compared with the control group (P < 0.05). After releasing the MMF, a bimanual mobility test of the fractured segments showed the stability of the segments in all patients. In the case group, the mouth opening was significantly more stable than that of the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PEMF therapy postoperatively leads to increased bone density, faster recovery, increased formation of new bone, a further opening of the mouth, and decreased pain.

A 4-Year Multicentre Audit of Complications Following ORIF Treatment of Mandibular Fractures

Purpose

To ascertain the complications arising from open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures and to elucidate if different osteosynthesis plating systems vary in treatment outcome.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective study. Parameters such as patient data, injury details, osteosynthesis implant system information, stability of fracture fragments, occlusion and complications were evaluated at different time intervals and logistic regression applied to determine the association of these factors with complications.

Results

Five hundred and ninety-three patients with mandibular fractures were included in this study (male 87.9% and female 12.1%), age range of 13-72 years (median = 22 years). Most fractures were caused by motor vehicle accidents (85.8%), assault (6.2%) and falls (4.7%). Parasymphyseal fractures were the most common (50.1%), followed by angle (35.2%) and body of mandible (25%). Median time interval between injury and intervention was 7 days (IQR 4-10). Median duration of follow-up from date of surgery was 72 days (IQR 30-230). 76.9% (456) were completely free of complications. Most complications (46%) occurred in the intermediate post-surgical period (1-6 weeks). Median interval period between surgery and complication was 15 days (IQR 7-67.5). Nerve injury and surgical site infection were the most common complications at 6.7% and 5.7%, respectively. There was a significant difference between the plating system in terms of complication outcome (p = 0.017).

Conclusion

Whilst the miniplate dimensions may be similar across different manufacturers, the complication outcome may differ between systems.

Titanium Lag Screw Versus Miniplate Fixation in the Treatment of Anterior Mandibular Fractures

PURPOSE

The use of plates for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures has become a widely accepted method in the past 3 decades. However, the anterior mandible is well suited to lag screw fixation owing to the thickness of its bony cortices. Hence, the purpose of the present study was to comparatively evaluate clinical outcomes of fixation using lag screws and miniplates in anterior mandibular fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty patients reporting to the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery with noncomminuted anterior mandibular fractures were randomly divided into 2 groups of 25 patients each. Patients in group A were treated with 2.5-mm lag screws 22 to 26 mm in length and those in group B were treated with 2.0-mm 4-hole miniplates with a gap using monocortical screws. Subsequent follow-up was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. The primary determinants included radiographic analysis of the fracture gap and biting efficiency of the patients in groups A and B. The secondary determinants included evaluation of duration of surgery, occlusion before and after injury, and postoperative complications. Results were evaluated using χ² and unpaired t tests.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients in this study was 29.1 ± 8.32 years (range, 18 to 67 yr). The mean postoperative fracture gap was considerably larger in group B. The mean duration of surgery (minutes) was 37.60 ± 9.30 for group A and 47 ± 6.55 for group B. The difference was statistically significant (P = .001). The lag screw group showed faster improvement in biting efficiency compared with the miniplate group.

CONCLUSIONS

Lag screw fixation was found to have good stability and rigidity, was inexpensive, and was less time consuming in treating anterior mandibular fractures compared with miniplates.

An in-vitro evaluation of a novel design of miniplate for fixation of fracture segments in the transition zone of parasymphysis-body region of mandible using finite element analysis

The mandibular parasymphysis and body regions are highly dynamic areas. They are constantly subjected to both occlusal and muscular forces. Fractures at this transition zone of the parasymphysis and body region thus represent a special pattern that creates a dilemma for the surgeons - whether to use one miniplate fixation or two miniplates as per Champy's guidelines. Mental nerve paresthesia is a very common complication due to dissection and stretching of the mental nerve in this region. Hence, an in-vitro research study of a novel twin fork design of miniplate is performed, which evaluates the biomechanical behavior using computerized finite element analysis. A comparison is carried out with the conventional design. The results show that the twin fork miniplate produces the lowest stresses - 23.821 MPa - and the least total structural deformation after applying the maximum occlusal bite force. This study concludes that the newly designed miniplate is superior in terms of stability because it shows the least structural deformation, and produces the lowest equivalent stresses on application of maximal occlusal forces. An additional advantage is the preservation of the mental nerve during the plating procedure because the broad end of the Y shape allows atraumatic positioning of the miniplate and hence the fixation of fractured segments.

Treatment Delay Impact on Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fractures: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The impact of mandible fracture treatment delay has been contested in the literature for decades, with conventional wisdom favoring earlier surgical treatment to prevent postoperative complications, primarily infection. Through a systematic review of all available evidence, this study aims to determine whether delay to open reduction and internal fixation of traumatic mandibular fractures influences outcomes.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically searched for English language literature pertaining to the above research question and screened in duplicate. Methodological quality scoring was performed using MINORS criteria. Qualitative and quantitative findings from relevant studies are presented.

RESULTS

Twenty eligible studies including 2,671 patients had open reduction internal fixation, with or without adjunct mandibulomaxillary fixation. All studies were observational cohort or case-control studies of low methodological quality with a mean MINORS score of 6.5 of 16 (40.6%) for noncomparative studies and 11.2 of 24 (46.7%) for comparative studies. Only 5 of 20 (25%) studies recommended earlier treatment. Due to insufficient reporting of data and study heterogeneity, the impact of treatment delay on complications could not be quantitatively analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial heterogeneity and no consensus on the definition of "early" versus "delayed" surgical treatment for patients with traumatic mandibular fractures. The majority of included studies do not make a recommendation for earlier treatment. Future, well-designed prospective studies are essential to determine if there is an optimal surgical treatment delay of mandibular fractures that mitigates the risk of infectious and noninfectious complications.

Is a fractured mandible an emergency?

We retrospectively audited the records of 708 patients who presented with the diagnosis of fractured mandible between January 2009 and July 2013 at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham. We assessed the different factors that may have altered their outcomes, and found that delay before definitive fixation caused no harm in either the short or the long term.

Comparison of 3D plate and locking plate in treatment of mandibular fracture-a clinical study

INTRODUCTION

This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and post-operative complication of 3-dimensional (3D) titanium miniplate and locking plate in mandibular fractures (parasymphysis, symphysis, body, and angle).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients, with non-comminuted mandibular fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation using 3D titanium miniplate system or locking plate system through an intra-oral approach, were included in this study. All patients were systematically monitored up to 2 months post-operatively. Parameters recorded were infection, occlusal discrepancies, hardware failure, wound dehiscence, sensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve, and stability of fractured segments.

RESULTS

Forty patients with mandibular fracture were divided into two groups randomly without any bias. The fractures of all 40 patients were found to be adequately fixed when checked intra-operatively after fixation. One patient (2.5%) of the 3D plate group developed an infection on the first and second post-operative visit and was treated by antibiotic coverage. One patient in the locking plate group (2.5%) reported wound dehiscence after the first week follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Both 3D titanium miniplates and locking plate are effective in the treatment of mandibular fractures, and overall complication rates are lesser. However, the 3D plating system uses less hardware in cases of parasymphysis and symphysis fractures and more hardware in cases of body and angle fractures.

Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures with Single Three-Dimensional Locking Miniplates without Maxillomandibular Fixation: How Much Fixation Is Required?

The aim of this simple nonrandomized and observational study was to evaluate the efficacy of single three-dimensional (3D) plate for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures without maxillomandibular fixation. A total of 30 patients with noncomminuted fractures of mandibular angle requiring open reduction and internal fixation were included in the study. All the patients were treated by open reduction and internal fixation using single 3D titanium locking miniplate placed with the help of transbuccal trocar or Synthes 90-degree hand piece and screw driver. 3D locking titanium miniplates used in our study was four-holed, box-shaped plate, and screws with 2 mm diameter and 8 mm length. The following clinical parameters were assessed for each patient at each follow-up visit: pain (visual analog scale: 0-5), swelling (visual analog scale: 0-5), mouth opening, infection, paresthesia, hardware failure (plate fracture), occlusal discrepancies, and mobility between fracture fragments. A significant decrease in pain level was seen during the follow-up visits. No statistically significant changes were seen in swelling, but mouth opening increased in the subsequent visits. Also better results were seen in terms of fracture stability and occlusion in the postoperative period. Two cases of infection and two cases of hardware failure were noted in sixth postoperative week. 3D plating system is an easy to use alternative to conventional miniplates to treat mandibular angle fractures that uses lesser foreign material, thus reducing the operative time and overall cost of the treatment. Better fracture stability and occlusion was also achieved using the 3D plating system.

How far reaching is our research? An analysis of the journals in which oral and maxillofacial surgery research is cited

In this study we investigate the five most cited articles in the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (BJOMS). Articles cited were usually published in other OMFS journals (40%) or dentistry journals (32%). The mean (SD) SCImago Journal and Country Rank, (SJR) (an interface to access the bibliometric database of journals) for cited papers was 0.64 (SD=0.56). Nearly one third of citations were of research in OMFS and dentistry, suggesting its relevance to the wider academic community.

Comparison of 2 mm single locking miniplates versus 2 mm two non-locking miniplates in symphysis and parasymphysis fracture of mandible

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of single 2 mm locking miniplates versus two 2 mm non-locking (conventional) miniplates in symphysis and parasymphysis fracture of mandible.

METHOD

This present study included 40 patients of maxillofacial trauma having mandibular symphysis/parasymphysis fractures in which open reduction and internal fixation is indicated. Patients were selected according to the inclusion criteria and divided into two groups, i.e. Group 1: consisted of 20 patients, requiring open reduction and internal fixation with 2 mm two non-locking titanium plate and Group 2: consisted of 20 patients, requiring open reduction and internal fixation with 2.0 mm single ultra-locking titanium plate. Fracture was then stabilized and postoperative clinical examination was carried out on 3rd day, 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 8th week.

RESULT

Results of this study suggested that the use of single 2.0 mm locking miniplate could be a viable option instead of using two miniplates in anterior mandibular fracture as advocated by Champy, as it provides equally good outcome along with placement of lesser implant material.

DISCUSSION

Single locking miniplates give the advantage of equally good stability and early restoration of function with almost similar results as seen in osteosynthesis with two miniplates. It was also found that less precision was required in plate adaptation when using single locking miniplate. This study suggests that there is not much difference in surgical outcome with the use of either single locking miniplate or two conventional miniplates in anterior mandibular region.

Mini-plate removal in maxillofacial trauma patients during a five-year retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of indications for the removal of mini-plates over a five-year period in maxillofacial trauma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 530 patients who underwent treatment with mini-plate fixation after maxillofacial trauma were reviewed for a five-year period (May 2007 to May 2012). Patients were evaluated concerning the number of mini-plates removed, age and gender distributions, time between insertion and removal, indication for removal, and site of removal.

RESULTS

The plates of 120 patients were removed (26 females and 94 males). The removal rate was 22.6%. The most frequent indication for removal was patient demand (81.7%), followed by tooth extraction (7.5%), and pain (3.3%). The most frequent removal site was the mandible (95.0%).

CONCLUSION

The number of mini-plates removed was small, and the most common indication for removal was patient demand. There is no evidence to support a recommendation for the routine removal of titanium mini-plates.

Mandibular fractures - towards a national standard for "time to theatre" - national audit by the BAOMS Trauma Specialist Interest Group

Recent studies have shown that in most patients, a delay of several days in the treatment of mandibular fractures is not associated with adverse outcomes, and this has challenged the traditional practice of recommending treatment within 24hours. Longer hospital stays cost more and lower the patients' quality of life, but we know of no standard recommendation about when these patients should be treated. Our aim therefore was to find out how many patients had reduction and fixation of a fractured mandible by the end of the next working day, with a view to developing a national standard. We invited all oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) units in the UK to participate in a prospective audit over two months, and 35 agreed. Overall, 506 patients (80%) were operated on by the end of the next working day. The time to theatre varied from 1 hour 15minutes to 11 days, 20hours and 51minutes (median 22hours 7minutes). Patients admitted to units with an OMFS trauma list were more likely to be operated on by the next working day (p=0.011) as were those operated on at the weekend (p=0.019). We think that early fixation, return of function, and discharge, benefit patients most in terms of quality of life. Also, shorter hospital stays and reduced costs increase the availability of resources for elective operations. Setting a standard will improve our service and the care we deliver.

Review of Maxillofacial Hardware Complications and Indications for Salvage

From 2002 to 2006, more than 117,000 facial fractures were recorded in the U.S. National Trauma Database. These fractures are commonly treated with open reduction and internal fixation. While in place, the hardware facilitates successful bony union. However, when postoperative complications occur, the plates may require removal before bony union. Indications for salvage versus removal of the maxillofacial hardware are not well defined. A literature review was performed to identify instances when hardware may be salvaged. Articles considered for inclusion were found in the PubMed and Web of Science databases in August 2014 with the keywords maxillofacial trauma AND hardware complications OR indications for hardware removal. Included studies looked at human patients with only facial trauma and miniplate fixation, and presented data on complications and/or hardware removal. Fifteen articles were included. None were clinical trials. Complication data were presented by patient, fractures, and/or plate without consistency. The data described 1,075 fractures, 2,961 patients, and 2,592 plates, nonexclusive. Complication rates varied from 6 to 8% by fracture and 6 to 13% by patient. When their data were combined, 50% of complications were treated with plate removal; this was consistent across the mandible, midface, and upper face. All complications caused by loosening, nonunion, broken hardware, and severe/prolonged pain were treated with removal. Some complications caused by exposures, deformities, and infections were treated with salvage. Exposed plates were treated with flaps, plates with deformities were treated with secondary procedures including hardware revision, and hardware infections were treated with antibiotics alone or in conjunction with soft-tissue debridement and/or tooth extraction. Well-designed clinical trials evaluating hardware removal versus salvage are lacking. Some postoperative complications caused by exposure, deformity, and/or infection may be successfully treated with plate salvage. We propose an algorithm using this review and clinical expertise. We also propose that a national databank be created where surgeons can uniformly compile their patient information and examine it in a standardized format to further our understanding of clinical management.

Are open mandibular fractures still an emergency?

INTRODUCTION

Early surgical management is often advocated for fractures of the tooth-bearing portion of the mandible. A 6-hour delay has been mentioned for the fixation of these fractures. Our aim was to bring this paradigm into question.

METHODS

All patients referred to our department from September 2012 to May 2014 for fractures of the tooth-bearing portion of the mandible were retrospectively included. For each patient, age, gender, aetiology of the fracture, and characteristics of the fractures were recorded. Tobacco and/or alcohol addictions, diabetes and mandibular dental condition were taken into account. We also noticed the preoperative delay and the occurrence of complications such as: haematoma, infection, wound dehiscence, osteosynthesis failure and pseudarthrosis.

RESULTS

Among the 47 patients referred, 36 were treated with a delay of more than 6 hours (76.6%). In 88.8% of the cases, the reason for this delay was unavoidable. The mean delay time from trauma to surgery was 52 hours (range: 7-312). Forty-nine percent of the patients had comorbidities. Complications occurred in 6 patients leading to an overall complication rate of 16.67%. A statistically significant higher complication rate was observed among smokers (P=0.006). No statistical relationship was found between the delay and the occurrence of complications (P=0.994). This study suggests that fractures of the tooth-bearing portion of the mandible should no longer be considered as an emergency that must be treated within a 6-hour delay.

Avoiding occlusal derangement in facial fractures: An evidence based approach

Facial fractures with occlusal derangement describe any fracture which directly or indirectly affects the occlusal relationship. Such fractures include dento-alveolar fractures in the maxilla and mandible, midface fractures - Le fort I, II, III and mandible fractures of the symphysis, parasymphysis, body, angle, and condyle. In some of these fractures, the fracture line runs through the dento-alveolar component whereas in others the fracture line is remote from the occlusal plane nevertheless altering the occlusion. The complications that could ensue from the management of maxillofacial fractures are predominantly iatrogenic, and therefore can be avoided if adequate care is exercised by the operating surgeon. This paper does not emphasize on complications arising from any particular technique in the management of maxillofacial fractures but rather discusses complications in general, irrespective of the technique used.

Fixation of mandibular angle fractures: clinical studies

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to review the literature regarding the evolution of current thoughts on fixation of mandibular angle fractures (MAFs).

METHODS

An electronic search in PubMed was undertaken in August 2012. The titles and abstracts from these results were read to identify studies within the selection criteria. Eligibility criteria included studies from the last 30 years (from 1983 onwards) reporting clinical studies of MAFs.

RESULTS

The search strategy initially identified 767 studies. The references from 1983 onwards totaled 727 articles. Fifty-four studies were identified without repetition within the selection criteria. Two articles showing significance in the development of treatment techniques were included. Additional hand-searching yielded 13 additional papers. Thus, a total of 69 studies were included.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective randomized controlled studies of MAFs repair techniques are scarce. The available data at best predict that complications are associated with all kinds of fixation techniques. The similar results of complications in studies using different methods of fixation indicate that biomechanics are only one factor to be considered when treating MAFs. A second fracture in the mandible (which was observed in the majority of the studies' population) can confound the outcome data because the fixation requirements of a double fracture are often different from those for an isolated fracture. It can be necessary additional effort intended for increase of stability when using biodegradable plate system to fixate MAFs. The use of 1.3 mm malleable miniplates was associated with an unacceptable incidence of plate fracture, suggesting that this is not the most adequate system to treat MAFs. The use of the 3D grid plates has shown good clinical results. The efficiency of locking miniplate system is yet to be proven because there are few clinical studies with its use to fixate MAFs, although they have shown good results. When considering the use of semirigid or rigid fixation systems, the use of two miniplates outweigh the advantages of the use of one reconstruction plate, although the use of miniplates is not recommended for displaced comminuted MAFs. Although it has been shown that absolute rigid fixation is not necessary for fracture healing, any system that provides superior stability without impacting negatively on other aspects of the procedure, i.e., time, exposure, and cost, should be favored. MAFs can be treated in a highly effective way and with a relatively low rate of complications with monocortical miniplate fixation. The large number of studies on the treatment of MAF reflects the fact that a consensus has not been reached for a single, ideal treatment method.

Facial fracture management in northwest Nigeria

Background:

Facial fracture is gradually become a public health problem in our community due to the attendant morbidity and mortality. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine the pattern of facial fracture in Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital. This cross-sectional study was undertaken to provide information regarding gender, age, etiology, and diagnosis of patients with maxillofacial fractures.

Materials and Methods:

A 1-year review of patients diagnosed and treated for facial fractures in Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital between January 2011 and December 2011. The diagnosis was based on radiographic data and clinical examination. The main analysis outcome measures were etiology, age, gender, site, and treatment. Data were organized and presented by means of descriptive statistics and Pearson's Chi-square test. The level of significance adopted was 5%.

Results:

A total of 40 patients were treated in this period. Over 95% were male, 81% were caused by road traffic crash (RTC) and 86.4% were in the 21-30 years group. Most patients (52%) had mandibular fractures, and the most common site was the body. Most patients with midfacial fractures had fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary region (36%), while fractures of the parasymphyseal region were more common in the mandible 156 (31%). The most common treatment for jaw fractures was mandibulomaxillary fixation (MMF). Stable zygomatic complex fractures were reduced (elevated) intraorally, and unstable ones were supported by antral packs.

Conclusions:

This study highlights facial fractures secondary to RTC as a serious public health problem in our environment. Preventive strategies remain the cheapest way to reduce direct and indirect costs of the sequelae of RTC. It also bring to the fore the necessity to shift to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of fractures.