Early post-operative endodontic therapy limits inflammatory root resorption of autotransplanted maxillary canine teeth

Long term outcomes of en-block autotransplantation of a tooth

Repositioning of impacted teeth in the dental arch through en-bloc autotransplantation showed short-term efficacy of 89%. The objective of this study was to evaluate the technique for long-term efficacy. The analysis involved 23 teeth transplanted to the alveolar ridge through harvesting the tooth with the adjacent bone tissue. Development of the root was completed and the apical foramen was closed in all the teeth. The teeth were examined clinically and radiologically (CBCT) and compared to contralateral ones. The obtained data were analysed statistically. The efficacy of the procedure amounted to 81% including two teeth lost at an early stage and another two lost during follow-up. The mean age of patients upon performing the procedure was 29.8. The long-term follow-up amounted to the mean of 34.3 months. In the study group recession of 1-2 mm as well as 3-5 mm was found, which was not noted on the control group. In 11.1% of the study group teeth the external root resorption was observed. No transplanted tooth underwent root canal treatment, no periapical changes were observed at CBCT and 77.8% of those showed positive reaction to ethyl chloride. One case of ankylosis was observed in tooth 11 and in two cases increased mobility of the transplanted tooth was found. Regeneration of nerves as well as revascularization in the en-bloc autotransplantation proceeded with high predictability and the risk of ankylosis of the treated tooth seemed to be negligible. Gingival recession was observed more often in case of en-bloc transplantation compared to the control group. The long-term follow-up suggested that this the technique does not prevent external resorption in 100%.

Autogenous transalveolar transplantation of maxillary canines: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objectives

The objective was to systematically review transalveolar transplantation of maxillary canines and the long-term outcome for an average follow-up period of 2 years or more.

Data collection and analysis

A systematic review of the currently available literature until December 2017 was conducted, using Medline, Cochrane Central, Web off Science, and PubMed. Articles were screened for 1. indications, 2. contra-indications, 3. surgical planning, 4. surgical technique, 5. associated risk factors, and 6. long-term outcome for transalveolar transplantation of maxillary canines with the following outcome measures: bone-related outcomes, tooth-related outcomes, soft tissue-related outcomes, and aesthetic outcome measures. Descriptive statistics, as well as a quality assessment of included articles, were performed. Following study retrieval and selection, relevant data was extracted and the risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).

Results

Twelve articles were included in this review. These studies included outcome data for 783 autotransplanted maxillary canines, with long-term studies indicating a clinically acceptable overall outcome.

Limitations

Since the lack of randomized controlled trials considering this topic, the quality of the evidence in the present review is considered low. However, impacted maxillary canines are a rare anomaly and different aspects, such as position of the impacted canine, patient’s age and patient’s demands, and expectancies must be taken into account, it is practically impossible to randomize treatment.

Conclusions

There is sufficient evidence to justify the transalveolar transplantation of maxillary canines as a legitimate treatment technique for impacted maxillary canines deemed difficult to treat with surgical exposure and subsequent orthodontic alignment. Long-term studies have shown that a good overall outcome is to be expected. There is no clear agreement in the literature on the indications and contra-indications for transalveolar transplantation of maxillary canines.

Implication of key findings

It is highly desirable that further research on this issue be undertaken, high-quality observational studies are recommended.

Registration

PROSPERO (CRD42017056348)

Development and validation of the autotransplanted maxillary canine radiological index

The purpose of this study was to propose and validate an index evaluating 2D and 3D radiographic variables of autotransplanted maxillary canines. Setting and sample population are from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at University Hospitals Leuven. Eight oral-maxillofacial surgeons rated 12 autotransplanted maxillary canines and adjacent bone using 11 rating variables. A new autotransplanted maxillary canine radiological index (AMCRI) was proposed. It consisted of 11 variables. These variables were based on 2D (intraoral) and 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) radiographs. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Fleiss's kappa statistics were performed to analyze intrarater and interrater agreement. Considering cumulative assessment of the AMCRI, the mean ICC value for the interrater agreement of the eight examiners was 0.94, representing an excellent agreement. Intrarater agreement was 0.91. The AMCRI is an objective tool in rating radiological outcome of autotransplanted canines and adjacent bone, when compared with the contralateral canine.