Intra-articular fractures at the base of the fifth metacarpal. A clinical and radiographical study of 64 cases

Delayed Diagnosis of Dislocation of All Four Ulnar Carpometacarpal Joints. Surgical Treatment Strategy and Challenges

Background  Carpometacarpal dislocations are rare injuries whose diagnosis is often missed initially. These injuries can be treated conservatively, as long as an anatomical closed reduction is achieved. However, in most cases, open reduction followed by internal or external fixation is necessary to reach a stable anatomical reduction. Case Description  A 32-year-old male was referred to our institution due to excess swelling of his right hand, 2 months after a motorcycle crash he sustained. During our imaging workup, a dorsal carpometacarpal dislocation of all four ulnar metacarpals was found accompanied by a fracture of the base of the fifth metacarpal. An open reduction was achieved using Kirschner wires and a small plate for arthrodesis of the fifth carpometacarpal joint. The postoperative follow-up on the 3rd, 6th, and 12th month was uncomplicated. The range of motion and grip strength was satisfactory on the 3rd month and almost full on the 6th month compared to the unaffected side. Literature Review  Carpometacarpal dislocations are rare hand injuries. They are often the result of a high-energy injury and their diagnosis is usually delayed or missed. The main reasons are the excessive pain and swelling of the hand which make the initial clinical examination difficult and the overlapping of the metacarpals on the X-ray, which make the radiological diagnosis challenging. Case Relevance  A delayed diagnosis needs urgent open surgical treatment to achieve an anatomical reduction due to the interposition of soft tissue, bony fragments, and newly formed callus. Diagnosis and treatment of these injuries demands a high clinical suspicion from the traumatologist. The role of computed tomography scan is invaluable and open reduction is the mainstay of treatment for the cases that are diagnosed late.

Treatment of Fourth and Fifth Carpometacarpal Fracture-Dislocations in Punching Injuries With Motion-Sparing Hamate Fixation Spring Plates: "Rabbit Ears" Plating

Punching injuries to the hand are frequent and can result in fourth and fifth carpometacarpal (CMC) fracture-dislocations. Fourth and fifth CMC fracture-dislocations are unstable, and dorsal metacarpal dislocations are most common. Operative management for maintaining reduction of the unstable fracture-dislocation was closed reduction and percutaneous pinning; however, in delayed fractures, open reduction is necessary. We report on a plating technique used for acute and delayed, unstable fourth and/or fifth CMC fracture-dislocations. This method of plating is novel and allows for physiological motion at the CMC joint through a dorsal buttressing mechanism while maintaining joint reduction. The range of motion begins within the first week postoperatively, and full composite fist formation and digital extension occur 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. This novel technique affords an alternative effective surgical treatment option with excellent outcomes for patients presenting with fourth and fifth CMC fracture-dislocations up to 12 weeks following the injury.

Metacarpal fractures

Metacarpal fractures are common and can be functionally disabling. The majority are managed non-operatively. When surgical intervention is indicated, various methods of fixation are available with the utility of each being based on injury pattern, patient function and surgeon preference. Early mobilization, especially in case of open reduction and internal fixation, is a critical component of treatment to prevent stiffness and restore function. When possible, a fixation construct that can withstand the applied forces of early postoperative motion is chosen. We provide an updated description for diagnosis, treatment options and operative fixation for metacarpal fractures.

Surgical Outcomes of Percutaneous Pinning and Open Locking Plating in Patients With Intra-articular Fractures of the Base of the Fifth Metacarpal

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to demonstrate the results of surgical treatment, including percutaneous K-wire fixation after closed reduction (CRKF) or locking plate fixation after open reduction (ORPF), in patients with intra-articular fractures of the base of the fifth metacarpal.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of 29 patients who received surgical treatment for closed, intra-articular fractures of the base of the fifth metacarpal and were followed up for at least 1 year after surgery. Sixteen of the 29 patients underwent CRKF, whereas 13 patients underwent ORPF. Attempts were made to address intra-articular step-off with closed reduction in all the patients; however, if inadequate, ORPF was performed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, visual analog scale pain scores, the total active motion (TAM) of the little finger, and grip strength. Osseous union and posttraumatic arthritis of the fifth carpometacarpal joint were also evaluated.

RESULTS

K-wire fixation after closed reduction was performed for 13 simple fractures and 3 comminuted fractures; ORPF was performed for 6 simple fractures and 7 comminuted fractures. All the patients had satisfactory subjective outcomes with over 90% grip strength compared with that on the contralateral side and nearly full TAM. All the patients in both the groups achieved osseous union. There were five cases of grade 1 posttraumatic arthritis after CRKF and seven cases of grade 1 posttraumatic arthritis after ORPF.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment provided satisfactory results in patients with intra-articular fractures of the base of the fifth metacarpal treated with either CRKF or ORPF. Our data showed that the patients who underwent CPKF had good results, and those who underwent ORPF after attempt failure of close reduction also had good results. Our experience suggests that ORPF can be a backup plan when CRKF cannot be accomplished in a satisfactory way.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Ulnar Wrist Denervation: Articular Branching Pattern and Selective Blockade of the Dorsal Branch of the Ulnar Nerve

PURPOSE

Ulnar wrist denervation has been a successful treatment for patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain. The purpose of this study was to characterize the articular branches of the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve (DBUN) and validate a technique for selective peripheral nerve blockade.

METHODS

In cadavers, we performed simulated local anesthetic injections using 0.5 mL of 0.5% methylene into the subcutaneous tissue at a point midway between the palpable borders of the pisiform and ulnar styloid. We then dissected the DBUN, characterized its articular branching pattern, and measured staining intensity of the DBUN and the ulnar nerve relative to a standard.

RESULTS

The DBUN branched from the ulnar nerve 7.0 ± 1.2 cm proximal to the ulnar styloid. Among 17 specimens, the DBUN provided an average of 1.2 (range, 0-2) ulnocarpal branches and 1.0 (range, 0-2) carpometacarpal articular branches. A simulated local anesthetic injection successfully stained 100% of the DBUN articular branches at or proximal to their takeoff. There was no staining of the proper ulnar nerves. In all specimens, the DBUN supplied at least one articular branch.

CONCLUSIONS

A point midway between the palpable border of the pisiform and ulnar styloid may be an effective location for selectively blocking the DBUN articular afferents.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In this study, we were able to identify a point halfway between the pisiform and ulnar styloid that has the potential to produce a selective peripheral nerve block of the portion of the DBUN that supplies articular fibers to the ulnocarpal joint and the fifth carpometacarpal joint. This technique may prove useful to surgeons treating ulnar-sided wrist pain.

Intermetacarpal M4-M5 arthrodesis (Dubert procedure) for fifth carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: long-term functional outcomes

The goal of this study was to describe the long-term functional outcomes of the procedure described by Dubert (stabilized arthroplasty with intermetacarpal arthrodesis) for painful carpometacarpal impingement of the little finger. Between 2005 and 2017, 8 patients (1 woman and 7 men) were operated on who had a mean age of 38 years (24-53 years). Seven cases were post-traumatic (malunion) and one was due to septic arthritis. A total of 5 patients were available for a retrospective clinical, functional, and radiological follow-up at a mean of 73 months (23-108 months). Clinical parameters included pain on VAS, grip strength, Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, and a subjective hand value (0-100%). Fusion was achieved in all cases. Of the 8 patients, one developed complex regional pain syndrome and one had persistent pain that required secondary proximal metacarpal resection. At the last follow-up, all patients were satisfied and reported a significant reduction in pain and improvement in strength. Mean Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation and subjective hand value were 19/100 points, 21/100 points and 75%, respectively. Our study suggests that the stabilized arthroplasty of the fifth finger, as describe by Dubert, is an efficient and reliable method to reduce pain and improve hand function in patients suffering from carpometacarpal impingement of the little finger. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: retrospective series, IV.

Bone plate fixation ability on the dorsal and lateral sides of a metacarpal shaft transverse fracture

Background

Metacarpal shaft fractures are a common hand trauma. The current surgical fixation options for such fractures include percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning and nonlocking and locking plate fixation. Although bone plate fixation, compared with Kirschner wire pinning, has superior fixation ability, a consensus has not been reached on whether the bone plate is better placed on the dorsal or lateral side.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fixation of locking and regular bone plates on the dorsal and lateral sides of a metacarpal shaft fracture.

Materials and methods

Thirty-five artificial metacarpal bones were used in the experiment. Metacarpal shaft fractures were created using a saw blade, which were then treated with four types of fixation as follows: (1) a locking plate with four locking bicortical screws on the dorsal side (LP_D); (2) a locking plate with four locking bicortical screws on the lateral side (LP_L); (3) a regular plate with four regular bicortical screws on the dorsal side (RP_D); (4) a regular plate with four regular bicortical screws on the lateral side (RP_D); and (5) two K-wires (KWs). All specimens were tested through cantilever bending tests on a material testing system. The maximum fracture force and stiffness of the five fixation types were determined based on the force–displacement data. The maximum fracture force and stiffness of the specimens with metacarpal shaft fractures were first analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s test.

Results

The maximum fracture force results of the five types of metacarpal shaft fracture were as follows: LP_D group (230.1 ± 22.8 N, mean ± SD) ≅ RP_D group (228.2 ± 13.4 N) > KW group (94.0 ± 17.4 N) > LP_L group (59.0 ± 7.9 N) ≅ RP_L group (44.5 ± 3.4 N). In addition, the stiffness results of the five types of metacarpal shaft fracture were as follows: LP_D group (68.7 ± 14.0 N/mm) > RP_D group (54.9 ± 3.2 N/mm) > KW group (20.7 ± 5.8 N/mm) ≅ LP_L group (10.6 ± 1.7 N/mm) ≅ RP_L group (9.4 ± 1.2 N/mm).

Conclusion

According to our results, the mechanical strength offered by lateral plate fixation of a metacarpal shaft fracture is so low that even KW fixation can offer relatively superior mechanical strength; this is regardless of whether a locking or nonlocking plate is used for lateral plate fixation. Such fixation can reduce the probability of extensor tendon adhesion. Nevertheless, our results indicated that when lateral plate fixation is used for fixating a metacarpal shaft fracture in a clinical setting, whether the mechanical strength offered by such fixation would be strong enough to support bone union remains questionable.

Effect of a figure-of-eight cerclage wire with two Kirschner wires on fixation strength for transverse metacarpal shaft fractures: an in vitro study with artificial bone

BACKGROUND

Metacarpal shaft fractures are a common type of hand fracture. Despite providing strong fixation strength, plate fixation has numerous shortcomings. Concerning internal fixation with Kirschner wires (K-wires), although this approach is frequently used to treat metacarpal shaft fractures, the lack of functional stability may result in fixation failure.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of figure-of-eight cerclage wire on fixation for transverse metacarpal shaft fractures using two K-wires.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used a saw blade to create transverse metacarpal shaft fractures in 14 fourth-generation artificial third metacarpal bones (Sawbones, Vashon, WA, USA), which were assigned to groups undergoing fixation with two K-wires (KP) or with two K-wires and figure-of-eight cerclage wire (KP&F8). All specimens were subjected to material testing, specifically cantilever bending tests. The maximum fracture force and stiffness of the two fixation types were determined on the basis of the force-displacement data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare between-group differences in maximum fracture force and stiffness.

RESULTS

The maximum fracture force of the KP group (median ± interquartile range = 97.30 ± 29.70 N) was significantly lower than that of the KP&F8 group (153.2 ± 69.50 N, p < 0.05; Figure 5a), with the median of the KP&F8 group exceeding that of the KP group by 57.5%. Similarly, stiffness was significantly lower in the KP group (18.14 ± 9.84 N/mm) than in the KP&F8 group (38.25 ± 23.49 N/mm; p < 0.05; Figure 5b), with the median of the KP&F8 group exceeding that of the KP group by 110.9%.

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of a figure-of-eight cerclage wire increased the maximum fracture force and stiffness by 57.5 and 110.9%, respectively, compared with those achieved in standard two K-wire fixation. Therefore, hand surgeons are advised to consider the proposed approach to increase fixation strength.

Carpometacarpal Fracture-Dislocations: A Retrospective Review of Injury Characteristics and Radiographic Outcomes

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the demographics and early radiographic treatment outcome of patients with carpometacarpal (CMC) injuries at our institution over a 10-year period. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who sustained CMC injuries of the second to fifth digits between 2005 and 2015. We recorded demographic data, mechanisms of and associated injuries, treatment methods, and complications. Injury and intraoperative and postoperative radiographs were evaluated, and the adequacy of reduction was determined on lateral radiographs of the hand using a grading system that we developed. Results: Eighty patients were included in this study. Delivering a blow with a closed fist was the most common mechanism of injury; however, high-energy mechanisms also made up a large percentage of those included. Injuries to the fourth and fifth CMC joints were most common, and these were frequently associated with fractures of the metacarpal bases and distal carpal row. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning offered a higher percentage of patients with concentric reduction at the time of pin removal. Time to surgery was significantly different between those with concentric reduction and those with residual subluxation. Conclusion: The most common mechanism of CMC injuries was blow with a closed fist; however, these injuries can be associated with high-energy mechanisms. Fractures of the metacarpal base and distal carpal row are commonly seen with these injuries. With early diagnosis, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning achieved concentric radiographic reduction. Delayed diagnosis makes closed reduction difficult and was associated with less favorable radiographic outcome.

Open Reduction for Dorsal Dislocation of Second to Fifth Carpometacarpal Joints: A Case Report

Background  Fracture-dislocations of all four ulnar (second to fifth) carpometacarpal (CMC) joints are rare hand injuries and frequently overlooked or missed. These injuries can be treated conservatively when closed reduction is successfully achieved, though they are sometimes irreducible and unstable. Case Description  We report the case of a 17-year-old boy involved in a vehicular accident. Clinical images showed dorsal dislocation of all four ulnar CMC joints of the left hand associated with a fracture of the base of the fourth metacarpal. Although closed reduction was attempted immediately, the affected joints remained unstable and easily redislocated. Therefore, we performed open reduction and percutaneous fixation of all ulnar CMCs. He showed excellent recovery after 1 year postoperatively, reported no pain, and demonstrated complete grip strength and range of motion of the affected wrist and fingers. Literature Review  Accurate clinical diagnosis of this lesion is difficult because of polytrauma, severe swelling masking the dislocated CMC joint deformity, and overlapping of adjacent metacarpals and carpal bones on radiographic examination. As for the treatment strategy, it has yet to obtain a consensus. Some reports value open reduction to guarantee anatomical reduction, and it is definitely needed in the patients with interposed tissues to be removed or with subacute and chronic injuries. Clinical Relevance  Delayed diagnosis or treatment could lead to poor outcomes. Therefore, surgeons must be aware that precise preoperative assessment is critical, and anatomical open reduction of interposed bony fragments, like our case, may be required even in an acute phase.

Ulnar-sided carpometacarpal fractures and fractures-dislocations. A systematic review and publication guidelines

BACKGROUND

Intra-articular fractures and fracture-dislocations of the ulnar-sided carpometacarpal joints (US-CMC) are common and under-reported. Their diagnosis is often delayed or incomplete, and there is no consensus as to the best treatment. The aim of this systematic literature review was to focus on the quality of existing data and to describe in detail the available evidence on the diagnosis and treatment of these lesions. Based on our findings, we will propose guidelines for improving the design of future studies on these lesions.

METHODS

This systematic literature review looked at all articles published between 1918 and 2019 on US-CMC fractures and fracture-dislocations. The quality of the articles was evaluated using the Quality Appraisal Tool devised by Moga et al. Information on the diagnostic and therapeutic methods were extracted along with epidemiological data, classifications, and clinical and radiological outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 500 articles identified, 13 were included. According to the Quality Appraisal Tool, three of these articles had acceptable quality. While either radiographs or CT scans were used for the diagnosis, the radiographs were insufficient to precisely describe the lesions and guide the treatment. Conservative treatment or percutaneous surgical treatment was preferred for acute stable lesions without extensive fractures or comminution, while open surgical treatment was used most often in cases of unstable or sub-acute fractures and fracture-dislocations.

DISCUSSION

The current literature on this topic is made up of case series with a low level of evidence. CT is needed to assess and classify these lesions and select between conservative and surgical treatment. Unstable cases or those with delayed presentation should be treated with an open surgical approach. Based on our findings, we propose reporting guidelines for future studies on the treatment of US-CMC fractures and fracture-dislocations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

New Locked-Wire-Type External Fixator (the Ichi-Fixator) for Fourth and Fifth Carpometacarpal Joint Dislocation

We developed a new fixation method that involves the insertion of two wires and external wire fixation using a metal clamp. The aim of this technique was to increase the stability and rigidity of conventional percutaneous Kirchner wire fixation. Here, we present a patient with dislocation of the fourth and fifth carpometacarpal joints who was satisfactorily treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation with a linking external wire fixator (Ichi-Fixator). Operative treatment using the Ichi-Fixator system facilitates anatomical reduction and immediate full mobilization, resulting in good outcomes. The patient could perform all routine activities with normal grip strength and a full range of hand motion without pain. Such a treatment that improves comfort after the operation and may allow an immediate return to work will clearly boost patient satisfaction. Linked external wire-type fixation enables enhanced security of fixation, facilitates postoperative mobilization, and may allow an immediate return to work.

Biomechanical Comparison of Fifth Carpometacarpal Fusion Methods: Kirschner Wires Versus Plate and Screws

Background:

Fractures and dislocations of the base of the fifth metacarpal can lead to arthritis of the fifth carpometacarpal (CMC) joint. For patients who are symptomatic and fail conservative management, arthrodesis of the fifth CMC joint can be offered. The fusion can be performed using Kirschner wires (K-wires), but can lead to complications such as pin tract infection and pin migration. A low-profile locking plate may represent an attractive alternative. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of these 2 fusion techniques.

Methods:

Twelve fresh frozen cadaver hands were divided into 2 groups. The first group underwent fixation of the fifth CMC joint using 2 1.6 mm (0.062 inches) diameter K-wires in a cross-pin configuration. The second group underwent fixation using a 2.0 mm locking plate with 2 locking screws in the hamate and 3 nonlocking screws in the fifth metacarpal shaft. The specimens were then loaded in extension until failure.

Results:

The stiffness was 15.0±7.2 N/mm for the K-wire group and 14.7±6.0 N/mm (mean±SD) for the plate group (P=0.9366). The peak loads were 62.5±40.0 N and 64.6±24.8 N for K-wire and plate groups, respectively (P=0.9181). The energy to peak load was 294±281 N mm for the K-wire group and 418±190 N mm for the plate group (P=0.3904).

Conclusions:

Fifth CMC fusion using either K-wires or plate and screws showed no significant difference in stiffness, peak load, and energy to peak load. These results suggest the 2 methods provide similar biomechanical stability.

Management of fracture-dislocations of the little finger carpometacarpal joint: a systematic review

Fracture-dislocations of the carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) of the little ray involve dorsal subluxation of the metacarpal base and they may be associated with injury of neighbouring CMCJs. Different treatment options are described, with no clear consensus on their management. This study presents a systematic review of comparative studies describing the management of these injuries. A bespoke search strategy was applied across multiple databases. Results were screened against specified stepwise inclusion criteria and data were extracted independently by two authors with discrepancy resolution by a third. Of 437 search results, six comparative studies were identified. Comparisons included non-operative or early mobilization versus fixation K-wires or open reduction and internal fixation. Conclusions were mixed; all studies had critical or significant risks of bias (using the ROBINS-I tool) and there was heterogeneity between studies.

Management of complications of periarticular fractures of the distal interphalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, metacarpophalangeal, and carpometacarpal joints

Fractures involving the bones of the hand are among the most common injuries in the United States. A significant portion of these fractures are periarticular. Although the great majority of these fractures are treated successfully by nonoperative means, complications arise. We present a comprehensive review of prevention and management of complications of periarticular fractures of the distal interphalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, metacarpophalangeal, and carpometacarpal joints.

Fracture-dislocations of the carpometacarpal joints of the ring and little finger

We report the functional and radiographic results of 16 patients with fracture-dislocations of the ring and little finger carpometacarpal joints and 23 cases with fracture-dislocations of only the little finger carpometacarpal joint treated between 2006 and 2012. The above two cohort populations of patients were treated with either open reduction and pin fixation or closed reduction and pin fixation. These patients were followed for a mean of 13 months (range 9 to 48). The DASH scores for patients with fracture-dislocations of the ring and little finger carpometacarpal joints were 6.0 and of the little finger carpometacarpal joint 7.2. We found no functional differences in term of DASH scores after treatment between patients with fracture-dislocations of only the little finger carpometacarpal joint and both the ring and little finger carpometacarpal joints.

Intra-articular fractures of the hand

Fractures of the hand are common injuries and in particular, fractures involving the articular surfaces can present difficulties to the orthopedic surgeon in practice. Although the treatment of these fractures needs to be individualized based on fracture pattern and location, the goals for these fractures are to restore the alignment, stability, and congruity and to allow for early motion to prevent stiffness and traumatic arthritis. This article classifies the various types of intra-articular hand fractures as well as the workup and management of these injuries.

Current management of metacarpal fractures

Metacarpal fractures are common, and many can be managed nonoperatively with appropriate reduction and immobilization. As with any hand fracture, the primary goals are to achieve anatomic and stable reduction, bony union, and early mobilization to minimize disability. Appropriate treatment requires a keen understanding of the types of fractures, their inherent stability, and the available treatment options. Functional outcomes depend on appropriate treatment and early range of motion whenever possible.

Rate of clinically significant posttraumatic arthritis after small finger intra-articular carpometacarpal fractures

Although small finger intra-articular carpometacarpal joint fractures are relatively common hand injuries, few studies in the orthopedic literature report their clinical outcomes. The goal of this study was to analyze the rate of symptomatic posttraumatic arthritis following small finger intra-articular carpometacarpal joint fractures. The authors performed a chart review of 82 consecutive patients with a small finger intra-articular carpometacarpal fractures treated at their institution over a 5-year period. Operative indications included irreducible small finger intra-articular carpometacarpal fractures and recurrent small finger carpometacarpal joint instability after attempted reduction. Group 1 included 66 patients with small finger intra-articular carpometacarpal fractures who were treated with cast immobilization alone for 6 weeks, whereas group 2 included 16 patients treated surgically followed by 6 weeks of cast immobilization. Clinical outcome parameters included posttreatment serial radiographs, a visual scale based on subjective pain scores (0-10) as part of a routine clinic intake form, and the need for subsequent small finger carpometacarpal arthrodesis. All patients included in the study had a minimum 12-month follow-up. In group 1, 6 (9.1%) of 66 patients developed symptomatic posttraumatic arthritis and required a subsequent small finger carpometacarpal arthrodesis. In group 2, none of the patients developed symptomatic posttraumatic arthritis or required arthrodesis. This study reports a relatively higher rate of small finger carpometacarpal arthrodesis after closed treatment alone for intra-articular small finger carpometacarpal fractures compared with open treatment, suggesting that anatomic alignment is important in this injury pattern.

Arthroplasty of the scaphoid-trapezium-trapezoid and carpometacarpal joints

Resection arthroplasty is an old, and yet reliable, solution for the isolated osteoarthritis (OA) of some joints of the hand. With complication low rates, this technically undemanding option is ideal for scapho-trapezial-trapezoidal joint OA, as well as for the OA of the carpometacarpal joints of the fingers. This paper reviews its indications, surgical technique, and results.

The safest direction of percutaneous pinning for achieving firm fixing of the fifth carpometacarpal joint

INTRODUCTION

Traditional treatment of unstable fifth carpometacarpal joint injuries is closed reduction and pinning. The purpose of this study was to determine the safest corridor for pinning of the fifth carpometacarpal joint to prevent iatrogenic injury to the ulnar nerve and tendons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the first phase of study, three fresh cadavers were dissected and the safest directions of Kirschner wire (k-wire) insertion in the coronal and sagittal planes were determined for k-wire entrance 2 cm distal to the base of the fifth metacarpal. The second phase objective was to evaluate the accuracy of data obtained in the previous phase. Therefore, with five other cadavers, k-wires were inserted in a combination of maximum angles in different planes determined previously. The ulnar nerve branches and tendons were then investigate to detect possible damage. In the third phase, four fresh carpometacarpal joints were fixed with directions outside the range of the defined angles.

RESULTS

The safe direction determined in the first phase was a 20°-30° coronal plane angle relative to the body of the fifth metacarpal bone and between 10° volar to dorsal to 20° dorsal to volar angle in the sagittal plane. Insertion of k-wires in the second phase could fix the fifth carpometacarpal joint firmly without penetration of the volar and dorsal cortices of the hamate. All inserted k-wires outside the defined range resulted in injuries to nerves or tendons or loose fixing.

CONCLUSION

The safest corridor for pinning unstable fifth carpometacarpal injuries is 2 cm distal to the joint at an angle of 20°-30° to the coronal plane from 10° volar to dorsal to 20° dorsal to volar direction in the sagittal plane.

[Treatment strategy for carpometacarpal fracture dislocation]

Carpometacarpal (CMC) fracture dislocations of the 2nd through 5th ray are rare injuries whose extent is regularly underestimated in the initial radiographic evaluation of the hand. Obtaining a computed tomography scan is imperative due to the radiographic underrepresentation of the full bone and joint injury. Restoration of bone and joint anatomy of the affected region is of paramount import to prevent joint deterioration and loss of hand durability and dexterity. Early surgical intervention can lead to good functional results. Different operative treatment strategies exist with a common approach being Kirschner wire, screw or plate fixation after closed or open fracture reduction and joint relocation.

Principles of hand fracture management

The hand is essential in humans for physical manipulation of their surrounding environment. Allowing the ability to grasp, and differentiated from other animals by an opposing thumb, the main functions include both fine and gross motor skills as well as being a key tool for sensing and understanding the immediate surroundings of their owner. Hand fractures are the most common fractures presenting at both accident and emergency and within orthopaedic clinics. Appropriate evaluation at first presentation, as well as during their management, can significantly prevent both morbidity and disability to a patient. These decisions are dependant on a wide range of factors including age, hand dominance, occupation and co-morbidities.A fracture is best described as a soft tissue injury with an associated bony injury. Despite this being the case, this paper intends to deal mainly with the bone injury and aims to discuss both the timing, as well as the methods available, of hand fracture management.

Evaluation of an evidence-based patient pathway for non-surgical and surgically managed metacarpal fractures

Introduction

A review of current literature was used to develop an evidence-based pathway, managing surgical and non-surgical metacarpal fractures according to their anatomical location and fracture stability. The aim of this paper is to evaluate functional outcome, splint compliance, range of motion (ROM), residual pain, return to work and patient satisfaction following treatment based on the pathway.

Method

Fifty patients referred for surgical or non-surgical management of metacarpal fracture(s) were selected to participate in the clinical evaluation. Patient demographics, fracture site, management approach, type of splint, number of appointments attended and complications were recorded. A telephone questionnaire was used to evaluate patient satisfaction, compliance with splinting, ROM, pain, return to work and functional outcome. Recorded complications included infection, malunion, nonunion, rotational deformity and angulation deformity.

Results

Thirty-six patients were contactable 10–24 weeks post-injury. A total of 23 metacarpal neck/head, eight shaft and four base fractures were included. Ninety-four percent (34/36) of fractures were treated non-operatively. Patients were compliant with splinting in 17/36 (47%) cases. There were no reported complications. Seventy-two percent reported no pain at follow-up. All employed patients returned to work. Full ROM was reported in all cases. Full functional use of the hand was present in 92% of cases. Patients reported high satisfaction with the service (8/10) and required an average of three therapy appointments.

Conclusion

The metacarpal fracture evidence-based pathway was successful with 92% of patients returning to full function. The absence of complications emphasizes hand therapy's ability to efficiently and cost-effectively manage these fractures following referral. The pathway has been further refined as a result of the clinical evaluation, with alteration of the metacarpal shaft fracture splint, removal of repeat X-rays and reduction of splinting durations. It is recommended that the revised pathway is further evaluated.

Hand therapy management of metacarpal fractures: an evidence-based patient pathway

Introduction

Metacarpal fracture injuries are commonly referred to hand therapy departments, and may account for up to 40% of all hand fractures. These fractures are managed with either a surgical or non-surgical approach depending on their location and stability. Evidence for the effective therapy management of these fractures is sparse, varied and of poor quality and does not provide a ‘gold standard’ therapeutic treatment approach.

Methods

A literature review was performed to develop an evidence-based patient pathway that accounts for the location and stability of a fracture, minimizes the risks associated with metacarpal fractures and prevents secondary complications from developing.

Results

An evidence-based patient pathway for metacarpal fractures is presented that prevents unnecessary immobilization of unaffected joints and facilitates timely return to function.

Conclusion

The hand therapy management of metacarpal fracture pathway accounts for the location of the fracture, stability and surgical or non-surgical management based on best available evidence. It is recommended that the patient pathway be evaluated against functional outcome measures to ensure patients achieve optimal results.

"Stabilized arthroplasty" for old fracture dislocations of the fifth carpometacarpal joint

The procedure of stabilized arthroplasty we present in this paper aims at a global functional restoration of old fracture dislocations of the fifth carpometacarpal joint. The conflict is eliminated by resecting the base of the metacarpal, whereas length of the fifth digit ray is restored by fusion to the adjacent fourth metacarpal. Fifth metacarpal mobility is maintained via transfer to the fourth carpometacarpal joint. The base of the fifth metacarpal is resected through a dorso-lateral approach to the fourth-fifth intermetacarpal space. The preferred plane of resection is not perpendicular to the shaft of the metacarpal but parallel to the distal articular surface of the hamatum which faces 30 degrees anteriorly. A 5 to 10 mm resection is possible without compromising the insertion of extensor carpi ulnaris. The fifth metacarpal must then be temporarily fixed by 1 or 2 intermetacarpal K-wires in the preferred position. The cortical bones on both sides of the proximal fourth intermetacarpal space must then be refreshed over 1 to 1.5 cm and the space filled with cancellous bone graft. The osteosynthesis of the lateral fusion is secured by 2 transverse screws including the 4 cortices. A temporary distal metaphyseal wire relieves forces until bone fusion. Compared with the more commonly used operative procedures, stabilized arthroplasty provides a better mobility than arthrodesis and restores metacarpal length better than nonstabilized resectional arthroplasty. Nevertheless, it can only be done given the fourth carpometacarpal joint is intact.

[Treatment of metacarpal fractures. Recommendations of the Hand Surgery Group of the German Trauma Society]

The major goal in the treatment of metacarpal fractures is to restore the normal function of the hand. Radiological criteria and the clinical extent of displacement should be individually considered when taking the decision for or against conservative treatment. Internal fixation techniques must protect soft tissue structures. Small screws and plates have proven effective for head and shaft fractures, whereas intramedullary splinting is favoured for neck fractures. In instable and displaced fractures of the base of the first metacarpal, surgery is regularly performed to restore the bony shape and articular surface. To prevent functional impairments, early mobilization is desirable both during conservative treatment and following internal fixation.

Management of intra-articular metacarpal base fractures of the second through fifth metacarpals

Intra-articular fractures of the second through fifth metacarpal bases are uncommon injuries but can result in serious morbidity if improperly managed. These injuries usually occur because of forced flexion of the wrist with simultaneous extension of the arm, as occurs with a punch or a fall. As there are few large series of reports for these injuries, there is no consensus in the current literature on the most appropriate treatment for them. Whereas some authors have reported successful results after closed reduction, many recommend open reduction with internal fixation to ensure the integrity of the tendinous insertions of the extensor carpi radialis longus, extensor carpi radialis brevis, and extensor carpi ulnaris. This article reviews the case reports and case series extant in the literature concerning intra-articular fractures of the bases of the second through fifth metacarpals, and it provides important diagnostic and management considerations for these injuries.

Degenerative and post-traumatic arthritis affecting the carpometacarpal joints of the fingers

Symptomatic post-traumatic arthritis affecting the finger CMC joints is less common than might otherwise be expected based on the frequency of injury, especially to the fifth CMC joint. For the fifth CMC joint, the shallow concavoconvex articulation combined with the typical fracture location may provide a protective effect. Non-operative measures are typically successful, except in cases of missed fracture/dislocations and symptomatic joint instability. In these instances, re-construction emphasizes stability first, with an eye toward mobility for the ulnar column. It is common to detect a bony prominence in the region of the dorsal second and third CMC joints during examination of the hand. In most instances, the projection is asymptomatic and likely represents an os styloideum [18]. When painful and unresponsive to nonoperative treatments, this carpometacarpal boss can be excised surgically.

Clinical results of intraarticular fractures of the base of the fifth metacarpal treated by closed reduction and cast immobilization

This retrospective study evaluated the results of closed reduction and cast immobilization for isolated intraarticular fractures of the base of the fifth metacarpal. Twenty-two of 37 such fractures were available for follow-up at an average of 43 months, and these had all healed at an average of 5 weeks without any cast complications. Twenty patients reported excellent or good results, and two reported fair or poor results. At follow-up, 13 had no arthrosis and nine had mild arthrosis of the carpometacarpal joint. However, outcome was not influenced by fracture type, the degree of subluxation or articular step off, or the presence of arthrosis. We conclude that isolated fractures of the base of the fifth metacarpal can be reliably treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization.

Proximal fractures of the fifth metacarpal: a retrospective analysis of 25 operated cases

The clinical and radiological outcomes of 25 surgically treated fractures of the proximal third of the fifth metacarpal were retrospectively analysed. Many different methods of osteosynthesis were used. At follow-up after a mean of 3.3 years, 15 of 25 patients had no pain. Most patients regained a nearly full range of motion in the adjacent joints and more than 90% of the contralateral grip strength. X-ray signs of degenerative arthritis in the metacarpohamate joint were observed in 10 of 25 patients. Pain was found to be directly correlated with the presence of degenerative changes.

Percutaneous treatment of carpal, metacarpal, and phalangeal injuries

Percutaneous fixation of hand fractures is a common technique that takes advantage of the subcutaneous nature of hand bones, their small size, and their limited loading potential for stress placed on hardware. Percutaneous wire fixation supplements cast fixation when plaster cannot hold particular reductions, and allow surgical fixation with limited postoperative swelling. In the first part of the current study, the types of wires that are used for hand fixation, fluoroscopy, helpful instruments, and the basic techniques used for this type of surgery are discussed. In the second part of the study, specific fixation techniques for different fractures of the carpals, metacarpals, and phalanges are outlined.

[Stabilized arthroplasty of the 5th metacarpal bone. A therapeutic proposal for the treatment of old fractures-luxations of the 5th metacarpal bone]

The goals of the surgical treatment of fracture-dislocations of the fifth ray are length restoration of the fifth metacarpal, release of impingement and preservation of the carpo-metacarpal mobility. Our technic of "stabilised arthroplasty" satisfies theoretically to these three goals. It consists in resection-arthroplasty of the base of the fifth metacarpal associated with stabilisation by arthrodesis between fourth and fifth metacarpal.